Driver eXperience (DX)Una aproximación a la interacción en el vehículo

  1. Guzmán, Juan S. 1
  2. Toledo, Isabela 1
  3. Luna-García, Huizilopoztli 2
  4. Collazos, César Alberto 1
  1. 1 Universidad del Cauca, Colombia
  2. 2 Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, México
Revue:
Revista Colombiana de Computación

ISSN: 1657-2831,  2539-2115

Année de publication: 2020

Titre de la publication: Colombian Journal of Computing

Volumen: 21

Número: 2

Pages: 83-91

Type: Article

DOI: 10.29375/25392115.4036 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista Colombiana de Computación

Résumé

La Experiencia de Usuario (UX) ha tenido un crecimiento en diferentes campos de la industria automotriz. Los vehículos se han convertido en un mundo lleno de oportunidades que le permiten al conductor sumergirse en un entorno de conectividad, comunicación, información y entretenimiento. Por lo tanto, es importante comenzar a darle al usuario un estudio más contextualizado, en donde no sea tratado como un individuo en general, sino más bien, por lo que realmente es, un conductor, con atributos y acciones propias de su rol en el vehículo. Este artículo presenta una definición subjetiva del término Driver eXperience (DX), y un conjunto de factores para tener en cuenta a fin de mejorar la relación vehículo-conductor, y así, brindarle al usuario una aproximación más comprensiva. Adicionalmente, se presenta un mapeo de la literatura de UX en la industria automotriz para entender la relevancia que puede tener introducir el término de DX.

Références bibliographiques

  • Referencias Alben, L. (1996). Quality of experience: defining the criteria for effective interaction design. Interactions, 3(3), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/235008.235010
  • Battarbee, K. (2004). Co-experience: understanding user experiences in interaction [University of Art and Design Helsinki]. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/11462
  • Blackwell, A. F., & Fincher, S. (2010). PUX: patterns of user experience. Interactions, 17(2), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/1699775.1699782
  • Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252116
  • Boehm-Davis, D. A., Green, P. A., Hada, H., Marcus, A., & Wheatley, D. (2003). The next revolution: Vehicle user-interfaces and the global rider/driver experience. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 708–709. https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.765941
  • Borchers, J. O., & Thomas, J. C. (2001). Patterns: what’s in it for HCI? CHI ’01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’01, 225. https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634201
  • Bosley, J. J. (2013). Creating a Short Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX) Scale. Interacting with Computers, 25(4), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwt007
  • Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. En P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis Ltd.
  • Brookhuis, K. A., & de Waard, D. (2010). Monitoring drivers’ mental workload in driving simulators using physiological measures. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(3), 898–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.001
  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2012). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609–1630. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22688
  • da Silva, F. P. (2014). Mental Workload, Task Demand and Driving Performance: What Relation? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 162, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.212
  • Eggermeier, F. T., Gleen, W. F., Kramer, A. F., & Damos, D. L. (1991). Workload assessment in multi-task environments. En D. L. Damos (Ed.), Multiple Task Performance (pp. 207–216).
  • Forlizzi, J., & Battarbee, K. (2004). Understanding experience in interactive systems. Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Designing interactive systems processes, practices, methods, and techniques - DIS ’04, 261. https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013152
  • Gefen, Karahanna, & Straub. (2003). Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
  • Habib, K., Shalkamy, A., & El-Basyouny, K. (2019). Investigating the Effects of Mental Workload on Highway Safety. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2673(7), 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119846474
  • Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience - a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330331
  • Hellweger, S., & Wang, X. (2015). What is User Experience Really: towards a UX Conceptual Framework. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.01850
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 9241-11:2018: Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en
  • Kaiser, T., Perterer, N., Meschtrcherjakov, A., & Mirning, A. (2016). Car User Experience Patterns: A Pattern Collection in Progress. The Eighth International Conferenceon Pervasive Patterns and Applications.
  • Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Martens, J.-B. (2009). User experience over time. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI 09, 729. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518814
  • Law, E. L.-C., van Schaik, P., & Roto, V. (2014). Attitudes towards user experience (UX) measurement. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72(6), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.09.006
  • Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
  • Lewis, M., Sycara, K., & Walker, P. (2018). The Role of Trust in Human-Robot Interaction. En H. A. Abbass, J. Scholz, & D. J. Reid (Eds.), Foundations of Trusted Autonomy. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (pp. 135–159). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64816-3_8
  • Li, R., Chen, Y. V., Sha, C., & Lu, Z. (2017). Effects of interface layout on the usability of In-Vehicle Information Systems and driving safety. Displays, 49, 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2017.07.008
  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
  • Medina-Lopez, C., Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Alfalla-Luque, R. (2010). Una propuesta metodológica para la realización de búsquedas sistemáticas de bibliografía (A methodological proposal for the systematic literature review). WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 1(2), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v1i2.786
  • Michon, J. A. (1985). A Critical View of Driver Behavior Models: What Do We Know, What Should We Do? En L. Evans & R. C. Schwing (Eds.), Human Behavior and Traffic Safety (pp. 485–524). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2173-6_19
  • Norman, D., & Nielsen, J. (2014). The Definition of User Experience (UX). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/definition-user-experience/
  • Orlovska, J., Wickman, C., & Söderberg, R. (2018). Big data analysis as a new approach for usability attributes evaluation of user interfaces: an automotive industry context. En D. Marjanović, M. Štorga, N. Škec, S.;Bojčetić, & N. Pavković (Eds.), DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference (pp. 1651–1662). https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0243
  • Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0015
  • Raats, K., Fors, V., & Pink, S. (2020). Trusting autonomous vehicles: An interdisciplinary approach. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 7, 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100201
  • Ross, J. (2014). The Business Value of User Experience. http://www.infragistics.com/media/335732/the_business_value_of_user_experience-3.pdf
  • Shimizu, K. (2017). Technological development in automotive industry and transformation in corporate governance system. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 6(3), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgr_v6_i3_p5
  • Tscheligi, M. (2012). UX Design for vehicles [Conference presentation]. AutomotiveUI ’12: International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. http://www.auto-ui.org/12/adjunct-proceedings/t5-ux-design-vehicles-tscheligi.pdf
  • van Schaik, P., & Ling, J. (2008). Modelling user experience with web sites: Usability, hedonic value, beauty and goodness. Interacting with Computers, 20(3), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.03.001
  • Wang, B., Hensher, D. A., & Ton, T. (2002). Safety in the road environment: A driver behavioural response perspective. Transportation, 29(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015661008598
La source de données: Dialnet