Conversions Between Trigonometric Representation Systems by Pre-service Secondary School Teachers

Referencias bibliográficas

• Akkoç, H. (2008). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ concept images of radian. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(7), 857-878.
• Bell A., Costello J., & Küchemann D. (1983). Research on learning and teaching. A Review of Re¬search in Mathematical Education. NFER- Nelson.
• Brown, S.A. (2005). The trigonometric connections: Students’ understanding of sine and cosine (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Illinois State University, Illinois, IL.
• Bunge, M. (2008). Tratado de Filosofía. Semántica I, Sentido y referencia [Treatise on philosophy. Semantic I, sense and reference]. Gedisa Editorial.
• Camacho, M., & Depool, R. (2003). Using derive to understand the concept of definite integral. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/matiascamacho.pdf
• Castro-Rodríguez, E., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Rico, L., & Gómez, P. (2016). Prospective teachers’ understanding of the multiplicative part-whole relationship of fraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(1), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9673-4
• Çekmez, E. (2020). What generalizations do students achieve with respect to trigonometric functions in the transition from angles in degrees to real numbers? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58, 100778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100778
• Challenger, M. (2009). From triangles to a concept: a phenomenographic study of A-level students’ development of the concept of trigonometry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Warwick University, UK.
• Chaar, M. (2015). Secondary Pre-service, In-Service, and Student Teachers’ Noticing of Mathematical Work and Thinking in Trigonometry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of New Hampshire, NH.
• Chin, K. E. (2013). Making sense of mathematics: Supportive and Problematic Conceptions with special reference to Trigonometry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Warwick.
• Choquet, G. (1964). L’enseignement de la Géométrie. [The teaching of geometry]. Hermann.
• Clements, D. H., & Burns, B. A. (2000). Students' development of strategies for turn and angle measure. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003938415559
• Demir, O. (2012). Students’ concept development and understanding of sine and cosine functions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Amsterdam University, Amsterdam, The Netherland. Retrieved from https://esc.fnwi.uva.nl/thesis/centraal/files/f107257570.pdf
• Dieudonné, J. (1971). Álgebra Lineal y Geometría Elemental. [Linear Algebra and Elementary Geometry]. Selecciones Científicas.
• Dündar, S. (2015). Mathematics Teacher-Candidates’ Performance in Solving Problems with Different Representation Styles: The Trigonometry Example. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1379-1397. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1396a
• Duval, R. (1993). Semiosis y noesis [Semiosis and noesis]. In E. Sánchez & G. Zubieta (Eds.), Lecturas en didáctica de la matemática: Escuela Francesa (pp. 118-144). Sección de Matemática Educativa del CINVESTAV-IPN.
• Even, R. (1990). Subject matter knowledge for teaching and the case of functions. Educational studies in mathematics, 21(6), 521-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315943
• Feferman, S. (1989). The Number Systems. Foundations of Algebra and Analysis. Chelsea Pub. Comp.
• Fi, C. (2003). Pre-service secondary school mathematics teachers’ knowledge of trigonometry: subject matter content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and envisioned pedagogy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Iowa, Iowa.
• Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Hilbert, D. (1991). Fundamentos de la Geometría. [Foundations of Geometry]. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
• Kaput, J. J. (1992). Technology and Mathematics Education. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515-516). Macmillan.
• Kumar, R. S., Subramaniam, K., & Naik, S. S. (2017). Teachers’ construction of meanings of signed quantities and integer operation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(6), 557-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9340-9
• Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where Mathematics come from: how the embodied mind brings mathematics. Basic Books.
• Marchi, D. J. (2012). A Study of Student Understanding of the Sine Function through Representations and the Process and Object Perspectives (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The Ohio State University, Ohio.
• Martín Fernández, E., Ruiz Hidalgo, J. F., & Rico, L., (2016). Significado escolar de las razo¬nes trigonométricas elementales [Student’s notions of elementary trigonometric ratios]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 34(3), pp. 51-71. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1871.
• Martín-Fernández, E., Ruiz-Hidalgo, J. F., & Rico, L. (2019). Meaning and Understanding of School Mathematical Concepts by Secondary Students: The Study of Sine and Cosine. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15 (12), em 1782. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110490
• Martínez-Planell, R., & Delgado, A. C. (2016). The unit circle approach to the construction of the sine and cosine functions and their inverses: An application of APOS theory. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.06.002
• Melike Yiǧit Koyunkaya (2016). Mathematics education graduate students’ understanding of trigonometric ratios. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 47(7), pp. 1028-1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1155774
• Moore, K. (2014). Quantitative reasoning and the sine function: The case of Zac. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 102-138. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.1.0102
• Morgan, C., & Kynigos, C. (2014). Digital artefacts as representations: forging connections between a constructionist and a social semiotic perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(3), 357-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9523-1.
• Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (2007). Real Decreto 1393/2007, de 29 de octubre, por el que se establece la ordenación de las enseñanzas universitarias oficiales. [Royal legislative Decree 1393/2007, by which the organization of official university education is established], BOE, 260, 2007, 30th October, pp. 44037-44048.
• Ortiz Galarza, M. L. (2017). The Influence of Multiple Representations on Secondary Students' Understanding of Trigonometric Functions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Texas at El Paso: Texas.
• Reinhardt, F., & Soeder, H. (1984). Atlas de matemáticas, 1. [Atlases of Mathematics, 1]. Alianza.
• Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físico-Químicas y Naturales (RAC) (1996). Vocabulario Científico y Técnico. [Scientific and Technical Vocabulary]. Espasa.
• Rico, L. (1997). Los organizadores del currículo de matemáticas [The Mathematics Curriculum Organizers]. In L. Rico (Ed.), La Educación Matemática en la enseñanza secundaria (pp. 39-59). ICE-Horsori.
• Rico, L. (2009). Sobre las nociones de representación y comprensión en la investigación en educación matemática. [On the notions of representation and understanding in mathematics education research]. PNA, 4(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v4i1.6172
• Rico, L. (2012). Aproximación a la Investigación en Didáctica de la Matemática. [Research Approach to Mathematics Education]. Avances de Investigación en Educación Matemática, 1, 39- 63.
• Rico, L. & Ruiz Hidalgo, J.F. (2018). Ideas to work for the curriculum change in school mathematics. In Y. Shimizu & R. Vithal (Eds.), Conference proceedings of the twenty-fourth ICMI Study: School Mathematics curriculum reforms: Challenges, changes and opportunities (pp. 301-308). ICMI
• Rico, L., Martín-Fernández, E., & Ruiz-Hidalgo. J. F. (2020). Significados y sistemas en trigonometría escolar [Meanings and systems in school trigonometry]. In E. Castro-Rodríguez, E. Castro, I. Segovia & P. Flores (Eds.), Libro homenaje a Enrique Castro (pp. 197-220). Octaedro.
• Russell, B. (1912). Problems of Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
• Skemp, R. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Psychology Press.
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An Overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (pp. 273-285). Sage publications.
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications.
• Thompson, P. W. (2016). Researching mathematical meanings for teaching. In L. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 435-461). Taylor & Francis.
• Weber, K. (2005). Student’s understanding of trigonometric functions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 102(2), 144-147. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ747914.pdf