Revisiones sistemáticas en cinco pasosIV. Cómo sintetizar los resultados (Art. 101785)

  1. K. Saeed Khan 1
  2. A. Bueno-Cavanillas 1
  3. J. Zamora 2
  1. 1 Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública. Universidad de Granada, Granada, España
  2. 2 Unidad de Bioestadística Clínica, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España
Zeitschrift:
Semergen: revista española de medicina de familia

ISSN: 1138-3593

Datum der Publikation: 2022

Nummer: 8

Seiten: 7-7

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.1016/J.SEMERG.2022.02.006 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Andere Publikationen in: Semergen: revista española de medicina de familia

Zusammenfassung

This fourth in a series of five articles on systematic reviews demonstrates how to compile and summarize the results of the studies included in a review. The synthesis of the extracted data consists of tabulating the characteristics, and the quality of the included studies, with the effects or the magnitude of the associations found in them. Statistical methods can be used to explore the differences between studies and the reasons for the inconsistencies. The magnitude of this heterogeneity influences whether it is feasible to perform an overall or subgroup meta-analysis. Finally, information is provided both to assessment of clinical and methodological reasons for heterogeneity.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • K.S. Khan, A. Bueno-Cavanillas, J. Zamora Revisiones sistemáticas en cinco pasos: I Cómo Formular una pregunta para la que se pueda obtener una respuesta válida SEMERGEN. (2022) (In Press) Google Scholar
  • K.S. Khan, A. Bueno-Cavanillas, J. Zamora Revisiones sistemáticas en cinco pasos: II. Cómo identificar los estudios relevantes SEMERGEN. (2022) (In Press) Google Scholar
  • K.S. Khan, A. Bueno-Cavanillas, J. Zamora Revisiones sistemáticas en cinco pasos: III. Cómo evaluar la calidad de los estudios SEMERGEN. (2022) (In Press) Google Scholar
  • K.S. Khan, R. Kunz, J. Kleijnen, G. Antes Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine (2nd ed.), CRC Press (2011) Google Scholar
  • K.S. Khan, R. Kunz, J. Kleijnen, G. Antes Five steps to conducting a systematic review J R Soc Med., 96 (2003), pp. 118-121, 10.1258/JRSM.96.3.118 View PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  • J. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. Page, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2nd ed.), John Wiley & Sons (2019) Google Scholar
  • C. Tufanaru, Z. Munn, E. Aromataris, J. Campbell, L. Hopp Systematic Reviews of Effectiveness E Aromataris, Z Munn (Eds.), JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020), pp. 71-88, 10.46658/JBIMES-20-04 View PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  • K.S. Khan, S. Daya, A.R. Jadad The Importance of Quality of Primary Studies in Producing Unbiased Systematic Reviews Arch Intern Med., 156 (1996), pp. 661-666, 10.1001/archinte.1996.00440060089011 View PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet