Impresiones sobre los estudios de lítica en la década de los años veinte del siglo XX

Bibliographische Referenzen

• Archer, W., Pop, C.M., Rezek, Z., Schlager, S., Lin, S.C., Weiss, M., Dogandžić, T., Desta, D. y McPherron, S.P. (2018). A geometric morphometric relatonship predicts stone fake shape and size variability. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10(8), 1991-2003.
• Archer, W. (2021). Carrying capacity, populaton density and the later Pleistocene expression of backed artefact manufacturing traditons in Africa. Philosophical Transactons of the Royal Society B, 376(1816), 20190716.
• Aubry, T., Bradley, B., Almeida, M., Walter, B., Neves, M.J., Pelegrin, J., Lenoir, M. y Tifagom, M. (2008). Solutrean laurel leaf producton at Maîtreaux: an experimental approach guided by techno-economic analysis. World Archaeology, 40(1), 48-66.
• Bandini, E., Harrison, R.A. y Motes-Rodrigo, A. (2022). Examining the suitability of extant primates as models of hominin stone tool culture. Humanites and Social Sciences Communicatons, 9(1), 1-18.
• Bailey, G. (2007). Time perspectves, palimpsests and the archaeology of tme. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26(2), 198-223.
• Bertran, P., Lenoble, A., Todisco, D., Desrosiers, P.M. y Sørensen, M. (2012). Partcle size distributon of lithic assemblages and taphonomy of Palaeolithic sites. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(10), 3148-3166.
• Blinkhorn, J., Groucut, H.S., Scerri, E.M., Petraglia, M.D. y Blockley, S. (2021). Directonal changes in Levallois core technologies between Eastern Africa, Arabia, and the Levant during MIS 5. Scientfc Reports, 11(1), 1-11.
• Boëda, E., Geneste, J.M. y Meignen, L. (1990). Identfcaton de chaînes opératoires lithiques du Paléolithique ancien et moyen. Paléo, Revue d’Archéologie Préhistorique, 2(1), 43-80.
• Bordes, J. G. (2000). La séquence aurignacienne de Caminade revisitée: l’apport des raccords d’intérêt stratgraphique. The Aurignacian sequence at Caminade Est revisited: contributon of the reftngs to stratgraphie study. Paléo, Revue d’Archéologie Préhistorique, 12(1), 387-407.
• Borrazzo, K. (2016). Lithic taphonomy in desert environments: contributons from Fuego-Patagonia (Southern South America). Quaternary Internatonal, 422, 19-28.
• Braun, D. R., Plummer, T. W., Ferraro, J. V., Ditchfeld, P. W. y Bishop, L.C. (2009). Raw material quality and Oldowan hominin toolstone preferences: evidence from Kanjera South, Kenya. Journal of Archaeological Sciences, 36, 1605–1614.
• Brooks, A. S., Yellen, J. E., Pots, R., Behrensmeyer, A. K., Deino, A. L., Leslie, D. E., Ambrose, S. H., Ferguson, J. R., d’Errico, F., Zipkin, A. M. y Whitaker, S. (2018). Long-distance stone transport and pigment use in the earliest Middle Stone Age. Science, 360(6384), 90-94.
• Bustos-Pérez, G. y Baena, J. (2021). Predicting Flake Mass: A View from Machine Learning. Lithic Technology, 46(2), 130-142.
• Calandra, I., Schunk, L., Rodriguez, A., Gneisinger, W., Pedergnana, A., Paixao, E., Pereira, T., Iovita, R. y Marreiros, J. (2019). Back to the edge: relative coordinate system for usewear analysis. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(11), 5937-5948.
• Cardillo, M. (2010). Some applications of geometric morphometrics to archaeology. In A. M. T. Elewa (Ed.), Morphometrics for nonmorphometricians (pp. 325-341). Springer.
• Carvalho, S., Cunha, E., Sousa, C. y Matsuzawa, T. (2008). Chaînes opératoires and resource-exploitaton strategies in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) nut cracking. Journal of Human Evoluton, 55(1), 148-163.
• Carvalho, S. y Almeida-Warren, K. (2019). Primate archaeology. In M. D. Breed y J. Moore (Eds.), Encyclopedia of animal behavior (pp. 397-407). Academic Press.
• Chacón, M. G., Détroit, F., Coudenneau, A. y Moncel, M. H. (2016). Morphometric assessment of convergent tool technology and functon during the Early Middle Palaeolithic: the case of Payre, France. PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0155316.
• Clarke, D. L. (1968). Analytical archaeology. Routledge.
• Cnuts, D. y Rots, V. (2018). Extracting residues from stone tools for optical analysis: towards an experiment-based protocol. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10 (7), 1717-1736.
• Conard, N. J., Soressi, M., Parkington, J. E., Wurz, S. y Yates, R. (2004). A unified lithic taxonomy based on paterns of core reducton. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 59(179), 12-16.
• Cortell-Nicolau, A., García-Puchol, O. y Shennan, S. (2020). Cultural continuities and discontinuities at the Neolithic transition in Eastern Iberia: an analysis of the morphometry of geometric microliths. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 12(11), 1-18.
• Cortell-Nicolau, A., García-Puchol, O., Barrera-Cruz, M. y García-Rivero, D. (2021). The spread of agriculture in Iberia through Approximate Bayesian Computation and Neolithic projectile tools. PLOS ONE, 16(12), e0261813.
• Delagnes, A., Schmidt, P., Douze, K., Wurz, S., Bellot-Gurlet, L., Conard, N. J., Nickel, K. G., Van Niekerk, K. L. y Henshilwood, C. S. (2016). Early evidence for the extensive heat treatment of silcrete in the Howiesons Poort at Klipdrift Shelter (Layer PBD, 65 ka), South Africa. PLOS ONE, 11(10), e0163874.
• d’Errico, F., Banks, W. E., Warren, D. L., Sgubin, G., van Niekerk, K., Henshilwood, C., Daniau, A. L. y Sánchez Goñi, M. F. (2017). Identifying early modern human ecological niche expansions and associated cultural dynamics in the South African Middle Stone Age. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), 869-7876.
• Dibble, H. L., Holdaway, S. J., Lin, S. C., Braun, D. R., Douglass, M. J., Iovita, R., McPherron, S. P., Olszewski, D. I. y Sandgathe, D. (2017). Major fallacies surrounding stone artifacts and assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24(3), 813-851.
• Domínguez-Ballesteros, E. y Arrizabalaga, A. (2015). Flint knapping and determination of human handedness. Methodological proposal with quantifiable results. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 3, 313–320.
• Domínguez-Ballesteros, E. y Arrizabalaga, A. (2022). Application of parabolic cracks in determining handedness in archaeological remains. The case study of the Axlor site (Bizkaia, Iberian Peninsula). Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 43, 103445.
• Domínguez-Rodrigo, M., Uribelarrea, D., Santonja, M., Bunn, H. T., García-Pérez, A., Pérez-González, A., Panera, J., Rubio-Jara, S., Mabulla, A., Baquedano, E. e Yravedra, J. (2014). Autochthonous anisotropy of archaeological materials by the action of water: experimental and archaeological reassessment of the orientation patterns at the Olduvai sites. Journal of Archaeological Science, 41, 44-68.
• Douze, K., Wurz, S. y Henshilwood, C. S. (2015). Techno-cultural characterization of the MIS 5 (c. 105–90 Ka) lithic industries at Blombos Cave, Southern Cape, South Africa. PLOS ONE, 10(11), e0142151.
• Driscoll, K. (2011). Vein quartz in lithic traditions: an analysis based on experimental archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(3), 734-745.
• Driscoll, K. y García-Rojas, M. (2014). Their lips are sealed: identifying hard stone, soft stone, and antler hammer direct percussion in Palaeolithic prismatic blade production. Journal of Archaeological Science, 47, 134-141.
• Eren, M. I., Dominguez-Rodrigo, M., Kuhn, S. L., Adler, D. S., Le, I. y Bar-Yosef, O. (2005). Defining and measuring reduction in unifacial stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32(8), 1190-1201.
• Eren, M. I., Lycet, S. J., Paten, R. J., Buchanan, B., Pargeter, J. y O’Brien, M. J. (2016). Test, model, and method validation: the role of experimental stone artifact replication in hypothesis-driven archaeology. Ethnoarchaeology, 8(2), 103-136.
• Falcucci, A., Karakosts, F. A., Göldner, D. y Peresani, M. (2022). Bringing shape into focus: Assessing differences between blades and bladelets and their technological significance in 3D form. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 43, 103490.
• Favreau, J., Soto, M., Nair, R., Bushozi, P. M., Clarke, S., DeBuhr, C. L., Durkin, P. R., Hubbard, S. M., Inwood, J., Itambu, M., Larter, F., Lee, P., Marr, R. A., Mwambwiga, A., Patalano, R., Tucker, L. y Mercader, J. (2020). Petrographic characterization of raw material sources at Oldupai Gorge, Tanzania. Fronters in Earth Science, 8, 158.
• Fernández Marchena, J. L. (2021). La gestión funcional de los recursos líticos durante el Paleolítico superior. Una aproximación diacrónica a partir de conjuntos del noreste de la Península Ibérica [Tesis doctoral inédita. Universitat de Barcelona].
• Gellis, J. J., Smith, C. R. y Foley, R. A. (2022). PyLithics: A Python package for stone tool analysis. Journal of Open Source Sofware, 7(69), 3738.
• Gliganic, L. A., Meyer, M. C., May, J. H., Aldenderfer, M. S. y Tropper, P. (2021). Direct dating of lithic surface artifacts using luminescence. Science Advances, 7(23), eabb3424.
• Goodale, N. y Andrefsky Jr, W. (2015). Lithic technological systems and evolutionary theory. Cambridge University Press.
• Goodwin, A. H. H. y Van Riet Lowe, P. C. (1929). The stone age cultures of South Africa. AMS Press.
• González-Molina, I., Jiménez-García, B., Maíllo-Fernández, J. M., Baquedano, E. y Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. (2020). Distinguishing Discoid and Centripetal Levallois methods through machine learning. PLOS ONE, 15(12), e0244288.
• Hiscock, P. (1985). The need for a taphonomic perspective in stone artefact analysis. Queensland Archaeological Research, 2, 82-97.
• Hussain, S. T. y Soressi, M. (2021). The technological condition of human evolution: Lithic studies as basic science. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 4(3), 1-17.
• Ibáñez-Estévez, J. J., Anderson, P. C., Arranz-Otaegui, A., González-Urquijo, J. E., Jörgensen-Lindahl, A., Mazzucco, N., Pichon, F. y Richter, T. (2021). Sickle gloss texture analysis elucidates long-term change in plant harvesting during the transition to agriculture. Journal of Archaeological Science, 136, 105502.
• Ibáñez, J. J. y Mazzucco, N. (2021). Quantitative use-wear analysis of stone tools: Measuring how the intensity of use affects the identification of the worked material. PLOS ONE, 16(9), e0257266.
• Karlin C., Bodu, P. y Pelegrin, J. (1991). Processus techniques et chaînes opératoires. Comment les préhistoriens s’approprient un concept élaboré par les ethnologues. En H. Balfet (Ed.), Observer l’action technique: des chaînes opératoires, pour quoi faire? (pp. 101-117). Editions du CNRS.
• Key, A. J. y Dunmore, C. J. (2015). The evolution of the hominin thumb and the influence exerted by the non-dominant hand during stone tool production. Journal of Human Evolution, 78, 60-69.
• Key, A. J., Dunmore, C. J., Hatala, K. G. y Williams-Hatala, E. M. (2017). Flake morphology as a record of manual pressure during stone tool production. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 12, 43-53.
• Key, A. J., Jarić, I. y Roberts, D.L. (2021). Modelling the end of the Acheulean at global and contnental levels suggests widespread persistence into the Middle Palaeolithic. Humanites and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1-12.
• Key, A. J., Roberts, D. L. and Jarić, I. (2021). Statistical inference of earlier origins for the first faked stone technologies. Journal of Human Evolution, 154, 102976.
• Kozowyk, P. R., Soressi, M., Pomstra, D. y Langejans, G. H. (2017). Experimental methods for the Palaeolithic dry distillation of birch bark: implications for the origin and development of Neandertal adhesive technology. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1-9.
• Kristansen, K. (2014). Towards a new paradigm? The third science revolution and its possible consequences in archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology, 22(1), 11-34.
• Laplace, G. (1972). La typologie analytique et structurale: base raitonnelle d’étude des industries lithiques et osseuses. Banq. Données Archéologiques, 932, 91–143.
