Los reflejos del patriarcado en la comunicación

  1. Juan Carlos Suárez Villegas
  2. Sergio Marín Conejo
Aldizkaria:
Ambitos: Revista internacional de comunicación

ISSN: 1988-5733,  1139-1979

Argitalpen urtea: 2023

Zenbakia: 59

Orrialdeak: 13-23

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.12795/AMBITOS.2023.I59.01 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Ambitos: Revista internacional de comunicación

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

This article analyses some issues in which the presumptions of patriarchy are still perceived in communication. Specifically, it focuses on the construction of gender identity in the model of patriarchal heteronormativity and the treatment of gender violence. A micromachist (instances of male chauvinism) gaze persists, illustrating the persistence of an inequality that has been filtered through the times of political correctness. Reversing these cultural inertias requires communicative creativity in order to highlight other ways of approaching the problems, with a broader vision than the episodic account of these events that allows us to reach the cultural roots of these problems. The media manage the symbolic wealth of gender identities in the social imaginary. We propose an integrating vision of equality that overcomes the hierarchical vision between the qualities associated with the masculine and the feminine in a common vital horizon of the human. This mutation of machismo in democratic times can be more difficult to detect and combat because it is integrated into social dynamics and is made invisible. This article reviews in four points these patriarchal reflexes in the communication realm that still persist today based on some cases and, in its conclusion, it exposes the failure of the patriarchal model of masculinity

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Aparisi-Miralles, A. (2016). Discursos de género: el modelo de la igualdad en la diferencia. Arbor, 192 (778), 303-311. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2016.778n2006
  • Benhabib, S. y Cornell, D. (1990). Teoría Crítica y Teoría Feminista. Alfonso el Magnánim.
  • Benjamin, H. (1968). Il fenomeno transessuale. Rapporto scientifico sul transessualismo e sui cambiamenti di sesso. Astrolabio.
  • Bisogno, F. & Ronzon, F. (2007). Altri generi. Inversioni e variazioni di genere tra culture. Il Dito e la Luna.
  • Bonino, L. (1998). Desvelando los micromachismos en la vida conyugal. https://bit.ly/3V1ripi
  • Bourdieu, P. (1999). Razones prácticas. Sobre la teoría de la acción. Anagrama.
  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
  • Cavendish, M. (1655). Philosophical and Physical Opinions. J. Martin and J. Allestrye.
  • Cazés, M. (2007). Edición crítica de obras feministas de François Poullain de la Barre. UNAM-CIICH.
  • Goffman, E. (1976). Gender Advertisements. Harper and Row.
  • Goffman, E. (2012). La presentación de la persona en la vida cotidiana. Amorrortu.
  • Levitt, H.M. & Ippolito, M.R. (2014) Being Transgender: The Experience of Transgender Identity Development. Journal of Homosexuality, 61(12), 1727-1758. https:// doi.org/ 10.1080/00918369.2014 .951262
  • Lingiardi, V. (2012). Scarti di genere: percorsi diagnostici, paesaggi uman. Educazione sentimentale, 18(2), 65-79. https:// doi.org/ 10.3280/ EDS2012 -018008
  • Molina, S. y Porras, L. (2011). Manual de Género para Periodistas. PNUD. https://bit.ly/3V7kYMU
  • Ruspini, E. (2003). Le identità di genere. Carocci.
  • Weber, M. y García, J. A. (2012). Sociología del poder: Los Tipos de Dominación. Alianza Editorial
Datuen iturria: Dialnet