Nuevas tecnologías empleadas en la intervención de la tartamudezuna revisión

  1. María Fernández-Martín 1
  2. Nuria Calet 1
  3. José A. González 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 University of Sheffield
    info

    University of Sheffield

    Sheffield, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/05krs5044

Revista:
Revista de Investigación en Logopedia

ISSN: 2174-5218

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 6

Número: 2

Páginas: 88-106

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/RLOG.58544 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de Investigación en Logopedia

Resumen

El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar los estudios más recientes sobre el tratamiento de las disfluencias en el habla en los que se han utilizado las nuevas tecnologías. Para ello, se realizó una búsqueda en bases de datos internacionales (Pubmed y Scopus) y nacionales (Dialnet) de estudios que utilizan las nuevas tecnologías en la intervención de las disfluencias del habla, publicados desde el año 2000 hasta el 2015. En general se observa que la finalidad de los programas es reducir el porcentaje de tartamudez a corto y largo plazo mediante dispositivos fáciles de usar. La metodología utilizada es muy variada, aunque los estudios presentan características comunes: se evalúa la severidad de la tartamudez previa a la intervención para poder asegurar que ésta disminuye gracias a los programas, y en todos se realizan análisis pre y post tratamiento. En conclusión, con el uso de estos programas los resultados que se obtienen suelen ser positivos, aunque no generalizables al resto de la población con disfluencias. El uso de dispositivos en la tartamudez podría ser beneficioso para algunas personas con disfluencias en el habla, aunque se requieren estudios con poblaciones más amplias para asegurar su efectividad en todos los casos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Angadi, V., y Stemple, J. (2012). New Frontiers and Emerging Technologies in Comprehensive Voice Care. Perspectives on Voice and Voice Disorders, 22, 72-79. doi: 10.1044/vvd22.2.72.
  • Armson, J., y Kiefte, M. (2008). The Effect of SpeechEasy on Stuttering Frequency, Speech Rate, and Speech Naturalness. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 33, 120-134. doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2008.04.002.
  • Armson, J., Kiefte, M., Mason, J., y De Croos, D. (2006). The Effect of SpeechEasy on Stuttering Frequency in Laboratory Conditions. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 31, 137-152. doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2006.04.004.
  • Au-Yeung, J., Vallejo Gomez I., y Howell P. (2003). Exchange of disfluency from function words to content words with age in Spanish speakers who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 754–765. doi: 10.1044/1092- 4388(2003/060).
  • Bakker, K. (2006). Technical support for stuttering treatment. In N. Bernstein Ratner, J. Tetnowski (Eds.), Current issues in stuttering research and practice, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (2006), pp. 205–237.
  • Beilby, J.M., Byrnes, M.L., y Yaruss, J.S. (2012). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for adults who stutter: psychosocial adjustment and speech fluency. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 37, 289–299.
  • Bloodstein, N. (1995). A handbook of stuttering. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
  • Bloodstein, N., y Bernstein R. (2008). A handbook on stuttering (6th ed.). Delmar, Clifton Park, NY.
  • Carey, B., O’Brian, S., Onslow, M., Block, S., Jones, M., y Packman, A. (2010). Randomized controlled non-Inferiority trial of a telehealth treatment for chronic stuttering: the Camperdown Program. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45, 108-120. doi: 10.3109/13682820902763944.
  • Dayalu, V.N., y Kalinowski, J. (2002). Pseudofluency in adults who stutter: The illusory outcome of therapy. Perceptual and Motor Skill Journal, 94, 87-96.
  • Foundas, A. L., Bollich A. M., Feldman, J., Corey, D. M., Lemen, L.C., y Heilman, K. M. (2004). Aberrant auditory processing and atypical planum temporale in developlmental stuttering. Neurology, 63, 1640-1646. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000142993.33158.2A.
  • Foundas, A. L., Mock, J. R., Corey, D. M., Golob, E. J., y Conture, E. G. (2013). The SpeechEasy device in stuttering and non-stuttering adults: Fluency effects while speaking and reading. Brain and Language, 126, 141-150. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.04.004.
  • Gallop, R. F., y Runyan, C. M. (2012). Long-term effectiveness of the SpeechEasy fluency-enhancement Device. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 37, 334-343. doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.07.001.
  • Harris, V., Onslow, M., Packman, A., Harrison, E,. y Menzies, R. (2002). An experimental investigation of the impact of the Lidcombe Program on early stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 27, 203-214. doi: 10.1016/S0094-730X(02)00127-4.
  • Howell, P. (2004). Effect of delayed auditory feedback and frequency-shifted feedback on speech control and some potential for future development of prosthetic aids for stammering. Stammering Research, 1, 31-46.
  • Hudock, D., y Kalinowky, J. (2014). Stuttering inhibition via altered auditory feedback during scripted telephone conversations. Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49(1), 139-147. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12053.
  • Johnson, M., Baxter, S., Blank, L., Cantrell, A., Brumfitt, S., Enderby, P., y Goyder, E. (2015). The state of the art in non-pharmacological interventions for developmental stuttering. Part 2: qualitative evidence synthesis of views and experiences. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12182.
  • Kalinowski. J. (2004). Self-reported efficacy of an all in-the-ear-canal prosthetic device to inhibit stuttering during one hundred hours of university teaching: an autobiographical clinical commentary. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 107-111.
  • Kalinowski, J., Guntupali, V., Stuart, A., y Saltuklaroglu, T. (2004) Self-reported efficacy of an ear-level prosthetic device that delivers altered auditory feedback for the management of stuttering. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 27, 167-170.
  • Koushik, S., Shenker, R. y Onslow, M. (2009). Follow-up of 6–10-Year-Old Stuttering Children after Lidcombe Program Treatment: A Phase I Trial. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 34, 279-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.11.001.
  • Kully, D. (2000). Telehealth in speech pathology: applications to the treatment of stuttering. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 10. doi: 10.1258/1357633001935509.
  • Lattermann, C., Euler, H., y Neumann, K. (2008). A randomized control trial to investigate the impact of the lidcombe program on early stuttering in Germanspeaking preschoolers. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 33, 52-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2007.12.002.
  • Loriente, C. (2013). Crítica y alternativa al modelo biomédico de la tartamudez. Revista de Investigación en Logopedia, 2, 120-145.
  • Lu, C., Chen, C., Peng, D., You, W., Zhang, X., Ding, G., Deng, X., Yan, Q., y Howell, P. (2012). Neural anomaly and reorganization in speakers who stutter: A short-term intervention study. Neurology, 79, 625-632. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826356d2.
  • Ludlow, C., y Loucks, T. (2003). Stuttering: a dynamic motor control disorder. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 28. doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2003.07.001.
  • Manning, W. H. (1999). Progress under the surface and over time. En N. Bernstein Ratner y E. C. Healey (Eds.), Stuttering Research and treatment: Bridging the gap. (pp. 123-130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum, Inc.
  • O’Donnell, J. J., Armson, J., y Kiefte, M. (2008). The effectiveness of SpeechEasy during situations of daily living. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 33, 99-119. doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2008.02.001.
  • Onslow M., Packman A., y Harrison E., (2003). The Lidcombe program of early stuttering intervention: a clinician's guide. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Packman, A. y Meredith, G. (2011). Reprint of: Technology and the Evolution of Clinical Methods for Stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 36, 195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.10.003.
  • Prado, M., y Roa, L. (2007). Wearable real-time and adaptative feedback device to face the stuttering: a knowledge-based telehealthcare proposal. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics , 127 147-156.
  • Prasse, J.E., y Kikano, GE. (2008). Stuttering: an overview. American Family Physician, 77 (9), 1271-6.
  • Reilly, S., et al., (2013). Natural history of stuttering to 4 years A Prospective community-based Study. Pediatrics, 132, 460-7.
  • Rodríguez-Morejón, A. (2003). La tartamudez: naturaleza y tratamiento. Barcelona: Herder.
  • Rodríguez-Morejón, A. (2002). Metodología de investigación en tartamudez. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 22, 203-218.
  • Sangorrín, J. (2005). Disfemia o tartamudez. Revista de Neurología, 41, 43-46.
  • Stidham, K. R., Olson, L., Hillbratt, M. y Sinopoli, T. (2006). A new antistuttering device: treatment of stuttering using bone conduction stimulation with delayed temporal feedback. The Laryngoscope, 116, 1951-1955. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000236079.52499.0b.
  • Stuart, A., Kalinowski, J., Rastatter, M. P., Saltuklaroglu, T., y Dayalu, V. (2004). Investigations of the impact of altered auditory feedback in-the-ear devices on the speech of people who stutter: initial fitting and 4-month follow-up. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39, 93-113. doi: 10.1080/13682820310001616976.
  • Van Borsel, J., Reunes, G., y Van Den Bergh, N. (2003). Delayed auditory feedback in the treatment of stuttering: clients as consumers. International Journal of Language Disorders, 38, 119-129.
  • Yairi, E., y Ambrose, N (2013). Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st century advances. Journal of Fluency Disorder, 38(2), 66-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.11.002.
  • Yairi, E., y Ambrose, N. (1999). Early childhood stuttering: Persistency and recovery rates. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1097-112.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet