Students’ Reasoning about the Normal Distribution

  1. Batanero, Carmen
  2. Tauber, Liliana Mabel
  3. Sánchez, Victoria
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Libro:
The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking

ISBN: 9781402022777 9781402022784

Año de publicación: 2004

Páginas: 257-276

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_11 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Batanero, C., Tauber, L., & Meyer, R. (1999). From data analysis to inference: A research project on the teaching of normal distributions. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute: Proceedings of the Fifty-Second Session of the International Statistical Institute (Tome LVIII, Book 1, pp. 57–58). Helsinki, Finland: International Statistical Institute.
  • Batanero, C., Tauber, L., & Sánchez, V. (2001). Significado y comprensión de la distribución normal en un curso introductorio de análisis de datos (Meaning and understanding of normal distributions in an introductory data analysis course). Quadrante, 10(1), 59–92.
  • Ben-Zvi, D. (2000). Towards understanding the role of technological tools in statistical learning. Mathematics Thinking and Learning, 2(1&2), 127–155.
  • Ben-Zvi, D., & Arcavi, A. (2001). Junior high school student’s construction of global views of data and data representations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 35–65.
  • Biehler, R. (1991). Computers in probability education. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnick (Eds.), Chance encounters: Probability in education (pp. 169–211). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Dantal, B. (1997). Les enjeux de la modélisation en probabilité (The challenges of modeling in probability). In Enseigner les probabilités au lycée (pp. 57–59). Reims: Commission Inter-IREM Statistique et Probabilités.
  • delMas, R. C., Garfield, J. B., & Chance, B. (1999). Exploring the role of computer simulations in developing understanding of sampling distributions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
  • Gal, I. (1997). Assessing students’ interpretations of data: Conceptual and pragmatic issues. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Papers on Statistical Education presented at ICME-8 (pp. 49–58). Swinburne, Australia: Swinburne University of Technology.
  • Garfield, J. B. (1991). Evaluating students’ understanding of statistics: Developing the statistical reasoning assessment. In R. G. Underhill (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 1–7). Blacksburg, VA: Comité organizador.
  • Godino, J. D. (1996). Mathematical concepts, their meaning and understanding. In L. Puig & A. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 417–424). Valencia: Comité organizador.
  • Godino, J. D., & Batanero, C. (1998). Clarifying the meaning of mathematical objects as a priority area of research in mathematics education. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics Education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 177–195). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Huck, S., Cross, T. L., & Clark, S. B. (1986). Overcoming misconceptions about z-scores. Teaching Statistics, 8(2), 38–40.
  • Méndez, H. (1991). Understanding the central limit theorem. Ph.D. diss., University of California, University Microfilm International number 1-800-521-0600.
  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1951). La génese de ľidée de hasard chez ľenfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Rubin, A., Bruce, B., & Tenney, Y. (1991). Learning about sampling: Trouble at the core of statistics. In D. Vere-Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Teaching Statistics (pp. 314–319). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
  • Schuyten, G. (1991). Statistical thinking in psychology and education. In D. Vere-Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of the III International Conference on Teaching Statistics (Vol. 2, pp. 486–489). Dunedin, Australia: University of Otago.
  • Vallecillos, A. (1996). Inferencia estadística y enseñanza: Un análisis didáctico del contraste de hipótesis estadísticas (Statistical inference and teaching: A didactical analysis of statistical tests). Madrid: Comares.
  • Vallecillos, A. (1999). Some empirical evidence on learning difficulties about testing hypotheses. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute: Proceedings of the Fifty-Second Session of the International Statistical Institute (Tome LVIII, Book 2, pp. 201–204). Helsinki, Finland: International Statistical Institute.
  • Wild, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–265.
  • Wilensky, U. (1995). Learning probability through building computational models. In D. Carraher y L. Meira (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th PME Conference (Vol. 3, pp. 152–159). Recife, Brazil: Organizing Committee.
  • Wilensky, U. (1997). What is normal anyway? Therapy for epistemological anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 171–202.