Analyzing and reducing plagiarism at university

  1. Jorge López Puga
Revista:
European journal of education and psychology

ISSN: 1888-8992,  1989-2209

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 7

Número: 2

Páginas: 131-140

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: European journal of education and psychology

Resumen

Plagiarism is one of the less desirable practises in the academic context. This paper presents an experience of massive plagiarism detection at university and the steps taken to prevent its subsequent occurrence. Plagiarism was detected in the first assessment phase of a research project practise. As a result, students were required to arrange ethical group discussions with the professor to prevent plagiarism in the future. A substantial reduction in the rate of plagiarism was observed from the first practical assessment to the second one, t(16)=2.5, p=.02, d=0.83, 1-?=.63, unilateral contrast. Additionally, a survey was developed to analyse students’ opinions and attitudes about plagiarism. A sample of 64 students (15 boys and 49 girls) with an average age of 22.69 (SD=2.8) filled in an electronic questionnaire. More than a half of the sample (56.92%) admitted that they had plagiarised before but most of the students (83.08%) agreed they would not like someone else plagiarising their reports. A preliminary short scale to measure attitude towards plagiarism in undergraduate students at university is provided. Finally, a set of recommendations are given based on this experience to prevent and to reduce the level of plagiarism in the university context.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abbott, A. (2012, May 17). Plagiarism charge for Romanian minister. Nature, 485, 289. doi:10.1038/485289a
  • American Psychological Association (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5 ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Psychological Association (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf (Originally published 2003)
  • American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6 ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Psychological Association Ethics Committee (1992). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.12.1597
  • Ariza, T., Quevedo-Blasco, M.P. y Buela-Casal, G. (2012). Analysis of Doctoral Programs with Mention of Quality. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 5(2), 107-119. doi: 10.1989/ejep.v5i2.95
  • Brennan, P. (2008, March 6). Duplication: most cases on database are innocent. Nature, 452, 29. doi:10.1038/452029d
  • Bruner, J. (2012). What psychology should study. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 5-13. doi: 10.4471/ijep.2012.01
  • Callaway, E. (2011, November 3). Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities. Nature, 479, 15. doi:10.1038/479015a
  • Corbyn, Z. (2012, October 4). Misconduct is the main cause of life-sciences retractions. Nature, 490, 21. doi:10.1038/490021a
  • Crocker, J. (2011, November 10). The road to fraud starts with a single step. Nature, 479, 151. doi:10.1038/479151a
  • David, D. (2008, March 6). Duplication spreads the word to a wider audience. Nature, 452, 29. doi:10.1038/452029b
  • Derby, B. (2008, March 6). Duplication and plagiarism increasing among students. Nature, 452, 29. doi:10.1038/452029c
  • Errami, M. & Garner, H. (2008, January 24). A tale of two citations. Nature, 451, 397-399. doi:10.1038/451397a
  • Fanelli, D. (2013, February 14). Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting. Nature, 494, 149. doi:10.1038/494149a
  • Fenner, M. (2008, March 6). Duplication: stop favouring applicant with longest list. Nature, 452. 29. doi:10.1038/452029a
  • López, J. (2011). Experiences encouraging creativity and team work in a content and language integrated learning framework at university. In I. Candel, L. Gómez & A. López (Eds.), ICERI2011 Proceedings CD (pp. 5543-5551). Valencia: International Association of Technology, Education and Development.
  • López, J. (2012). Introducción al análisis de datos con R y R Commander en psicología y educación. Almería: Editorial de la Universidad de Almería. Retreived from http://hdl.handle.net/10835/1658
  • Perfect, T.J. & Stark, L.J. (2012). Unconscious plagiarism in recall: attribution to the self, but not for self-relevant reasons. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8, 275-283. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v8i2.459
  • Reich, E.S. (2010, December 9). Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules. Nature, 468, 745. doi:10.1038/468745a
  • Sanz de Acedo, M.L. y Sanz de Acedo, M.T. (2013). How creative potential is related to metacognition. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 6(2), 69-81. doi: 10.1989/ejep.v6i2.104
  • Wicherts, J.M. (2011, December 1). Psychology must learn a lesson from fraud case. Nature, 480, 7. doi:10.1038/480007a
  • Yong, E. (2012, May 17). Bad copy. In the wake of high-profile controversies, psychologists are facing up to problems with replication. Nature, 485, 298-300. doi:10.1038/485298a
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet