La calidad en el Bloque Quirúrgico del Hospital Clínico San Cecilio. La perspectiva del cliente interno

  1. A. Danet-Danet 1
  2. A. Palacios-Córdoba 2
  3. J.C. March-Cerdá 1
  1. 1 Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, España
  2. 2 Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Granada, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, España
Journal:
Revista de calidad asistencial

ISSN: 1134-282X

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 32

Issue: 2

Pages: 73-81

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.CALI.2016.08.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista de calidad asistencial

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the quality of the services provided by the anaesthesia department of the San Cecilio Clinical University Hospital, from the health professionals’ point of view. Material and methods Location: Andalusia. Participants: 134 health professionals in contact with the hospital anaesthesia department. Tool: self-administered questionnaire, measuring: accessibility, personal treatment, comfort, scientific and technical quality (scale 1 to 5), overall satisfaction (scale 0 to 10), and suggestions for improvement. A descriptive statistical and correlation analysis were performed, including mean differences (by sex, frequency of contact with the anaesthesia department, and unit), as well as a regression model. Results The quality of personal treatment received a mean of 4.2 points (SD 0.651), the scientific and technical quality 4.00 points (SD 0.532), accessibility 3.3 (SD 0.795), professional comfort 3.30 (SD 0.988), and patient comfort 2.62 points (SD 1.051). Overall satisfaction obtained a mean of 7.1 points (0 to 10 scale). Women and professionals working in units with less than 10 people had a better general evaluation of the anaesthesia department. The worse perspective was that of staff with daily contact with the anaesthesia department. Among the suggestions for improvement there were: Reducing waiting lists, creating special rooms to give information to families, improving working conditions, training and work satisfaction for staff, and achieving better communication and collaboration between health professionals. Conclusions The internal evaluation shows the need for training strategies and organisational interventions in the anaesthesia department, in order to achieve a better quality and satisfaction for both professionals and patients.