Eficacia de un programa de intervención para la integración de procesos cognitivos superiores en la formación en didáctica de una lengua extranjera

  1. Elvira Barrios 1
  2. Francisca Zaragoza-Canales 1
  3. María-José Carrillo-López 1
  4. Aurora Carretero-Ramos 1
  5. Natalia Martínez-León 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Málaga, España
Revista:
Revista de investigación en educación

ISSN: 1697-5200 2172-3427

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 13

Número: 1

Páginas: 121-137

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de investigación en educación

Resumen

Este artículo presenta un estudio destinado a evaluar la eficacia de una intervención dirigida a capacitar a futuros docentes de inglés en la incorporación a la enseñanza de un idioma de propuestas orientadas a desarrollar procesos cognitivos superiores. El estudio adoptó un diseño cuasi-experimental de grupo de control no equivalente con medidas pretest y postest. Los datos fueron analizados mediante procedimientos de estadística descriptiva e inferencial. Los resultados evidencian la eficacia de la intervención al constatar que, tras la intervención, se produce en el grupo experimental una mejora sensible de las tres medidas utilizadas en la dirección promovida por el programa, con diferencias pretest-postest estadísticamente significativas, mientras que, por el contrario, no se encuentran tales diferencias en ninguna de las variables en relación al grupo de control.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adey, P., Robertson, A. y Venville, G. (2001). Let’s Think!. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
  • Adey, P. (2006). A model for the professional development of teachers of thinking.Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 49-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2005.07.002
  • Allen, L. (2004). Implementing a culture portfolio project within a constructivist paradigm. Foreign Language Annals, 37 (2), 232-239. DOI:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02196.x
  • Alnofaie, H. (2012). An investigation of the effects of critical thinking on thequality of classroom discussions: A case study. En A. Akbarov (Ed.). Approaches and methods in second and foreign language teaching (pp. 257-266). Sarajevo: IBU.
  • American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  • Anderson, L.W. y Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.), (2001).A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.
  • Bagnall, R. (2000). Lifelong learning and the limits of economic determinism.International Journal of Longlife Education, 19 (1), 20-35. DOI:10.1080/026013700293430
  • Beckett, G. y Slater, T. (2005). The project framework: A too for language, content, and skills integration. ELT Journal, 59 (2), 108-116. DOI:10.1093/eltj/cci024
  • Beyer, B.K. (1997).Improving student thinking: A comprehensive approach. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Beyer, B.K. (2001).Teaching Thinking SkillsDefining the Problem. En A.L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd ed.) (pp. 35-41). Alexandria, Virginia USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Bloom, B. (1956).Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I. Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.
  • Bümen, N.T. (2007). Effects of the original versus revised Bloom's Taxonomy on lesson planning skills: A Turkish study among pre-service teachers. Review of Education, 53, 439-455. DOI:10.1007/s11159-007-9052-1
  • Burke, L.A. y Williams, J.M. (2008). Developing young thinkers: An intervention aimed to enhance children’s thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3 (2), 104-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.01.001
  • Byrd, P.A. (2002). The Revised Taxonomy and Prospective Teachers. Theory Into Practice, 41 (4), 244-248. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_7
  • Campbell, D.T. y Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research on Teaching. En N.L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 171-246). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Revised Edition. New York: Academic Press.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Comisión Europea (2012). Convocatoria de propuestas 2013EAC/507/12. Programa de Aprendizaje Permanente. (2012/c 232/04). Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. 3 de agosto de 2012.
  • Corbalán Berná, J. y Limiñana Gras, R.M. (2010). El genio en una botella. El test CREA, las preguntas y la creatividad. Introducción al monográfico “El test CREA, inteligencia creativa”. Anales de Psicología, 26 (2), 197-205.
  • Corbalán, F.J., Martínez, F., Donolo, D., Tejerina M. y Limiñana, R.M. (2003). CREA Inteligencia Creativa. Una medida cognitiva de la creatividad. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
  • Cornford, I.R. (2002).Learning-to-learn strategies as a basis for effective lifelong learning. International Journal of Longlife Education, 21 (4), 357-368. DOI: 10.1080/02601370210141020
  • Cross, J. (2011). Metacognitive instruction for help ingless-skill edlisteners. ELT Journal, 65 (4), 408-416. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccq073
  • Csapó, B. y Nikolov, M. (2009).The cognitive contribution to the development of proficiency in a foreign language. Learning and Individual Differences, 19 (2), 209-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.01.002
  • Dantas-Whitney, M. (2002). Critical reflection in the second language classroom through audio taped journals. System, 30, 543-555. DOI: 10.1016/S0346251X(02)00046-5
  • De Bono, E. (1985). The CoRT thinking program. En J.W. Segal, S.F. Chipman, y R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • De Bono, E. (1991). The direct teaching of thinking in education and the CoRT Method. En S. Maclure y P. Davies (Eds.). Learning to think: Thinking to learn (pp. 3-14). Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1999). National curriculum for modern foreign languages: Key Stages 34. London: DfEE y QCA.
  • Elisondo, R.C. y Donolo, D.S. (2010). ¿Creatividad o inteligencia? That is not the question. Anales de Psicología, 26 (2), 220-225.
  • Feuerstein, R. (1980). Instrumental Enrichment: An Intervention Programme for Cognitive Modifiability. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
  • Ferguson, C. (2002). Using the Revised Taxonomy to Plan and Deliver TeamTaught, Integrated, Thematic Units. Theory Into Practice, 41 (4), 238-243. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_6
  • Fung, D. y Howe, C. (2012). Liberal Studies in Hong Kong: A new perspective on critical thinking through group work. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7 (2), 101-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.002
  • Hashemi, M. y Ghanizadeh, A. (2012). Critical discourse analysis and critical thinking: An experimental study in an EFL context. System, 40 (1), 37-47. DOI: 10.1016%2Fj.system.2012.01.009
  • Landis, J.R. y Koch, G.G. (1977).The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159174. DOI: 10.2307/2529310
  • Li, L. (2011). Obstacles and opportunities for developing thinking through interaction in language classrooms. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6 (3), 146-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2011.05.001
  • Lin, M. y Mackay, C. (2004). Thinking through modern foreign languages. Cambridge: Chris Kingston.
  • López Martínez, O. y Navarro Lozano, J. (2008). Estudio comparativo de medidas de creatividad: TTCT vs. CREA. Anales de Psicología, 24 (1), 138-142.
  • Marzano, R.J., Brandt, R.S., Hughes, C.S., Jones, F., Presseisen, B.Z., Rankin, S.C. y Suhor, C. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
  • Mayer, R.E. (2002). Rote Versus Meaningful Learning. Theory Into Practice, 41 (4), 226-232. DOI:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4
  • McGuinness, C. (1999). From thinking skills to thinking classrooms: A review and evaluation of approaches for developing pupils’ thinking. Nottingham: DfEE.
  • McGuinness, C. (2005). Teaching thinking; theory and practice. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, 3 Pedagogy-Teaching for Learning, 1 (1), 107-126.
  • Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 (2), 137-168. DOI: 10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137
  • Mercer, N., Wegerif, R. y Dawes, L. (1999). Children's Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom. British Edu cational Research Journal, 25 (1), 95111. DOI:10.1080/0141192990250107
  • Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Higgins, S., Lin, M., Miller, J., Newton, D. et al. (2004). Thinking Skill Frameworks for Post-16 Learners: An Evaluation. A Research Report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
  • Näsström, G. (2009). Interpretation of standards with Bloom’s revised taxonomy: A comparison of teachers and assessment experts. International Journal of Research y Method in Education, 32 (1), 39-51. DOI: 10.1080/17437270902749262
  • Nickerson, R.S., Perkins, D.N. y Smith, E.E. (1985).Teaching thinking. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
  • Parlamento Europeo y Consejo de la Unión Europea (2006). Recomendación del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 18 de diciembre del 2006sobre las competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. L 394/10-18. 30 de diciembre del 2006.
  • Pica, T. (2000).Tradition and transition in English language teaching methodology. System, 28 (1), 1-18. DOI: 10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00057-3
  • Pintrich, P.R. (2002). The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41 (4), 219-225.
  • Porto, M. (2007). Learning diaries in the English as a foreign language classroom: A tool for access inglearners’ perceptions of lessons and developing learner autonomy and reflection. Foreign Language Annals, 40 (4), 672-696. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02887.x
  • Rahimi, M. (2013). Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students’ feedback and writing. Language Teaching Research, 17 (1), 67-89. DOI: 10.1177/1362168812459151
  • Raths, J. (2002). Improving Instruction. Theory Into Practice, 41 (4), 233-237. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_5
  • Resnick, L.B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research (Revised ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Sanz de Acedo Lizarraga, M.L., Sanz de Acedo Baquedano, M.T., Goicoa, T. y CardelleElawar, M. (2009). Enhancement of thinking skills: Effects of two intervention methods. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4 (1), 30-43.
  • Schwartz, R.J. (1987). Teaching for Thinking: A Developmental Model for the Infusion of Thinking Skills Into Mainstream Instruction. En J. Baron y R. Sternberg, Teacher Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice (pp. 106-126). New York: Freeman.
  • Schwartz, R. y Parks, D. (1994).Infusing the Teaching of Critical and Creative Thinking in Elementary Instruction. Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Press.
  • Sokol, A., Oget, D. Sonntag, M. y Khomenko, N. (2008). The Development of Inventive Thinking Skills in the Upper Secondary Language Classroom.Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3 (1), 34-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.001
  • Tishman, S., Perkins, D.N. y Jay, E. (1995).The Thinking Classroom: Learning and Teaching in a Culture of Thinking. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Tomic, W., Kingma, J. y Tenvergert, E.M. (1993). Training in measurement. Journal of Educational Research, 86 (6), 340-348. DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1993.9941227
  • Wegerif, R. (2010). Mind Expanding. Teaching for thinking and creativity in primary education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  • Zohar, A. (2006). El pensamiento de orden superior en las clases de ciencias: Objetivos, medios y resultados de investigación. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 24 (2), 157-172.