ABFR-indexcorrelation between "soccer" scientific production and ranking.
-
1
Universidad de Granada
info
ISSN: 1577-0354
Año de publicación: 2014
Volumen: 14
Número: 56
Páginas: 705-718
Tipo: Artículo
Otras publicaciones en: Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte
Resumen
Introducción: La sociedad reclama a la ciencia aporte de soluciones que reviertan las inversiones en investigación. Objetivo: Analizar la relación existente entre el ranking de un indicador bibliométrico, producción científica del tópico "fútbol/soccer" y el ranking de un indicador de la influencia de los resultados de la investigación de este tópico en la sociedad, rankings de Fútbol. Resultados: Correlación directa y moderadamente significativa entre ranking de nº publicaciones WoS 2010 y ranking FIFA 2010 con un rs=0,520, p=0,000, y R2=0,238. Siendo positivo ABFR-Index=0,575 y moderadamente significativo. Conclusiones: Hay influencia directa de los resultados de la investigación en la sociedad en relación al tópico ¿fútbol/soccer¿; ABFR-Index será un referente para interpretar las relaciones e influencias entre mundo científico y sociedad.
Referencias bibliográficas
- Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. [Review]. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 273-289.
- Ball, P. (2005). Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. [News Item]. Nature, 436(7053), 900-900.
- Ball, P. (2007). Achievement index climbs the ranks. [News Item]. Nature, 448(7155), 737-737.
- Banks, M. G. (2006). An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. [Article]. Scientometrics, 69(1), 161-168.
- Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. [Article]. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271.
- Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., & Martinez, A. S. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? [Article]. Scientometrics, 68(1), 179-189.
- Bergh, D. D., Perry, J., & Hanke, R. (2006). Some predictors of SMJ article impact. [Article]. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 81-100.
- Bordons, M., & Zulueta, M. A. (1999). Evaluation of scientific activity through bibliometric indicators. [Article]. Revista Espanola De Cardiologia, 52(10), 790-800.
- Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. [Review]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72.
- Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2005). Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? [Article]. Scientometrics, 65(3), 391-392.
- Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2007). What do we know about the h index? [Article]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381-1385.
- Braun, T., Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. [Article]. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169-173.
- Burrell, Q. L. (2007). Hirsch's h-index: A stochastic model. [Article]. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 16-25.
- Cooke, I. R., Queenborough, S. A., Mattison, E. H. A., Bailey, A. P., Sandars, D. L., Graves, A. R., . . . Sutherland, W. J. (2009). Integrating socioeconomics and ecology: a taxonomy of quantitative methods and a review of their use in agro-ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46(2), 269-277.
- Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. [Article]. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 193-203.
- Cronin, B., & Meho, L. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. [Article]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1275-1278.
- De-Granda-Orive, J. I., Alonso-Arroyo, A., & Roig-Vazquez, F. (2011). Which data base should we use for our literature analysis? Web of Science versus SCOPUS. [Letter]. Archivos De Bronconeumologia, 47(4), 213-213.
- Devis-Devis, J., Valcarcel, J. V., Villamon, M., & Perez-Samaniego, V. (2010). Disciplines and thems of study in physical activity and sport science. [Article]. Revista Internacional De Medicina Y Ciencias De La Actividad Fisica Y Del Deporte, 10(37), 150-166.
- Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. [Article]. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.
- Egghe, L. (2008). Examples of simple transformations of the h-index: Qualitative and quantitative conclusions and consequences for other indices. [Article]. Journal of Informetrics, 2(2), 136-148.
- Federation International Basketball Association (FIBA). (2012). Federation International Basketball Association (FIBA)
- Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA). (2011). Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA)
- Fernández-Revelles, A. B. (2005). Análisis de la producción científica de baloncesto en España. In R. Martínez de Santos, S. Ibáñez & L. M. Sautu (Eds.), III Congreso Ibérico de Baloncesto. Libro de Actas (pp. 48). Vitoria-Gasteiz: Avafiep.
- Fernández-Revelles, A. B. (2012). ABFR-Index: Correlación entre producción científica en “fútbol” y ranking de fútbol. [Article]. Revista Espanola De Documentacion Cientifica(Sometido a revisión).
- Fernández-Revelles, A. B., Robles, A., Dafos, J., Soto Hermoso, V. M., Pérez Cortés, A. J., Latorre, P. Á., . . . Heredia, J. M. (2009). Actividad física: Evaluación de la investigación en España. Gaceta sanitaria, 23(EC1), 204 - 204.
