Medidas de Calidad de Vida en Personas con Afasia. Revisión Sistemática

  1. Dunia Garrido del Águila 1
  2. Ana Lydia Niño 2
  3. Gloria Carballo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, España
Revista:
Revista de Investigación en Logopedia

ISSN: 2174-5218

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 12

Número: 2

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de Investigación en Logopedia

Resumen

La afasia después de un daño cerebral y sus diferentes condiciones negativas derivadas, afectan a la calidad de vida (CdV) de la persona. El objetivo de este estudio es describir y analizar la literatura de los años comprendidos entre 2016 y 2020 para identificar y cuantificar aspectos relevantes de la CdV y su evaluación en personas con afasia (PWA). Para lo anterior, se consultaron tres bases de datos (PsycINFO, Medline y Psicodoc). Se incluyeron 38 estudios. Se codificaron y analizaron las características de los estudios y se evaluó la calidad de los trabajos siguiendo las pautas marcadas por la STROBE y la NIH. Los resultados muestran que la prueba de evaluación de CdV más utilizada fue la Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39) (n= 19, 50.00%). En la mayoría de los estudios, independientemente de las pruebas de evaluación, las PWA presentan una baja CdV. Los estudios seleccionados presentan una calidad metodológica media-alta. Como conclusión cabe destacar que, además de limitar aspectos de la comunicación y el lenguaje, la afasia afecta negativamente a la CdV de forma global de la persona que la padece. El desarrollo de pruebas de evaluación de la CdV puede ayudar a los profesionales a planificar una intervención adecuada.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Armour, M., Brady, S., Sayyad A., y Krieger, R. (2019): Self-Reported Quality of Life Outcomes in Aphasia Using Life Participation Approach Values: 1-Year Outcomes. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation, 1, 100025, 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100025
  • Attard, M.C., Loupis, Y., Togher, L., y Rose, M.L. (2018). The efficacy of an inter-disciplinary community aphasia group for living well with aphasia. Aphasiology, 32(2), 105-138. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2017.1381877
  • Azizbeigi-Boukani, J., Khatoonabadi, A. R., Maroufizadeh, S., y Abdi, S. (2020): Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39), Aphasiology, 35(6), 859-873. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1737315
  • Barnes, S., y Nickels, L. (2018). Interaction-focussed therapy for aphasia: Effects on communication and quality of life. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(5), 528-540. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1329851
  • Bénaim, C. et al., (2003). Un outil francophone de mesure de la qualité́ de vie de l’aphasique: le SIP-65. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médicine Physique, 46(1), 2–11. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6054(02)00306-9
  • Berg, K., Isaksen, J., Wallace, S. J., Cruice, M., Simmons-Mackie, N. y Worrall, L. (2020). Establishing consensus on a definition of aphasia: An e-Delphi study of international aphasia researchers. Aphasiology, 36(4), 385-400. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1852003.
  • Bowling, A. (1995). Measuring Disease. Buckingham: Open University Press. Bränholm, I. B., Lundmark, P., Mansson, M., y Fugl-Meyer, A.- R. (1996). On life satisfaction in subjects with neurological disorders. Neurologie Rehabilitation, 2, 63–67. doi: 10.1191/0269215503cr629oa
  • Breitenstein, C. et al., (2017). Intensive speech and language therapy in patients with chronic aphasia after stroke: A randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial in a health-care setting. Lancet, 389, 1528-1538. doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(17)30067-3
  • Bullier, B. et al., (2020). New factors that affect quality of life in patients with aphasia. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 63(1), 33–37. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.06.015
  • Calis, F. A., Celik, S., Demir, O., Aykanat, D., y On, A. Y. (2016). The psychometric properties of the Turkish stroke and aphasia quality of life scale-39. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 39(2), 140-144. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000159
  • Caute, A, Woolf, C., Wilson, S., Stokes, C., Monnelly, K., y Cruice, M. (2019). Technology-enhanced writing therapy for people with aphasia: Findings from a quasirandomized waitlist controlled study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(12), 4382-4416. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0484
  • Chapey, R. (2008). Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (5th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Chiou, H. S., y Yu, C.Y. (2018). Measuring Life Participation, Communicative Confidence, Language, and Cognition in People with Aphasia. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups SIG, 3(2), 4-12. doi: 10.1044/persp3.SIG2.4
  • Crosson, B. et al., (2019). Neuroplasticity and aphasia treatments: New approaches for an old problem. Cognitive Neurology, 90(10), 1147–1155. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2018-319649
  • Cruice, M., Hill, R., Worrall, L., y Hickson, L. (2010). Conceptualizing quality of life for older people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 24(3), 327–347. doi:10.1080/02687030802565849
  • Cruice, M., Woolf, C., Caute, A., Monnelly, K., Wilson, S., y Marshall, J. (2020). Preliminary outcomes from a pilot study of personalized online supported conversation for participation intervention for people with Aphasia. Aphasiology, 35(10), 1293-1317. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1795076
  • Cruice, M., Worrall, L., y Hickson, L. (2010). Health-related quality of life in people with aphasia: Implications for fluency disorders quality of life research. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 35(3), 173-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.05.008
  • Cruice, M., Worrall, L., y Hickson, L. (2006). Quantifying aphasic people’s social lives in the context of their non-aphasic peers. Aphasiology, 20(12), 1210–1225. doi: 10.1080/02687030600790136
  • DeDe, G., Hoover, E., y Maas, E. (2019). Two to tango or the more the Merrier?. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of group size in Aphasia Conversation treatment on standardized tests. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 62(5), 1437-1451. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0404
  • Dipper, L., Pritchard, M., Walkden, E., y Cruice, M. (2018): How do speakers with and without aphasia use syntax and semantics across two discourse genres? Aphasiology, 32(6), 720-738. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1447642
  • Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., Johnson, D., Embretson, S., y Laster, L. J. (1999). The stroke impact scale version 2.0: Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30(10), 2131-2140. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2131
  • Efstratiadou, E., Chelas, E., Ignatiou, M., Christaki, V., Papathanasiou, I., y Hilari, K. (2012). Quality of life after stroke: Evaluation of the Greek SAQOL-39g. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica, 64(4),179–186. doi:10.1159/000340014
  • Efstratiadou, E-A., Papathanasiou, I., Holland, R., Varlokosta, S., y Hilari, K. (2019). Efficacy of elaborated semantic features analysis in Aphasia: A quasi-randomised controlled trial. Aphasiology, 33(12), 1482-1503. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1571558
  • Ellis, C., Hardy, R.Y., Lindrooth, R. C., y Peach, R. K. (2018). Rate of aphasia among stroke patients discharged from hospitals in the United States. Aphasiology 32(6), 1075-1086. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2017.1385052
  • EuroQol Group (1990). EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3), 199-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
  • Fotiadou, D., Northcott, S., Chatzidaki, A., y Hilari, K. (2014). Aphasia blog talk: How does stroke and aphasia affect a person’s social relationships? Aphasiology, 28(11), 1281–1300. doi:10.1080/ 02687038.2014.928664
  • Georgiou, A., Konstantinou, N., Phinikettos, I., y Kambanaro, M. (2019). Neuronavigated theta burst stimulation for chronic aphasia: Two exploratory case studies. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 33(6), 532-546. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1562496
  • Georgiou, A.M., Phinikettos, I., Giasafaki, C., y Kambanaros, M. (2020). Can transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) facilitate language T recovery in chronic global aphasia post-stroke? Evidence from a case study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 55, 100907, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100907
  • Giachero, A., Calati, M., Pia, L., La Vista, L., Molo, M., Rugiero, C., Fornaro, C., y Marangolo, P. (2020). Conversational therapy through semi-immersive virtual reality environments for language recovery and Psychological well-being in post stroke Aphasia. Behavioural Neurology, 2846046, 1-15. doi: 10.1155/2020/2846046
  • Goodglass, H., y Kaplan, E. (1983). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
  • Guo, Y. E., Togher, L., Power, E., y Koh, G. C. H. (2016). Validation of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale in a multicultural population. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(26), 2584-2592. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1138551
  • Guo,Y. E., Togher, L., Power, E., y Heard, R. (2017). Validation of the assessment of living with aphasia in Singapore. Aphasiology, 31(9), 981-998. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2016.1230839
  • Hilari, K. (2011). The impact of stroke: are people with aphasia different to those without? Disability & Rehabilitation, 33(3), 211–218. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.508829.
  • Hilari, K., y Byng, S. (2009). Health-related quality of life in people with severe aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44(2), 193- 205. doi:10.1080/13682820802008820.
  • Hilari, K., Byng, S., Lamping, D. L., y Smith, S. C. (2003). Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale—39 (SAQOL-39). Evaluation of acceptability, reliability and validity. Stroke, 34, 1944–1950. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000081987.46660. ED
  • Hilari, K., Cruice, M., Sorin-Peters, R., y Worrall, L. (2015). Quality of life in aphasia: State of the art. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 67(3), 114–118. doi: 1159/000440997
  • Hirsch, F., y Holland, A. (2000). Beyond activity: Measuring participation in society and quality of life. In L. E. Worral, y C. M. Frattali (Eds.). Neurogenic communication disorders: A functional approach (pp. 35–54). New York: Thieme.
  • Hoover, E.L., Caplan, D.N., Waters, G.S., y Carney, A. (2017). Communication and quality of life outcomes from an interprofessional intensive, comprehensive, aphasia program (ICAP). Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 24(2), 82-90. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1207147.
  • Hula, W. D. et al., (2015). The Aphasia Communication Outcome Measure (ACOM): Dimensionality, item bank calibration, and initial validation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 906-919. doi: 10.1044/2015_ JSLHR-L-14-0235
  • Kariyawasam, P. N., Pathirana, K. D., Hewage, D. C., y Dissanayake, R. D. A. (2020). Cultural Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Proxy-Rated Sinhala Version of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Generic Scale–39. Journal of Central Nervous System Disease, 12, 1–8. doi: 10.1177/1179573520924953.
  • Kertesz, A., y Raven, J. C. (2007). WAB-R: Western aphasia battery-revised. San Antonio, Tx; PsychCorp.
  • Kim, E. S., Ruelling, A., Garcia, J. R. y Kajner, R. (2017). A pilot study examining the impact of aphasia camp participation on quality of life for people with aphasia. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 24(2), 107-113. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1196907
  • Koleck, M., Gana, K., Lucot, C., Darrigrand, B., Mazaux, J-M. y Glize, B. (2017). Quality of life in aphasic patients 1 year after a first stroke. Quality of Life Research, 26(1), 45-54. doi 10.1007/s11136-016-1361-z
  • Kristinsson, S. y Halldorsdottir, T.H. (2020). Translation, adaptation and psychometric properties of the Icelandic stroke and aphasia quality of life scale-39g. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 35(1), 244-251, doi: 10.1111/scs.12840
  • Lam, J. M. C., y Wodchis, W. P. (2010). The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in Ontario hospital-based long- term care residents. Medical Care, 48(4), 380–387. doi:1097/ MLR.0b013e3181ca2647
  • Lee, H., Lee, Y., Choi, H., y Pyun, S-B. (2015). Community integration and Quality of Life in Aphasia after Stroke. Yonsei Medical Journal, 56(6), 1694-1702. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.6.1694
  • Maresca, G. et al., (2019). Toward Improving Poststroke Aphasia: A Pilot Study on the Growing Use of Telerehabilitation for the Continuity of Care. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 28(10), 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104303
  • Marshall, J. et al., (2019). Technology-enhanced writing therapy for people with aphasia: Results of a quasi-randomized wait list controlled study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 54(2), 203-220. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12391
  • Marshall, J. et al., (2020). A randomised trial of social support group intervention for people with aphasia: A Novel application of virtual reality. PLoS One, 15(9), e0239715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239715
  • Mattioli, F. (2019). The clinical management and rehabilitation of post stroke aphasia in Italy: Evidences from the literature and clinical experience. Neurological Sciences, 40(7), 1329-1334. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-03844-0
  • Mitchell, C. et al., (2021). Prevalence of aphasia and dysarthria among inpatient stroke survivors: Describing the population, therapy provision and outcomes on discharge. Aphasiology. 35(7), 950-960. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1759772
  • Mitra, I.H. y Krishnan, G. (2015). Adaptation and validation of Stroke-Aphasia Quality of Life (SAQOL-39) scale to Hindi. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 18(1), 29-32. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.144276
  • Mizoon, A., Lyden, P., Brady, M., y VISTA Collaboration (2015). Aphasia and dysarthria in acute stroke: Recovery and functional outcome. International Journal of Stroke, 10(3): 400–406. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12067.
  • National Institute of Health (NIH). Study Quality Assessment Tools. Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Recuperado 11 de febrero de 2020
  • Nicholas, M., Jennelle, L., Connor, L.S., Haynes, C., y Zipse, L. (2020). Do caregiver proxy reports and congruence of client–proxy activity participation goals relate to quality of life in people with aphasia? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 55(3), 373-386. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12524
  • Nicholas, M., Hunsaker, E., y Guarino, A. J. (2017). The relation between language, non-verbal cognition and quality of life in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 32(6), 688-702. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1076927
  • Neumann, S., Quinting, J., Rosenkranz, A., Beer, C., Jonas, K., y Stenneken, P. (2019). Quality of life in adults with neurogenic speech-language- communication difficulties: A systematic review of existing measures. Journal of Communication Disorders, 79, 24-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.01.003
