Clase social, bienestar y afectividad general durante la pandemia de la COVID-19 en Iberoamérica

  1. Ginés Navarro - Carrillo 1
  2. Lander Méndez 2
  3. Huseyin Cakal 3
  4. Darío Páez 2
  5. José J. Pizarro 2
  6. Larraitz Zumeta 2
  7. Marcela Gracia - Leiva 2
  8. Silvia da Costa 2
  9. Nekane Basabe 2
  10. Saioa Telletxea 2
  11. Gisela Delfino 4
  12. Elza Techio 5
  13. Anderson Mathias 2
  14. Carolina Alzugaray - Ponce 6
  15. Loreto Villagrán 7
  16. Gonzalo Martínez - Zelaya 8
  17. Marian Bilbao 9
  18. Anna Wlodarczyk 10
  19. Wilson López - López 11
  20. Laura Alfaro - Beracoechea 12
  21. Manuel. L. Ibarra 13
  22. Catarina Carvalho 14
  23. Isabel. R. Pinto 14
  24. Emilio Moyano - Díaz 15
  25. Agustín Espinosa 16
  26. Rosa. M. Cueto 16
  27. Erakutsi egile guztiak +
  1. 1 Universidad de Jaén, España
  2. 2 Universidad del País Vasco, España
  3. 3 Universidad de Keele, Reino Unid
  4. 4 Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina, Argentina
  5. 5 Universidad Federal de Bahía, Brasil
  6. 6 Universidad Santo Tomás, Chile
  7. 7 Universidad de Concepción, Chile
  8. 8 Universidad Viña del Mar, Chile
  9. 9 Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Chile
  10. 10 Universidad Católica del Norte, Chile
  11. 11 Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
  12. 12 Universidad de Guadalajara, México
  13. 13 Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, México
  14. 14 Universidad de Oporto, Portugal
  15. 15 Universidad de Talca, Chile
  16. 16 Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
    info

    Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Lima, Perú

    ROR https://ror.org/00013q465

Erakutsi afiliazioak +
Aldizkaria:
Escritos de psicología

ISSN: 1138-2635,  1989-3809

Argitalpen urtea: 2021

Zenbakien izenburua: Impacto de la pandemia de COVID-19 en la salud mental

Alea: 14

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 84-95

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.24310/ESPSIESCPSI.V14I2.13608 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Escritos de psicología

