Planificação de programas intergeracionaisIlustrações com base numa freguesia da cidade do Porto

  1. Villas-Boas, Susana 1
  2. Oliveira, Albertina Lima de 1
  3. Ramos, Natália 2
  4. Montero, Inmaculada 3
  1. 1 Universidade de Coimbra
    info

    Universidade de Coimbra

    Coímbra, Portugal

    ROR https://ror.org/04z8k9a98

  2. 2 Universidade Aberta de Lisboa
  3. 3 Universidade de Granada, Espanha
Zugehörigkeit anzeigen +
Zeitschrift:
Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación

ISSN: 2386-7418

Datum der Publikation: 2017

Titel der Ausgabe: XIV Congreso Psicopedagogía. Área 5: FAMILIA, ESCUELA Y COMUNIDAD

Nummer: 5

Seiten: 379-383

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.17979/REIPE.2017.0.05.3222 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

No presente trabalho apresentam-se os resultados do estudo sobre a análise de necessidades e potencialidades para a elaboração de programas educativos intergeracionais na freguesia do Bonfim da cidade do Porto. Começamos por apresentar dados do levantamento do perfil comunitário da referida freguesia, relacionados com as suas principais problemáticas, que resulta de três diferentes tipos de pesquisa: i) a pesquisa documental do que se sabe sobre a freguesia, ii) a pesquisa quantitativa, sobre as potencialidades e necessidades da população para o desenvolvimento de programas educativos intergeracionais e iii) a pesquisa qualitativa sobre as relações intergeracionais e os estereótipos e atitudes negativas de uma geração em relação às outras. E termina-se com a apresentação de programas educativos intergeracionais, desenhados a partir do cruzamento dos dados provenientes das três vias de investigação supramencionadas.

€ Finanzierung ansehen

Informationen zur Finanzierung

Co-financiado pela Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia.

Geldgeber

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Boström, A-K. (2014). Reflections on intergenerational policy in Europe: The past twenty years and looking into the future. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 12(4), 357-367. doi:10.1080/15350770.2014.961828
  • Bressler, J., Henkin, N., & Adler, M. (2005). Connecting generations, strengthening communities: A toolkit for intergenerational program planners. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Intergenerational Learning, Temple University.
  • Brink, S. (2017). Learning in later years in the lifelong learning trajectory. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 15(1), 14-25. doi:10.1080/15350770.2017.1260391
  • Cabanillas, C. (2011). Intergenerational learning as an opportunity to generate new educational models. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 9(2), 229-231. doi: 10.1080/15350770.2011.568347
  • Caffarella, R., & Daffron, S. (2013). Planning programs for adult learners: A practical guide (3ª ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Carmo, H. (1999). Desenvolvimento comunitário. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta.
  • Comissão Europeia (2014), The 2015 Ageing Report. Brussels: European Commission. Acedido em junho de 2017. Disponível em: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/eur opean_economy/2015/pdf/ee3_en.pdf
  • Dorfman, L., Murty, S., Ingram, J., & Evans, R. (2002). Incorporating intergenerational service-learning into an introductory gerontology course. In M. Mellor & J. Ivry (Eds.), Advancing gerontological social work education (pp. 219-240). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
  • Eurostat (2013). European social statistics, pocketbooks. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European. Acedido em junho de 2017. Disponível em: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3930297/5968 986/KS-FP-13-001-EN.PDF/
  • Formosa, M., Krasovec, S., & Schmidt-Hertha, B. (2014). Conclusion: Policy futures in older adult education and intergenerational learning. In B. Schmidt-Hertha, S. Krasovec & M. Formosa (Eds.), Learning across generations in Europe (pp. 203-212). Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Hatton-Yeo, A. (2002). Conference report: Connecting generations: A global perspective. In ICIP International intergenerational conference connecting generations: A global perspective (pp. 1-48). Keele: UNESCO Institute for Education and Beth Johnson Foundation.
  • Hatton-Yeo, Alan, & Watkins, Celeste (2004). Intergenerational community development: Practice guide. London: The Beth Johnson Foundation.
  • Kaplan, M. (2001). Intergenerational programs in schools: Considerations of form and function. International Review of Education, 48(5), 305–334.
  • Mannion, Greg (2012). Intergenerational education: The significance of reciprocity and place. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 10(4), 386-399.
  • Martin, K., Springate, I., & Atkinson, M. (2010). Intergenerational practice: Outcomes and effectiveness - LGA Research Report. Slough: NFER. Montero, I., & Gallego, A. (2002). Los programas intergeneracionales: Una alternativa socio-educativa para todas las edades. In J. García & M. Bedmar (Coords.), Hacia la educación intergeneracional (pp.167-177). Madrid: DyKinson.
  • Newman, Sally, & Sánchez, Mariano (2007). Los programas intergeneracionales: Concepto, historia y modelos. In Mariano Sanchéz (Dirs.), Programas intergeneracionales: Hacia una sociedad para todas las edades (pp. 34-69). Barcelona: Fundación «la Caixa».
  • O’Neill, P. (2016). Intergenerational gatherings among the water and willows. In M. Kaplan, L. Thang, M. Sánchez, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), Intergenerational contact zones - A compendium of applications. University Park, PA: Penn State Extension.
  • Ohsako, T. (2002). The role of intergenerational programs in promoting lifelong learning for all ages. In C. Mendel-Añonuevo (Ed.), Integrating lifelong learning perspectives (pp. 186- 207). Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education.
  • Pinazo, S., & Kaplan, M. (2007). The benefits of intergenerational programmes. In M. Sánchez (Dir.), Intergenerational programmes: Towards a society for all ages, (pp. 64-91). Barcelona: The “la caixa” Foundation.
  • Sáez, J. (2002). Hacia la educación intergeneracional: Concepto y posibilidades. In J. Sáez (Coord.), Pedagogía social y programas intergeneracionales: Educación de personas mayores (pp. 99–112). Málaga: Aljibe.
  • Sánchez, Mariano, & Díaz, Pilar (Eds.). (2014). Certificado europeo en aprendizaje intergeneracional: Materialesde formación. Granada: The Beth Johnson Foundation, Association Generations, Högskolan för Lärande och Kommunikation i Jkpg AB, Universidad de Granada & Druˇstvo za izobraˇzevanje za tretje ˇzivljenjsko obdobje.
  • Savater, F. (2006). O valor de educar. Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote.
  • Seedsman, T. (2014). The pursuit of continuous improvement in the field of intergenerational relationships: The discipline of the second curve. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 12(4), 347-356. doi:10.1080/15350770.2014.959442
  • Simons, L., & Cleary, B. (2006). The influence of service learning on students' personal and social development. College Teaching, 54(4), 307-319. doi:10.3200/CTCH.54.4.307–319
  • Springate, I., Atkinson, M., & Martin, K. (2008). Intergenerational practice: A review of the Literature - LGA Research Report. Slough: NFER. Retrieved from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/LIG01/LIG01.pdf
  • Teater, B. (2016). Intergenerational programs to promote active ageing: The experiences and perspectives of older adults. Activities, Adaptation & Ageing, 40(1), 1-19. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2016.1127041
  • Witkin, B. & Altschuld, J. (1995). Planning and Conducting Needs Assessments: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet