Evaluation of research on the Knowledge Building pedagogya mixed methodological approach

Bibliographic References

• Aliaga, F. M. (1999). Análisis de correspondencias: estudio bibliométrico sobre su uso en la investigación educativa. RELIEVE-Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 5(1).
• Aliaga, F. M., Gutiérrez-Braojos, C. & Fernández-Cano, A. (2018). Research journals in education: SWOT Analysis. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 36(2), 563-579. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.36.2.312461
• Avcı, Ü. (2020). Examining the role of sentence openers, role assignment scaffolds and self-determination in collaborative knowledge building. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 109-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09672-5
• Bereiter, C (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Bereiter, C. (2014). Principled practical knowledge: Not a bridge but a ladder. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.812533
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). An attainable version of high literacy: Approaches to teaching higher-order skills in reading and writing. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(1), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179375
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Open Court.
• Bueno, Á., & Fernández-Cano, A. (2003). Análisis cientimétrico de la productividad en la Revista de Investigación Educativa (1983-2000). Revista de Investigación Educativa, 21(2), 507-532.
• Cacciamani, S. (2017). Experimental learning and knowledge building in higher education: An application of the progressive design method. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(1). 27-38. DOI: 10.20368/1971-8829/1245
• Chen, B. (2017). Fostering scientific understanding and epistemic beliefs through judgments of promisingness. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 255-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9467-0
• Chen, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2016). Schools as knowledge-building organizations: Thirty years of design research. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 266-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1175306
• Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2015). Advancing knowledge‐building discourse through judgments of promising ideas. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 345-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9225-z
• Comes, M., Cavalcante, F., & Toda, F. (2020). Avaliação do clima organizacional de suporte à criatividade e inovação em programas de pós-graduação stricto sensu. Revista Ciências Administrativas ou Journal of Administrative Sciences, 26(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41380-4
• Costello, G. (2020). Teaching of Design and Innovation. Suiza: Springer Nature.
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach. Sage.
• Cozzens, S., Gatchair, S., Kang, J., Kim, K.S., Lee, H.J., Ordóñez, G., & Porter, A. (2010). Emerging technologies: quantitative identification and measurement. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22, 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537321003647396
• Fernández, A. D., Ruiz-Corbella, M., & Galán, A. (2017). Calidad editorial y científica en las revistas de educación. Tendencias y oportunidades en el contexto 2.0. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 35(1), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.35.1.244761
• Fernández-Bautista, A., Torralbo, M., & Fernández-Cano, A. (2014). Análisis longitudinal de tesis doctorales españolas en educación (1841-2012). RELIEVE-Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.20.2.4479
• Fernández-Cano, A., Torralbo, M. & Vallejo, M. (2004) Reconsidering Price's model of scientific growth: An overview. Scientometrics, 61, 301–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045112.11562.11
• Fonseca-Mora, M. C., & Aguaded, I. (2014). Las revistas científicas como plataformas para publicar la investigación de excelencia en educación: estrategias para atracción de investigadores. RELIEVE-Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.20.2.4274
• Ghazal, S., Al-Samarraie, H., & Wright, B. (2019). A conceptualization of factors affecting collaborative knowledge building in online environments. Online Information Review, 44(1), pp. 62-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2019-0046
• Goh, A., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Facilitating students’ development of their views on nature of science: A knowledge building approach. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 521-530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0050-0
• Goldman, S. R., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). Managing, understanding, applying, and creating knowledge in the information age: Next-generation challenges and opportunities. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 255-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2013.773217
• Gutiérrez-Braojos, C. (2020, March). A sequence for the Knowledge Building Pedagogy. Knowledge Building International. https://ikit.org/kbi/index.php/news/
• Gutierrez-Braojos, C., Martín-Romera, A., Casasempere, A., & Fernández Cano, A. (2015). Análisis Cientimétrico de la Grounded Theory en Educación. Revista de Educación, 370 (Octubre-Diciembre), 121-148.
• Gutiérrez-Braojos, C., Martín-Romera, A., Salmerón-Pérez, H., Casasempere, A., & Fernández Cano, A. (2017). Análisis temático de la investigación educativa soportada por Grounded Theory. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 69(1), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2016.41035
• Gutiérrez-Braojos, C., Montejo-Gámez, J., Ma, L., Chen, B., de Escalona-Fernández, M., Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2019). Exploring collective cognitive responsibility through the emergence and flow of forms of engagement in a knowledge building community. In L.D. (Ed). Didactics of Smart Pedagogy (pp. 213-232). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_11
• Gutiérrez-Braojos, C., Montejo-Gámez, J., Marín-Jiménez, A. & Campaña, J. (2019). Hybrid learning environment: Collaborative or competitive learning? Virtual Reality, 23(4), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0358-z
• Gutiérrez-Braojos, C., Montejo-Gámez, J., Marín-Jiménez, A. E. & Poza-Vilches, F. (2018). A Review of Educational Innovation from a Knowledge-building Pedagogy Perspective. In A.V., M.L., L.D. (Eds), The Future of Innovation and Technology in Education: Policies and Practices for Teaching and Learning Excellence, (41-54). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-555-520181005
• Gutiérrez-Braojos, C., Montejo-Gámez, J., & Poza-Vilches, F. (August 2018). That’s an impactful idea: Using peer citation to explore collective responsibility for knowledge advancement. Poster presented at the 22nd Knowledge Building Summer Institute; Toronto, Canada.
