Exactly, what do you mean?

  1. Almagro Holgado, Manuel 1
  2. Villanueva, Neftalí 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Revista:
Daimon: revista internacional de filosofía
  1. Pérez Navarro, Eduardo (coord.)
  2. Frápolli Sanz, María José (coord.)

ISSN: 1130-0507,  1989-4651

Año de publicación: 2021

Título del ejemplar: Monográfico sobre «Expressing Hatred: The Political Dimension of Expressives»

Número: 84

Páginas: 97-113

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/DAIMON.482231 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Daimon: revista internacional de filosofía

Resumen

El propósito de este trabajo es explorar los límites de un subconjunto de los usos evalua-tivos del lenguaje: el discurso ofensivo. Nuestro objetivo es doble. Primero, introducimos la rela-ción que hay entre el contexto y las proferencias evaluativas, tal y como puede rastrearse en la literatura reciente acerca de la cuestión. Segundo, nos centramos en el estudio experimental de una interacción particular entre la información contextual y nuestras afirmaciones evaluativas: cuándo el contexto es capaz de convertir una pro-ferencia aparentemente descriptiva en una evalua-tiva. Para este segundo propósito, argumentamos, ciertas propuestas positivas recientes, a pesar de su mérito, son insuficientes.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Resumen: El propósito de este trabajo es explorar los límites de un subconjunto de los usos evalua-tivos del lenguaje: el discurso ofensivo. Nuestro objetivo es doble. Primero, introducimos la rela-ción que hay entre el contexto y las proferencias evaluativas, tal y como puede rastrearse en la literatura reciente acerca de la cuestión. Segundo, nos centramos en el estudio experimental de una interacción particular entre la información contextual y nuestras afirmaciones evaluativas: cuándo el contexto es capaz de convertir una pro-ferencia aparentemente descriptiva en una evalua-tiva. Para este segundo propósito, argumentamos, ciertas propuestas positivas recientes, a pesar de su mérito, son insuficientes. Palabras Clave: Lenguaje evaluativo, Discurso ofensivo, Actitudes afectivas, Contexto-depen-dencia, Contenido expresivo Recibido: 02/06/2021. Aceptado: 21/06/2021. * This work was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy (Project FFI2016-80088-P, FPI Predoctoral Fellow BES-2017-079933), the Spanish Ministry of Science (PID2019-109764RB-I00), Junta de Andalucía (B-HUM-459-UGR18), and the University of Granada (FiloLab Excellence Unit). ** FPI Predoctoral Researcher, Department of Philosophy I, University of Granada (Spain). Email: malmagro@

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abbott, B. (2006), Where have some of the presuppositions gone, in: Birner, B. & Ward, G. (eds): Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, Amsterdam: Studies in Language Companion Series, pp. 1–20.
  • Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015), “Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?”, Psychological Science, 26 (10), pp. 1531–1542. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
  • Carothers, T., & O’Donohue, A. (2019), Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization. Brookings Institution Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctvbd8j2p
  • Carruthers, P. (2011), The Opacity of Mind: An Integrative Theory of Self-Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cepollaro, B. (2015), “In defense of a presuppositional account of slurs”, Language Sciences, 52, pp. 36-45.
  • Cepollaro, B. (2016), “Building evaluation into language”, Phenomenology and Mind, 11, pp. 158-168.
  • Cepollaro, B. (2017a), “The shortcut of discrimination”, Rivista di Estetica, 64, pp. 53-65.
  • Cepollaro, B. (2017b), The Semantics and Pragmatics of Slurs and Thick Terms. Doctoral Thesis, Paris: PSL Research University.
  • Cepollaro, B. & Stojanovic, I. (2016), “Hybrid evaluatives: In defense of a presuppositional account”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 93 (3), pp. 458-488.
  • Cepollaro, B., Sulpizio, S. & Bianchi, C. (2018), “How bad is it to report a slur? An empirical investigation”, Journal of Pragmatics, 146, pp. 32-42.
  • Cepollaro, B. & Zeman, D. (2020), “The Challenge from Non-Derogatory Uses of Slurs”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, 97, pp. 1-10.
  • Cepollaro, B., Soria, A. & Stojanovic, I. (2021), The semantics and pragmatics of value judgments, in: Stalmaszczyk, P. (ed.): The Cambridge Handbook of Philosophy of Language, ch. 24, Cambridge University Press.
  • Corredor, C. (2014), Pejoratives and social interaction, in: Stalmaszczyk, P. (ed.): Issues in Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, Łódź Studies in English and General Linguistics 2.
  • Copp, D. (2009), Realist-expressivism and conventional implicature, in: R. Shafer- Landau (ed.): Oxford studies in metaethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 167–202.
  • Edwards, P. & Roberts, I. (2008), “Finding long-term solutions to the world food crisis”, The Lancet, 371 (9622), p. 1389.
  • Field, H. (2009), “Epistemology without metaphysics”, Philosophical Studies, 143(2), pp. 249–290.
  • Field, H. (2018), “Epistemology from an evaluativist perspective”, Philosophers’ Imprint, 18(2), pp. 1-23.
  • Gibbard, A. (2012), Meaning and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gibson, J. L., Epstein, L. & Magarian, G. (2019), “Taming Uncivil Discourse”, Political Psychology, doi: 10.1111/pops.12626
  • Gutzman, D. (2011), Expressive Modifiers & Mixed Expressives, in: Bonami, O. & Hofherr, P. (eds): Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8, pp. 123–141.
  • Kappel, K. (2016), “Fact-Dependent Policy Disagreements and Political Legitimacy”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 20, pp. 313–331
  • Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018), How democracies die (First edition). Crown.
  • Macià, J. (2002), “Presuposición y significado expresivo”, Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 3 (45), pp. 499-513.
  • McCready, E. (2010), “Varieties of Conventional Implicature”, Semantics and Pragmatics 3 (8), pp. 1–57.
  • McNally, L. & Stojanovic, I. (2017), Aesthetic adjectives, in: Young, J., (ed.): The Semantics of Aesthetic Judgment. Oxford University Press.
  • McCready, E. (2010), “Varieties of conventional implicature”, Semantics and Pragmatics, 3 (8), pp. 1-57.
  • Moreno, A. & Pérez-Navarro, E. (Manuscrito), Beyond the conversation: Why slurs are always dangerous.
  • Nisbett, R., & Wilson, T. (1977), “Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes”, Psychological Review, 84 (3), pp. 231–259.
  • Potts, C. (2005), The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Public Health England (08, 2020). Disparities in the risk and outcomes of COVID-19. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/908434/Disparities_in_the_risk_and_outcomes_of_COVID_August_2020_update.pdf
  • Rankine, C. (2014), Citizen. An American Lyric. Graywolf Press.
  • Saul, J. (2018), Dogwhistles, political manipulation and philosophy of language, in: Fogal, D., Will-Harris, D. (eds.): New Works on Speech Acts, Oxford University Press, pp. 360–383.
  • Schmidt, H. (2008), “Transport policy, food policy, obese people, and victim blaming”, The Lancet, 372 (9622), p. 627
  • Simko, V. & Ginter E. (2010), “Short life expectancy and metabolic syndrome in Romanies (gypsies) in Slovakia”, National Center for Biotechnology Information, 18 (1), pp. 16-8.
  • Stanley, J. (2015), How Propaganda Works. Princeton University Press.
  • Stenner, A. J. (1981), A note on logical truth and non-sexist semantics, in: Vetterling-Braggin, M. (ed.): Sexist Language: A Modern Philosophical Analysis, New York: Littlefield, Adams & Co, pp. 299-306.
  • Sunstein, C. (2017), #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press: Princeton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884711
  • Schwitzgebel, E. (2008), “The Unreliability of Naïve Introspection”, Philosophical Review, 117, pp. 245–273.
  • Schwitzgebel, E. (2011), Perplexities of Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Väyrynen, P. (2013), The lewd, the rude and the nasty: A study of thick concepts in ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Vicario, M. D., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016), “The spreading of misinformation online”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113 (3), pp. 554– 559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113
  • Whiting, D. (2007), “Inferentialism, representationalism and derogatory words”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 15 (2), pp. 191-205.
  • Whiting, D. (2013), “It’s not what you said, it’s the way you said it: Slurs and conventional implicatures”, Analytic Philosophy, 54 (3), pp. 364-377.
  • Williamson, T. (2009), Reference, inference, and the semantics of pejoratives, in: Almog, J. & Leonardi, P. (eds.): The Philosophy of David Kaplan, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137-159.
  • Wilson, T. (2002), Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Zajonc, R. (2001), “Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10 (6), pp. 224–228.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet