Wolf (Dis)Protection in Spainexceptions to the Rules in the Bern Convention and in The Habitats Directive as a Conservation and Management Tool

  1. Fajardo del Castillo, Teresa
Revista:
Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental

ISSN: 2014-038X

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 12

Número: 1

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17345/RCDA3090 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental

Resumen

The announcement that Spain was going to ban wolf hunting throughtout its territory has been the trigger to reopen the debate on the wolf and its conservation and management status.  In Europe, the unexpected success of wolf conservation policies has led to the wolf being considered as a pest or a species detrimental to agriculture and livestock farming. This perception of predators is present in and inspires the reservations and exceptions to the rules of the Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and those of the Habitats Directive of the European Union, which provide for different protection statuses and management regimes. Exceptions to these rules allow some states to prohibit wolf hunting and others to allow it in order to avoid escalating conflicts with humans. Although this 'rule of law of biodiversity',  guarantees legal protection for the wolf, in practice a serious lack of compliance has been revealed, which is one of the threats to the wolf. A study of the application of these exceptions in Spain and the case law of the Spanish courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union suggests that the legalisation of hunting cannot serve to remedy this compliance deficit when there are alternatives. These may include criminal or administrative prosecution of their violation.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • - Bassi, E. et al., “Attacks on hunting dogs: the case of wolf–dog interactions in Croatia”, European Journal of Wildlife Research, Vol. 67, 2021, pp. 1-9.
  • - Campins, M. y Fajardo, T. (Eds.), Biological Diversity and International Law. Challenges for the Post 2020 Scenario, Springer, 2021.
  • - Darpö, J., “The Last Say?: Comment on CJEUs Judgement in the Tapiola Case (C-674/17)”, Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 2020, pp. 117-130.
  • - Epstein, Y., “The Habitats Directive and Bern Convention: Synergy and Dysfunction in Public International and EU Law”, The Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Vol. 26, 2014, pp. 139-172.
  • - Esteve Pardo, Derecho del Medio Ambiente, Marcial Pons, 2017
  • - T. Fajardo, “The EU diplomacy for biodiversity”, en Mar Campins, The European Union and Global Environmental Protection. Transforming Influence into Action, Routledge, Londres, 2020, pp. 35-49.
  • - Fries-Tersch, E., Sundseth, K., and Ballesteros, M., Report on the open public consultation of the 'fitness check' one the Birds and Habitats Directives. Final report for the European Commission, DG Environment. Brussels, October 2015, p. 37.
  • - Fuentes, J. y Fajardo, T., Estudio sobre el carácter disuasorio, efectivo y proporcional de las sanciones penales impuestas en España y Portugal en delitos contra el Medio Ambiente y su adecuación a la Directiva 2008/99/EC sobre protección del medio ambiente a través del derecho penal (Estudio en España), SEO/BirdLife, 2020, 144 pp.
  • - García Ureta, A., “Nature conservation”, en Lees, E.; Viñuales, J. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 460-488.
  • - García Ureta, A., EU Biodiversity Law, Europa Law Publishing, 2020.
  • - García Ureta, A., “Lost in translation? Reporting obligations under the EU Wild Birds and Habitats Directives”, Environmental Liability, vol. 26, 2020, pp. 7-22.
  • - Linnell, J.D.C., Trouwborst, A., Fleurke, F.M., “When is it acceptable to kill a strictly protected carnivore? Exploring the legal constraints on wildlife management within Europe’s Bern Convention”, Nature Conservation, Vol. 21, 2017, pp. 129-157.
  • - López-Bao, J.V., Fleurke, F. Chapron, G. Trouwborst, A., “Legal obligations regarding populations on the verge of extinction in Europe: Conservation, Restoration, Recolonization, Reintroduction”, Biological Conservation, Vol. 227, 2018, pp. 319-325.
  • - Lute, M.L, Carter, N.H. López-Bao, J.V. y Linnell, J.D.C., “Conservation professionals' views on governing for coexistence with large carnivores”, Biological Conservation, Vol. 248, 2020.
  • - Ruiz de Apocada, A., “Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia la Unión Europea (Sala Segunda), de 10 de octubre de 2019, asunto C-674/17, por la que se resuelve cuestión prejudicial en relación con la interpretación del artículo 16.1 la Directiva 92/43/CE, de hábitats y especies”, Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental, 21 de Noviembre de 2020.
  • - Salvatori, Valeria y Linnell, John, Report on the conservation status and threats for wolf (Canis lupus) in Europe, Octubre de 2005.
  • - Sollund, R., “Perceptions and law enforcement of illegal and legal wolf killing in Norway: organized crime or folk crime?”, Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 2017, pp.1-9
  • - Sollund, R., “Wildlife Management, Species Injustice and Ecocide in the Anthropocene”. Critical Criminology, 2019, pp.1-19.
  • - Trouwborst, A. y Fleurke, F.M., “Killing Wolves Legally: Exploring the Scope for Lethal Wolf Management under European Nature Conservation Law”, Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, Vol. 22, 2019, pp. 231-273.
  • - Trouwborst, A., Fleurke F. M. & Linnell J.D.C., “Norway's Wolf Policy and the Bern Convention on European Wildlife: Avoiding the “Manifestly Absurd”, Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, Vol. 20:2, 2017, pp. 155-167.
  • - Von Essen, E., Hansen, H. P., Källström, H. N., Peterson, M. N., & Peterson, T. R.; “The radicalisation of rural resistance: How hunting counterpublics in the Nordic countries contribute to illegal hunting”, Journal of Rural Studies, 39, 2015, pp. 199-209.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet