Mejorando la calidad de las publicaciones y avanzando en todos los paradigmas de la investigación de la farmacia asistencial, clínica y social: las declaraciones de Granada

  1. Fernando Fernandez-Llimos 1
  2. Shane Desselle 2
  3. Derek Stewart 3
  4. Victoria Garcia-Cardenas 4
  5. Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar 5
  6. Christine Bond 6
  7. Ana Dago 7
  8. Ramune Jacobsen 8
  9. Lotte StigNørgaard 9
  10. Carlo Polidori 10
  11. Manuel Sanchez-Polo 11
  12. Bernardo Santos-Ramos 12
  13. Natalia Shcherbakova 13
  14. Fernanda S. Tonin 14
  15. Ana Molinero 15
  1. 1 evista Brasileira de Farmacia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saude; Professor, Laboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  2. 2 Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy; Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy; Associate Dean for Research and Professional Affairs, Touro University California, Vallejo, CA, USA.
  3. 3 International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy; Professor of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
  4. 4 Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy; Senior Lecturer, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  5. 5 Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice; Professor in Medicines and Healthcare, Department of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
  6. 6 International Journal of Pharmacy Practice; Emeritus Professor (Primary Care), Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom.
  7. 7 Pharmaceutical Care España; President, Pharmaceutical Care España Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
  8. 8 Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy; Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
  9. 9 Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy; Associate Professor at the Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  10. 10 European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Associate Professor, Department of Experimental Medicine and Public Health, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
  11. 11 Ars Pharmaceutica; Professor, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
  12. 12 Farmacia Hospitalaria; Pharmacy, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío; Associated researcher, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS), Seville, Spain.
  13. 13 Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy; Associate Professor, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, United States.
  14. 14 Researcher. Pharmacy Practice; Health & Technology Research Center (H&TRC), Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde (ESTeSL), Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
  15. 15 Farmacéuticos Comunitarios; Deputy Editor-in-chief, SEFAC, Madrid, Spain. Associate Professor, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Alcala, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Farmacéuticos comunitarios

ISSN: 1885-8619

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 15

Número: 3

Páginas: 31-38

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2023).23 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Farmacéuticos comunitarios

Resumen

La farmacia y las ciencias farmacéuticas abarcan una serie de disciplinas diferentes. La Farmacia Asistencial se ha definido como “la disciplina científica que estudia los diferentes aspectos de la práctica de la farmacia y su impacto en los sistemas de atención de la salud, el uso de medicamentos y la atención al paciente”. Por lo tanto, los estudios de Farmacia Asistencial abarcan tantos elementos de farmacia clínica como de farmacia social. Como cualquier otra disciplina científica, la práctica de la farmacia clínica y social difunde los resultados de la investigación utilizando revistas científicas. Los editores de revistas de farmacia clínica y farmacia social tienen un papel en la promoción de la disciplina al mejorar la calidad de los artículos publicados. Como ha ocurrido en otras áreas del cuidado de la salud (es decir, medicina y enfermería), un grupo de editores de revistas de práctica farmacéutica clínica y social se reunió en Granada, España, para discutir cómo las revistas pueden contribuir a fortalecer la práctica farmacéutica como disciplina. El resultado de esa reunión se compiló en estas Declaraciones de Granada, que comprenden 18 recomendaciones reunidas en seis temas: el uso apropiado de la terminología, los resúmenes con impacto, la necesidad de la revisión por pares, la dispersión de revistas, el uso más eficaz e inteligente de los indicadores bibliométricos y la selección por parte de los autores de la revista de práctica farmacéutica más adecuada para presentar su trabajo. Este artículo se publica conjuntamente bajo el acuerdo de publicación y copyright con las siguientes revistas: Ars Pharmaceutica; European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy; Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy; Farmacia Hospitalaria; International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy; International Journal of Pharmacy Practice; Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice; Pharmaceutical Care España; Revista Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde; Farmaceuticos Comunitarios.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 1. McGillivray B, Jenset G, Salama K, et al. Investigating patterns of change, stability, and interaction among scientific disciplines using embeddings. Humanit Soc Sci Commun2022;9:285.
  • 2. Biglan A. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. JAppl Psychol. 1973;57(3):195–203.
  • 3. Becker T. Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures. Studies in Higher Educ. 1982;6(2):109–22.
  • 4. Lodahl J, Gordon G. The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. Am SociologRer. 1972;37(1):57-72.
  • 5. Perry RP, Smart JC. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective.Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media; 2007.
  • 6. Almarsdottir AB, Granas AG. Social pharmacy and clinical pharmacy-Joining forces. Pharmacy (Basel). 2015;4(1.
  • 7. Holmes ER, Desselle SP. Is scientific paradigm important for pharmacy education? Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68(5):118.
  • 8. Marsh HW, Hattie J. The relation between research productivity and teaching Effectiveness. The Journal of Higher Education. 2016;73(5):603-41.
  • 9. Williams K. Playing the fields: Theorizing research impact and its assessment. Res Eval. 2020;29(2):191-202.
  • 10. Mendes AM, Tonin FS, Buzzi MF, et al. Mapping pharmacy journals: A lexicographic analysis. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019;15(12):1464-71.
  • 11. Sørensen E, Mount J, Christensen S. The concept of social pharmacy. Chronic Illn. 2003;7:8-11.
  • 12. Garcia-Cardenas V, Rossing CV, Fernandez-Llimos F, et al. Pharmacy practice research - A call to action. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020;16(11):1602-8.
  • 13. Kerlinger FN, Lee HB. Foundations of Behavioral Research, 4th Ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 1999. ISBN: 978-0155078970
  • 14. Dreischulte T, van den Bemt B, Steurbaut S. European Society of Clinical Pharmacy definition of the term clinical pharmacy and its relationship to pharmaceutical care: a position paper. Intl J Clinical Pharm. 2022;44:1-6.
  • 15. Scahill SL, Atif M, Babar ZU. Defining pharmacy and its practice: a conceptual model for an international audience. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2017;6):121-9.
  • 16. OECD. Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris: OECD; 2015. ISBN: 978-926423901-2
  • 17. Clapham P. Publish or perish. BioScience. 2005;55):390-1.
  • 18. Desselle SP, Amin M, Aslani P, et al. Moving the needle-what does RSAP look for and what does it aim to do? Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019;15(1):1-2.
  • 19. Fernandez-Llimos F, Mendes AM, Tonin FS. Confusing terminology used in the abbreviation of pharmacy journal names. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022;18(8):3463-5.
  • 208. Fernandez-Llimos F, Garcia-Cardenas V. The importance of using standardized terminology in titles and abstracts of pharmacy practice articles. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022.
  • 21. Gernant SA, Bacci JL, Upton C, et al. Three opportunities for standardization: A literature review of the variation among pharmacists’ patient care services terminology. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020;16(6):766-75.
  • 22. van Mil JW, Henman M. Terminology, the importance of defining. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):709-13.
  • 23. MacLure K, Paudyal V, Stewart D. Reviewing the literature, how systematic is systematic? Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):685-94.
  • 24. Al Saeedy D, Thomas D, Palaian S. Visibility of evidence-based pharmacy on PubMed - Identity crisis? Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019;15(11):1374.
  • 25. McCann A. Advantages of a universal coding and classification system for drugs. Implications of classification for medical subject headings. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1966;23(2):87-8.
  • 26. Minguet F, Van Den Boogerd L, Salgado TM, et al. Characterization of the Medical Subject Headings thesaurus for pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014;71(22):1965-72.
  • 27. Fernandez-Llimos F, Salgado TM. Standardization of pharmacy practice terminology and the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021;17(4):819-20.
  • 28. Minguet F, Salgado TM, van den Boogerd L, et al. Quality of pharmacy-specific Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) assignment in pharmacy journals indexed in MEDLINE. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015;11(5):686-95.
  • 29. Tonin FS, Gmunder V, Bonetti AF, et al. Use of ‘Pharmaceutical services’ Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in articles assessing pharmacists’ interventions. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2022;7): 100172.
  • 30. Rodriguez RW. Comparison of indexing times among articles from medical, nursing, and pharmacy journals. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016;73(8):569-75.
  • 31. Irwin AN, Rackham D. Comparison of the time-to-indexing in PubMed between biomedical journals according to impact factor, discipline, and focus. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017;13(2): 389-93.
  • 32. Kronick DA. Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1321-2.
  • 33. Kassirer JP, Campion EW. Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable. JAMA. 1994;272(2):96-7.
  • 34. Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, et al. What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? J R Soc Med. 2008;101(10):507-14.
  • 35. Bailar JC, 3rd, Patterson K. The need for a research agenda. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(10):654-7.
  • 36. Jirschitzka J, Oeberst A, Göllner R, et al. Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field. Scientometrics. 2017;113(2):1059-92.
  • 37. Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wager E, et al. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287(21):2784-6.
  • 38. Jefferson T, Rudin M, BrodneyFolse S, et al. Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007(2):MR000016.
  • 39. Kovanis M, Trinquart L, Ravaud P, et al. Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication. Scientometrics. 2017;113(1): 651-71.
  • 40. Walbot V. Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts? J Biol. 2009;8(3):24.
  • 41. Huisman J, Smits J. Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective. Scientometrics. 2017;113(1):633-50.
  • 42. Mendes AM, Tonin FS, Mainka FF, et al. Publication speed in pharmacy practice journals: A comparative analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253713.
  • 43. Fernandez-Llimos F. Peer review and publication delay. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2019;17(1):1502.
  • 44. Aczel B, Szaszi B, Holcombe AO. A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021;6(1):14.
  • 45. Desselle SP, Chen AM, Amin M, et al. Generosity, collegiality, and scientific accuracy when writing and reviewing original research. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020;16(2):261-5.
  • 46. Fernandez-Llimos F, Salgado TM, Tonin FS. How many manuscripts should I peer review per year? Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020;18(1):1804.
  • 47. Donato H, Marinho RT. Acta Medica Portuguesa and peer-review: quick and brutal! Acta Med Port. 2012;25(5):261-2.
  • 48. Fernandez-Llimos F. Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing? Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021;19(1):2284.
  • 49. Desselle SP, Andrews B, Lui J, et al. The scholarly productivity and work environments of academic pharmacists. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018;14(8):727-35.
  • 50. Karimi-Sari H, Rezaee-Zavareh MS. Citation metrics for appraising scientists: misuse, gaming and proper use. Med J Aust. 2020;213(5):238-9 e1.
  • 51. Liu XL, Gai SS, Zhou J. Journal Impact Factor: Do the Numerator and Denominator Need Correction? PLoS One. 2016;11(3): e0151414.
  • 52. Rossner M, Van Epps H, Hill E. Show me the data. J Cell Biol. 2007;179(6):1091-2.
  • 53. Fernandez-Llimos F. Bradford’s law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016;14(3):842.
  • 54. Paulus FM, Cruz N, Krach S. The Impact Factor Fallacy. Front Psychol. 2018;9):1487.
  • 55. Dougherty MR, Horne Z. Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences. R Soc Open Sci. 2022;9(8):220334.
  • 56. Ritchie A, Seubert L, Clifford R, et al. Do randomised controlled trials relevant to pharmacy meet best practice standards for quality conduct and reporting? A systematic review. Int J Pharm Pract. 2020;28(3):220-32.
  • 57. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(46):16569-72.
  • 58. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment. 2022; Available at: https://www.scienceeurope.org/media/y41ks1wh/20220720-rra-agreement.pdf. [Accessed 02-Nov-2022]
  • 59. van Mil JWF, Green J. Citations and science. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017;39(5):977-9.
  • 60. Minguet F, Salgado TM, Santopadre C, et al. Redefining the pharmacology and pharmacy subject category in the journal citation reports using medical subject headings (MeSH). Int J Clin Pharm. 2017;39(5):989-97.
  • 61. Malone T, Burke S. Academic librarians’ knowledge of bibliometrics and altmetrics. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2016;11):3.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet