Intervention programs in educational psychologybridging research and practice

Referencias bibliográficas

• American Psychological Association. (2003). Task Force on Evidence-Based Interventions in School Psychology: Procedural and Coding Manual. Retrieved from: www.madison.k12.in.us/MCSWeb/CSSU/EBI%20Manual.pdf
• American Psychological Association. (2005). APA Policy Statement on Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology. Retrieved from: http://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/evidence-based-statement.aspx
• Angulo-Domínguez, M. C., Ocampos, J. G., Luque-Vilaseca, J. L., Rodríguez-Romero, M. P., Sánchez-Cantero, R., Satorras-Fioretti, R. M., & Vázquez-Uceda, M. (2011). Manual de atención al alumnado con necesidades específicas de apoyo educativo derivadas de dificultades específicas de aprendizaje: Dislexia. Junta de Andalucía - Consejería de Educación. Retrieved from: http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/educacion/webportal/ishare-servlet/content/a9327d5e-1443-445e-9d32-18953f54684f
• Babcock, N. L. & Pryzwansky, W. B. (1983). Models of consultation: Preferences of educational professionals at five stages of service. Journal of School Psychology, 21(4), 359-366.
• Barber, M. & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Co. Retrieved from: http://mckinseyonsociety.com/downloads/reports/Education/Worlds_School_Systems_Final.pdf
• Beck, I., McKeown, M., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Biemiller, A. & Boote, C. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1): 44-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.44
• Butler, S., Urrutia, K., Buenger, A., Gonzalez, N., Hunt, M., & Eisenhart, C. (2010). A review of the current research on vocabulary instruction. National Reading Technical Assistance Center, RMC Research Corporation. Retrieved from: https://www2.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/support/rmcfinal1.pdf
• Burkhardt, H. & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3-14. Doi: 10.3102/0013189X032009003
• Calet, N., Gutiérrez-Palma, N., Simpson, I. C., González-Trujillo, M. C., & Defior, S. (2015). Suprasegmental phonology development and reading acquisition: A longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(1), 51-71. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2014.976342.
• Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavský, M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E., Salas, N., Schöffelová, M., Defior, S., Mikulajová, M., Seidlová-Málková, G., & Hulme, C. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science 23(6), 678–686. Doi: 10.1177/0956797611434536
• Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Defior, S., Seidlová-Málková, G., & Hulme, C. (2013). Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychological Science, 24(8) 1398–1407. Doi: 10.1177/0956797612473122
• Carballo, G., Mendoza, E., Fresneda, M. D., & Muñoz, J. (2008). La práctica basada en la evidencia en la logopedia española: Estudio descriptivo. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 28, (3), 149-165.
• Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2017). Redressing inequities: An aspiration in search of a method. Summit Keynote by A. Bryk. Retrieved from: https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Carnegie_Bryk_Summit_2017_Keynote.pdf
• Carreiras, M. & Perea, M. (2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language, 90, 393-400.
• Cheesman, E. & De Pry, R. (2010). A critical review of culturally responsive literacy instruction. Journal of Praxis in Multicultural Education, 5(1): 83-99.
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2005). Teaching Reading: Report and recommendations, national inquiry into the teaching of literacy. Australia: Department of Education, Science, and Training.
• Cook, B., Tankersley, M., Cook, L., & Landrum, T. (2008). Evidence-based practices in special education: Some practical considerations. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44 (2), 69-75. Doi: 10.1177/1053451208321452.
• Christianakis, M. (2010). Collaborative research and teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 19(2), 109-122.
• Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonology, 11, 51–62.
• DeForest, P. A. & Hughes, J. N. (1992). Effect of teacher involvement and teacher self-efficacy on ratings of consultant effectiveness and intervention acceptability. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3(4), 301-316.
• Duff, F. J. & Clarke, P. J. (2011). Practitioner review: Reading disorders: What are effective interventions and how should they be implemented and evaluated? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 3–12. Doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02310.x
• Echeita-Sarrionandía, G. & Verdugo-Alonso, M. A. (2004). La Declaración de Salamanca sobre necesidades educativas especiales 10 años después: valoración y prospectiva. Colección Investigación 2. Salamanca, Spain: INICO.
• Eckert, T. & Hintze, J. M. (2000). Behavioral conceptions and applications of acceptability: Issues related to service delivery and research methodology. School Psychology Quarterly, 15(2), 123-148.
• Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 1-44. Doi: 10.1080/19345740802539200
• Elliott, S. (1988). Acceptability of behavioral treatments in educational settings. In J. C. Witt, S. N. Elliott, & F. M. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of Behavior Therapy in Education, (pp. 121-150). New York: Plenum Press.
• Ferrándiz-Mingot, J. (1978). Vocabulario Común y Fundamental. [Basic and Fundamental Vocabulary]. Vida Escolar, 197-198. Madrid.
• Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., González-Castro, F., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., Móscicki, E. K., Schinke, S., Valentine, J. C., & Ji, P. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6(3): 151-175.
• Foorman, B., Breier, J., & Fletcher, J. (2003) Interventions aimed at improving reading success: An evidence-based approach. Developmental Neuropsychology, 24 (2-3), 613-639. Doi: 10.1080/87565641.2003.9651913
• Forman, G., Fagley, N. S., Steiner, D. D., & Schneider, K. (2009). Teaching evidence-based interventions: Perceptions of influences on use in professional practice in school psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(4), 226-232. Doi: 10.1037/a0016874.
• Fresneda, Mª. D., Muñoz, J., Mendoza, E., & Carballo, G. (2012). La práctica basada en la evidencia en la logopedia española: Actitudes, usos y barreras. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 30 (1), 29-52.
• Frith, U. (1995). Dyslexia: Can we have a shared theoretical framework? Educational and Child Psychology, 12, 6-17.
• Fuentes-Biggi, J., Ferrari-Arroyo, M. J., Boada-Muñoz, L., Touriño-Aguilera, E., Artigas-Pallarés, J., Belinchón-Carmona, M., & Posada-de-La Paz, M. (2006). Guía de buena práctica para el tratamiento de los trastornos del espectro autista. Revista Neurologia, 43, 425-438.
• Fundación Alternativas. (2017). Informe sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnología en España. Retrieved from: http://compromiso.atresmedia.com/documents/2018/01/25/D4557414-C6AA-425B-9A23-0AA15139C002/informe_sobre_la_ciencia_y_la_tecnologiiacolor.pdf
• Gay, G. (Ed.) (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Gobierno Vasco (2006). Guía de buenas prácticas. El profesorado ante la enseñanza de la lectura. Gobierno Vasco - Departamento de Educación, Universidades e Investigación. Retrieved from: http://www.hezkuntza.ejgv.euskadi.net/r43-573/es/contenidos/informacion/dia6/es_2027/adjuntos/RecursosParaLaInclusion/ensenanza_lectura_c.pdf
• Gomes-Koban, C., Simpson, I. C., Valle, A., & Defior, S. (2017). Oral vocabulary training program for Spanish third-graders with low socio-economic status: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 12(11): e0188157. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188157
• Graham, D. S. (1998). Consultant effectiveness and treatment acceptability: An examination of consultee requests and consultant responses. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 155-168.
• Harmsworth, S. & Turpin, S. (2000). Creating an effective dissemination strategy: An expanded interactive workbook for educational development projects. TQEF National Coordination Team – Bridging the Gap/Innovations Project 2001. Retrieved from: https://ajpp-online.org/resources/downloads/06-CreatingAnEffectiveDisseminationStrategy-AnExpandedWorkbook.pdf
• Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. (2003). The early catastrophe: The 30 million word gap by age 3. American Educator, 4-9. Retrieved from: https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/TheEarlyCatastrophe.pdf
• Henderson, C. & Dancy, M. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3, 020102. Doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020102
• Kamphaus, R. W. (2000). Acceptability research in school psychology: Current trends and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 15(2).
• Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 13, 259-273.
• Kazdin, A. E. (2004). Evidence-based treatments: challenges and priorities for practice and research. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13, 923-940. Doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2004.04.002
• Kelly, U., McNicoll, I., & Kelly, D. (2018). An elephant in the room: The hidden economic value of public engagement and knowledge exchange in UK universities. Viewforth Consulting Ltd. Retrieved from: http://www.viewforthconsulting.co.uk/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/Theelephantintheroom.pdf
• Kutsick, K. A., Gutkin, T. B., & Witt, J. C. (1991). The impact of treatment development process, intervention type, and problem severity on treatment acceptability as judged by classroom teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 325-331
• Mautone, J. A., Dupaul, G. J., Jitendra, A. K., Tresco, K. E., Junod, R. V., & Volpe, R. J. (2009). The relationship between treatment integrity and acceptability of reading interventions for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 919-931. Doi: 10.1002/pits.20434
• McCardle, P. & Miller, B. (2009). Why we need evidence-based practice in reading and where to find that evidence. In S. Rosenfield & V. Berninger (Eds.), Implementing Evidence Based Academic Interventions in School Settings. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
• Metropolitan Center for Urban Education. (2008). Academic Interventions for struggling learners: Using culturally responsive instructional support teams. New York: NYU Steinhardt. Retrieved from: https://steinhardt.nyu.edu/metrocenter.olde/programs/TACD/documents/Academic%20Interventions.pdf
• Mihalic, S., Fagan, A., Irwin, K., Ballard, D., & Elliott, D. (2004). Blueprints for violence prevention. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention/ NCJ 204274. Office of Justice Programs - US Department of Justice.
• Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia de España (1994). Declaración de Salamanca: Marco de acción para las necesidades educativas especiales. UNESCO.
• National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems (NCCRESt, 2005). Cultural considerations and challenges in response-to-intervention models: An NCCRESt position statement. Retrieved from: http://www.isbe.net/learningsupports/pdfs/cultural-consid-rti.pdf
• National Institute of Child Health Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching Children to Read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00.4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from: http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org
• Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2007). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook, (pp. 227-247). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
• Ripoll, J. C. (2014). ¿Existen métodos de mejora de la comprensión lectora en español y basados en evidencias? Investigaciones Sobre Lectura, (2), 44-52. Retrieved from: https://www.comprensionlectora.es/revistaisl/index.php/revistaISL/article/view/5
• Ripoll, J. C. & Aguado, G. A. (2014). La mejora de la comprensión lectora en español: Un metaanálisis. Revista de Psicodidáctica 19(1), 27-44. Doi:0.1387/RevPsicodidact.9001
• Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading: Final report. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills Publications. Retrieved from: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5551/2/report.pdf
• Save the Children (Sola, C.) (2013). Guía de Buenas Prácticas en Educación Inclusiva. Madrid: Save the Children.
• Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143-174. doi: 10.1348/000712603321661859.
• Share, D. (2008). On the anglocentrities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584-615.
• Snow, C. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Washington, DC: The RAND Corporation.
• Snow, C., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Snowling, M. J. & Hulme, C. (2011). Evidence-based interventions for reading and language difficulties: Creating a virtuous circle. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 1–23. Doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02014.x
• Spiel, C., Schober, B., & Strohmeier, D. (2016). Implementing Intervention Research into Public Policy-the "I3-Approach". Prevention Science, 19(3), 337-346. Doi: 10.1007/s11121-016 0638-3
• Turan, Y., Ostrosky, M. M., Halle, J. W., & Destefano, L. (2004). Acceptability of language interventions: A comparison of preschool and elementary school teachers’ responses. Journal of Early Intervention, 26(3), 221-233.
• Van der Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. Van der Akker, N. Nieveen, R. M. Branch, K. L. Gustafson, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training, (1-14). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
• Vanderlinde, R. & Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36 (2), 299-316. Doi: 10.1080/01411920902919257.
• Wendling, B. J. & Mather, N. (2009). Essentials of evidence-based academic interventions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
• West, J. F. & Idol, L. (1987). School consultation (part I): An interdisciplinary perspective on theory, models, and research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 388-408.
• Wilson, P. M., Petticrew, M., Calnan, M. W, & Nazareth, I. (2010). Disseminating research findings: What should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks. Implementation Science, 5(91), 1-16.
• Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203-214.
• World Health Organisation (2014). Module 5: Disseminating the research findings. Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Document Production Services. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/year/2014/participant-workbook5_030414.pdf