Impacto glocal de Bandung a la Iniciativa “Belt and Road”Flujos de materiales, energías y humanos y sus efectos en la (in)justicia socio-ambiental en China

  1. Chiara Olivieri 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Revista:
Relaciones internacionales

ISSN: 1699-3950

Año de publicación: 2021

Título del ejemplar: Ecología-Mundo, Capitaloceno y Acumulación Global - Parte 2

Número: 47

Páginas: 237-256

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15366/RELACIONESINTERNACIONALES2021.47.012 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Relaciones internacionales

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

The aim of this article is to investigate the impact of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) on the appropriation of materials and energy in XUAR (PRC). To do this, I propose a critical contrastive analysis of official historiographical narratives: narratives about the official inclusion of the conquered territory of the Uyghur Autonomous Region of Xinjiang (XUAR-PRC) at the borders of the Qing Empire in the 18th century; the Final Communiqué of the Bandung Conference; the modernizing speeches imposed by the PRC on the territory of XUAR through the developmental narratives that accompany the BRI. The autochthonous socio-environmental systems have been subjected, since the inclusion of the territory into the Chinese borders, to mechanisms of colonialism implemented by external agents. This process has given rise to an interethnic conflict and a process of gentrification of the territories resulting from an extractivist and capitalist model of natural resource management (agriculture, gas, oil). The BRI, based on the development of transport and logistics infrastructures, reflects a strategy that aims to promote PRC’s role in global relations: it enhances international investment flows and commercial outlets for Chinese products, through land and sea routes, trying to reestablish the ancient Silk Roads, and promotes the creation of new roads, in order to connect a wider number of territories and countries —around sixty—. In turn, this research aims to reveal the impact of the imposition of the PRC neo-colonialist economic and extractive model, as well as the future consequences, on indigenous populations and management models. In terms of methodology this requires reconstructing the poverty narrative of Uyghur peoples, including accounts of their exclusion, ejection from the original areas, and a special emphasis on autochthonous outlook on their environment and how Modernity invades their natural and human space. Local and regional sociopolitical tensions have, in the final third of the twentieth century, forced or encouraged Uyghur emigration from XUAR and from the PRC, leading to the creation of distant exile communities. Through the inclusion of Uyghur studies (Jacobs, 2016; Leibold, 2007; Millward, 2007, 2018; Sautman, 2000; Thum, 2012, among others), in a wider panorama of decolonial studies (Escobar, 2016; Restrepo, 2016; Santos y Meneses, 2014, Ortega Santos y Olivieri, 2020, etc.), academia still faces the need to continue researching the socio-environmental impact of the modernization policies imposed by the PRC and its impact on the forms of autochthonous management of human and natural resources of the territory of XUAR. This, under Chinese domination in its different historical stages, has become a scenario of socio-environmental conflicts: economic, political and identity consequences return the image of a colonized territory (Millward, 2007, 2018; Sautman, 2000; Olivieri, 2020; Roberts, 2020), subjected to continuous extraction and repression processes by the central government. This institutional constraint, in recent years, has been legitimized by the PRC central state within the international community by accusing Uyghurs —culturally Muslims by majority— of terrorism, and thus including the whole oppression policies in the global scenario of GWOT (Roberts, 2020). This strategy hides the extractive-colonial interests that China has on the indigenous land of Uyghurs and other turkic peoples —such as Kazakhs, which represent more than a million people living in the territory—. Post-coloniality and national independence in a global scenario have presented the overwhelming need to rethink Asia in all its political and cultural complexity, and to launch projects —such as the one proposed at the Bandung Conference (1955), in which China played a leading role— that promote a supra-national unity respectful of plurality (Peña, 1956; Yoon, 2018); however, it seems now necessary to analyze how Bandung narratives coexist with those of a sinocentric megaproject (Pérez, 2014), with modernizing and developmental neo-colonial purposes (Islam, 2019). The BRI proposes reestablishing connections between Europe, Asia and Africa —that is, reviving old geoschemes (Millward, 2018) from a neo-colonial perspective (Clarke, 2017). Those links allegedly propose an economic supra-national development plan on an intercontinental scale, with the aim of modelling a scenario of revived cultural and human contacts, as well as commercial exchanges—. Nevertheless, the PRC’s BRI underlies the imposition of its economic and cultural model and the application of measures of natural resources extraction on the affected regions. The current conflict in XUAR may be seen as socio-environmental for: 1. The economic divide between Han/Uyghur-North/south in the region, is also a divide between agrarian and commercial-urban economies; 2. The PRC development strategy is focused on urbanization, but within XUAR, the Uyghur south has been largely left out of urban-based development, or controlled by the predominantly Han organization of the Bingtuan (Production Construction Corps) which is now developing colonies in southern XUAR that largely excluded local Uyghurs from the benefits of housing and commercial opportunity; 3. XUAR has a systemic water deficit, and dire prospects within decades as climate change melts the glaciers on whose melt water the region currently relies. Since the annexation of the territory of XUAR, the Government has been launching policies aimed at developing a greater control and power over the Uyghur historical region which represents a fundamental enclave both for natural resources extraction and for geopolitical strategies of Chinese politics and trade. The conquest and the subsequent mechanisms of coloniality have imposed in XUAR changes in the modes of management and those related to the natural environment, turning “particular ecosystems” into “modern forms of nature” (Escobar, 2016). Throughout this research, the term “coloniality” will be understood as a process that has certainly transformed the forms of domination deployed by Modernity, but not the structure of the center-periphery relations worldwide. In this particular case study, we are confronted with a scenario where decolonization has not happened; in fact, it is still denied, by the government itself, that there has been a colonization per se. Therefore, coloniality here is built from the creation of denialist and inclusionist discourses, which nullify the possibility of the subjects’ —in broad terms: the land of XUAR and those who inhabit it— very existence. Since then, the ways of life of the subaltern groups, in all aspects, are subject to the Modern/Colonial model, it is necessary to re-dignify the community attempts of survival and resistance, as ones of subjects oppressed by the mechanisms of capitalist modernity. Through this article I aim to reveal the Uyghurs perspective on how the official narratives about “development” and “modernity” proclaimed by the BRI, besides the monetary growth, hide colonial and oppressive control politics, and whose consequences are exclusion, repression, and even elimination of autochthonous identities in order to impose control over their territories and resources. So, jointly with a deep bibliographical and theoretical reflection, the very voices of exiled Uyghurs are here anonymously presented, based on Participatory Action Research (PAR) and Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Agnew, J. (2010). Emerging China and Critical Geopolitics: Between World Politics and Chinese Particularity. Eura-sian Geography and Economics, 51 (5), 569-582. https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.51.5.569
  • ALICE CES (18.07.2016). Alice na cidade: Ciências Sociais, Rap e Mais – Intervenção de Banda Linha Abissal [Video file] Recuperado de: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeGpZyl1akw (a partir del minuto 8:30) (25.05.2018).
  • Anand, D. (2019). Colonization with Chinese characteristics: politics of (in)security in Xinjiang and Tibet. Central Asian Survey, 38 (1), 129-147
  • Anderson, B. (2001). Western nationalism and eastern nationalism: Is there a difference that matters? New Left Review, 21, 31-42.
  • Ascensão, F., Fahrig, L., Clevenger, A.P., Corlett, R.T., Jaeger, J.A.G., Laurance, W.F., y Pereira, H.M. (2018). Envi-ronmental challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative. Nature Sustainability, 1, 206-209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0059-3
  • Asia-Africa speak from Bandung. (1955) Djakarta: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs Republic of Indonesia.
  • Bellér-Hann, I. (1997). The peasant condition in Xinjiang. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 25 (1), 87-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066159708438659
  • Campaign For Uyghurs (2020). China’s genocide in East Turkestan. The Genocide of Uyghurs by Definition of the United Nation Convention on Genocide Prevention. Recuperado de: https://campaignforuyghurs.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Genocide-Report-English-1.pdf (10.08.2020).
  • Castro-Gómez, S., y Grosfoguel, R. (Eds.) (2007). El giro decolonial: reflexiones para una diversidad epistémica más allá del capitalismo global. Siglo del Hombre Editores.
  • China Daily (07.05.2017). What's the Belt and Road Initiative? - "Belt and Road Bedtime Stories" series episode 1 [Video file]. Recuperado de: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKhYFFLBaeQ&feature=youtu.be (26.08.2019)
  • Chomsky, N. (2016). ¿Quién domina el mundo? Penguin Random House.
  • Clarke, M. (2007). The Problematic Progress of 'Integration' in the Chinese State's Approach to Xinjiang, 1759-2005. Asian Ethnicity, 8 (3), 261-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631360701595015
  • Clarke, M. (2017). The Belt and Road Initiative and China's Xinjiang Dilemma: ‘Connectivity’ Versus Control? The Central Asia-Caucasus ANALYST. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13458-the-belt-and-road-initiative-and-china’s-xinjiang-dilemma-“connectivity”-versus-control?.html
