Climate Change, Moral Bioenhancement and the Ultimate Mostropic

Referencias bibliográficas

• Agar, N. (2004). Liberal Eugenics. In Defence of Human Enhancement. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
• Agar, N. (2010). ‘Enhancing Genetic Virtue?’ Politics and the Life Sci-ences, 29 (1), 73-75.
• Agar, N. (2015). ‘Moral Bioenhancement is Dangerous.’ Journal of Medical Ethics, 41, 343-345.
• Brey, P. (2009). ‘Human Enhancement and Personal Identity.’ In Olsen, J. K. B., Selinger, E. & Riis, S. (Eds.). New Waves in Philosophy of Technology. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 169-185.
• Cortina, A. (2013). ‘¿Es la biomejora moral un imperativo ético?’ Sis-tema. Revista de ciencias sociales, 230, 3-14.
• Crocket, M. J. (2014). ‘Moral Bioenhancement: A Neuroscientific Per-spective.’ Journal of Medical Ethics, 40 (6), 370-371.
• DeGrazia, D. (2005). ‘Enhancement Technologies and Human Identity.’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 30 (3), 261-283.
• DeGrazia, D. (2014). ‘Moral Enhancement, Freedom, and What We (Should) Value in Moral Behaviour.’ Journal of Medical Ethics, 40, 361-368.
• Diéguez, A., & Véliz, C. (2019). ‘Would Moral Enhancement Limit Freedom?’ Topoi, 38 (1), 29-36.
• Doran, P. T., & Zimmerman, M. K. (2009). ‘Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change.’ EOS, 90 (3), 22-23.
• Douglas, T. (2008). ‘Moral Enhancement.’ Journal of Applied Philoso-phy, 25 (3), 228-245.
• Douglas, T. (2013). ‘Moral Enhancement Via Direct Emotion Modula-tion: A Reply to John Harris.’ Bioethics, 27 (3), 160-168.
• Douglas, T. (2014). ‘Moral Bioenhancement, Freedom and Reasoning.’ Journal of Medical Ethics, 40 (6), 359-360.
• Douglas, T., & Devolder, K. (2013). ‘Procreative altruism: beyond in-dividualism in reproductive selection.’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38 (4), 400-419.
• Earp, B. D., Douglas, T., & Savulescu, J. (2018). ‘Moral neuroenhance-ment.’ In Johnson, L. S. M. & Rommelfanger, K. S. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics, New York: Routledge, 166-184.
• Faust, H. S. (2008). ‘Should we select for genetic moral enhancement? A thought experiment using the Moral Kinder (MK+) haplotype.’ Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 29 (6), 397-416.
• Frumhoff, P. C., Heede, R., & Oreskes, N. (2015). ‘The Climate Re-sponsibilities of Industrial Carbon Producers.’ Climatic Change, 132 (2), 157-171.
• Giubilini, A., & Savulescu, J. (2017). ‘The Artificial Moral Advisor. The “Ideal Observer” Meets Artificial Intelligence.’ Philosophy and Tech-nology, 31 (2), 169-188.
• Giurgea, C. E. (1972). ‘Vers une pharmacologie de l’activité intégrative du cerveau. Tentative du concept nootrope en psychopharmacologie.’ In Actualités Pharmacologiques, 25ème Serie. Paris: Masson, 115-156.
• Giurgea, C. E. (1982). ‘The Nootropic Concept and Its Prospective Implications.’ Drug Development Research, 2, 441-446.
• Glannon, W. (2018). ‘Moral Enhancement as a Collective Action Prob-lem.’ Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 83, 59-85.
• Griffin, P. (2017). The Carbon Majors Database: CDP Carbon Majors Report 2017. In Climate Accountability Institute, online resource: http://climateaccountability.org/publications.html
• Handfield, T., Huang, P. H., & Simpson, R. M. (2016). ‘Climate Change, Cooperation and Moral Bioenhancement.’ Journal of Medical Ethics, 42 (11), 742-747.
• Hardin, G. (1968). ‘The Tragedy of the Commons.’ Science, 162, 1243-1248.
• Harris, J. (2011). ‘Moral Enhancement and Freedom.’ Bioethics, 25 (3), 102-111.Harris, J. (2013). ‘Moral Progress and Moral Enhancement.’ Bioethics, 27 (5), 285-290.
• Harris, J. (2016). How to be Good. The Possibility of Moral Enhance-ment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.
• Huxley, A. (1932). Brave New World, London: Grafton Books, 1977.
• Jolić, T. (2014). ‘Climate Change and Human Moral Enhancement.’ In Domazet, M. & Marinovic Jerolimov, D. (eds.), Sustainability Per-spectives from the European Semiperiphery. Institute for Social Research, 79-91.
• Klincewizc, M. (2016). ‘Artificial Intelligence as a Means to Moral En-hancement.’ Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 48 (1), 171-187.
• Kulawska, A., & Hauskeller, M. (2018). ‘Moral Enhancement and Cli-mate Change: Might It Work?’ Royal Institute of Philosophy Sup-plement, 83, 371-388.
• Kudlek, K. (2019). ‘The Role of Emotion Modulation in Moral Bioen-hancement Debate.’ Topoi, 38 (1), 113-123.
• Lara, F. (2017a). ‘Oxytocin, Empathy and Human Enhancement.’ Theoria, 32 (3), 367-384.
• Lara, F. (2017b). ‘Ethical Requisites for Neuroenhancement of Moral Motivation.’ Ramon Llul Journal of Applied Ethics, 8, 159-181.
