Identificación de los componentes afectivo-motivacionales para el aprendizaje de la ciencia en estudiantes del grado de farmacia

  1. Campos, F. 1
  2. Sánchez-Porras, D. 1
  3. Chato-Astrain, J. 1
  4. García-García, O.D 1
  5. Blanco-Elices, C. 1
  6. Durand-Herrera, D 1
  7. Milla, A. 2
  8. González-Quevedo, D. 2
  9. Campos-Sánchez, A 3
  1. 1 Departamento de Histología, Grupo de Investigación Ingeniería Tisular CTS 115. Universidad de Granada
  2. 2 Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga
    info

    Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga

    Málaga, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01mqsmm97

  3. 3 Grupo de Investigación HUM-672 de la Universidad de Granada
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Actualidad médica

ISSN: 0365-7965

Year of publication: 2020

Tome: 105

Issue: 809

Pages: 27-30

Type: Article

DOI: 10.15568/AM.2020.809.OR03 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Actualidad médica

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

In the article the affective-motivational components for science learning in pharmacy students are identified because the learning process is conditioned by these components. The study was carried out using a specific questionnaire. The results showed variations in self-determination, self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and short and long-term motivation, with differences between both genders.

Bibliographic References

  • 1. Crossley ML, Mubarik A. A comparative investigation of dental and medical student’s motivation towards career choice. Br Dent J 2002;193:471-73.
  • 2. Kusurkar R, Ten Cate TJ, Van Asperen M, Croiset G. Motivation as an independent and a dependent variable in medical education: A review of the literature. Med Teach 2011;33:242-62.
  • 3. Mann KV. Motivation in medical education: How theory can inform our practice. Acad Med 1999; 74:237-9.
  • 4. Campos-Sánchez, A, López-Núñez JA, Carriel V, MartínPiedra MÁ, Sola T, Alaminos M. Motivational component profiles in university students learning histology. A comparative study between genders and different health science curricula. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:46.
  • 5. Cook DA, Artino AR. Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories. Med Educ 2016; 50(10):997-1014.
  • 6. Campos F, Sola M, Santisteban-Espejo A, et al. Conceptions of learning factors in postgraduate health sciences master students: a comparative study with non-health science students and between genders. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):128-36
  • 7. Glynn SM, Brickman P, Armstrong N, Taasoobshirazi G. Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with Science Majors and Nonscience Majors. J Res Sci Teach 2011;48:1159-76.
  • 8. Glynn SM, Koballa TRJr. Motivation to learn college science. In Mintzes JJ, Leonard WH, Arlington VA Handbook of college science teaching. National Science Teachers Association Press;2006.
  • 9. Glynn SM, Taasoobshirazi G, Brickman P. Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. J Res Sci Teach 2009;46:127-46.
  • 10. Black AE, Deci EL. The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self- determination theory perspective. Sci Edu 2000;84:740-56.
  • 11. Lawson AE, Banks DL, Logvin M. Self-efficacy, reasoning ability, and achievement in college biology. J Res Sci Teach 2007;44:706-24.
  • 12. Lin YG, McKeachie WJ, Kim YC. College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learn Individ Differ 2003;13:251-8.
  • 13. Kusurkar R, Kruitwagen EC, Ten Cate O, Croiset G. Effects of age, gender and educational background on strength of motivation for medical school. Advances in Health Sciences Education 2010;15:303-13.
  • 14. Butler R. Motivation in educational contexts: does gender matter? Adv Child Dev Behav 2014;47:1-41.
  • 15. Nabizadeh S, Hajian S, Sheikhan Z, Rafiei F. Prediction of academic achievement based on learning strategies and outcome expectations among medical students. BMC Med Educ 2019;19(1):99-110.
Data source: Dialnet