• Lenoble, A. (2005). Ruissellement et formation des sites préhistoriques: référentiel actualiste et exemples d’application au fossile. B.A.R. International Series n. 1363.
• Lemorini, C., Bishop, L. C., Plummer, T. W., Braun, D. R., Ditchfeld, P. W. y Oliver, J. S. (2019). Old stones’ song—second verse: use-wear analysis of rhyolite and fenetized andesite artifacts from the Oldowan lithic industry of Kanjera South, Kenya. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(9), 4729-4754.
• Lepot, M. (1993). Approche techno-fonctionnelle de l’outillage lithique moustérien: essai de classification des partes actives en termes d’efficacité technique [Memoire de maîtrise, Paris X Nanterre].
• Lin, S. C., Douglass, M. J., Holdaway, S. J. y Floyd, B. (2010). The application of 3D laser scanning technology to the assessment of ordinal and mechanical cortex quantification in lithic analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(4), 694-702.
• Lombard, M. (2011). Quartz-tipped arrows older than 60 ka: further use-trace evidence from Sibudu, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(8), 1918-1930.
• Maíllo-Fernández, J. M. 2003. La transición Paleolítico Medio-Superior en Cantabria: análisis tecnológico de la industria lítica de Cueva Morín [Tesis doctoral inédita, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia].
• Maíllo-Fernández, J. M. y Jiménez-García, B. 2021. Lithic technology at the Early Dabban in Hagfet ed Dabba (Cyrenaica, Libya). Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 13(7), 1-23.
• Márquez, B., Baquedano, E., Pérez-González, A. y Arsuaga, J. L. (2016). Microwear analysis of Mousterian quartz tools from the Navalmaíllo Rock Shelter (Pinilla del Valle, Madrid, Spain). Quaternary International, 424, 84-97.
• Marreiros, J., Mazzucco, N., Gibaja, J. F. y Bicho, N. (2015). Macro and micro evidences from the past: the state of the art of archeological use-wear studies. In J. Marreiros, J. F. Gibaja Bao y N. Bicho (Eds), Use-Wear and Residue Analysis in Archaeology. Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique (pp. 5-26). Springer.
• Martínez-Moreno, J., Mora Torcal, R., Benito-Calvo, A., Roy Sunyer, M. y Sánchez-Martínez, J. (2019). A bunch of refits: 497D blade knapping assemblage of the Early Upper Paleolithic in Cova Gran (Northeast Iberia). Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 11(9), 4585-4600.
• Mercader, J., Belev, G., Bushozi, P., Clarke, S., Favreau, J., Itambu, M., Jianfeng, Z., Koromo, S., Larter, F., Lee, P. y Maley, J. (2022). Microbotanical residues for the study of early hominin tools. Scientfc Reports, 12(1), 1-12.
• Mesfin, I., Oslisly, R. y Forester, H. (2021). Technological analysis of the quartz industry of Maboúe 5–Layer 3 (Lope National Park, Gabon): implications for the Late Stone Age emergence in western Central Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 39, 103130.
• Mora Torcal, R., Roy Sunyer, M., Martínez-Moreno, J., Benito-Calvo, A. y Samper Carro, S. (2020). Inside the palimpsest: identifying short occupations in the 497D Level of Cova Gran (Iberia). In J. Cascalheira y A. Picin (Eds.), Short-Term Occupations in Paleolithic Archaeology. Definition and Interpretation (pp. 39-69). Springer.
• Morales, J. I., Lorenzo, C. y Vergès, J. M. (2015). Measuring retouch intensity in lithic tools: a new proposal using 3D scan data. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(2), 543-558.
• Motes-Rodrigo, A., McPherron, S. P., Archer, W., Hernandez-Aguilar, R. A. y Tennie, C. (2022). Experimental investigation of orangutans’ lithic percussive and sharp stone tool behaviours. PLOS ONE, 17(2), e0263343.
• Muller, A., Shipton, C. y Clarkson, C. (2022). Stone toolmaking difficulty and the evolution of hominin technological skills. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1-12.
• Nash, D. J., Coulson, S., Staurset, S., Ullyot, J. S., Babutsi, M., Hopkinson, L. y Smith, M. P. (2013). Provenancing of silcrete raw materials indicates long-distance transport to Tsodilo Hills, Botswana, during the Middle Stone Age. Journal of Human Evolution, 64(4), 280-288.
• Niekus, M. J. T., Kozowyk, P. R., Langejans, G. H., Ngan-Tillard, D., van Keulen, H., van der Plicht, J., Cohen, K. M., van Wingerden, W., van Os, B., Smit, B. I. y Amkreutz, L. W. (2019). Middle Paleolithic complex technology and a Neandertal tar-backed tool from the Dutch North Sea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(44), 22081-22087.
• Ollé, A., Pedergnana, A., Fernández-Marchena, J. L., Martin, S., Borel, A. y Aranda, V. (2016). Microwear features on vein quartz, rock crystal and quartzite: A study combining Optical Light and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Quaternary International, 424, 154-170.
• Paixao, E., Pedergnana, A., Marreiros, J., Dubreuil, L., Prevost, M., Zaidner, Y., Carver, G. y Gneisinger, W. (2021). Using mechanical experiments to study ground stone tool use: exploring the formation of percussive and grinding wear traces on limestone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 37, 102971.
• Pargeter, J. (2007). Howiesons Poort segments as hunting weapons: experiments with replicated projectiles. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 62(186), 147-153.
• Pargeter, J. y Bradfeld, J. (2012). The efects of Class I and II sized bovids on macrofracture formation and tool displacement: results of a trampling experiment in a southern African Stone Age context. Journal of Field Archaeology, 37(3), 238-251.
• Pargeter, J. y Eren, M. I. (2017). Quantifying and comparing bipolar versus freehand fake morphologies, production currencies, and reduction energetics during lithic miniaturization. Lithic Technology, 42(2-3), 90-108.
• Pelegrin, J. (1995). Technologie lithique. Le Chàtelperronien de Roc-De-Combe (Lot) et de la Côte (Dordogne). Cahiers du Quaternaire, Vol. 20. Editons du CNRS.
• Pedergnana, A., Asryan, L., Fernández-Marchena, J. L. y Ollé, A. (2016). Modern contaminants afecting microscopic residue analysis on stone tools: A word of caution. Micron, 86, 1-21.
• Pedergnana, A. y Ollé, A. (2017). Monitoring and interpreting the use-wear formation processes on quartzite fakes through sequential experiments. Quaternary International, 427, 35-65.
• Perreault, C. (2019). The quality of the archaeological record. University of Chicago Press.
• Pettitt, P., Rockman, M. y Chenery, S. (2012). The Britsh Final Magdalenian: Society, setlement and raw material movements revealed through LA-ICP-MS trace element analysis of diagnostic artefacts. Quaternary International, 272, 275-287.
• Petraglia, M. D. (2002). The heated and the broken: thermally altered stone, human behavior, and archaeological site formation. North American Archaeologist, 23(3), 241-269.
• Pigeot, N. (1987). Magdaléniens d’Étolles. Économie de débitage et organisaton sociale (l’unité d’habitation U5). Supplément à Gallia Préhistoire Vol. 25, No. 1. Editions du CNRS.
• Porraz, G. y Guillemard, I. (2019). What is a Wilton scraper? Perspectives from the Late Holocene assemblage of Balerno Main Shelter, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Southern African Humanities, 32(1), 135-162.
• Prieto, A., Yusta, I. y Arrizabalaga, A. (2020). From petrographic analysis to stereomicroscopic characterisation: a geoarchaeological approach to identify quartzite artefacts in the Cantabrian Region. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 12(1), 1-23.
• Režek, Ž., Dibble, H. L., McPherron, S. P., Braun, D. R. y Lin, S. C. (2018). Two million years of faking stone and the evolutionary efficiency of stone tool technology. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2(4), 628-633.
• Riede, F., Hoggard, C. y Shennan, S. (2019). Reconciling material cultures in archaeology with genetic data requires robust cultural evolutionary taxonomies. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1-9.
• Rios Garaizar, J. R. (2012). Industria lítica y sociedad del Paleolítico medio al superior en torno al Golfo de Bizkaia. Ediciones de la Universidad de Cantabria.
• Rodríguez, S. V., Greaves, K. U. y Ruiz, M. N. (2017). Characterization and supply of raw materials in the Neanderthal groups of Prado Vargas Cave (Cornejo, Burgos, Spain). Quaternary International, 435, 35-48.