• Lara, F., & Deckers, J. (2019). ‘Artificial Intelligence as a Socratic As-sistant for Moral Enhancement.’ Neuroethics. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-019-09401-y
• Levy, N., Douglas, T., Kahane, G., Terbeck, S., Cowen, P. J., Hewstone, M., & Savulescu, J. (2014). ‘Are You Morally Modified? The Moral Effects of Widely Used Pharmaceuticals.’ Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 21 (2), 111-125.
• Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2013). ‘The Pivotal Role of Perceived Scientific Consensus in Acceptance of Science.’ Nature Climate Change, 3 (4), 399-404.
• Mill, J. S. (1859). On Liberty. Auckland, New Zealand: The Floating Press, 1909.
• Pacholczyck, A. (2011). ‘Moral Enhancement: What It Is and Do We Want It?’ Law, Innovation and Technology, 3 (2), 251-277.
• Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2008). ‘The Perils of Cognitive Enhancement and the Urgent Imperative to Enhance the Moral Character of Hu-manity.’ Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25 (3), 162-177.
• Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2010). ‘Moral Transhumanism.’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35 (6), 656-669.
• Persson, I. & Savulescu, J. (2011a). ‘Unfit for the Future? Human Nature, Scientific Progress, and the Need for Moral Enhancement.’ In Sa-vulescu, J., Ter Meulen, R. & Kahane, G. (eds.). Enhancing Human Capacities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 486-500.
• Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2011b). ‘The Turn to Ultimate Harm: a Reply to Fenton.’ Journal of Medical Ethics, 37 (7), 441-444.
• Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2012). Unfit for the Future. The Need for Moral Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2013). ‘Getting Moral Enhancement Right: the Desirability of Moral Bioenhancement.’ Bioethics, 27 (3), 124-131.
• Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2014a). ‘Against Fetishism About Egali-tarianism and in Defense of Cautious Moral Enhancement.’ The American Journal of Bioethics, 14 (4), 39-42.
• Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2014b). ‘Should Moral Enhancement Be Compulsory? Reply to Vojin Rakic.’ Journal of Medical Ethics, 40 (4), 251-252.
• Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2015a). ‘The Art of Misunderstanding Moral Bioenhancement.’ Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 24 (1), 48-57.
• Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2015b). ‘Reply to Commentators on Unfit for the Future.’ Journal of Medical Ethics. 41 (4), 348-352.
• Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2019a). ‘The Duty to be Morally Enhanced.’ Topoi, 38 (1), 7-14.
• Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2019b). ‘The Irrelevance of a Moral Right to Privacy for Biomedical Moral Enhancement.’ Neuroethics, 12 (1), 35-37.
• Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2019c). ‘Biomedical Moral Enhancement – not a Lever without a Fulcrum.’ Neuroethics, 12 (1), 19-22.
• Rakić, V. (2014). ‘Voluntary Moral Enhancement and the Survival-at-Any-Cost Bias.’ Journal of Medical Ethics, 40, 246-250.
• Rakić, V. (2017). ‘Compulsory Administration of Oxytocin Does Not Result in Genuine Moral Enhancement.’ Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, 20 (3), 291-297.
• Raus, K., Focquaert, F., Schermer, M., Specker, J., & Sterckx, S. (2014). ‘On Defining Moral Enhancement: A Clarificatory Taxonomy.’ Neuroethics, 7 (3), 263-273.
• Riis, J., Simmons, J. P., & Goodwin, G. P. (2008). ‘Preferences for Enhancement Pharmaceuticals: The Reluctance to Enhance Funda-mental Traits.’ Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (3), 495-508.
• Savulescu, J., & Maslen, H. (2015). ‘Moral Enhancement and Artificial Intelligence: Moral AI?’ In Romportl, J.; Zackova, E. & Kelemen, J. (eds.). Beyond artificial intelligence. The disappearing human-ma-chine divide. Springer. 79-95.
• Savulescu, J., & Persson, I. (2012). ‘Moral Enhancement, Freedom and the God Machine.’ Monist, 95 (3), 399-421.
• Schaefer, G. O., & Savulescu, J. (2019). ‘Procedural Moral Enhance-ment.’ Neuroethics, 12 (1), 73-84.
• Schlag, S. (2019). ‘The Tragedy of Biomedical Moral Enhancement.’ Neuroethics, 12 (1), 5-17.
• Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2005). ‘It’s Not My Fault: Global Warming and Individual Moral Obligation.’ In Sinnott-Armstrong, W. & Howarth, R. B. (eds.) Perspectives on Climate Change: Science, Economics, Politics, Ethics, Advances in the Economics of Environ-mental Resources book series, Vol. 5. Emerald Publishing, 293-315.
• Sparrow, R. (2014a). ‘Better Living Through Chemistry? A Reply to Savulescu and Persson on “Moral Enhancement”.’ Journal of Applied Philosophy, 31 (1), 23-32.
• Sparrow, R. (2014b). ‘Egalitarianism and Moral Bioenhancement.’ The American Journal of Bioethics, 14 (4), 20-28.
• Terbeck, S., & Francis, K. (2018). ‘The Experimental Psychology of Moral Enhancement: We Should If We Could, But We Can’t.’ Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 83, 313-328.
• Torres, P. (2017). ‘Moral Bioenhancement and Agential Risks: Good and Bad Outcomes.’ Bioethics, 31, 691-696.
• Walker, M. (2009). ‘Enhancing Genetic Virtue.’ Politics and the Life Sciences, 28 (2), 27-47.
• Whitby, B. (2011). ‘On Computable Morality. An Examination of Machines as Moral Advisors.’ In Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L., (eds.). Machine Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 138-150