"Material knowledges"Intra-acting van der Tuin’s new materialism with Barad’s agential realism

  1. Revelles-Benavente, Beatriz 1
  1. 1 Universitat de Barcelona. Departament d’Arts Visuals i Disseny
Revista:
Enrahonar: an international journal of theoretical and practical reason

ISSN: 0211-402X,  2014-881X

Año de publicación: 2018

Título del ejemplar: Epistemologies feministes

Número: 60

Páginas: 75-91

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5565/REV/ENRAHONAR.1190 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Enrahonar: an international journal of theoretical and practical reason

Resumen

Este artículo propone una discusión sobre la teoría del nuevo materialismo entendido por Iris van der Tuin conjuntamente con la teoría del realismo agencial de Karen Barad. El principal objetivo de este enfoque es encontrar prácticas diferenciales que ayuden a construir un giro hacia lo que se denomina ontología relacional, en la cual ética, epistemología, ontología y metodología se entienden como inseparables. Este nuevo paradigma transversal genera genealogías de filosofías minoritarias y teorías feministas para entender la materia como un entrelazamiento dinámico, agencial y relacional donde prácticas humanas y no humanas intraaccionan de una manera igualitaria. Así pues, el nuevo materialismo y el realismo agencial producen un punto de partida diferente parar generar conocimiento que, en lugar de pensar a través de entidades claramente diferenciadas, parten de estas relaciones como procesos dinámicos inseparables. Además de ofrecer un acercamiento a la materia como agente activo, estas teorías se amparan en un enfoque afirmativo del proceso de construcción teórica, alteran la noción clásica de linealidad y se alejan de binarios dicotómicos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BARAD, Karen (2001). “Re(Con)Figuring Space, Time, and Matter”. In: Desoven, Marianne (ed.). Feminist Locations: Global and Local, Theory and Practice, 75-109. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  • — (2003). “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28 (3), 801-831.
  • — (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • — (2010). “Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come”. Derrida Today, 3, 240-268.
  • — (2014). “Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart”. Parallax, 20 (3), 168-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
  • BRAIDOTTI, Rosi (1994). Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press
  • — (1996). Patterns of Dissonance. A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.
  • COLMAN, Felicity. (2014). Digital feminicty: Predication and measurement, materialist informatics and images. In: Revelles-Benavente, Beatriz; González, Ana M. & Nardini, Krizia (eds). New feminist materialism. Engendering an ethic-onto-epistemological methodology. Artnodes (14). https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i14.2410
  • DOLPHIJN, Rick & VAN DER TUIN, Iris (eds.). 2012. New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Open Humanities MPublishing, University of Michigan Library. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ohp;idno=11515701.0001.001
  • FOUCAULT, Michel (2013). Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. New York: Vintage.
  • HARAWAY, Donna (1988). “Situated Knowledges. The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”. Feminist Studies, 14 (3), 575-599.
  • — (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York & London: Routledge.
  • — (2015). “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin”. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159-165.
  • HARDING, Sandra (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • HEMMINGS, Clare (2011). Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.
  • HOEL, Aud Sissel & VAN DER TUIN, Iris (2013). “The Ontological Force of Technicity: Reading Cassirerand Simondon Diffractively”. Philosophy & Technology, 26, 187-202.
  • KAISER, Mara & THIELE, Kathrin (eds.) (2014). “Diffracted Worlds – Diffractive Readings: Onto-Epistemologies and the Critical Humanities”. Parallax, 20 (3), 165-167.
  • LYOTARD, Jean F. (1979). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • MASSUMI, Brian (2005). “Fear (the spectrum said)”. Positions: East Asia cultures critique, 13 (1), 31-48.
  • PALMER, Helen (2014). Deleuze and Futurism: A Manifesto for Nonsense. London: Bloomsbury Press.
  • PUAR, Jasbir (2007). Terrorist Assemblages: homonationalism in queer times. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.
  • REVELLES-BENAVENTE, Beatriz; GONZÁLEZ, Ana M. & NARDINI, Krizia. (2014). “Nuevo materialismo feminista: engendrar una metodología ético-onto-epistemológica”. Artnodes (14). https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i14.2410
  • RICH, Adrienne (1987). “Notes Towards a Politics of Location”. In: Blood, Bread and Poetry, 210- 232. London: Virago.
  • ROGOWSKA-STANGRET, Monika (2017). “Corpor(e)al Cartographies of New Materialism. Meeting the Elsewhere Halfway”. The Minnesota Review, 88, 59-68.
  • VAN DER TUIN, Iris (2008). “Deflationary Logic. Response to Sara Ahmed’s ‘Imaginary Prohibitions: Some Preliminary Remarks on the Founding Gestures of the ‘New Materialism’”. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 15 (4), 411-416.
  • — (2009a). “Jumping Generations: On Second- and Third-Wave Feminist Epistemology”. Australian Feminist Studies, 24 (59), 17-31.
  • — (2009b). The Arena of Feminism: Simone de Beauvoir and the History of Feminism. In: Buikema, Rosemarie & van der Tuin, Iris (eds.). Doing Gender in Media, Art and Culture. London & New York: Routledge, 7-23.
  • — (2011b). “‘A Different Starting Point, a Different Metaphysics’: Reading Bergson and Barad Diffractively”. Hypatia, 26 (1), 22-42.
  • — (2014). Diffraction as a Methodology for Feminist Onto-Epistemology: On Encountering Chantal Chawaf and Posthuman Interpellation. Parallax, 20 (3), 231-244.
  • — (2015). Generational Feminism: New Materialist Introduction to a Generative Approach. Maryland: Lexington Books.
  • — (2016a). “Reading Diffractive Reading: Where and When does Diffraction Happen?” Journal of Electronic Publishing 19 (2). At: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0019.205/--reading-diffractive-reading-where-and-when-does-diffraction?rgn=main;view=fulltext
  • — (2016b). “Microaggressions as New Political Material for Feminist Scholars and Activists: Perspectives from Continental Philosophy, the New Materialisms, and Popular Culture”. Australian Feminist Studies, 31 (89), 246-262.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet