Assesing the role of risk and trust in consumers’ adoption of online payment systems

  1. Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco 1
  2. Higueras-Castillo, Elena 1
  3. Molinillo, Sebastián 2
  4. Ruiz Montañez, Miguel 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Universidad de Málaga
    info

    Universidad de Málaga

    Málaga, España

    ROR https://ror.org/036b2ww28

Revista:
International Journal of Information Systems and Software Engineering for Big Companies: IJISEBC

ISSN: 2387-0184

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 5

Número: 2

Páginas: 99-113

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: International Journal of Information Systems and Software Engineering for Big Companies: IJISEBC

Resumen

The determinants of the intention to use online payment methods linked to e-commerce have been present in numerous and current studies which shows its importance. The present study aims to study some of its determinants based on the classical variables proposed in the successive acceptance models of the technology and its subsequent modifications, adding the constructs of trust and perceived risk. To achieve our objectives, we designed a self-administered web-based survey of open access to users with different characteristics. The results showed that only attitude determine the intention to use payment systems as opposed to trust and perceived risk. Finally, our research introduces several implications for businesses, focusing on consumers' intent to use these online payment services. The results obtained in this research poses important implications for the adoption of online payment systems.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akhlaq, A.; Ahmed, E. (2013). The effect of motivation on trust in the acceptance of Internet banking in a low income country. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 31(2), 115-125.
  • Akman, I.; Turhan, C. (2017). User acceptance of social learning systems in higher education: an application of the extended Technology Acceptance Model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(3), 229-237.
  • Anderson, E.; Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
  • Azam, A.; Qiang, F.; Abbas, S. A.; Ibrahim Abdullah, M. (2013). Structural equation modeling (SEM) based trust analysis of Muslim consumers in the collective religion affiliation model in e-commerce. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 4(2), 134-149.
  • Ba, S.; Pavlou, P. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243-268.
  • Bagozzi, R. P.; Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  • Bahmanziari, T.; Odom, D. M.; Ugrin, J. C. (2009). An experimental evaluation of the effects of internal and external e-Assurance on initial trust formation inB2C e-commerce. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 10(3), 152-170.
  • Bailey, A.; Pentina, I.; Mishra, A. S.; Ben Mimoun, M. S. (2017). Mobile payments adoption by US consumers: an extended TAM. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(6).
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
  • Bauer, R. A. (1964). Consumer behavior as risk taking. Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, American Marketing Association Proceedings, 389-398.
  • Bélanger, F.; Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. Journal of Strategic Information System, 17, 165-176.
  • Berry, L.; Parasuraman, A. (1991). Marketing Services. The Free Press, New York.
  • Blank, G.; Dutton, W.H. (2012). Age and trust in the Internet: The centrality of experience and attitudes toward technology in Britain. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 135-151.
  • Blut, M.; Chowdhry, N.; Mittal, V.; Brock, C. (2015). E-service quality: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Retailing, 91(4), 679-700.
  • Casaló, L. V.; Flavián, C.; Guinalíu, M. (2012). Redes sociales virtuales desarrolladas por organizaciones empresariales: antecedentes de la intención de participación del consumidor. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 15(1), 42-51.
  • Castañeda, J. A. (2005). El comportamiento del usuario de Internet: Análisis de los antecedentes y consecuencias de la fidelidad. Universidad de Granada.
  • Chaparro-Peláez, J.; Agudo-Peregrina, A. F.; Pascual-Miguel, F. J. (2016). Conjoint analysis of drivers and inhibitors of e-commerce adoption. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1277-1282.
  • Chaudhuri, A.; Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(April), 81-93.
  • Chemingui, H.; Ben lallouna, H. (2013). Resistance, motivations, trust and intention to use mobile financial services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 31(7), 574-592.