  • Noyan-ErbaŞ, A., y Toğram, B. (2016). Stroke and aphasia quality-of-life scale-39: Reliability and validity of the Turkish version. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(5), 432-438. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1126641
  • Organización Mundial de la Salud -OMS- (2019). Las 10 principales causas de defunción. https://www.who.int/es/newsroom/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death. Recuperado 10 de abril de 2021.
  • Organización Mundial de la Salud -OMS- (2021). Envejecimiento y salud. https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/ detail/ageing-and-health. Recuperado 9 de febrero de 2022.
  • Page, M. J., et al., (2021). Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003
  • Pitt, R., Theodoros, D., Hill A. J., y Russell, T. (2019). The development and feasibility of an online aphasia group intervention and networking program– TeleGAIN, International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(1), 23-36. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.136956
  • Qiu, W., Guan, H., Chen, Z., Yu, Y., Wu, H., Yu, W. S., Qiu, G., Feng, X., y Lee, K. Y. S. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Chinese-version Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale 39-generic version (SAQOL-39g). Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 26(2), 106-112. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1544842
  • Raven-Takken, E., Ter Wal, N., y Van Ewijk, L. (2020). What minimum level of language comprehension is required for reliable administration of the SAQOL-39NLg? Aphasiology, 34(6), 695-708. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1610152
  • Ribeiro, R., Rose, M. L., do Nascimento, J., Guarinello, A. C., Sampaio, R. y Athayde, G. (2020). Socio-demographic factors associated with quality of life after a multicomponent aphasia group therapy in people with sub-acute and chronic post- stroke aphasia. Aphasiology, 35(5), 1-16. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1727710
  • Rose, M. L. et al., (2019). Constraint-induced or multi-modal personalized aphasia rehabilitation (COMPARE): A randomized controlled trial for stroke-related chronic aphasia. International Journal of Stroke, 14(9), 972-976. doi: 10.1177/1747493019870401
  • Ross, K., y Wertz, R. (2003). Quality of life with and without aphasia. Aphasiology, 17(4), 355-364. doi: 10.1080/02687030244000716
  • Simmons-Mackie, N. et al., (2014). The assessment for living with aphasia: Relibility and construct validity. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(1), 82–94. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2013.831484.
  • Spaccavento, S., et al., (2018). Italian adaptation of the functional outcome questionnaire – aphasia: Initial psychometric evaluation. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal, 40(24), 2925-2930. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1362042
  • Spaccavento, S. et al., (2014). Quality of life measurement and outcome in aphasia. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 10, 27-37. doi:10.2147/NDT.S52357
  • Stroup, D. F., Berlin, J. A., Morton, S. C., Olkin, I., y Williamson, G. D. R. D. (2000). MOOSE guidelines for metaanalyses and systematic reviews of observational studies. Jama, 283, 2008-2012. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008.
  • Swinburn, K. et al., (2019). A concise patient reported outcome measure for people with aphasia: The aphasia impact questionnaire 21. Aphasiology, 33(9), 1035-1060. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1517406
  • The WHOQOL Group (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment in Psychological Medicine, 28, 551– 558, Cambridge University Press.
  • van Ewijk, L., Versteegde, L., Raven-Takken, E. y Hilari, K. (2017). Measuring quality of life in Dutch people with aphasia: development and psychometric evaluation of the SAQOL-39NL. Aphasiology, 31(2), 189-200. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2016.1168919
  • Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., y Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573-577. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010.
  • Wallace, S. J. et al., (2019). A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement. International Journal of Stroke, 14(2), 180-185. doi: 10.1177/1747493018806200
  • Ware J. E.,y Sherbourne, C.D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473-83.
  • Watila, M. M., y Balarabe, S. A. (2015). Factors predicting post- stroke aphasia recovery. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 352(1–2), 12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.03.020.
  • Worrall, L.E., Hudson K., Khan A., Ryan B., y Simmons-Mackie N. (2017). Determinants of living well with aphasia in the first year post stroke: A prospective cohort study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 98(2), 235- 240. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.020
  • Zumbansen, A. et al., (2017). Effect of choir activity in the rehabilitation of aphasia: A blind, randomised, controlled pilot study. Aphasiology, 31(9), 879-900. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2016.1227424
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet