Уход от коммуникации в неприятном разговоре в русской коммуникативной культуре (на материале интернет-форумов)

  1. Kopylova, Tatiana 1
  2. Marynenko, Pavlo 2
  1. 1 Udmurt State University
    info

    Udmurt State University

    Izhevsk, Rusia

    ROR https://ror.org/00yp6m473

  2. 2 Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
    info

    Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

    Kiev, Ucrania

    ROR https://ror.org/02aaqv166

Journal:
Mundo eslavo

ISSN: 1579-8372

Year of publication: 2017

Issue Title: 150º aniversario de la publicación de la obra “Crimen y castigo” de Dostoievski

Issue: 16

Pages: 427-440

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Mundo eslavo

Abstract

The way to avoid communication is one of the frequent subjects of scientific research. This strategy allows communicants to stop unwanted communication and an unpleasant conversation. During some decades the study of an unpleasant conversation was limited to determine only forbidden subjects (taboos) which helped to avoid conflicts and misunderstandings. However, the modern communication is characterized by a new type of communicants, who do not maintain the interlocutor’s image, but preserve good self image and own communicative space. The development of the individualist culture of present-day society brings to the fact that a person does not want and does not consider necessary his remaining in an uncomfortable state of communication.This article deals with not just only topics of conversation which are potentially unpleasant for Russian-speaking communicants, but also with basic tactics which allow avoiding communication and are widely used in the contemporary Russian communicative culture.The material of the study consists of Internet forums texts where users discuss unpleasant topics of conversation and express different manners to avoid them in communication. The selection of this material is not random. First of all, the access to Internet communication allows to analyze a large number of texts and to obtain reliable results. On the other hand, Internet communication reflects the communicative culture of present-day native speakers. An important factor to choose the material for this research was also the peculiarity of Internet communication. Thus the anonymity allows users to answer sincerely for a moderator’s questions and to give examples from their personal lives.

Bibliographic References

  • (2002). Consejo de Europa. Marco Europeo Común de Referencia para las Lenguas: Aprendizaje, Enseñanza, Evaluación. Madrid.
  • Kopylova, T. (2016). Types of silence: approaches to classification. Bulletin Udmurt University, 26 (3), 80-85.
  • (2004). Человек, культура и общество в контексте глобализации современного мира, 3. Москва: Независимый институт гражданского общества.
  • Арапова, Н.С. (1990). Эвфемизмы. Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь. Москва: Советская энциклопедия.
  • Варбот, Ж.Ж. (1998). Табу. Русский язык. Энциклопедия. Москва: Дрофа.
  • Добреньков, В. И. (2006). Глобализация и Россия: социологический анализ. Москва: ИНФРА.
  • Замеченко, Н.И. (2015). Коммуникативные табу в немецкой и русской лингвокультурах. В мире науки и искусства: вопросы филологии, искусствоведения и культурологии. Новосибирск: СибАК, 23-32.
  • Кашкин, В. Б., Смоленцева Е.М. (2005). Этностереотипы и табуированные темы в межкультурной коммуникации. Культурные табу и их влияние на результат коммуникации. Воронеж: ВГУ, 246—252.
  • Крысин, Л.П. (1994). Эвфемизмы в современной русской речи. Русистика. Берлин, 1-2, 28-49.
  • Сидорова, М.Ю. (2006). Интернет-лингвистика: русский язык. Межличностное общение. Москва: 1989.ру.
  • Тер-Минасова, С. Г. (2000). Язык и межкультурная коммуникация. Москва: Слово
Data source: Dialnet