  • Chircu, A. M.; Davis, G. B.; Kauffman, R. J. (2000). The role of trust and experience in the adoption of electronic commerce intermediaries. In MISRC Work Paper. University of Minnesota.
  • Corbitt, B. J.; Thanasankit, T.; Yi, H. (2003). Trust and e-commerce: A study of consumer perceptions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2, 203-215.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
  • Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P.; Warsaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to use Computers in The Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1111-1132.
  • Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P.; Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
  • Del Barrio, S.; Luque, T. (2012). Análisis de ecuaciones estructurales. In T. Luque Martínez (Ed.), Técnicas de análisis de datos en investigación de mercados (2ª ed), (489-557). Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Dinev, T.; Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61-80.
  • Featherman, M.; Fuller, M. (2003). Applying TAM to e-services adoption: The moderating role of perceived risk. In 36ª Conferencia Internacional de Hawaii sobre Ciencias del Sistema (pp. 1-11).
  • Featherman, M. S.; Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 451-474.
  • Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachussetts.
  • Flavián, C.; Guinalíu, M. (2007). Un análisis de la influencia de la confianza y del riesgo percibido sobre la lealtad a un sitio web: el caso de la distribución de servicios gratuitos. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 16, 159-178.
  • Freitas, A.; Santos, J. F. (2017). Uso do UGC na reserva de hotéis em Portugal: uma aplicação ao Booking.com baseada no Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). European Journal of Applied Business and Management, 3(2).
  • Gallego, M. D.; Bueno, S.; Terreño, J. F. (2016). Motivations and barriers to set up e-commerce in Spain: A Delphi study. Estudios Gerenciales, 32(140), 221-227.
  • García, E. M. (2016). Los servicios de pago, su regulacion y desarrollo en la era digital (Análisis de paypal). Universidad CEU San Pablo.
  • Gefen, D.; Straub, D. W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of Association for Information Systems, 1, 1-28.
  • Gefen, D.; Karahanna, E.; Straub, D. W. (2003). Inexperience and experience with online Stores: The importance of TAM and Trust. IEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50, 307-321.
  • Glajchen, D. (2011). Comparative Analysis of Mobile Phone-Based Payment Services in the United States and South Africa. Scholl of Business and Technology Management. Prescott Valley, Arizona.
  • Gómez, J. T.; Bello, L.; Cervantes, M. (2000). Del Marketing de Relaciones al Marketing Postmoderno. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 9 (3), 113-124.
  • Hair, J. F.; Hult, G. T. M.; Ringle, C. M.; Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hair, J. F.; Ringle, C. M.; Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
  • Islam, A.; Ahmad, T.; Khan, M.; Ali, M. (2010). Adoption of M-Commerce Services: The Case of Bangladesh. World Journal of Management, 2(1), 37-54.
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L.; Tractinsky, N.; Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1, 45-71.
  • Kim, D. J.; Ferrin, D. L.; Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44, 544-564.
  • Kim, D.; Benbasat, I. (2006). The effects of trust-assuring arguments on consumer trust in Internet store: Application of Toulmin’s model of argumentation. Information System Research, 17(3), 286-300.
  • Kim, K.; Prabhakar, B. (2000). Initial trust, perceived risk, and the adoption of Internet banking. Proceedings of ICIS, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Kim, Y.; Peterson, R. A. (2017). A Meta-analysis of Online Trust Relationships in E-commerce. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 38, 44-54.
  • King, W. R.; He, J. (2006). Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Communications of the AIS, 43, 740-755.
  • Lee, H.; Lee, Y.; Kwon, D. (2005). The intention to use computerized reservation sys- tems: the moderating effects of organizational support and supplier incentive. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1552-1561.
  • Lévy-Mangin, J. P.; Varela-Mallou, J. (2003). Análisis multivariable para las Ciencias Sociales. Madrid: Pearson Educación.
  • Li, X.; Hess, T. J.; Valacich, J. S. (2008). Why do we trust new technology? Initial trust formation with organization information systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, 39-71.
