Razonamiento algebraico en educación primariaUn reto para la formación inicial de profesores

Referencias bibliográficas

• Amit M., Neria D. (2008): Rising to the challenge: using generalization in pattern problems to unearth the algebraic skills of talented pre-algebra students. ZDM. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 11-119.
• Asquith P., Stephens A., Knuth E., Alibali M. (2007):Middle school mathematics teachers’ knowledge of students’ understanding of core algebraic concepts: equal sign and variable. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 249-272.
• Ball D. L., Thames M. H., Phelps G. (2008): Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special?. Journal of Teacher Education,59(5), 389-407.
• Beker J. R., Rivera F. D. (2008):Generalization in algebra: the foundation of algebraic thinking and reasoning across the grades. ZDM. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 1.
• Blanton M. L., Kaput J.J. (2005): Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 412-446.
• Britt M., Irwin K. (2008): Algebraic thinking with and without algebraic representation: a three-year longitudinal study. ZDM. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 39-53.
• Burkhardt H. (2001): Algebra for all: What does it mean? How are we doing? En: H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, J. Vincent (eds.) The future of the teaching and learning of algebra, Vol. 1, pp. 140-146. University of Melbourne, Australia.
• Carpenter T., Levi L., Franke M.L., Zeringue J.K. (2005):Algebra in elementary school: Developing relational thinking. ZDM. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37, 53-59.
• Carraher D. W., Schlieman A. (2007):Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. En: F. Lester (ed.) Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Vol. 2, 669-705. Information Age Publishing, Inc. y NCTM, Greenwich.
• Castro W., Godino J.D. (2009): Cognitive configurations of pre-service teachers when solving an arithmetic-algebraic problem. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of European Research in Mathematics Education. Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France. Disponible en Internet: http://www.ugr.es/local/jgodino/indice_eos.htm.
• Davis R. B. (1989): Theoretical considerations: Research studies in how humans think about algebra. En: S. Wagner, C. Kieran (eds.) Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra Vol. 4, 266-274. NCTM y Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Reston, VA.
• Derry S. J., Wilsman M. J., Hackbarth A. J. (2007):Using contrasting case activities to deepen teacher understanding of algebraic thinking and teaching. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 305-329.
• Filloy E.; Rojano T., Puig L..(2008). Educational Algebra: A theoretical and Empirical Approach (Vol. 43): Springer.
• Fong N. S. (2004):Developing algebraic thinking in early grades: A case study of the Singapore primary mathematics curriculum. The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 39-59.
• Fujii T., Stephens M. (2001):Fostering an understanding of algebraic generalisation through numerical expressions: The role of quasi-variables. En: H. L. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, J. Vincent (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th ICMI Study Conference. The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra, Vol. 1, 258-264. University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
• Godino J. D. (2009):Categorías de análisis de los conocimientos del profesor de matemáticas. UNIÓN Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Matemática, 20, 13-31.
• Godino J. D., Batanero C., Font V. (2007):The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. ZDMThe International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1-2), 127-135. [Versión ampliada en español: Un enfoque ontosemiótico del conocimiento y la instrucción matemática. Disponible en Internet: http://www.ugr.es/local/jgodino/indice_eos.htm]
• Godino J. D., Rivas M., Castro W. F., Konic P. (2008):Desarrollo de competencias para el análisis didáctico del profesor de matemáticas. Actas de las VI Jornadas de Educación Matemática Región de Murcia. Centro de Profesores y Recursos. Murcia. Disponible en Internet: http://www.ugr.es/local/jgodino/indice_eos.htm .
• Hill H. C., Ball D.L., Schilling S.G. (2008):Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers' topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,39, 372-400.
• Jaworski B. (2005):Tools and tasks for learning and meta-learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 359-361.
• Kaput J. J. (2000):Transforming algebra from an engine of inequity to an engine of mathematical power by "algebrafying" the K–12 curriculum. En: National Research Council (ed.) The nature and role of algebra in the K–14 curriculum: Proceedings of a National Symposium. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Disponible en http://eric.ed.gov/ (Eric # ED441664).
• Kieran C. (1996):The changing face of school algebra. En B. Hodgson, C. Alsina, J. Alvarez, C. Laborde, A. Pérez (eds.) 8vo Congreso Internacional de Educación Matemática: Selección de conferencias, 271-290. Sociedad Andaluza de Educación Matemática “Thales”, Sevilla, España.
• MacGregor M., Price E. (1999):An exploration of aspects of language proficiency and algebra learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(4), 449-467.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000): Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM, Reston, VA.
• Radford L. (2006):The anthropology of meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 39-65.
• Schoenfeld A. H., Kilpatrick J. (2008):Towards a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. En: D. Tirosh, T. Wood (eds.) Tools and Processes in Mathematics Teacher Education, 321-354. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.
• Shulman L. S. (1986):Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher,15(2), 4-14.
• Stephens A. C. (2006):Equivalence and relational thinking: Preservice elementary teachers’ awareness of opportunities and misconceptions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 249-278.
• Stump S. L., Bishop J. (2002): Preservice elementary and middle school teachers’ conceptions of algebra revealed through the use of exemplary curriculum materials. En: D. S. Mewborn, P. Sztajn, D. Y. White, H. G. Wiegel, R. L. Bryant, K. Nooney (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1903-1914, PME, Columbus, OH.
• Van Dooren W., Verschaffel L., Onghema P. (2003): Pre-service teachers’ preferred strategies for solving arithmetic and algebra word problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 27-52.
• Vergnaud G. (1988): Long terme et court terme dans l’apprentissage de l'algèbre. En: C. Laborde, N. Balacheff (eds.) Actes du Premier Colloque Franco-Allemand de Didactique des Mathématiques et de l’informatique, 189-199, La Pensée Sauvage, Grenoble, Paris.
• Watanabe T. (2008): Algebra in elementary school: A Japanese perspective. En: C. E. Greenes, R. Rubenstein (eds.) Algebra and Algebraic Thinking in School Mathematics, 183-193. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
• Wubbels T., Korthagen F., Broekman H. (1997):Preparing teachers for realistic mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 1-28.