ICT use and perceived effectiveness in an adult EFL learning context

  1. Hughes, Stephen Pearse
  2. Tulimirovic, Bojana
Revista:
LFE: Revista de lenguas para fines específicos

ISSN: 1133-1127

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 21

Número: 1

Páginas: 15-40

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: LFE: Revista de lenguas para fines específicos

Resumen

Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are firmly established in language learning contexts, yet there are still many questions in relation to how widely they are employed and, indeed, how useful they are in developing all aspects of communicative competence. With a cohort of four teachers and one hundred students, we examine learners’ digital habits and their perceived usefulness of online computer-assisted language training in an official state-funded language school for adults. Perceptions from students were collected through an anonymous questionnaire with open and closed questions in relation to how often they used ICTs and how useful the level of usefulness of these technologies.  This information was complemented by data obtained from teachers by means of a semi-structured interview. In general, teachers and students coincide in their belief that ICTs are useful for language learning, but also express difficulties in finding appropriate resources, despite (or even as a result of) the vast number of available websites and pages. Results from students point to a tendency to use ICTs mostly to improve pronunciation, listening comprehension, and reading and less for oral interaction. In addition, the frequency with which female participants use ICTs to improve oral expression, reading and grammar is significantly higher than male students. This study concludes by drawing attention to the need for training of students and teachers in ICT use and to the desirability of following a sound and shared policy in language learning contexts.DOI: 10.20420/rlfe.2015.0002

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Al-Qudah, F. (2012). Improving English pronunciation through computer-assisted programs in Jordanian universities. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 9(3), 201–207.
  • Arslan, R.S. & Şahin-Kizil, K. (2010). How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 183-197. http://dx.doi.org /10.1080/09588221.2010.486575.
  • Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: an introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
  • Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(1), 21–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958.
  • Bodnar, S., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & van Hout, R. (2014). Evaluating the motivational impact of CALL systems: current practices and future directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.927365.
  • Bueno, M.C. & López, M.V. (2014). Evaluation of a blended language language course: Students' perceptions of appropriateness for the development of skills and language areas. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6) 509-527. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/09588221.2013.770037
  • Chao, Y. & Lo, H. (2011). Students' perceptions of Wiki-based collaborative writing for learners of English as a foreign language. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 395-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820903298662.
  • Chen, C. E., Cheng, W. E. (2008). Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes. Language Learning & Technology, 12(2), 94-112.
  • Cowie, N., Sakui, K. (2013): It’s never too late. ELT Journal, 67(4), 459-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1 093/elt/cct037.
  • Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L., & Molka-Danielsen, J (2009). Designing oral participation in Second Life - a comparative study of two language proficiency courses. ReCALL, 22(2), 206-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000196.
  • Dudeney, G., Hockly, N. (2012). ICT in ELT: how did we get here and where are we going? ELT Journal, 66(4), 533-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs050.
  • Evans, M. (2009). Digital technology and language learning: a review of policy and research evidence. In M. Evans (ed.) Foreign language learning with digital technology (pp. 7-31). London: Continuum.
  • Gallego, M. J. (2011). La integración de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en los centros educativos. In M. Cebrían de la Serna, & M. J. Gallego (Coords), Procesos educativos con TIC en la sociedad del conocimiento (pp. 33-43). Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.
  • Harris, A. Allsop, A, & Sparks, N. (2013). Leading the improving department: A handbook of staff activities. New York: Routledge.
  • Hismanoglu, H. (2012). An investigation of pronunciation learning strategies of Advanced EFL learners. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 43, 246-257.
  • Hockly, N. (2011). The digital generation. In ELT Journal, 65(3), 322-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr041.
  • Hourigan, T. & Murray, L. (2010). Using blogs to help language students to develop reflective learning strategies: Towards a pedagogical framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 209-225.
  • Huang, H. (2013). E-reading and e-discussion: EFL learners' perceptions of an e-book reading program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 258-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.10 80/09588221.2012.656313.
  • Hughes, S. (2007). The identification of quality indicators in English Language Teaching: A study in compulsory and non-compulsory secondary level language education in the province of Granada. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Granada: Universidad de Granada.
  • Jauregi, K., de Graaff, R., van den Bergh, H., & Kriz, M. (2012). Native/non-native speaker interactions through video-web communication: a clue for enhancing motivation? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.201 1.582587.
  • Jung, S. (2006). The use of ICT in learning English as an international language. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Maryland College Park, U.S.A. Accessed 14 December, 2014 from http://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/3885 .
  • Kavaliauskienė, G. (2008). Podcasting: a tool for improving listening skills. Teaching English with Technology. Accessed 28 December, 2008, from http://tewtjournal.org/issues/past-issue-2008/past-issue-2008-issue-4/.
  • Kennedy, T., Wellman, B., & Klement, K. (2003). Gendering the Digital Divide. IT & Society 1, 149–72.
  • Kessler, G. (2010). Fluency and anxiety in self-access speaking tasks: The influence of environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(4), 361–375. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/09588221.2010.512551.
  • Lee, L. (2004). Learners’ perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning and Technology, 8(1), 83–100.
  • Liaw, M. (2006). E-learning and the development of intercultural competence. Language learning & Technology, 10(3), 49-64.
  • Lim, K., & Shen, H. (2006). Integration of computers into an EFL reading classroom. ReCALL, 18(2), 212–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344006000528.
  • Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14-29. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2167/illt040.0.
  • McBride, K. (2011). The effect of rate of speech and distributed practice on the development of listening comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 131-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.528777.
  • MECD (2014). Datos y cifras: Curso escolar 2014/2015. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. Madrid: Subdirección General de Documentación y Publicaciones.
  • Morton, H. & Jack, M. (2010). Speech interactive computer-assisted language learning: a cross-cultural evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(4), 295-319. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/09588221.2010.493524.
  • Pelgrum, W. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers and Education, 82(5), 163-178.
  • Razagifard, P., Razzaghifard, V. (2011). Corrective feedback in a computer-mediated communicative context and the development of second language grammar. Teaching English with Technology, 11(2), 1-17.
  • Richards, C. (2005). The design of effective ICT-supported learning activities: exemplary models, changing requirements, and new possibilities. Language learning& Technology, 9(1), 60-79.
  • Seferolu, G. (2005). Improving students’ pronunciation through accent reduction software. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 303–316.
  • Shang, H. (2007). An exploratory study of e-mail application on FL writing performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 79-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0958822060 1118479.
  • Shih, Y. (2013). A virtual walk through London: culture learning through a cultural immersion experience. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Accessed 14 December, 2014 from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09588221.2013.8 51703#. VQnlL2xFAcB
  • Vanderlinde, R., Dexter, S., & van Braak, J. (2012). School-based ICT policy plans in primary education: Elements, typologies and underlying processes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 505-519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01191.x
  • Vetter, A. & Chanier, T. (2006). Supporting oral production for professional purposes in synchronous communication with heterogenous learners. ReCALL, 18(1), 5-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344006000218.
  • Weng, S., Smith, S. (2013). Reading and grammar learning through mobile phones. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 117-134.
  • Yang, Y., Gamble, J., & Tang, S. (2012). Voice over instant messaging as a tool for enhancing the oral proficiency and motivation of English-as-a-foreign-language learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 448–464. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01204.x
  • Yip, F., & Kwan, A. (2006). Online vocabulary games as a tool for teaching and learning English vocabulary. Educational Media International, 43(3), 233-249.
  • Young, S.S. (2003). Integrating ICT into second language education in a vocational high school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4) 447–461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00049.x.
  • Yunus, M., Nordin, N., Salehi, H. Sun, C., & Amin, M. (2013). Pros and Cons of Using ICT in Teaching ESL Reading and Writing. International Education Studies, 6(7), 119-130. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5539/ies.v6n7p119.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet