La ley aplicable a la validez del acuerdo arbitral

  1. Sixto A. Sánchez Lorenzo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada,
Revista:
Revista cubana de Derecho

ISSN: 2788-6670,  0864-165X

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 1

Número: 1

Páginas: 342-360

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista cubana de Derecho

Resumen

A partir de la premisa de la separabilidad del contrato y del acuerdo de arbitraje, el presente estudio aborda, desde una perspectiva comparada, la determina-ción de la ley aplicable a la validez del acuerdo de arbitraje en las transacciones internacionales. Se deslinda a estos efectos la validez formal y la validez sustan-cial, se pone de relieve la divergencia de las distintas aproximaciones existentes a tales cuestiones en las legislaciones nacionales y en los reglamentos institucio-nales y se delimita el ámbito de aplicación de la ley rectora de la validez formal y sustancial de los acuerdos de arbitraje.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AA.VV., Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 1999.
  • ARTUCH IRIBERRI, E., El convenio arbitral en el arbitraje comercial internacional, Madrid, Eurolex, 1997.
  • ARZANDEH, A., y J. HILL, “Ascertaining the Proper Law of an Arbitration Clause under English Law”, 5 Journal of Private International Law, 2009.
  • ATTERITANO, A., L'enforcement delle sentenze arbitrali del comercio internacionale (il principio del rispetto della volontà delle parti), Giuffrè, Milán, 2008.
  • BALTHASAR, S., “§ 10: International Arbitration in Germany”, en International Commercial Arbitration (A Handbook), Balthasar ed., CH Beck, Munich, 2016, pp. 377-406.
  • BELOHKAVEK, A. J., “The Law Applicable to the Arbitration Agreement and the Arbitrability of a Dispute”, 3 Yearbook on International Arbitration, 2013.
  • BERGER, K. P., “The Arbitration Agreement under the Swedish 1999 Arbitration Act and the German 1998 Arbitration Act”, Arbitration Int’l, vol. 17/4, 2001.
  • BERMANN, G. A., “International Arbitration and Private International Law”, R. des C., t. 381 (2017).
  • BERNARDINI, P., “Arbitration clauses: Achieving Effectiveness in the Law Applicable to the Arbitration Clause”, ICCA Congress Series, No. 9, París, 1999, pp. 197-203.
  • COLLINS, L., “The Law Governing the Agreement and Procedure in International Arbitration in England”, en J. D. M. Lew (ed.), Contemporary Problems in International Arbitration, Springer, Dordrecht, 1987, pp. 126-138.
  • CONEJERO ROOS, C., “El arbitraje comercial internacional en Iberoamérica: un panorama general”, en El arbitraje comercial internacional en Iberoamérica (marco legal y jurisprudencial), 2ª ed., La Ley - Wolters Kluwer, 2012, pp. 57-110.
  • FERNÁNDEZ ROZAS, J. C., Tratado de arbitraje comercial en América Latina, Iustel, Madrid, 2008.
  • FASFALIS, G. y M. KRESTIN, “§ 13: International Arbitration in the Netherlands”, en International Commercial Arbitration (A Handbook), Balthasar ed., CH Beck, Munich, 2016, pp. 476-508.
  • GRAFFI, L., “The Law Applicable to the Validity of the Arbitration Agreement: A Practitioner View”, en Franco Ferrari, Stefan Kröll (eds.), Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration, Sellier, Munich, 2011, pp. 19-62.
  • GROVER, N., “Dilemma of the Proper Law of the Arbitration Agreement; an Approach towards Unification of Applicable Laws”, 32 Singapore Law Review, 2014.
  • HARISANKAR, K. S., “International Commercial Arbitration in Asia and the Choice of Law Determination”, Journal of International Arbitration, vol. 30, 2013/6, pp. 621-636.
  • ILLMER, M., “§ 8: International Arbitration in England and Walles”, en International Commercial Arbitration (A Handbook), Balthasar ed., CH Beck, Munich, 2016, pp. 299-352.
  • JACQUET, J. M., Ph. DELEBECQUE y S. CARNELOUP, Droit du commerce international, 3ª ed., Dalloz, París, 2014.
  • KARRER, P. A., “The Law Applicable to the Arbitration Agreement: A Civilian Discusses Switzerland’s Arbitration Law and Glances Across the Channel”, 26 Singapore Academic of Law Journal, 2014.
  • LANDAU, T. y S. MOOLAN, “Article II and the Requirement of Form”, en Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards: The New York Convention in Practice, Cameron May Ltd., Londres, 2008, pp. 189-256.
  • LEW, J. D. M.; L. A. MISTELIS y S. M. KRÖLL, Comparative International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law Int'l, La Haya/Londres/Nueva York, 2003.
  • LINDSAY, D., Y. LAHLOU, “The Law Applicable to International Arbitration in New York”, en International Commercial Arbitration in New York, 2ª ed., Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 17-53.
  • LO, A., “§ 11: International Arbitration in Hong Kong”, en International Commercial Arbitration (A Handbook), Balthasar ed., CH Beck, Munich, 2016, pp. 407-446.
  • NACIMIENTO, P., “Article V (1) (a)”, en Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention, Kluwer, 2010, pp. 205-229.
  • NAZZINI, R., “The Law Applicable to the Arbitration Agreement: Towards Transnational Principles”, 65 ICLQ, 2016.
  • NESBITT, S. y H. QUINLAN, “The Status and Operation of Unilateral or Optional Arbitration Clauses”, Arbitration International, vol. 22/1, 2006, pp. 133-149.
  • MAYER, P., “Les limites de la séparabilité de la clause compromissoire”, Revue de l'arbitrage, 1998.
  • PAULSSON, M., The 1958 New York Convention in Action, Kluwer, 2016.
  • POUDRET, J. F. y S. BESSON, Droit comparé de l'arbitrage international, Schulthess, Ginebra, 2002.
  • RICHERS, R. y M. MAGLIANA, “§ 18: International Arbitration in Switzerland”, en International Commercial Arbitration (A Handbook), Balthasar ed., CH Beck, Munich, 2016, pp. 623-659.
  • SCHRAMM, D.; E. GEISINGER y P. PINSOLLE, “Article II”, en Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention, Kluwer, 2010, pp. 37-114.
  • SERAGLINI, C. y J. ORTSCHEIDT, Droit de l'arbitrage interne et international, Montchrestien, París, 2013.
  • SELEVARAJ, R. y T. K. LIANG, “§ 15: International Arbitration in Singapore”, en International Commercial Arbitration (A Handbook), Balthasar ed., CH Beck, Munich, 2016, pp. 540-567.
  • STEINBRÜCK, B., “§ 12: International Arbitration in India”, en International Commercial Arbitration (A Handbook), Balthasar ed., CH Beck, Munich, 2016, pp. 154-475.
  • STEINGRUBER, A. M., Consent in International Arbitration, Oxford University Press, 2012.
  • VIRGOS SORIANO, M., “El convenio arbitral en el arbitraje internacional”, Actualidad Jurídica Uría-Menéndez, 14-2006.
  • VIRGOS SORIANO, M. y F. J. GARCIMARTÍN ALFÉREZ, Derecho procesal civil internacional (litigación internacional), 2ª ed., Thomson/Civitas, Cizur Menor, 2007.
  • WIDJESKOG, N., “§ 17: International Arbitration in Sweden”, en International Commercial Arbitration (A Handbook), Balthasar ed., CH Beck, Munich, 2016, pp. 594-622.
  • WOLFF, R., “Article II: Recognition of Arbitration Agreements”, en New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards – Commentary, CH Beck, Munich, 2012, pp. 85-151.
  • YANG, F., “The Proper Law of the Arbitration Agreement: Mainland Chinese and English Law Compared”, Arbitration International, vol. 33, 2017, pp. 121-137.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet