Investigación en Diseño, Arte y tecnología como base de resiliencia e innovación

  1. García López, Ana 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Journal:
Umática: revista sobre creación y análisis de la imagen

ISSN: 2659-8574

Year of publication: 2021

Issue Title: Art and design: transfers, methodologies and Futures

Issue: 4

Pages: 1-16

Type: Article

DOI: 10.24310/UMATICA.2021.V3I4.13134 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Umática: revista sobre creación y análisis de la imagen

Abstract

The paradigm shift we are facing after the pandemic crisis has brought with it a profound reflection on the model in which social progress is developed and how it is necessary to mark a new time in which design, creativity and applied transversal innovation will need to be worked on as disciplines for their collective appropriation by the citizenry. 2021 has been presented as a crucial year in which the creative economy and the postulates of the new Bauhaus clearly mark a discourse in which nations become aware of their importance as a key to innovation, sustainable development and, ultimately, economic recovery. In this context, research in art and design provides a nutrient of transfer to society that becomes indispensable for the impulse of this transversal innovation that has to face a new time for resilience and sustainability. This article presents the theoretical bases on which two European research projects are based, in which design and contemporary art are put in direct relation through artificial intelligence, machine learning and the circular economy in order to establish connections between artists, artisans, designers, makers, producers and recycling companies through a hybrid management model based on knowledge communities and eco-design, integrating paradigms of circular economy, creative economy and collaborative economy.These projects are also approached from the institutional support that has led to the creation of the first university research chair for Innovation in Crafts, Design and Contemporary Art which, from the University of Granada and together with the Albayzín National Reference Centre for Crafts, addresses research, transfer and training processes in the three areas with the aim of opening new avenues of development and entrepreneurship for young artists, designers and artisans.

Bibliographic References

  • ASEE. (2016). “Envisioning the Future of the Maker Movement: Summit Report”. American Society for Engineering Education. Recuperado el 20/09/2021 de: https://www.asee.org/documents/papers-and-publications/papers/maker-summit-report.pdf
  • Braungart, M.; Mcdonough, W.; Bollinger, A. (2007). “Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emission- a strategy for eco-effective product and system design” en Journal of Cleaner production, Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003
  • Briceño Gutiérrez, A. (2017), Escenarios distribuidos, albores de un nuevo modelo, Fundación DID, Chile. Recuperado el 23/09/2021en http://www.fundaciondid.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/escenarios_distribuidos_albores_AB.pdf
  • González Martín, C. (2020), “Prefico co-, innovación abierta desde la colaboración”, en GARCÍA LOPEZ, A. y Suárez Martínez, A. (Coord.), Repensar la artesanía. Estrategias para impulsar la artesanía contemporánea. Comares, Granada.
  • García López, A. (2020), “La investigación como estrategia para impulsar la artesanía” en GARCÍA LOPEZ, A. y Suárez Martínez, A. (Coord.), Repensar la artesanía. Estrategias para impulsar la artesanía contemporánea. Comares, Granada.
  • Suárez Martínez, A, (2021), “Nuevos paradigmas para la artesanía contemporánea en el contexto de la investigación en economía circular” en MESEGUER SÁNCHEZ, et. Alt. (Ed.), Economía circular: fundamentos y aplicaciones, Thomson Reuters Aranzadi, Pamplona.
  • Hatch, M. (2014). The Maker Movement Manifesto. DOI: 10.1162/INOV_a_00135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135
  • Hermida Balboa, C.; Dominguez Somonte, M. (2014). Economía circular como marco para el ecodiseño: el modelo ECO-3. Recuperado el 10/09/2021 de: https://www2.uned.es/egi/publicaciones/articulos/Economia_circular_como_marco_para_el_ecodiseno_el_modelo_ECO-3.pdf
  • Malakuczi, V. (2019), Computational by design, Common Ground Research Networs, University of Illinois Research Park, Campaign, IL. ISBN 9781863351218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/978-1-86335-123-2/CGP
  • Martín, J. (2017). La era del prosumidor. Recuperado el 02/08/2021 de Cerem: https://www.cerem.es/blog/la-era-del-prosumidor
  • Ritzer, G., Jurgenson, N. (2010). “Production, Consumption, Prosumption. The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’”. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13-36. DOI: 10.1177/1469540509354673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354673
  • VVAA_ Guía de recomendaciones y buenas prácticas. Producción y consumo de productos artesanos sostenibles, publicado por el Instituto para el fomento del desarrollo y la formación. Recuperado el 24/09/2021 de: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OqfLwBEYnmM4ArQU0egnMMWgAXOOvdwD/view
  • VVAA_ Report on the situation of craftsmanship in Europe. CR@FTSMAN PROJECT ES/09/LLP-LdV/TOI/149072. Recuperado el 24/09/2020 de: http://projects.ifes.es/pdfs/craft/craft1.pdf
  • VVAA_ II Plan integral para el fomento de la artesanía en Andalucía (2014-2017). Recuperado el 12/09/2021 de: http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/turismoycomercio/publicaciones/143474860.pdf
Data source: Dialnet