• Romanowska, I., Crabtree, S. A., Harris, K. y Davies, B. (2019). Agent-based modeling for archaeologists: Part 1 of 3. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 7(2), 178-184.
• Rots, V., Hayes, E., Cnuts, D., Lepers, C. y Fullagar, R. (2016). Making sense of residues on faked stone artefacts: learning from blind tests. PLOS ONE, 11(3), e0150437.
• Rots, V., Lentfer, C., Schmid, V. C., Porraz, G. y Conard, N. J. (2017). Pressure faking to serrate bifacial points for the hunt during the MIS5 at Sibudu Cave (South Africa). PLOS ONE, 12(4), e0175151.
• Sánchez de la Torre, M., Le Bourdonnec, F. X., Dubernet, S., Gratuze, B., Mangado, X. y Fullola, J. M. (2017). The geochemical characterization of two long distance chert tracers by ED-XRF and LA-ICP-MS. Implications for Magdalenian human mobility in the Pyrenees (SW Europe). STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research, 3(2), 405-417.
• Sánchez Martínez, J. (2022). El comportamiento técnico de los grupos de cazadores recolectores en el noreste de la Península Ibérica durante el Paleolítico superior [Tesis doctoral inédita. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona].
• Sánchez-Romero, L., Benito-Calvo, A., Marín-Arroyo, A.B., Agudo-Pérez, L., Karampaglidis, T. y Rios-Garaizar, J. (2020). New insights for understanding spatial patterning and formation processes of the Neanderthal occupation in the Amalda I cave (Gipuzkoa, Spain). Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1-15.
• Scerri, E. M., Gravina, B., Blinkhorn, J. y Delagnes, A. (2016). Can lithic atribute analyses identify discrete reduction trajectories? A quantitative study using refitted lithic sets. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23(2), 669-691.
• Schick, K. D. (1986). Stone Age Sites in the Making. Experiments in the Formation and Transformation of Archaeological Occurrences. B.A.R. International Series Vol. 319. Archaeopress.
• Semaw, S., Rogers, M. J., Quade, J., Renne, P. R., Butler, R. F., Dominguez-Rodrigo, M., Stout, D., Hart, W. S., Pickering, T. y Simpson, S. W. (2003). 2.6-Million-year-old stone tools and associated bones from OGS-6 and OGS-7, Gona, Afar, Ethiopia. Journal of Human Evolution, 45(2), 169-177.
• Schmid, V. C., Porraz, G., Zeidi, M. y Conard, N. J. (2019). Blade technology characterizing the MIS 5 DA layers of Sibudu Cave, South Africa. Lithic Technology, 44(4), 199-236.
• Shea, J., Davis, Z. y Brown, K. (2001). Experimental tests of Middle Palaeolithic spear points using a calibrated crossbow. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28(8), 807-816.
• Shea, J. J. (2011). Homo sapiens is as Homo sapiens was: Behavioral variability versus “behavioral modernity” in Paleolithic archaeology. Current Anthropology, 52(1), 1-35.
• Shea, J. J. (2014). Sink the Mousterian? Named stone tool industries (NASTIES) as obstacles to investigating hominin evolutionary relationships in the Later Middle Paleolithic Levant. Quaternary International, 350, 169-179.
• Shea, J. J. (2020). Prehistoric stone tools of Eastern Africa: a Guide. Cambridge University Press.
• Shot, M. J. (2003). Chaîne opératoire and reduction sequence. Lithic Technology, 28(2), 95-105.
• Shot, M. J. y Trail, B. W. (2010). Exploring new approaches to lithic analysis: laser scanning and geometric morphometrics. Lithic Technology, 35(2), 195-220.
• Schmidt, P. (2016). The ‘sand-bath’ and lithic heat treatment in the South African Middle Stone Age: myth or reality? African Archaeological Review, 33(2), 99-105.
• Schoville, B. J., Wilkins, J., Ritzman, T., Oestmo, S. y Brown, K. S. (2017). The performance of heat-treated silcrete backed pieces in actualistic and controlled complex projectile experiments. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 14, 302-317.
• Soriano, S. y Villa, P. (2017). Early Levallois and the beginning of the Middle Paleolithic in central Italy. PLOS ONE, 12(10), e0186082.
• Stout, D. (2011). Stone toolmaking and the evolution of human culture and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 1050-1059.
• Thomas, M., Discamps, E., Gravina, B. y Texier, J. P. (2019). Analyse taphonomique et spatiale de palimpsestes d’occupations moustériennes de l’abri inférieur du Moustier (Dordogne, France). Paléo, Revue d’Archéologie Préhistorique, 30(1), 278-299.
• Todisco, D., Bhiry, N. y Desrosiers, P. M. (2009). Paleoeskimo site taphonomy: An assessment of the integrity of the Tayara site, Qikirtaq Island, Nunavik, Canada. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal, 24(6), 743-791.
• Tostevin, G. B. (2012). Seeing lithics: a middlerange theory for testing for cultural transmission in the Pleistocene. American School of Prehistoric Research Monograph Series. Peabody Museum, Harvard University y Oxbow Books.
• Vaesen, K. y Houkes, W. (2021). Is human culture cumulative? Current Anthropology, 62(2), 218-238.
• Vaquero, M. (1999). Intrasite spatial organization of lithic production in the Middle Palaeolithic: the evidence of the Abric Romaní (Capellades, Spain). Antiquity, 73(281), 493-504.
• Vega Toscano, L. G. (2001). Aplicación de la metodología de los programas de investigación al análisis historiográfico del Paleolítico. Complutum, 12, 185-215.
• Vergès, J. M. y Ollé, A. (2011). Technical microwear and residues in identifying bipolar knapping on an anvil: experimental data. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(5), 1016-1025.
• Wadley, L., Lombard, M. y Williamson, B. (2004). The first residue analysis blind tests: results and lessons learnt. Journal of Archaeological Science, 31(11), 1491-1501.
• Wadley, L. (2013). Recognizing complex cognition through innovative technology in Stone Age and Palaeolithic sites. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 23(2), 163-183.
• Wadley, L. y Prinsloo, L. C. (2014). Experimental heat treatment of silcrete implies analogical reasoning in the Middle Stone Age. Journal of Human Evolution, 70, 49-60.
• Wadley, L., de la Peña, P. y Prinsloo, L. C. (2017). Responses of South African agate and chalcedony when heated experimentally, and the broader implications for heated archaeological minerals. Journal of Field Archaeology, 42(4), 364-377.
• Way, A. B. M. (2017). Event-based analysis: Identifying and sequencing prehistoric activities in buried palimpsests. An example from Lake George, Australia. [Tesis doctoral inédita. University of Sydney].
• Way, A. M. y Hiscock, P. (2021). The evolution of Still Bay points at Sibudu. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 13(7), 1-15.
• Way, A. M., de la Peña, P., de la Peña, E. y Wadley, L. (2022). Howiesons Poort backed artifacts provide evidence for social connectivity across southern Africa during the Final Pleistocene. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1-12.
• Weitzel, C., Borrazzo, K., Ceraso, A. y Balirán, C. (2014). Trampling fragmentation potential of lithic artifacts: an experimental approach. Intersecciones en Antropología, 15(1), 97-110.
• Weitzel, C. y Sánchez, A. (2021). A Trampling Experiment to Assess Fractures and Edge Damage in Quarry’s Lithic Assemblages. Lithic Technology, 46(4), 286-301.
• Will, M., Tryon, C., Shaw, M., Scerri, E. M., Ranhorn, K., Pargeter, J., McNeil, J., Mackay, A., Leplongeon, A., Groucutt, H. S. and Douze, K. (2019). Comparative analysis of Middle Stone Age artifacts in Africa (CoMSAfrica). Evolutionary Anthropology, 28(2), 57-59.
• Wilkins, J. (2020). Is it time to retire NASTIES in southern Africa? Moving beyond the culture-historical framework for Middle Stone Age lithic assemblage variability. Lithic Technology, 45(4), 295-307.
• Williamson, B. S. (2004). Middle Stone Age tool function from residue analysis at Sibudu Cave: Sibudu Cave. South African Journal of Science, 100(3), 174-178.
• Wynn, T. (2000). Symmetry and the evolution of the modular linguistic mind. In P. Carruthers y A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition (pp. 113-139). Cambridge University Press.