Modelo para el análisis didáctico en educación matemática

  1. Font Moll, Vicenç
  2. Planas Raig, Núria
  3. Diaz Godino, Juan
Journal:
Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje

ISSN: 0210-3702,  1578-4126

Year of publication: 2010

Issue Title: Where developmental psychology and neuroscience meet: a threatening or a felicitous enconunter?

Volume: 33

Issue: 1

Pages: 89-105

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1174/021037010790317243 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje

Abstract

The viability of a theoretical model to analyse teaching and learning mathematical processes is presented in the paper. It is a model with five levels of analysis that are jointly applied to a classroom episode. We have constructed the model in order to describe (what has happened here?), explain (why has it happened?) and evaluate (what could be improved?) instruction processes in the mathematics classroom. Our work is based on a theoretical synthesis of aspects of the onto-semiotic approach applied to mathematical knowledge and instruction. Although some parts of the model are specific to mathematical activity, researchers from other educational areas can adapt them so that they can be used effectively to analyse other types of educational practices. The application of the model primarily seeks to provide a solid evaluation of the educational suitability of mathematics instruction processes.

Bibliographic References

  • BLOOR, D. (1983). Wittgenstein. A social theory of knowledge. Londres: The Macmillan Press.
  • BROUSSEAU, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: didactique des mathématiques. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • CHEVALLARD, Y. (1992). Concepts fondamentaux de la didactique: perspectives apportées par une approche anthropologique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 12 (1), 73-112.
  • CIVIL, M. & PLANAS, N. (2004). Participation in the mathematics classroom: does every student have a voice? For the Learning of Mathematics, 24 (1), 7-13.
  • COBB, P. & BAUERSFELD, H. (Eds.) (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning: interaction in classroom cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • COLL, C. & SÁNCHEZ, E. (2008). El análisis de la interacción alumno-profesor: líneas de investigación. Revista de Educación, 346, 15-32.
  • D'AMORE, B., FONT, V. & GODINO, J. D. (2007). La dimensión metadidáctica en los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje de la matemática. Paradigma, 28 (2), 49-77.
  • ERNEST, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. Nueva York, NY: SUNY.
  • FONT, V. & CONTRERAS, A. (2008). The problem of the particular and its relation to the general in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 33-52.
  • FONT, V. & GODINO, J. D. (2006). La noción de configuración epistémica como herramienta de análisis de textos matemáticos: su uso en la formación de profesores. Educaçao Matemática Pesquisa, 8 (1), 67-98.
  • FONT, V., GODINO, J. D. & CONTRERAS, C. (2008). From representations to onto-semiotic configurations in analysing the mathematics teaching and learning processes. En L. Radford, G. Schubring & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 157-173). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • GODINO, J. D. & BATANERO, C. (1994). Significado institucional y personal de los objetos matemáticos. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 14 (3), 325-355.
  • GODINO, J. D., BATANERO, C. & FONT, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 39 (1-2), 127-135.
  • GODINO, J. D., BENCOMO, D., FONT, V. & WILHELMI, M. R. (2006). Análisis y valoración de la idoneidad didáctica de procesos de estudio de las matemáticas. Paradigma, 27 (2), 221-252.
  • GODINO, J. D., CONTRERAS, A. & FONT, V. (2006). Análisis de procesos de instrucción basado en el enfoque ontológicosemiótico de la cognición matemática. Recherches en Didactiques des Mathematiques, 26 (1), 39-88.
  • GODINO, J. D., FONT, V. & WILHELMI, M. R. (2006). Análisis ontosemiótico de una lección sobre la suma y la resta. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática, 9 (especial), 131-155.
  • GODINO, J. D., FONT, V., WILHELMI, M. R. & DE CASTRO, C. (2009). Aproximación a la dimensión normativa en didáctica de las matemáticas desde un enfoque ontosemiótico. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 27 (1), 59-76.
  • HIEBERT, J., MORRIS, A. K. & GLASS, B. (2003). Learning to learn to teach: an "experiment"model for teaching and teacher preparation in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 66, 201-222.
  • HILL, H., BALL, D. L. & SCHILLING, S. (2008). Unpacking "pedagogical content knowledge": conceptualizing and measuring teachers' topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39 (4), 372-400.
  • PLANAS, N. & CIVIL, M. (2002). The influence of social issues on the reconstruction of mathematical norms. En H. Chick & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th PME Conference (vol. 2, pp. 71-80). Norwich: PME.
  • PLANAS, N. & CIVIL, M. (2004). Understanding interruptions in the mathematics classroom: implications for equity. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14 (2), 169-189.
  • PLANAS, N. & CIVIL, M. (2009). Working with immigrant students and mathematics teachers: an empowerment perspective. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, (6), 391-409.
  • PLANAS, N. & IRANZO, N. (2009). Consideraciones metodológicas para el análisis de procesos de interacción en el aula de matemáticas. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática, 12 (2), 179-213.
  • PLANAS, N. & SETATI, M. (2009). Bilingual students using their languages in the learning of mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21 (3), 169-190.
  • RADFORD, L., SCHUBRING, G. & SEEGER, F. (Eds.) (2008). Semiotics in mathematics education: epistemology, history, classroom, and culture. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • RAMOS, A. B. & FONT, V. (2008). Criterios de idoneidad y valoración de cambios en el proceso de instrucción matemática. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática, 11 (2), 233-265.
  • SCHÖN, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Nueva York, NY: Basic Books.
  • SULLIVAN, P. (2008). Knowledge for teaching mathematics: an introduction. En P. Sullivan & T. Wood (Eds.), Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and development (pp. 1-12). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • YACKEL, E. & COBB, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27 (4), 458-477.
Data source: Dialnet