Análisis de la cobertura del Data Citation Index Thomson Reutersdisciplinas, tipologías documentales y repositorios

  1. Torres-Salinas, Daniel
  2. Martín Martín, Alberto
  3. Fuente Gutiérrez, Enrique
Revista:
Revista española de documentación científica

ISSN: 0210-0614,  1988-4621

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 37

Número: 1

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3989/REDC.2014.1.1114 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de documentación científica

Resumen

In the past years, the movement of data sharing has been enjoying great popularity. Within this context, Thomson Reuters launched at the end of 2012 a new product inside the Web of Knowledge family: the Data Citation Index. The aim of this new database is to enable discovery and access, from a single place, to data from a variety of data repositories from different subject areas and from around the world. In short note we present some results from the analysis of the Data Citation Index. Specifically, we address the following issues: discipline coverage, data types present in the database and repositories that were included at the time of the study.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arzberger, P.; Schroeder, P.; Beaulieu, A.; Bowker, G.; Casey, K.; Laaksonen, L.; Moorman, D.; Uhlir, P.; Wouters, P. (2004). An international framework to promote access to data. Science, vol. 303 (5665), 1777-1778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1095958 PMid:15031482
  • Costas, R., Meijer, I., Zahedi, Z. and Wouters, P. (2013). The Value of Research Data - Metrics for datasets from a cultural and technical point of view. A Knowledge Exchange Report. Available from: www.knowledge-exchange.info/datametrics. [Accessed on July 15 2013]
  • Hrynaszkiewicz, I.; Altman, D.G. (2009). Towards an agreement on best practice for publishing raw clinical trial data. Trials, vol. 10 (17). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-17 PMid:19296844 PMCid:PMC2662833
  • Moed, H.F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Dordrecht; Springer.
  • Piwowar, H.A.; Day, R.S.; Fridsma, D.B. (2007). Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. Plos One, vol. 2 (3), e308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000308 PMid:17375194 PMCid:PMC1817752
  • Rennolls, K. (1997). Science demands data sharing. British Medical Journal, vol. 315 (7106), 486. PMid:9284679 PMCid:PMC2127344
  • Thomson Reuters (2012). Repository Evaluation, Selection, and Coverage Policies for the Data Citation Index within Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge. Available from: http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/DCI_selection_essay.pdf [Accessed on July 15 2013]
  • Torres-Salinas, D.; Robinson-García, N.; Cabezas-Clavijo, Á. (2012). Compartir los datos de investigación: introducción al data sharing. El Profesional de la Información, vol. 21 (2), 173-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.mar.08
  • Torres-Salinas, D.; Robinson-García, N.; Campanario, J.M.; Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2013). Coverage, field specialization and impact of scientific publishers indexed in the 'Book Citation Index'. Online Information Review. [In Press]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2012-0169
  • Torres-Salinas, D.; Martín-Martín, A.; Fuente-Gutiérrez, E. (2013). An introduction to the coverage of the Data Citation Index (Thomson-Reuters): disciplines, document types and repositories. EC3 Working Papers (11), June 2013. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1306/1306.6584.pdf [Accessed on July 15 2013]
  • Vickers, A.J. (2006). Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials. Trials, vol. 7 (15). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-15, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-15
  • Wouters, P.; Schröder, P. (2003). Promise and practice in data sharing: the public domain of digital research data. The Netherlands: NIWI-KNAW.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet