Obtaining and Comparing Factors in Land Change Models Using One or Two Time Points Based Calibration

  1. Camacho Olmedo, M. T.
Libro:
Geomatic Approaches for Modeling Land Change Scenarios

ISSN: 1863-2246 1863-2351

ISBN: 9783319608006 9783319608013

Año de publicación: 2017

Páginas: 101-120

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60801-3_6 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abuelaish B, Camacho Olmedo MT (2016) Scenario of land use and land cover change in the Gaza Strip using remote sensing and GIS models. Arab J Geosci 9:274
  • Camacho Olmedo MT, Paegelow M, Mas JF (2013) Interest in intermediate soft-classified maps in land change model validation: suitability versus transition potential. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 27(12):2343–2361
  • Camacho Olmedo MT, Pontius RG Jr, Paegelow M, Mas JF (2015) Comparison of simulation models in terms of quantity and allocation of land change. Environ Model Softw 69(2015):214–221
  • Clark Labs (2016) http://www.clarklabs.org/
  • Conway TM, Wellen CC (2011) Not developed yet? Alternative ways to include locations without changes in land use change models. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(10):1613–1631
  • Eastman JR, Solorzano LA, Van Fossen ME (2005) Transition potential modeling for land cover change. In: Maguire DJ, Batty M, Goodchild MF (eds) GIS, spatial analysis, and modeling. Redland, CA, ESRI, pp 357–385
  • Gómez Espín JM, López Fernández JA, Montaner Salas ME (eds) (2011) Modernización de regadíos: Sostenibilidad social y económica. La singularidad de los regadíosdelTrasvase Tajo-Segura. Colección Usos del agua en el territorio. Universidad de Murcia. Spain
  • Gómez JL, Grindlay A (eds) (2008) Agua, Ingeniería y Territorio: La transformación de la cuenca del río Segura por la IngenieríaHidráulica. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Medio Rural y Marino. Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura. Spain
  • Kolb M, Mas JF, Galicia L (2013) Evaluating drivers of land-use change and transition potential models in a complex lanscape in Southern Mexico. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 27(9):1804–1827
  • Lambin E et al (2001) The causes of land-use and land cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Change 11(4):261–269
  • Mas JF, Flamenco-Sandoval A (2011) Modelación de los cambios de coberturas/uso del suelo en una región tropical de México. GeoTrópico 5(1):1–24
  • Mas JF, Kolb M, Paegelow M, Camacho Olmedo MT, Houet T (2014) Inductive pattern-based land use/ cover change models: a comparison of four software packages. Environ Model Softw 51(2014):94–111
  • National Research Council (NRC) (2014) Advancing land change modeling: opportunities and research requirements. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
  • Osorio LP, Mas JF, Guerra F, Maass M (2015) Análisis y modelación de los procesos de deforestación: un caso de estudio en la cuenca del río Coyuquilla, Guerrero, México. Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletín, núm. 88:60–74
  • Paegelow M, Camacho Olmedo MT (2005) Possibilities and limits of prospective GIS land cover modeling – a compared case study: Garrotxes (France) and Alta Alpujarra Granadina (Spain). Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19(6):697–722
  • Paegelow M, Camacho Olmedo MT (eds) (2008) Modelling environmental dynamics. Advances in geomatics solutions. Springer, Berlin
  • Paegelow M, Camacho Olmedo MT, Mas JF, Houet T, Pontius RG Jr (2013) Land Change Modelling: moving beyond projections. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 27(9):1691–1695
  • Paegelow M, Camacho Olmedo MT, Mas JF, Houet T (2014) Benchmarking of LUCC modelling tools by various validation techniques and error analysis. Cybergeo, document 701, mis en ligne le 22 décembre 2014
  • Pérez-Vega A, Mas JF, Ligmann-Zielinska A (2012) Comparing two approaches to land use/cover change modeling and their implications for the assessment of biodiversity loss in a deciduous tropical forest. Environ Model Softw 29(1):11–23
  • Pontius RG Jr, Malanson J (2005) Comparison of the structure and accuracy of two land change models. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19:243–265
  • Pontius RG Jr, Neeti N (2010) Uncertainty in the difference between maps of future land change scenarios. Sustain Sci 5:39–50
  • Pontius RG Jr, Petrova SH (2010) Assessing a predictive model on land change using uncertain data. Environ Model Softw 25:299–309
  • Pontius RG Jr et al (2008) Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. Ann Region Sci 42(1):11–27
  • Sangermano F, Eastman JR, Zhu H (2010) Similarity weighted instance based learning for the generation of transition potentials in land change modeling. Trans GIS 14(5):569–580
  • Soares-Filho B, Rodrigues H, Follador M (2013) A hybrid analytical-heuristic method for calibrating land-use change models. Environ Model Softw 43(2013):80–87
  • Turner ABL, Meyer WB, Skole DL (1994) Global land-use/land-cover change: towards an integrated study. Ambio 23(1):91–95
  • Villa N et al (2007) Various approaches for predicting land cover in Mediterranean mountains. Commun Stat 36(1):73–86
  • Wang J, Mountrakis G (2011) Developing a multi-network urbanization model: a case study of urban growth in Denver, Colorado. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(2):229–253
  • Yu J et al (2011) Cellular automata-based spatial multi-criteria land suitability simulation for irrigated agriculture. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(1):131–148