Laburpena

La actual pandemia de la COVID-19 ha supuesto un marcado incremento de las brechas sociales preexistentes. En esta investigación analizamos las relaciones de diferentes facetas de clase social con el bienestar y afectividad general a lo largo de un total de 8 países de la región cultural iberoamericana. Asimismo, también pusimos a prueba el potencial rol mediador del riesgo percibido relativo a la COVID-19 y de la eficacia colectiva percibida. Los resultados obtenidos (a) revelaron que una clase social más baja se relacionó con un menor bienestar y afecto positivo, así como con un mayor afecto negativo; (b) confirmaron que la clase social subjetiva constituye un mejor predictor del bienestar y afectividad general que el nivel educativo (i.e., indicador de clase social objetiva); y (c) mostraron que los efectos de la clase social subjetiva en el bienestar/afectividad general se daban de forma indirecta a través del riesgo percibido y la eficacia colectiva. Estos hallazgos confirman la existencia de diferencias en bienestar y afectividad general en función de la clase social durante la pandemia, al tiempo que permiten avanzar en la comprensión de los mecanismos psicosociales subyacentes.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
  • Alonso-Ferres, M., Navarro-Carrillo, G., Garrido-Macías, M., Moreno-Bella, E., & Valor-Segura, I. (2020). Connecting perceived economic threat and prosocial tendencies: The explanatory role of empathic concern. Plos One, 15, e0232608. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232608
  • Afridi, L., & Block, L. (2020). Frontline communities hit hardest by COVID-19. Association for Neighborhood & Housing Development. Recuperado de: https://anhd.org/blog/frontline-communities-hit-hardest-COVID-19
  • Bagci, S. C., & Canpolat, E. (2020). Group efficacy as a moderator on the associations between perceived discrimination, acculturation orientations, and psychological well‐being. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 30, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2421
  • Becker, J. C., Kraus, M. W., & Rheinschmidt-Same, M. (2017). Cultural expressions of social class and their implications for ingroup-related beliefs and behaviors. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12209
  • Blow, C. M. (2020). Social distancing is a privilege: The idea that this virus is an equal-opportunity killer must itself be killed. The New York Times. Recuperado de: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/05/opinion/coronavirus-social-distancing.html
  • Boyce, C. J., Brown, G. D. A., & Moore, S. C. (2010). Money and happiness: Rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 21, 471–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362671
  • Boyce, C. J., Delaney, L., & Wood, A. M. (2018). The Great Recession and subjective well-being: How did the life satisfaction of people living in the United Kingdom change following the financial crisis? Plos One, 13(8), e0201215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201215
  • Cundiff, J. M., & Matthews, K. A. (2017). Is subjective social status a unique correlate of physical health? A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 36, 1109–1125. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000534
  • Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018066
  • Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. En E.Diener & E. M.Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 185–218). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
  • Eom, K., Kim, H. S., & Sherman, D. K. (2018). Social class, control, and action: Socioeconomic status differences in antecedents of support for pro-environmental action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.009
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2009). Positivity. New York: Three Rivers Press.
  • Goldberg, D.P., & Williams P. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. UK: NFER-NELSON.
  • Gratius, S. (2014). La Cumbre Iberoamericana de Salamanca: ¿de una comunidad cultural a una alianza política? IBEROAMERICANA. América Latina - España - Portugal, 6, 171–176. https://doi.org/10.18441/ibam.6.2006.21.171-176.
  • Han, Q., Zheng, B., Agostini, M., Belanger, J. J., Gutzkow, B., Kreienkamp, J., ... & Leander, N. P. (2021). Associations of risk perception of COVID-19 with emotion and mental health during the pandemic. Journal of Affective Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.049
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Hipp, J. R. (2016). Collective efficacy: How is it conceptualized, how is it measured, and does it really matter for understanding perceived neighborhood crime and disorder? Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.016
  • Kahn, J. H. 2011. Multilevel modeling: Overview and applications to research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 257–271.
  • Kraus, M. W., Piff, P., & Keltner, D. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016357
  • Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119, 546–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028756
  • Lachman, M. E., & Weaver, S. L. (1998). The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 763–773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.763
  • Manstead, A. S. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251
  • Moya, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). The social psychology of the great recession and social class divides. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12201
  • Navarro-Carrillo, G., Alonso-Ferres, M., Moya, M., & Valor-Segura, I. (2020). Socioeconomic status and psychological well-being: Revisiting the role of subjective socioeconomic status. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1303. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01303
  • Navarro-Carrillo, G., Valor-Segura, I., & Moya, M. (2019). The consequences of the perceived impact of the Spanish economic crisis on subjective well-being: The explanatory role of personal uncertainty. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00506-4
  • Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) (2020). Recuperado de: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 (31 de enero, 2021).
  • Pons-Valls, E. (2020). Covid-19, un virus que sí entiende de clases sociales, como todos. Público. Recuperado de: https://www.publico.es/sociedad/coronavirus-covid-19-virus-entiende-clases-sociales.html
  • Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., Jr., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
  • Rocha, K. B., Pérez, K., Rodríguez-Sanz, M., Borrell, C., & Obiols, J. E. (2011). Propiedades psicométricas y valores normativos del General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) en población general española. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11, 125–139.
  • Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2020). Inequality viewed through the mirror of COVID-19 (La desigualdad ante el espejo del COVID-19). International Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 647–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2020.1796298
  • Snibbe, A. C., & Markus, H. R. (2005). You can't always get what you want: educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 703–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.703
  • Tan, J. J. X., Kraus, M. W., Carpenter, N. C., & Adler, N. E. (2020). The association between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146, 970–1020. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000258
  • Yu, S. Y., & Blader, S. L. (2020). Why does social class affect subjective well-being? The role of status and power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219853841
  • Wanberg, C. R., Csillag, B., Douglass, R. P., Zhou, L., & Pollard, M. S. (2020). Socioeconomic status and well-being during COVID-19: A resource-based examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105, 1382–1396. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000831
  • Zell, E., Strickhouser, J. E., & Krizan, Z. (2018). Subjective social status and health: A meta-analysis of community and society ladders. Health Psychology, 37, 979–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000667
Datuen iturria: Dialnet