Asignación de Riesgos en las Concesiones de Autopistas de Peaje españolas¿qué debemos mejorar?

  1. Alejandro Ortega 1
  2. María de los Ángeles Baeza 2
  1. 1 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03n6nwv02

  2. 2 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Journal:
Gestión Joven

ISSN: 1988-9011

Year of publication: 2012

Issue: 9

Type: Article

More publications in: Gestión Joven

Abstract

The Spanish government tendered from late 90 to 2004 more than 15 greenfield toll highways. The government wanted to build an entire network of highways with a double objective. On the one hand, allow Spain to be more competitive. On the other hand, comply with the budgetary constrain imposed by the EU to access the Euro without slowing the development and investment in transport infrastructure. This paper explores the location of risks made in these toll highways and the causes that have led to the recent renegotiation of many of them. Also, we study if the location of the risks after the renegotiations has been the most efficient and profitable to society. In the results of the paper, we analyze how the risks should be identified and allocated in future packages of toll highways.

Bibliographic References

  • Akintoye, A. and MacLeod, M. (1997): Risk Analysis and Management in construction. International Journal of Project Management Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 31-38, 1997.
  • Baeza, M. A. y Vassallo, J. M. (2011): “La intervención de la Administración ante las dificultades financieras de las sociedades concesionarias de autopistas de peaje” Presupuesto y Gasto Público. Vol. 65, pp. 51-60, 2011.
  • BEI,(2010): A guide to guidance. Sourcebook for PPPs. EPEC: European PPP`s Expertise Centre.
  • Bing, L., Akintoye, A., Edwards, P. and Hardcastle, C. (2005): The allocation of Risk in PPP/PFI in construction projects in the U.K. International Journal of Project Management 23, 25–35.
  • Guiny, S. y Alvarado, C.(2011): Risk Allocation and Management in International PublicPrivate Partnership programs for highways infrastructure. Transportation Research Board. Annual Meeting , 25 de Enero del 2011. Washington.
  • Jones, R. and Noble, G. (2008): Managing the implementation of Public – Private Partneships. . Public Money and Management, April 2008: pp. 109 – 114.
  • Ortega, A., Baeza, M. A. and Vassallo, J. M. (2011): “Autopistas de peaje en los accesos a Madrid: ¿qué lecciones debemos aprender para el futuro?” Revista de Obras Públicas 3519: pp. 41-50.
  • Ping Jo, S. (2006): Model for Financial Renegotiation in Public – Private Partnership Projects and Its Policy Implications: Game Theoretic View. Journal of construction engineering and management, July 2006: pp. 678 – 688.
  • Vassallo. J.M. y J. Gallego “Risk-sharing in the New Public Works Concession Law in Spain.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. No. 1932. TRB. National Research Council. Washington. D.C., 2005. pp. 1-9.
  • Vassallo, J. M. y Izquierdo, R. (2010): Infraestructura Pública y Participación Privada, 2010. Editado por Confederación Andina de Fomento. ISBN – 978 – 980 – 6810 – 47 – 1.
  • Vassallo J.M. y Sánchez Soliño A. (2007): Subordinated Public Participation Loans for Financing Toll Highway Concession in Spain. Transportation Research Record Nº 1996: pp. 1- 8
  • Weihe G. (2008): Public – Private Partnerships and Public – Private Value Trade – Offs. Public Money and Management, June 2008: pp. 153 – 158.
  • Zhang, X. and Kumaraswamy, M. (2001): Procurement Protocols for Public – Private Partnered Projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, September/October 2001: pp. 351 – 358.