  • Lian, J. W.; Yen, D. C. (2014). Online shopping drivers and barriers for older adults: Age and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 133-143.
  • Liébana-Cabanillas, F.; Muñoz-Leiva, F.; Sánchez-Fernández, J. (2017). A global approach to the analysis of user behavior in mobile payment systems in the new electronic environment. Service Business.
  • Lorenzo-Romero, C.; Gómez-Borja, M. Á.; Alarcón-del-Amo, M. C. (2011). Redes sociales virtuales, ¿de qué depende su uso en España?. INNOVAR, 21(41), 145-157.
  • Malhotra, N. K.; Kim, S. S.; Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336-355.
  • Mallat, N.; Rossi, M.; Tuunainen, V. K.; Öörni, A. (2009). The impact of use context on mobile services acceptance: the case of mobile ticketing. Information & Management, 46(3), 190-195.
  • Mayer, R. C.; Davis, J. H.; Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
  • McCloskey, D. (2004). Evaluating electronic commerce acceptance with the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(2), 49-57.
  • McKnight, D. H.; Chervany, N. (2002). What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 35-59.
  • Metzger, M. J. (2006). Effects of site, vendor, and consumer characteristics on Web site trust and disclosure. Communication Research, 33, 155-179.
  • Miranda, F. J.; Rubio, S.; Chamorro, A.; Correia, S. (2014). Determinantes de la intención de uso de Facebook en el proceso decisión de compra. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 21, 26-34.
  • Moon, J.; Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information and Management, 38, 217-230.
  • Moorman, C.; Deshpande, R.; Zaltman, G. (1993). Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 81-101.
  • Moraga, E. T.; Blanco, C. F. (2007). Construcción de la confianza del consumidor hacia la banca en Internet: Un análisis de los factores de la imagen corporativa. Estudios de Administración, 14(1), 23-45.
  • Muñoz, F. (2008). La adopción de una innovación basada en la Web. Análisis y modelización de los mecanismos generadores de confianza. Universidad de Granada.
  • Muñoz-Leiva, F.; Climent-Climent, S.; Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2017). Determinants of intention to use the mobile banking apps: An extension of the classic TAM model. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 21(1), 25-38.
  • Muñoz-Leiva, F.; Hernández-Méndez, J.; Sánchez-Fernández, J. (2012). Generalising user behaviour in online travel sites through the Travel 2.0 website acceptance model. Online Information Review, 36(6), 879-902.
  • Observatorio Cetelem. (2016). El comercio electrónico en España. (http://elobservatoriocetelem.es/2016/12/observatorio-cetelem-e-commerce-2016/)
  • Observatorio e-Commerce y transformación Digital. (2017). Informe de Evolución y Perspectivas eCommerce 2017. (http://observatorioecommerce.com/informes/)
  • Observatorio Nacional de las Telecomunicaciones y de la SI (ONTSI) (2016). Estudio sobre comercio electrónico B2C 2015 (Edición 2016). (https://www.ontsi.red.es/ontsi/es/estudios-informes)
  • Oliveira, T.; Alhinho, M.; Rita, P.; Dhillon, G. (2017). Modelling and testing consumer trust dimensions in e-commerce. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 153-164.
  • Orantes, S. D. (2011). Viabilidad del “Modelo de Aceptación de la Tecnología” en las empresas mexicanas. Una aproximación a las actitudes y percepciones de los usuarios de las tecnologías de la información. Revista Digital Universitaria, 12(1). (http://www.ru.tic.unam.mx:8080/tic/handle/123456789/1847)
  • Pavlou, P. A.; Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37-59.
  • Pavlou, P. A.; Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30, 115-144.
  • Pavlou, P. A. (2002a). A theory of Planned Behavior Perspective to the Consumer Adoption of Electronic Commerce. MIS Quarterly.
  • Pavlou, P. A. (2002b). What drives electronic commerce? A Theory of Planned Behavior perspective. In Academy of Management Proceeding (pp. 1-6).
  • Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 69-103.
  • Pennington, R.; Wilcox, H. D.; Grover, V. (2003). The role of system trust in business-to-consumer transactions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(3), 197-226.
  • Pham, T. T. T.; Ho, J. C. (2015). The effects of product-related, personal-related factors and attractiveness of alternatives on consumer adoption of NFC-based mobile payments. Technology in Society, 43, 159-172.
