The bibliometric journey towards technological and social changeA review of current challenges and issues

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alonso, Sergio; Cabrerizo, Francisco-Javier; Herrera-Viedma, Enrique; Herrera, Francisco (2009). “h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields”. Journal of informetrics, v. 3, n. 4, pp. 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001
• Anderson, Chris (2008). “The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete”. Wired, 23 June. https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory
• Aria, Massimo; Cuccurullo, Corrado (2017). “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis”. Journal of informetrics, v. 11, n. 4, pp. 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
• Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao; Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Costas, Rodrigo (2022). Wikipedia knowledge graph dataset [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6346900
• Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao; Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Herrera-Viedma, Enrique; Romero-Frías, Esteban (2020). “Science through Wikipedia: A novel representation of open knowledge through co-citation networks”. Plos one, v. 15, n. 2, e0228713. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228713
• Athar, Awais (2014). Sentiment analysis of scientific citations (UCAM-CL-TR-856). University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.48456/tr-856
• Banda, Juan M.; Tekumalla, Ramya; Wang, Guanyu; Yu, Jingyuan; Liu, Tuo; Ding, Yuning; Artemova, Katya; Tutubalina, Elena; Chowell, Gerardo (2022). A large-scale COVID-19 Twitter chatter dataset for open scientific research - An international collaboration [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7029821
• Barré, Rémi (2019). “Les indicateurs sont morts, vive les indicateurs! Towards a political economy of S&T indicators: A critical overview of the past 35 years”. Research evaluation, v. 28, n. 1, pp. 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy029
• Bastedo, Michael N.; Bowman, Nicholas A. (2010). “U.S. news & world report college rankings: Modeling institutional effects on organizational reputation”. American journal of education, v. 116, n. 2, pp. 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1086/649437
• Bell, Gordon; Hey, Tony; Szalay, Alex (2009). “Beyond the data deluge”. Science, v. 323, n. 5919, pp. 1297-1298. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170411
• Benedictus, Rinze; Miedema, Frank; Ferguson, Mark W. J. (2016). “Fewer numbers, better science”. Nature, v. 538, n. 7626, pp. 453-455. https://doi.org/10.1038/538453a
• Bérubé, Nicolas; Ghiasi, Gita; Sainte-Marie, Maxime; Larivière, Vincent (2020). Wiki-Gendersort: Automatic gender detection using first names in Wikipedia. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ezw7p
• Björneborn, Lennart; Ingwersen, Peter (2001). “Perspective of webometrics”. Scientometrics, v. 50, n. 1, pp. 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005642218907
• Boekhout, Hanjo; Van-der-Weijden, Inge; Waltman, Ludo (2021). Gender differences in scientific careers: A large-scale bibliometric analysis. Arxiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.12624
• Bollen, Johan; Van-de-Sompel, Herbert; Smith, Joan A.; Luce, Rick (2005). “Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data”. Information processing & management, v. 41, n. 6, pp. 1419-1440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.024
• Bu, Yi; Waltman, Ludo; Huang, Yong (2021). “A multidimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications”. Quantitative science studies, v. 2, n. 1, pp. 155-183. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00109
• Cabezas-Clavijo, Álvaro; Torres-Salinas, Daniel (2021). “Bibliometric reports for institutions: Best practices in a responsible metrics scenario”. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, v. 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.696470
• Clarivate Analytics (2018). InCites: Indicators Handbook. Clarivate. https://help.prod-incites.com/inCites2Live/8980-TRS/version/default/part/AttachmentData/data/InCites-Indicators-Handbook-6%2019.pdf
• Costas, Rodrigo; Corona, Carmen; Robinson-García, Nicolás (2022). Could ORCID play a key role in meta-research? Discussing new analytical possibilities to study the dynamics of science and scientists. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/sjck6
• Cronin, Blaise (1984). The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham. ISBN: 0 947568 0 1 8