• Gutiérrez-Braojos, C. & Salmerón-Pérez, H. (2015). Exploring collective cognitive responsibility and its effects on students' impact in a knowledge building community. Infancia y Aprendizaje. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 38(2), 327-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2015.1016746
• Halatchliyski, I., Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2013). Explaining authors’contribution to pivotal artifactsduring mass collaboration in the Wikipedia’s knowledge base. International Society of the Learning Sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9182-3
• Hong, H. Y. (2014). Developing student-centered teaching beliefs through knowledge building among prospective teachers. In Tan, S., So, H., & Yeo (Eds), Knowledge creation in education (pp. 189-204). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-047-6_11
• Hong, H-Y., & Chai, C.S. (2017). Principle-based design: Development of adaptive mathematics teaching practices and beliefs in a knowledge building environment. Computers & Education, 115, 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.011
• Hong, H-Y., Chang, Y-H., & Chai, C.S. (2014). Fostering a collaborative and creative climate in a college class through idea-centered knowledge-building. Instructional Science, 42(3), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9289-y
• Hong, H. Y., & Scardamalia, M. (2014). Community knowledge assessment in a knowledge building environment. Computers & Education, 71, 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.009
• Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Brendle, D., & Cress, U. (2017). All in good time: Knowledge introduction, restructuring, and development of shared opinions as different stages in collaborative writing. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(2), 195-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9258-6
• Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Oeberst, A., & Cress, U. (2015). Learning and collective knowledge construction with social media: A process-oriented perspective. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 120-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1036273
• Lai, M. & Law, N. (2013) Questioning and the quality of knowledge constructed in a CSCL context: A study on two grade-levels of students. Instructional Science, 41(3), 597-620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9246-1
• Lee, Y., & Yoo, S. (2020). Individual profiles and team classes of the climate for creativity: A multilevel latent profile analysis. Creativity and Innovation Management; 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12371
• Li, S., Tang, Q., & Shi, P. (2015). Learning analysis on learners’ wiki-based collaborative knowledge building behaviors. In G. Chen, V. Kumar, Kinshuk, R. Huang, & S. C. Kong (Eds.), Emerging Issues in Smart Learning (pp. 217-224). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44188-6_30
• Lin, K.Y., Hong, H-Y., & Chai, C. S. (2014). Development and validation of the knowledge-building environment scale. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 124-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.018
• Lotka, A. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317-323.
• MacLeod, J., & Yang, H. H. (2018). Intercultural computer-supported collaborative learning: Theory and Practice. In digital technologies and instructional design for personalized learning, (pp. 80-97). Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3940-7.ch004
• Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
• Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79(4), 606-623. https://doi.org/10.1086/354848
• Moher, D. A. & Liberati, A. (2010). Revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: la responsabilidad de los autores, revisores, editores y patrocinadores. Med Clin (Barc), 135, 505-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.02.016
• Muhonen, H., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A. & Lerkkanen, M. (2017). Knowledge-building patterns in educational dialogue. International Journal of Education Research, 81, 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.10.005
• Oeberst, A., Halatchliyski, I., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2014). Knowledge construction in Wikipedia: A systemic-constructivist analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 149-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.888352
• Park, H., & Park, H. W. (2018). Two-side face of knowledge building using scientometric analysis. Quality & Quantity, 52(6), 2815-2836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0711-z
• Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor – An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 537-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-5157-0
• Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge (Vol. 360). Oxford University Press.
• Popper, K. (1994). Knowledge and the mind-body problem: In defence of interaction. (Vol. 134). Routledge.
• Porcaro, D. (2014). Educational change in Oman: a design research study of personal, institutional, and societal reactions to collaborative Knowledge Building. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(2), 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.802993
• Price, D. de S. (1963). Little science, big science. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/pric91844
• Price, D. de S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometrics and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5-6), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630270505
• Price, D. de S. (1986). Little science, big science... and beyond. Columbia University Press.
• Resendes, M., Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Chen, B., & Halewood, C. (2015). Group-level formative feedback and metadiscourse. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 309–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9219-x
• Rodríguez Gómez, G., Gil Flores, J., & García Jiménez, E. (1996). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Ediciones Aljibe.
• Roscoe, R. D. (2014). Self-monitoring and knowledge-building in learning by teaching. Instructional Science, 42(3), 327-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9283-4
• Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. Liberal education in a knowledge society, 97, 67-98.
• Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge forum®. Education and technology: An encyclopedia, (183-192). ABC-CLIO.
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3
• Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). CSILE: Trying to bring students into world 3. In K. McGilley (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201–228). MIT Press.
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2017). Two modes of thinking in Knowledge Building. Revista Catalana de Pedagogía, 12, 61-83.
• Small, H., Boyack, K.W., & Klavans, R. (2014). Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Research Policy, 43, 1450–1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.005
• Tammets, K., Pata, K., & Laanpere, M. (2013). Promoting teachers’ learning and knowledge building in the socio-technical system. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 14(3), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1478
• Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and brain sciences, 12(3), 435-467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00057046
• Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 55, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-004-0002-8
• Wu, Y. T., & Wang, L. J. (2016). Research trends in technology-enhanced knowledge building pedagogies: a review of selected empirical research from 2006 to 2015. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(3), 353-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0065-2
• Zhi, Q., & Su, M. (2015, October). Enhance collaborative learning by visualizing process of knowledge building with Padlet. In 2015 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT) (pp. 221-225). IEEE. Wuhan (China). https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2015.54