El modelo Flipped Learning en el desarrollo de la competencia profesional del futuro maestro en matemáticas

  1. Emilio Gil Martínez 1
  2. José Luis Lupiáñez Gómez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Journal:
FPIEM: Formación del Profesorado e Investigación en Educación Matemática
  1. Bruno Castañeda, Alicia (ed. lit.)
  2. Camacho Machín, Matías (ed. lit.)
  3. García Díaz, A. (ed. lit.)
  4. Hernández Suárez, V. M. (ed. lit.)

ISSN: 1885-2912

Year of publication: 2022

Issue: 14

Pages: 59-69

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: FPIEM: Formación del Profesorado e Investigación en Educación Matemática

Abstract

This work contains the research plan for the PhD of one of the autors. The research problem of this study is the low level of argumentation that future teachers presents and their low autonomy level. Because of this, this plan proposes to design, implement and evaluate a teacher training program based on the Flipped Learning methodological approach. Finally, as this study is ongoing, some preliminary results are presented

Bibliographic References

  • Araujo, Z., Otten, S. y Birisci, S. (2017) Mathematics teachers’ motivations for, conceptions of, and experiences with flipped instruction. Teaching and teacher education, 62, 60-70, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.11.006
  • Bergmann, J. y Sams, A. (2012) Flipped your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Boero P., Fenaroli G. y Guala E. (2018) Mathematical Argumentation in Elementary Teacher Education: The Key Role of the Cultural Analysis of the Content. en: Stylianides A., Harel G. (Eds) Advances in Mathematics Education Research on Proof and Proving (49-67). Springer.
  • Caraballo, R. M. (2014) Diseño de pruebas para la evaluación diagnóstica. Una experiencia con profesores [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad de Granada]. https://digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/handle/10481/35214/24465720.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • Hamdan, N, McKnight, P, McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. (2013). A review of Flipped Learning. Retrieved May 20, 2021, from Flipped Learning Network: http://www.flippedlearning.org
  • Morado, R. (2013) Funciones básicas del discurso argumentativo. Revista iberoamericana de argumentación, 6, 1-13. https://revistas.uam.es/ria/article/view/8195
  • Palau, R., & Santiago, R. (2021). Las metodologías activas enriquecidas con tecnología. Revista de Ciències de l'Educació, 5-16. https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2021.1.3269
  • Rico, L., Lupiáñez, J.L. y Molina, M. (2013) Análisis Didáctico en Educación Matemática. Metodología de investigación, formación de profesores e innovación curricular. Editorial Comares.
  • Santiago, R. y Bergmann, J. (2018) Aprender al revés. Flipped Learning 3.0 y metodologías activas en el aula. Paidós Educación.
  • Scott, G. W., Furnell, J., Murphy, C. M. y Goulder, R. (2015). Teacher and student perceptions of the development of learner autonomy; a case study in the biological sciences. Studies in higher education, 40(6), 945–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842216
  • Segovia, I. y Rico, L. (2011) Matemáticas para maestros de Educación Primaria. Pirámide.
  • Tilga, H., Hein, V. y Koka, A. (2017) Measuring the perception of the teachers’ autonomy-supportive behaviour in physical education: development and initial validation of a multi-dimensional instrument, Measurement in physical education and exercise science, 21, 244-255, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2017.1354296
Data source: Dialnet