Evaluación de la densidad ósea en defectos óseos palatinos tras injerto de tejido óseo generado mediante ingeniería tisular en conejos

  1. García Sevilla, Alba
  2. Bullejos Martínez, Elena
  3. Arena de Frutos, Gema
  4. España López, Antonio J.
  5. Fernández Valadés, Ricardo
Journal:
Actualidad médica

ISSN: 0365-7965

Year of publication: 2017

Tome: 102

Issue: 800

Pages: 13-17

Type: Article

DOI: 10.15568/AM.2017.800.OR02 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Actualidad médica

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Purpose. We have carried out a study to determine the bone density after using artificial autologous bone grafts generated by tissue engineering by means of computed tomography, and to determine the in vivo usefulness of these biomaterials. Methods. Twelve 3-week-old New Zeland White male rabbits were used in this study. Bone substitutes were generated by using adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells. After culture and expansion, osteogenic differentiation was induced and cells were combined with fibrin-agarose biomaterials. This bone substitute was autologously grafted in experimental animals. Three study groups were established: Group I: a 4mm bone defect was created and the autologous bone tissue was implanted, covered by a mucoperiosteal flap. Group II: as a negative control, the same procedure was performed, but without implanting bone tissue. Group III: as a positive control, native non-operated rabbits were used. Bone density was studied 6 months after implantation by using computed tomography, expressed in Hounsfield units, and both sides of the palate -operated and control side- were compared. Results. In group III -positive control-, the bone density was similar in both sides of the palate (p>0.05). In contrast, negative controls corresponding to group II showed a statistically significant bone density difference between the right and the left palate (p<0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between both sides of the palate in group I (p>0.05). Conclusion. Computed tomography and data analysis in Hounsfield units suggest that grafting tissue-engineered bone substitutes contributes to improved bone quality and density in palatal bone defects created in laboratory rabbits.

Bibliographic References

  • Amin K, Khor WS, Rosich-Medina A, Beale V. Alveolar Bone Grafting: Donor Site Review of 100 Consecutive Cases in Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26506046
  • Arangio P, Marianetti TM, Tedaldi M, Ramieri V, Cascone P. Early secondary alveoloplasty in cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19(5):1364-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18812864 http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/ovftpdfs/FPDDNCJCGDOHFF00/fs046/ovft/live/gv025/00001665/00001665-200809000- 00025.pdf
  • Arosarena OA. Cleft lip and palate. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007;40(1):27-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17346560
  • Bousdras VA, Ayliffe PR, Barrett M, Hopper C. Esthetic and functional rehabilitation in patients with cleft lip and palate. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2015;5(1):108- 11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26389047 http://www.amsjournal.com/article.asp?issn=2231-0746;year=2015;volume=5;issue=1;spage=108;epage=111;aulast=Bousdras
  • Cho-Lee GY, Garcia-Diez EM, Nunes RA, et al. Review of secondary alveolar cleft repair. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013;3(1):46- 50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23662259 http://www.amsjournal.com/article.asp?issn=22310746;year=2013;volume=3;issue=1;spage=46;epage=50;aulast=Cho%2D Lee
  • Cune MS, Meijer GJ, Koole R. Anterior tooth replacement with implants in grafted alveolar cleft sites: a case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(5):616- 24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15355405 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.16000501.2004.01052.x/abstract http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01052.x/asset/j.1600-0501.2004.01052.x.pdf?v=1&t=ir6i9rxk&s=b28b7caf610fea46376bf53df4ef7e4a702a8090
  • Le BT, Woo I. Alveolar cleft repair in adults using guided bone regeneration with mineralized allograft for dental implant site development: a report of 2 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(8):1716- 22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19615587 http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0278239109005126/1-s2.0- S0278239109005126-main.pdf?tid=797ff066-54dc-11e6- ad65-00000aacb361&acdnat=1469721839_0b2cbae8833f68a 8c949954c7ac56049
  • Matsui Y, Ohno K, Nishimura A, et al. Long-term study of dental implants placed into alveolar cleft sites. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44(4):444-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17608551
  • Muzaffar AR, Warren A, Baker CL. Use of the On-Q Pain Pump in Alveolar Bone Grafting: Effect on Hospital Length of Stay. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(2):e23-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25531732
  • Nieto-Aguilar R, Serrato D, Garzon I, Campos A, Alami- nos M. Pluripotential differentiation capability of human adipose-derived stem cells in a novel fibrin-agarose scaffold. J Biomater Appl. 2011;25(7):743-68. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20237181 http://jba.sagepub.com/content/25/7/743.full.pdf
  • Pessoa EA, Braune A, Casado PL, Tannure PN. Alveolar Bone Graft: Clinical Profile and Risk Factors for Complications in Oral Cleft Patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016. http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27427932
  • Raposo-Amaral CA, Denadai R, Chammas DZ, et al. Cleft Patient- Reported Postoperative Donor Site Pain Following Alveolar Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Grafting: Comparing Two Minimally Invasive Harvesting Techniques. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(7):2099- 103. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26413958 http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/ovftpdfs/FPDDNCJCGDOHFF00/fs047/ovft/live/gv024/00001665/00001665-201510000- 00014.pdf
  • Semb G. Alveolar bone grafting. Front Oral Biol. 2012;16:124- 36. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22759676 http://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/337666
  • Stanko P, Mracna J, Stebel A, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells a promising perspective in the orofacial cleft surgery. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2013;114(2):50-2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23331197
  • Tavakolinejad S, Ebrahimzadeh Bidskan A, Ashraf H, Hamidi Alamdari D. A glance at methods for cleft palate repair. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(9):e15393. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25593724 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4270645/pdf/ ircmj-16-09-15393.pdf
  • Wu J, Wang G. [Evaluation of orthodontic teeth moving in bone graft area by dental CT]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012;30(4):383-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22934494
  • Yilmaz S, Kilic AR, Keles A, Efeoglu E. Reconstruction of an alveolar cleft for orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117(2):156- 63. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10672215 http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0889540600702265/1-s2.0-S0889540600702265-main.pdf?_tid=f9c9029e-54dc11e6845800000aacb35d&acdnat=1469722054_ e026586d0100ff34bb4a939f58f8d573
Data source: Dialnet