Los juegos como herramienta de análisis, prospectiva y docencia en estudios estratégicos

  1. Jordán, Javier
Revista:
Global strategy reports

ISSN: 2695-8937

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 14

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Global strategy reports

Resumen

Los juegos con orientación profesional, incluidos los wargames, ofrecen numerosas ventajas como técnica de análisis estratégico y prospectiva, y como herramienta para promover el aprendizaje activo en los estudios estratégicos. Este documento expone qué se entiende por juego con orientación profesional, qué beneficios aportan, y qué cabe esperar de ellos a partir del conocimiento de sus límites.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Asal, Victor (2005), “Playing Games with International Relations”, International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 6, No 3, pp. 359-373.
  • Bartels, Elizabeth (2018), “Building A Pipeline of Wargaming Talent: A Two-Track Solution”, War on the Rocks, November 14.
  • Bartels, Elizabeth (2019), “Getting the Most Out of Your Wargame: Practical Advice for Decision-Makers”, War on the Rocks, November 19.
  • Bartels, Elizabeth M. (2020), Building Better Games for National Security Policy Analysis Towards a Social Scientific Approach, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
  • Caffrey, Mathew B. (2019) On Wargaming: How Wargames Have Shaped History and how They May Shape the Future, Washington, DC: Naval War College Press.
  • Curry, John & Price, Tim (2014), Matrix Games for Modern Wargaming: Developments in Professional and Educational Wargames, San Bernardino, CA: Lulu.
  • Fielder, James (2020), “Reflections on Teaching Wargame Design”, War on the Rocks, January 1.
  • Fuchida, Mitsuo & Okumiya, Masatake (2019), Midway. La batalla que condenó a Japón: una perspectiva japonesa, Málaga: Ediciones Salamina.
  • Graham Allison & Philip Zelikow (1999), Essence of decision: explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, New York: Longman.
  • Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Publication 5-0: Joint Planning (Washington, DC: Joint Chiefs of Staff, 2017). p V-31.
  • Jones, Mark (2017), “Communicating Uncertainty in #Wargaming Outcomes”, The Strategy Bridge, March 30.
  • Kriz, W. C. (2017). “Historical Roots and New Fruits of Gaming and Simulation”. Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 48, No 5, pp. 583-587.
  • Lee, Michael & Shirkey, Zachary C. (2017), “Going Beyond the Existing Consensus: The Use of Games in International Relations Education”, Political Science & Politics, Vol. 50 , No 2 , pp. 571-575.
  • Lillard, John M. (2016), Playing War: Wargaming and U.S. Navy Preparations for World War II, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Lin-Greenberg, Erik, Pauly, Reid B.C. & Schneider, Jacquelyn G. (2022), “Wargaming for International Relations Research”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 28, No 1, pp. 83-109.
  • McCloskey, Joseph F. (1987), “British Operational Research in World War II”, Operations Research, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 453-470.
  • Perla, Peter P. (1990), The Art of Wargaming: A Guide for Professionals and Hobbyists, Washington, DC: US Naval Institute Press. (Versión Kindle).
  • Perla, Peter P. (2016), “Operations research, systems analysis, and wargaming: Riding the cycle of research” en Pat Harrigan and Matthew G. Kirschenbaum (eds), Zones of Control Perspectives on Wargaming, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 159-182.
  • Rosen, Stephen P. (1991), Winning the Next War. Innovation and the Modern Military, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Sabin, Philip (2012), Simulating War: Studying Conflict through Simulation Games, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Samuelson, Jared (2019), “Roll for Initiative: NATO’s Navies Need a Wargaming Series”, War on the Rocks, August 12.
  • Snidal, Duncan (1985), “The Game Theory of International Politics”, World Politics, Vol. 38, No 1, pp. 25-57.
  • Zenko, Micah (2015), “Millennium Challenge: The Real Story of a Corrupted Military Exercise and Its Legacy”, War on the Rocks, November 5.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet