Affiliative Stimuli as Primers to Prosocial Predispositions

  1. Souza, Gabriela Guerra Leal 1
  2. Pereira, Mirtes Garcia 2
  3. Vila Castellar, Jaime 3
  4. Oliveira, Letícia 2
  5. Volchan, Eliane 4
  1. 1 Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
    info

    Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto

    Ouro Preto, Brasil

    ROR https://ror.org/056s65p46

  2. 2 Universidade Federal Fluminense
    info

    Universidade Federal Fluminense

    Niterói, Brasil

    ROR https://ror.org/02rjhbb08

  3. 3 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  4. 4 Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
    info

    Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

    Río de Janeiro, Brasil

    ROR https://ror.org/03490as77

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 15

Número: 1

Páginas: 237-243

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/REV_SJOP.2012.V15.N1.37315 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Affiliative stimuli are pleasant and highly biologically relevant. Affiliative cues are thought to elicit a prosocial predisposition. Here affiliative and neutral pictures were exposed prior to a reaction time task which consisted in responding to a visual target. Half the participants responded with finger-flexion, a movement frequently involved in prosocial activities. The other half responded with finger extension, a less prosocially compatible movement. Results showed that under the exposure to affiliative pictures, as compared to neutral ones, participants who used finger flexion were faster, while those using finger extension were slower. Performance benefits to the task, when flexing the finger, together with performance costs, when extending it, indicate the relevance of movement compatibility to the context. These findings put forward a possible link between affiliative primers and motor preparation to facilitate a repertoire of movements related to prosocial predispositions including finger flexion.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

This research was supported by FAPERJ, CNPq, CAPES, CNC and FINEP.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.106.3.529
  • Azevedo, T. M., Volchan, E., Imbiriba, L. A., Rodrigues, E. C., Oliveira, J. M., Oliveira, L.... & Vargas, C. D. (2005). A freezing-like posture to pictures of mutilation. Psychophysiology, 42, 255-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00287.x
  • Blakemore, S. J., Bristow, D., Bird, G., Frith, C., & Ward, J. (2005). Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision-touch synaesthesia. Brain 128, 1571-1583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh500
  • Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 276-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1528-3542.1.3.276
  • Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment mannequin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49-59.
  • Brosch, T., Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2007). That baby caught my eye... Attention capture by infant faces. Emotion, 7, 685-689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.685
  • Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002007
  • Dreisbach, G. (2006). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: The costs and benefits of reduced maintenance capability. Brain and Cognition, 60, 11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2005.08.003
  • Duckworth, K. L., Bargh, J. A., Garcia, M., & Chaiken, S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 13, 513-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00490
  • Dunbar, R. I. (2010). The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 260-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.001
  • Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis) match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 260-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262
  • Elliot, A. J. (2008). Approach and avoidance motivation. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 3-16). New York, NY: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Facchinetti, L. D., Imbariba, L. A., Azevedo, T. M., Vargas, C. D., & Volchan, E. (2006). Postural modulation induced by pictures depicting prosocial or dangerous contexts. Neuroscience Letters, 410, 52-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.063
  • Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122
  • Lang, P. J., & Bradley, M. M. (2008). Appetitive and defensive motivation is the substrate of emotion. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 51-56). New York, NY: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1990). Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychological Review, 97, 377-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.377
  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report A-4. The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
  • Lloyd, D. M. (2009). The space between us: A neurophilosophical framework for the investigation of human interpersonal space. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 297-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.007
  • Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C M. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16, 6-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00772.x
  • Nelson, H., & Geher, G. (2007). Mutual grooming in human dyadic relationships: An ethological perspective. Current Psychology, 26, 121-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-007-9009-3
  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
  • Over, H., & Carpenter, M. (2009). Einghteen-month-old infants show increased helping following priming with affiliation. Psychological Science, 20, 1189-1193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02419.x
  • Pereira, M. G., Volchan, E., de Souza, G. G. L., Oliveira, L., Campagnoli, R., Machado-Pinheiro, W., & Pessoa, L. (2006). Sustained and transient modulation of performance induced by emotional picture viewing. Emotion, 6, 622-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.622
  • Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press Inc.
  • Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 28-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.1.28
  • Smith, J. C., Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J (2005). State anxiety and affective physiology: Effects of sustained exposure to affective pictures. Biological Psychology, 69, 247-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.09.001
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet