Poland Before the Court of JusticeLimitless or Limited Case Law on Art. 19 TEU?

  1. Pablo J. Martín Rodríguez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Revue:
European papers: a journal on law and integration

ISSN: 2499-8249

Année de publication: 2020

Volumen: 5

Número: 1

Pages: 331-346

Type: Article

DOI: 10.15166/2499-8249/351 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: European papers: a journal on law and integration

Résumé

In 2019, the Court of Justice has ruled in an innovative case on the protection of the independence of Member States’ judiciaries. In two judgments, delivered in June and November, the Court declared that several statutes amending the organisation of the Polish judicial system infringed the second subparagraph of Art. 19, para. 1, TEU because they did not respect judicial independence. This case law relies on two key legal arguments: an “ideal” holistic approach to judicial independence and the broadening of the material scope of Art. 19 TEU (see Court of Justice: judgment of 24 June 2019, case C-619/18, Commission v. Poland (Independence of the Supreme Court) [GC]; judgment of 5 November 2019, case C-192/18, Commission v. Poland (Independence of ordinary courts) [GC]). Both arguments may invite us to think that this case law is boundless. This Insight considers if some limits should nevertheless apply.