- Frank, C., & Nason, E. (2009). Health research: measuring the social, health and economic benefits. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 180(5), 528-534.
- Garfield, E. (1980). Are the 1979 prizewinners of Nobel class. [Article]. Current Contents(38), 5-13.
- Garfield, E. (1987). 50 classics from the journal-of-clinical-investigation-over 60 years of Nobel-Class research. [Article]. Current Contents(8), 3-11.
- Garfield, E. (1998). Random thoughts on citationology. Its theory and practice -Comments on theories of citation? [Article]. Scientometrics, 43(1), 69-76.
- Garfield, E., & Welljamsdorof, A. (1992). Of nobel class - a citation perspective on high-impact research authors. 2. (Reprinted from theoretical medicine, vol 13, pg 117, 1992). [Reprint]. Current Contents, 35, 4-12.
- Gil-Leiva, I., & Alonso-Arroyo, A. (2007). Keywords given by authors of scientific articles in database descriptors. [Article]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8), 1175-1187.
- Giles, J. (2006). How the topics were ranked. [News Item]. Nature, 441(7091), 265-265.
- Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. [Article]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569.
- Lane, J., & Bertuzzi, S. (2011). Measuring the Results of Science Investments. Science, 331(6018), 678-680.
- Lehmann, S., Jackson, A. D., & Lautrup, B. E. (2006). Measures for measures. [Editorial Material]. Nature, 444(7122), 1003-1004.
- Macilwain, C. (2010a). ERA of austerity. [Editorial Material]. Nature, 466(7304), 314-314.
- Macilwain, C. (2010b). Scientists vs engineers: this time it's financial. [Editorial Material]. Nature, 467(7318), 885-885.
- Macilwain, C. (2010c). What science is really worth. [News Item]. Nature, 465(7299), 682-684.
- Macilwain, C. (2011a). Europe lines up hefty science-funding hike. [News Item]. Nature, 475(7354), 14-15.
- Macilwain, C. (2011b). Science's attitudes must reflect a world in crisis. [Editorial Material]. Nature, 479(7374), 447-447.
- Macilwain, C. (2011c). University cuts show science is far from saved. [Editorial Material]. Nature, 469(7329), 133-133.
- Macmillan, P., & Smith, I. (2007). Explaining international soccer rankings. [Article]. Journal of Sports Economics, 8(2), 202-213.
- Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar. [Article]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105-2125.
- Olympic-Movement. (2012). Olympic.org. Offcicial website of the Olympic Movement Retrieved 10/01/2012
- Quindos, G. (2009). Confusing the confused: thoughts on impact factor, h(irsch) index, Q value, and other cofactors that influence the researcher's happiness. [Article]. Revista Iberoamericana De Micologia, 26(2), 97-102.
- Schreiber, M. (2008). A modification of the h-index: The h(m)-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts. [Article]. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 211- 216
- Spearman, C. (2010). The proof and measurement of association between two things. [Editorial Material]. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39(5), 1137-1150
- Sutherland, W. J., Fleishman, E., Mascia, M. B., Pretty, J., & Rudd, M. A. (2011). Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2(3), 238-247
- Thomson Reuters Web of Science. (2011). Web of Science (WoS). Retrieved 23/11/2011
- Torres-Salinas, D., Moreno-Torres, J. G., Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). A methodology for Institution-Field ranking based on a bidimensional analysis: the IFQ(2)A index. [Article]. Scientometrics, 88(3), 771-786.
- Valcarcel, J. V., Devis-Devis, J., Villamon, M., & Peiro-Velert, C. (2010). Scientific cooperation in the field of Physical Activity and Sport Science in Spain. [Article]. Revista Espanola De Documentacion Cientifica, 33(1), 90-105
- Valcarcel, J. V., Villamon, M., & Devis-Devis, J. (2008). Assessment and classification of Spanish scientific-technical journals of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences. [Article]. Revista Espanola De Documentacion Cientifica, 31(3), 396-412.
- Vanclay, J. K. (2007). On the robustness of the h-index. [Article]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1547- 1550.
- Woeginger, G. J. (2009). Generalizations of Egghe's g-Index. [Article]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1267-1273