ABFR-INDEXCorrelación entre producción científica y juegos olímpicos 2008

  1. Fernández Revelles, Andrés B.
Revista:
Habilidad Motriz: revista de ciencias de la actividad física y del deporte

ISSN: 1132-2462

Año de publicación: 2012

Número: 38

Páginas: 51-58

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Habilidad Motriz: revista de ciencias de la actividad física y del deporte

Referencias bibliográficas

  • • Aebischer, P. (2012). Philanthropy: The price of charity. [Article]. Nature, 481(7381), 260-260. doi: doi:10.1038/481260a
  • • Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., HerreraViedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. [Review]. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 273-289. doi: 10.1016/j. joi.2009.04.001
  • • Ball, P. (2005). Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. [News Item]. Nature, 436(7053), 900-900. doi: 10.1038/436900a
  • • Ball, P. (2007). Achievement index climbs the ranks. [News Item]. Nature, 448(7155), 737-737. doi: 10.1038/448737a
  • • Banks, M. G. (2006). An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. [Article]. Scientometrics, 69(1), 161-168. doi: 10.1007/ s11192-006-0146-5
  • • Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. [Article]. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271. doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y
  • • Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., & Martinez, A. S. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? [Article]. Scientometrics, 68(1), 179-189.
  • • Bergh, D. D., Perry, J., & Hanke, R. (2006). Some predictors of SMJ article impact. [Article]. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 81-100.
  • • Bordons, M., & Zulueta, M. A. (1999). Evaluation of scientific activity through bibliometric indicators. [Article]. Revista Espanola De Cardiologia, 52(10), 790-800.
  • • Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. [Review]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72.
  • • Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2005). Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? [Article]. Scientometrics, 65(3), 391-392.
  • • Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2007). What do we know about the h index? [Article]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381-1385.
  • • Braun, T., Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. [Article]. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169-173.
  • • Burrell, Q. L. (2007). Hirsch’s h-index: A stochastic model. [Article]. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 16-25. doi: 10.1016/j. joi.2006.07.001
  • • Cantanzaro, M. (2012). Spain cuts science ministry in government changeover. [News]. Nature. doi: doi:10.1038/ nature.2011.9725
  • • Cap in hand Nature. (2012). [Editorial Material]. Nature, 481(7381), 238-238. doi: doi:10.1038/481238a
  • • Cooke, I. R., Queenborough, S. A., Mattison, E. H. A., Bailey, A. P., Sandars, D. L., Graves, A. R., . . . Sutherland, W. J. (2009). Integrating socio-economics and ecology: a taxonomy of quantitative methods and a review of their use in agro-ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46(2), 269-277. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01615.x
  • • Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. [Article]. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 193-203. doi: 10.1016/j. joi.2007.02.001
  • • Cronin, B., & Meho, L. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. [Article]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1275-1278. doi: 10.1002/asi.20354
  • • de-Granda-Orive, J. I., Alonso-Arroyo, A., & Roig-Vazquez, F. (2011). Which data base should we use for our literature analysis? Web of Science versus SCOPUS. [Letter]. Archivos De Bronconeumologia, 47(4), 213-213. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2010.10.007
  • • de Mello, J., Angulo-Meza, L., & da Silva, B. P. B. (2009). A ranking for the Olympic Games with unitary input DEA models. [Article]. Ima Journal of Management Mathematics, 20(2), 201-211. doi: 10.1093/imaman/dpn025
  • • Devis-Devis, J., Valcarcel, J. V., Villamon, M., & Perez-Samaniego, V. (2010). Disciplines and thems of study in physical activity and sport science. [Article]. Revista Internacional De Medicina Y Ciencias De La Actividad Fisica Y Del Deporte, 10(37), 150-166.
  • • Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. [Article]. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152. doi: 10.1007/s11192- 006-0144-7
  • • Egghe, L. (2008). Examples of simple transformations of the h-index: Qualitative and quantitative conclusions and consequences for other indices. [Article]. Journal of Informetrics, 2(2), 136- 148. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.12.003
  • • Federation International Basketball Association (FIBA). (2012). Federation International Basketball Association (FIBA) Retrieved 10/01/2012, from http://www.fiba. com/pages/eng/fc/p/openNodeIDs/888/ selNodeID/888/index.html
  • • Fernández-Revelles, A. B. (2005). Análisis de la producción científica de baloncesto en España. In R. Martínez de Santos, S. Ibáñez & L. M. Sautu (Eds.), III Congreso Ibérico de Baloncesto. Libro de Actas (pp. 48). Vitoria-Gasteiz: Avafiep.
  • • Fernández-Revelles, A. B. (2012a). ABFR-Index: Correlación entre producción científica en “Fútbol” y ranking. Revista Internacional De Medicina Y Ciencias De La Actividad Fisica Y Del Deporte(Sometido a revisión).