• Cronin, Blaise (2013). “From signtometrics to scientometrics: A cautionary tale of our times”. Journal of information science theory and practice, v. 1, n. 4, pp. 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2013.1.4.1
• Daraio, Cinzia; Lenzerini, Maurizio; Leporelli, Claudio; Moed, Henk F.; Naggar, Paolo; Bonaccorsi, Andrea; Bartolucci, Alessandro (2016). “Data integration for research and innovation policy: An ontology-based data management approach”. Scientometrics, v. 106, n. 2, pp. 857-871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1814-0
• De-Bellis, Nicola (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the Science Citation Index to cybermetrics. Scarecrow Press. ISBN: 978 0 810867130
• Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio; Ràfols, Ismael; Abadal, Ernest (2021). “Letter: A call for a radical change in research evaluation in Spain”. Profesional de la información, v. 30, n. 3, e300309. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.may.09
• Egghe, Leo; Rousseau, Ronald (1990). Introduction to informetrics. Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Elsevier Science Publishers. ISBN: 0 444 884939 http://eprints.rclis.org/6011
• Elsevier (2019). Research metrics guidebook. Elsevier. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/53327/ELSV-13013-Elsevier-Research-Metrics-Book-r12-WEB.pdf
• European Commission (2022). Reforming research assessment: The Agreement is now final. European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://onx.la/e1aef
• Garfield, Eugene (2004). “Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature”. Journal of information science, v. 30, n. 2, pp. 119-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504042802
• Gorraiz, Juan; Wieland, Martin; Ulrych, Ursula; Gumpenberger, Christian (2020). “De profundis: A decade of bibliometric services under scrutiny”. In: Daraio, Cinzia; Glänzel, Wolfgang (eds.). Evaluative informetrics: The art of metrics-based research assessment. Festschrift in Honour of Henk F. Moed. Cham: Springer, pp. 233-260. ISBN: 978 3 030 47665 6 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47665-6_11
• Gregorio-Chaviano, Orlando; Repiso, Rafael; Calderón-Rehecho, Antonio; León-Marín, Joaquín; Jiménez-Contreras, Evaristo (2021). “Dialnet Métricas como herramienta de evaluación bibliométrica: Aportes al análisis de la actividad científica en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades”. Profesional de la información, v. 30, n. 3, e300318. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.may.18
• Grodzinski, Noah; Grodzinski, Ben; Davies, Benjamin M. (2021). “Can co-authorship networks be used to predict author research impact? A machine-learning based analysis within the field of degenerative cervical myelopathy research”. Plos one, v. 16, n. 9, e0256997. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256997
• Gumpenberger, Christian; Glänzel, Wolfgang; Gorraiz, Juan (2016). “The ecstasy and the agony of the altmetric score”. Scientometrics, v. 108, n. 2, pp. 977-982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1991-5
• Haustein, Stefanie; Bowman, Timoty D.; Costas, Rodrigo (2016). “Interpreting ‘altmetrics’: viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories”. In: Sugimoto, Cassidy R. (ed). Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication. De Gruyter, pp. 372-406. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110308464
• Herzog, Christian; Hook, Daniel; Konkiel, Stacy (2020). “Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data”. Quantitative science studies, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 387-395. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00020
• Hicks, Diana; Wouters, Paul; Waltman, Ludo; De-Rijcke, Sarah; Ràfols, Ismael (2015). “The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics”. Nature, v. 520, n. 7548, pp. 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
• Jappe, Arlette (2020). “Professional standards in bibliometric research evaluation? A meta-evaluation of European assessment practice 2005-2019”. Plos one, v. 15, n. 4, e0231735. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231735
• Jefferson, Osmat-Azzam; Koellhofer, Deniz; Warren, Ben; Jefferson, Richard (2019). The Lens MetaRecord and LensID: An open identifier system for aggregated metadata and versioning of knowledge artefacts [Preprint]. LIS Scholarship Archive. https://doi.org/10.31229/osf.io/t56yh
• Khan, Samiya; Liu, Xiufeng; Shakil, Kashish A.; Alam, Mansaf (2017). “A survey on scholarly data: From big data perspective”. Information processing & management, v. 53, n. 4, pp. 923-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.03.006
• Kozlowski, Diego; Larivière, Vincent; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Monroe-White, Thema (2022). “Intersectional inequalities in science”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 119, n. 2, e2113067119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113067119
• Lammey, Rachael (2020). “Solutions for identification problems: A look at the Research Organization Registry”. Science editing, v. 7, n. 1, pp. 65-69. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.192
• Leydesdorff, Loet (1998). “Theories of citation?”. Scientometrics, v. 43, n. 1, pp. 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458391
• Leydesdorff, Loet (2009). “How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox?”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 60, n. 7, pp. 1327-1336. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21024
• Leydesdorff, Loet; Etzkowitz, Henry (1998). “Triple Helix of innovation: Introduction”. Science and public policy, v. 25, n. 6, pp. 358-364. https://www.leydesdorff.net/spp98
• Ma, Anqi; Liu, Yu; Xu, Xiujuan; Dong, Tao (2021). “A deep-learning based citation count prediction model with paper metadata semantic features”. Scientometrics, v. 126, n. 8, pp. 6803-6823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04033-7
• Mateo, Ferrán (2015). “Producción científica en español en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Algunas propuestas desde Dialnet”. El profesional de la información, v. 24, n. 5, pp. 509-516. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.sep.01
• Moed, Henk F. (2017). Applied evaluative informetrics. Springer International Publishing. ISBN: 978 3 319 60522 7 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60522-7
• Moed, Henk F.; Burger, W. J. M.; Frankfort, J. G.; Van-Raan, Anthony F. J. (1985). “The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance”. Research policy, v. 14, n. 3, pp. 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90012-5
• Moher, David; Bouter, Lex; Kleinert, Sabine; Glasziou, Paul; Sham, Mai Har; Barbour, Virginia; Coriat, Anne-Marie; Foeger, Nicole; Dirnagl, Ulrich (2020). “The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity”. Plos biology, v. 18, n. 7, e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
• Orduña-Malea, Enrique; Martín-Martín, Alberto; Ayllón, Juan M.; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2016). La revolución Google Scholar: Destapando la caja de Pandora académica. Universidad de Granada. ISBN: 978 84 338 5985 3
• Ortega y Gasset, José (2005). Misión del bibliotecario. Edición conmemorativa del 50 aniversario luctuoso del autor y de la celabración de la Día Nacional del Bibliotecario. Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes.
• Pardo-Guerra, Juan-Pablo (2022). The quantified scholar: How research evaluations transformed the British social sciences. Columbia University Press. ISBN: 978 0 231197809
• Priem, Jason; Piwowar, Heather; Orr, Richard (2022). OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts (arXiv:2205.01833). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01833
• Priem, Jason; Taraborelli, Dario; Groth, Paul; Neylon, Cameron (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto – altmetrics.org. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
• Ràfols, Ismael; Molas-Gallart, Jordi; Chavarro, Diego-Andrés; Robinson-García, Nicolás (2016). On the dominance of quantitative evaluation in ‘peripheral’ countries: Auditing research with technologies of distance (SSRN Scholarly paper No 2818335). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818335
• Ràfols, Ismael; Stirling, Andy (2021). “Designing indicators for opening up evaluation: insights form research assessment”. In: Dahler-Larsen, Peter. A research agenda for evaluation. Edward Elgar, pp. 165-193. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839101083.00015
• Robinson-García, Nicolás; Amat, Carlos-Benito (2018). “¿Tiene sentido limitar la coautoría científica? No existe inflación de autores en Ciencias Sociales y Educación en España”. Revista española de documentación científica, v. 41, n. 2, e201. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2018.2.1499
• Robinson-García, Nicolás; Costas, Rodrigo; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Larivière, Vincent; Nane, Gabriela F. (2020). “Task specialization across research careers”. eLife, v. 9, e60586. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60586
• Robinson-García, Nicolás; Jiménez-Contreras, Evaristo; Torres-Salinas, Daniel (2016). “Analyzing data citation practices using the data citation index”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 67, n. 12, pp. 2964-2975. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23529
• Robinson-García, Nicolás; Ràfols, Ismael (2020). “The differing meanings of indicators under different policy contexts. The case of internationalisation”. In: Daraio, Cinzia; Glänzel, Wolfgang (eds.). Evaluative informetrics: The art of metrics-based research assessment: Festschrift in honour of Henk F. Moed. Springer, pp. 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47665-6_10
• Robinson-García, Nicolás; Repiso, Rafael; Torres-Salinas, Daniel (2018). “Perspectiva y retos de los profesionales de la evaluación científica y la bibliometría”. El profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 3, pp. 461-466. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.may.01
• Robinson-García, Nicolás; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Murray, Dakota; Yegros-Yegros, Alfredo; Larivière, Vincent; Costas, Rodrigo (2019). “The many faces of mobility: Using bibliometric data to measure the movement of scientists”. Journal of informetrics, v. 13, n. 1, pp. 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.11.002
• Robinson-García, Nicolás; Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Zahedi, Zohreh; Costas, Rodrigo (2014). “New data, new possibilities: Exploring the insides of Altmetric.com”. El profesional de la información, v. 23, n. 4. http://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2014.jul.03
• Rose, Michael E.; Kitchin, John, R. (2019). “Pybliometrics: Scriptable bibliometrics using a Python interface to Scopus”. SoftwareX, v. 10, 100163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2019.100263
• Saier, Tarek; Färber, Michael; Tsereteli, Tornike (2022). “Cross-lingual citations in English papers: A large-scale analysis of prevalence, usage, and impact”. International journal on digital libraries, v. 23, n. 2, pp. 179-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-021-00312-z
• Saltelli, Andrea; Bammer, Gabriele; Bruno, Isabelle; Charters, Erica; Di-Fiore, Monica; Didier, Emmanuel; Espeland, Wendy-Nelson; Kay, John; Lo-Piano, Samuele; Mayo, Deborah; Pielke Jr., Roger; Portaluri, Tommaso; Porter, Theodore M.; Puy, Arnald; Ràfols, Ismael; Ravetz, Jerome R.; Reinert, Erik; Sarewitz, Daniel; Stark, Philip B.; Stirling, Andrew; Van-der-Sluijs, Jeroen; Vineis, Paolo (2020). “Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto”. Nature, v. 582, pp. 482-484. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01812-9
• Small, Henry (2006). “Tracking and predicting growth areas in science”. Scientometrics, v. 68, pp. 595-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0132-y
• Small, Henry; Sweeney, Ed; Greenlee, Edward (1985). “Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. II. Mapping science”. Scientometrics, v. 8, n. 5, pp. 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018057
• Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Larivière, Vincent (2018). Measuring research: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 190640125
• Szomszor, Martin; Adie, Euan (2022). “Overton: A bibliometric database of policy document citations”. Quantitative science studies, v. 3, n. 3, pp. 624-650. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00204
• Tahamtan, Iman; Bornmann, Lutz (2022). “The social systems citation theory (SSCT): A proposal to use the social systems theory for conceptualizing publications and their citations links”. Profesional de la información, v. 31, n. 4, e310411. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.jul.11
• Tekles, Alexander; Bornmann, Lutz (2020). “Author name disambiguation of bibliometric data: A comparison of several unsupervised approaches”. Quantitative science studies, v. 1, n. 4, pp. 1510-1528. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00081
• Torres-Salinas, Daniel (2022a). “InfluScience2: Disponible la nueva versión de nuestra plataforma altmétrica”. InfluScience. https://influscience.eu/novedades/influscience2-disponible-la-nueva-version-de-nuestra-plataforma-altmetrica
• Torres-Salinas, Daniel (2022b). “1985: Cinco lecciones inmortales de Moed para bibliómetras profesionales”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 16, e16a14. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a14
• Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao (2022a). Material complementario de ‘Nuevas formas de trabajar con la información científica: Introducción al uso de las APIs en contextos bibliométricos’. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6323589
• Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao (2022b). “APIs en contextos bibliométricos: Introducción básica y corpus exhaustivo”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 16. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a09
• Torres-Salinas, Daniel; González-Molina, Antonio (2019). A modo de acta: “II Reunión de los Servicios de Evaluación Científica” en la Universidad de Córdoba. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2557725
• Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Jiménez-Contreras, Evaristo (2012). “Hacia las unidades de bibliometría en las universidades: modelo y funciones”. Revista española de documentación científica, v. 35, n. 3, pp. 469-480. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.3.959
• Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Robinson-García, Nicolás; Jiménez-Contreras, Evaristo; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2012). “Towards a “Book Publishers Citation Reports”. First approach using the ‘Book Citation Index’”. Revista española de documentación científica, v. 35, n. 4, pp. 615-624. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.4.1010
• Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Robinson-García, Nicolás; Herrera-Viedma, Enrique; Jiménez-Contreras, Evaristo (2018). “Consideraciones metodológicas sobre uso del impacto normalizado en convocatorias Severo Ochoa y María de Maetzu”. El profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 2, pp. 367-374. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.mar.15
• Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Valderrama-Baca, Pilar; Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao (2022). “Is there a need for a new journal metric? Correlations between JCR Impact Factor metrics and the Journal Citation Indicator - JCI”. Journal of informetrics, v. 16, n. 3, 101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101315
• Van-Eck, Nees-Jan; Waltman, Ludo (2017). “Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer”. Scientometrics, v. 111, pp. 1053-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
• Visser, Martijn; Van-Eck, Nees-Jan; Waltman, Ludo (2021). “Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic”. Quantitative science studies, v. 2, n. 1, pp. 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112
• Wang, Yuzhuo; Zhang, Chengzhi; Li, Kai (2022). “A review on method entities in the academic literature: Extraction, evaluation, and application”. Scientometrics, v. 127, n. 5, 2479-2520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04332-7
• Wildgaard, Lorna; Schneider, Jesper W.; Larsen, Birger (2014). “A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators”. Scientometrics, v. 101, n. 1, pp. 125-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1423-3
• Wilsdon, James (2018). “Has the tide turned towards responsible metrics in research?”. The Guardian, July 10. https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2018/jul/10/has-the-tide-turned-towards-responsible-metrics-in-research
• Wilsdon, James; Allen, Liz; Belfiore, Eleonora; Campbell, Philip; Curry, Stephen; Hill, Steven; Jones, Richard; Kain, Roger; Kerridge, Simon; Thelwall, Mike; Tinkler, Jane; Viney, Ian; Wouters, Paul; Hill, Jude; Johnson, Ben (2015). The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. HEFCE. http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363
• Wouters, Paul; Zahedi, Zohreh; Costas, Rodrigo (2019). “Social media metrics for new research evaluation”. In: Glänzel, Wolfgang; Moed, Henk F.; Schmoch, Ulrich; Thelwall, Mike (eds.). Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Springer, pp. 687-713. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_26
• Xia, Feng; Wang, Wei; Bekele, Teshome Megersa; Liu, Huan (2017). “Big scholarly data: A survey”. IEEE transactions on big data, v. 3, n. 1, pp. 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2016.2641460
• Yang, Zhan; Xu, Wei; Chen, Runyu (2021). “A deep learning-based multi-turn conversation modeling for diagnostic Q&A document recommendation”. Information processing & management, v. 58, n. 3, 102485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102485
• Zacharewicz, Thomas; Lepori, Benedetto; Reale, Emanuela; Jonkers, Koen (2019). “Performance-based research funding in EU Member States - a comparative assessment”. Science and public policy, v. 46, n. 1, pp. 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy041
• Zahedi, Zohreh; Costas, Rodrigo (2018). “General discussion of data quality challenges in social media metrics: Extensive comparison of four major altmetric data aggregators”. Plos one, v. 13, n. 5, e0197326. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197326