  • Phang, C. W.; Sutanto, J.; Kankanhalli, A.; Li, Y.; Tan, B. C.; Teo, H. H. (2006). Senior citizens' acceptance of information systems: A study in the context of e-government services. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(4), 555-569.
  • Ramos de Luna, I.; Montoro-Ríos, F.; Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2018). New Perspectives on Payment Systems: Near Field Communication (NFC) Payments Through Mobile Phones. In Mobile Commerce: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1487-1507). IGI Global.
  • Rodríguez, I. A.; Herrero, Á. (2008). Antecedentes de la utilidad percibida en la adopción del comercio electrónico entre particulares y empresas. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 34, 107-134.
  • Rodríguez, M. (2015). Nuevos Métodos de Pago Online, seguridad y confiabilidad. Universidad de Cantabria.
  • Rodríquez, N.; Liñares, S.; De la Llana, M. (2009). The Main Determinants of Web 2.0 Acceptance: The Case of Youtube. In 8th International Marketing Trends Congress.
  • Romero, C. L.; de Amo, M. D. C. A.; Borja, M. Á. G. (2011). Adopción de redes sociales virtuales: ampliación del modelo de aceptación tecnológica integrando confianza y riesgo percibido. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 14(3), 194-205.
  • Rouibah, K.; Lowry, P. B.; Hwang, Y. (2016). The effects of perceived enjoyment and perceived risks on trust formation and intentions to use online payment systems: New perspectives from an Arab country. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 19, 33-43.
  • Ruiz Mafé, C.; Tronch García de los Ríos, J. E. (2007). Factores determinantes de la decisión de compra en Internet: un análisis de la formación a distancia. Estudios sobre Consumo, (80), 49-60.
  • Shih, H. P. (2004). Extended Technology Acceptance Model of Internet utilization behavior. Information & Management, 41, 719-729.
  • Shin, D. H. (2008a). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to Cyworld user behavior. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 11, 12-20.
  • Shin, D. H. (2008b). Understanding purchasing behaviors in a virtual economy: Consumer behavior involving virtual currency in Web 2.0 communities. Interacting with Computers, 20, 433-446.
  • Shuen, A. (2008). Web 2.0: A Strategy Guide: Business thinking and strategies behind successful Web 2.0 implementations. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
  • Sorkin, D. E. (2001). Payment methods for consumer-to-consumer online transactions. Akron L. Rev., 35, 1.
  • Sumanjeet, S. (2009). Emergence of payment systems in the age of electronic commerce: the state of art. Asia Pacific Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 3(3), 19-20.
  • Tavera J. F.; Sánchez, J. C.; Ballesteros, B. (2011). Aceptación del E-Commerce en Colombia.
  • Tavera, J. F.; Londoño, B. E. (2014). Factores Determinantes de la Aceptación Tecnológica del E-Commerce en Países Emergentes. Revista Ciencias Estratégicas, 22(31), 101-119.
  • Trocchia, P. J.; Janda, S. (2000). A phenomenological investigation of Internet usage among older individuals. Journal of consumer marketing, 17(7), 605-616.
  • Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  • Venkatesh, V.; Brown, S. A.; Maruping, L. M.; Bala, H. (2008). Predicting different conceptualization of system use: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavior expectation. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 483-502.
  • Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M. G.; Davis, G. B.; Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
  • Willis, T. (2008). An Evaluation of the Technology Acceptance Model as a Means of Understanding Online Social Networking Behavior.
  • Yang, Q.; Pang, C.; Liu, L.; Yen, D. C.; Tarn, J. M. (2015). Exploring consumer perceived risk and trust for online payments: An empirical study in China’s younger generation. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 9-24.
  • Yazdanifard, R.; Sayed, M.; Elkhabir, A. (2011). Mobile Commerce and Related Mobile Security Issues. International Conference on Software and Computer Applications IPCSIT, 9, 198-201.
  • Yoon, H. S.; Occeña, L. G. (2015). Influencing factors of trust in consumer-to-consumer electronic commerce with gender and age. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 352-363.
  • Yousafzai, S.; Pallister, J.; Foxall, G. (2003). A proposed model of e-trust for electronic banking. Technovation, 23(11), 847-860.
  • Yu, J.; Ha, I.; Choi, M.; Rho, J. (2005). Extending the TAM for a t-commerce. Information & Management, 42, 965-976.
  • Zhou, T.; Lu, Y. (2011). The Effects of Personality Traits on User Acceptance of Mobile Commerce. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(6), 545-561.