  • • Fernández-Revelles, A. B. (2012b). ABFR-Index: Correlación entre producción científica en “fútbol” y ranking de fútbol. [Article]. Revista Espanola De Documentacion Cientifica(Sometido a revisión).
  • • Fernández-Revelles, A. B., Robles, A., Dafos, J., Soto Hermoso, V. M., Pérez Cortés, A. J., Latorre, P. Á., . . . Heredia, J. M. (2009). Actividad física: Evaluación de la investigación en España. Gaceta sanitaria, 23(EC1), 204 - 204.
  • • Frank, C., & Nason, E. (2009). Health research: measuring the social, health and economic benefits. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 180(5), 528- 534. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090016
  • • Garfield, E. (1980). Are the 1979 prizewinners of Nobel class. [Article]. Current Contents(38), 5-13.
  • • Garfield, E. (1987). 50 classics from the journal-of-clinical-investigation-over 60 years of Nobel-Class research. [Article]. Current Contents(8), 3-11.
  • • Garfield, E. (1998). Random thoughts on citationology. Its theory and practice - Comments on theories of citation? [Article]. Scientometrics, 43(1), 69-76. doi: 10.1007/bf02458396
  • • Garfield, E., & Welljamsdorof, A. (1992). Of nobel class - a citation perspective on highimpact research authors. 2. (Reprinted from theoretical medicine, vol 13, pg 117, 1992). [Reprint]. Current Contents, 35, 4-12.
  • • Gil-Leiva, I., & Alonso-Arroyo, A. (2007). Keywords given by authors of scientific articles in database descriptors. [Article]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8), 1175-1187. doi: 10.1002/asi.20595
  • • Giles, J. (2006). How the topics were ranked. [News Item]. Nature, 441(7091), 265-265.
  • • Giles, J. (2012). Finding philanthropy: Like it? Pay for it. [Article]. Nature, 481(7381), 252–253. doi: 10.1038/481252a
  • • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. [Article]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  • • Lane, J., & Bertuzzi, S. (2011). Measuring the Results of Science Investments. Science, 331(6018), 678-680. doi: 10.1126/ science.1201865
  • • Ledford, H. (2012). Alternative funding: Sponsor my science. [Article]. Nature, 481(7381), 254–255. doi: 10.1038/481254a
  • • Lehmann, S., Jackson, A. D., & Lautrup, B. E. (2006). Measures for measures. [Editorial Material]. Nature, 444(7122), 1003-1004.
  • • Lins, M. P. E., Gomes, E. G., de Mello, J., & de Mello, A. (2003). Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model. [Article]. European Journal of Operational Research, 148(2), 312-322. doi: 10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00687-2
  • • Macilwain, C. (2010a). ERA of austerity. [Editorial Material]. Nature, 466(7304), 314-314. doi: 10.1038/466314a
  • • Macilwain, C. (2010b). Scientists vs engineers: this time it’s financial. [Editorial Material]. Nature, 467(7318), 885-885.
  • • Macilwain, C. (2010c). What science is really worth. [News Item]. Nature, 465(7299), 682-684.
  • • Macilwain, C. (2011a). Europe lines up hefty science-funding hike. [News Item]. Nature, 475(7354), 14-15.
  • • Macilwain, C. (2011b). Science’s attitudes must reflect a world in crisis. [Editorial Material]. Nature, 479(7374), 447-447.
  • • Macilwain, C. (2011c). University cuts show science is far from saved. [Editorial Material]. Nature, 469(7329), 133-133. doi: 10.1038/469133a
  • • Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar. [Article]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105-2125. doi: 10.1002/asi.20677
  • • Olympic-Movement. (2012). Olympic. org. Offcicial website of the Olympic Movement Retrieved 10/01/2012, from http://www.olympic.org/
  • • Quindos, G. (2009). Confusing the confused: thoughts on impact factor, h(irsch) index, Q value, and other cofactors that influence the researcher’s happiness. [Article]. Revista Iberoamericana De Micologia, 26(2), 97-102.
  • • Schreiber, M. (2008). A modification of the h-index: The h(m)-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts. [Article]. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.001
  • • Spearman, C. (2010). The proof and measurement of association between two things. [Editorial Material]. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39(5), 1137-1150. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq191
  • • Sutherland, W. J., Fleishman, E., Mascia, M. B., Pretty, J., & Rudd, M. A. (2011). Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2(3), 238-247. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00083.x
  • • Thomson Reuters Web of Science. (2011). Web of Science (WoS). Retrieved 23/11/2011 http://isiknowledge.com
  • • Torres-Salinas, D., Moreno-Torres, J. G., Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). A methodology for Institution-Field ranking based on a bidimensional analysis: the IFQ(2)A index. [Article]. Scientometrics, 88(3), 771- 786. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0418-6
  • • Valcarcel, J. V., Devis-Devis, J., Villamon, M., & Peiro-Velert, C. (2010). Scientific cooperation in the field of Physical Activity and Sport Science in Spain. [Article]. Revista Espanola De Documentacion Cientifica, 33(1), 90-105. doi: 10.3989/redc.2010.1.726
  • • Valcarcel, J. V., Villamon, M., & Devis-Devis, J. (2008). Assessment and classification of Spanish scientific-technical journals of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences. [Article]. Revista Espanola De Documentacion Cientifica, 31(3), 396-412.
  • • Vanclay, J. K. (2007). On the robustness of the h-index. [Article]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1547-1550.
  • • Woeginger, G. J. (2009). Generalizations of Egghe’s g-Index. [Article]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6),