La Corona y el control del reconocimiento nobiliariola actividad del fiscal de la Real Chancillería de Granada a examen. Análisis y documentos

  1. Luis Díaz de la Guardia y López 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Revista:
Cuadernos de historia del derecho

ISSN: 1133-7613 1988-2521

Any de publicació: 2016

Número: 23

Pàgines: 121-166

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.5209/REV_CUHD.2016.V23.53060 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Cuadernos de historia del derecho

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resum

The inquiries made in 1590 about the activities of general attorneys of Granada in lawsuits of gentlemanship from 1579 until 1590 are analyzed and studied here, along with the edition of a documental collection which summarizes them. The full text of the inquiries performed by the magistrate Benavente de Benavides, which were focused on general attorney Diego de Amézaga and are enclosed in the Visit by don Juan de Acuña to that Royal Chancellery, as well as a documental collection summarising them, are provided. The precision of this performance, its neatly legal nature and the consequences it had, give a new perspective on these litigations that in certain cases have been defined by the historiography as mere formalities and that however had a complex and hard nature that were kept unnoticed until now.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • J. Castillo de Bovadilla, chez, 1597, Libro I, Capítulo IV, § 2, p. 90.
  • Erasmo de Rotterdam, Elogio de la locura, Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 1984, p.164.
  • Gan Giménez, La Real Chancillería de Granada (1505-1834), Granada, Centro de Estudios
  • Ruiz Rodríguez, La Real Chancillería de Granada en el siglo XVI, Diputación Provincial de Granada, Granada 1987, pág. 34.
  • Ordenanças de la Real Audiencia y Chancillería de Granada, Granada, Sebastián de Mena,
  • AGS (Archivo General de Simancas), CCA (Cámara de Castilla), leg. 2.723. por otro y cumpliendo la norma, se volvía a delatar a los Pretel. _____________
  • De Blas Barela. Cuadernos de Historia del Derecho 145 2016, 23, 121-166