  • Cliff, T. (2009). Neo Oasis: The Xinjiang Bingtuan in the Twenty-first Century. Asian Studies Review, 33 (1), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357820802714807.
  • Crosby, A. (1988). Imperialismo Ecológico La expansión biológica de Europa, (900-1900). Editorial Crítica.
  • Escobar, A. (2000). El lugar de la naturaleza y la naturaleza del lugar: ¿globalización o postdesarrollo? En Lander, E. (Ed). La colonialidad del saber: Eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas latinoamericanas (pp. 68-87). CLACSO - Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales.
  • Escobar, A. (2016). Sentipensar con la Tierra: Las Luchas Territoriales y la Dimensio?n Ontolo?gica de las Epistemologi?as del Sur. AIBR - Revista Iberoamericana de Antropología, 11 (1), 11-36. https://doi:10.11156/aibr.110102
  • Frankopan, P. (2018). The New Silk Roads. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Golden, P. (2006). Some thoughts on the origins of the Turks and the shaping of the Turkic peoples. En Mair, V. (Ed). Contact and Exchange in the Ancient World (pp. 136-157). University of Hawai’i Press.
  • Grose, T. (11.08.2020). Publicación de Timothy Grose en su cuenta de Twitter. Recuperado de: https://twitter.com/GroseTimothy/status/1293375184674664448?s=20 (11.08.2020)
  • Grosfoguel, R. (2008). Para descolonizar os estudos de economia política e os estudos pós-coloniais: Transmoder-nidade, pensamento de fronteira e colonialidade global. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 80, 115-147. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.697
  • Gudynas, E. (2016). Teología de los extractivismos. Tabula Rasa, 24, 11-23. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.55
  • Islam, Md. Nazrul (Ed). (2019). Silk Road to Belt Road. Reinventing the Past and Shaping the Future. Springer.
  • Jacobs, J.M. (2016). Xinjiang and the Modern Chinese State. University of Washington Press.
  • Johnson, C.K. (2016). President Xi Jinping’s “Belt and Road” Initiative. A Practical Assessment of the Chinese Com-munist Party’s Roadmap for China’s Global Resurgence. CSIS - Center for Strategic and International Studies.
  • Henao Castro, A.F. y Ernstson, H. (2019). "Hic Rhodus, Hic Salta!" Postcolonial Remains and the Politics of the Anth-ropo-ob(S)cene. En Ernstson, H. y Swyngedouw, E. (Eds). Urban Political Ecology in the Anthropo-obscene: Inte-rruptions and Possibilities (pp. 69-87). Routledge.
  • Inquérito (29.11.2018). INQUÉRITO e Boaventura de Sousa Santos | Linha Abissal [Video file]. Recuperado de: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlHnMgu_Hys (30.11.2018).
  • Le Billon, P. (2015). Environmental conflict. En Perreault, T., Bridge, G. y McCarthy, J. (Eds). The Routledge Hand-book of Political Ecology (pp. 598-608). Routledge.
  • Leibold, J. (2007). Reconfiguring Chinese Nationalism: How the Qing Frontier and Its Indigenes Became Chinese. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Martínez Alier, J. (2011). El ecologismo de los pobres: conflictos ambientales y lenguajes de valoración. Icaria.
  • McNeill, J. (26.02.2019). Anthropocene. Recuperado de: https://www.kth.se/en/abe/inst/philhist/historia/ehl/ehl-dictionary/anthropocene-john-mcneill-1.499858 (05.08.2020).
  • Meneses, M.P. (2020). Desafios ambientais a Sul: o ubuntu como ética de ligação entre a comunidade e a natureza. En Ortega Santos, A. y Olivieri, C. (Eds). Saberes bioculturales. En pie de resistencias desde el Sur Global (pp. 49-81). Editorial Universidad de Granada.
  • Mignolo, W. (2000). Border Thinking and the Colonial Difference. En Mignolo, W. (Ed). Local Histories/Global De-signs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges and Border Thinking (pp. 49-90). Princeton UniversityPress.
  • Millward, J. (2009). Positioning Xinjiang in Eurasian and Chinese history: differing Visions of the ‘Silk Road’. En Clar-ke, M. y Mackerras, C. (Eds). China, Xinjiang and Central Asia: History, Transition and Future Prospects into the 21st Century (pp. 55-74). Routledge.
  • Millward, J. A. (marzo, 2018). Old World Geoschemes, Past and Present, and the Belt and Road Initiative as Sino-Silk Roadist Remapping of Afro-Eurasia. Trabajo presentado en Remapping Asian Studies, Granada.
  • Millward, J.A. (2021). Eurasian Crossroads. A History of Xinjiang. Hurst Publishers
  • Moore, J. (2015). Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. Verso.
  • New China TV (10.05.2017a). Music Video: The Belt and Road is How [Video file]. Recuperado de: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0lJc3PMNIg (26.08.2019).
  • New China TV (14.05.2017b). Music Video: The Belt and Road, Sing Along ??????? [Video File]. Recuperado de: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98RNh7rwyf8 (26.08.2019).
  • OECD. The Belt and Road Initiative in the global trade, investment and finance landscape. OECD Business and Fi-nance Outlook, 61-101. https://doi.org/10.1787/bus_fin_out-2018-6-en
  • Oidtmann, M. (2018). Forging the Golden Urn: The Qing Empire and the Politics of Reincarnation in Tibet. Columbia University Press
  • Olivieri, C. (01.04.2019). Asia. Dicionário Alice. Recuperado de: https://alice.ces.uc.pt/dictionary/?id=23838&pag=23918&id_lingua=1&entry=24598 (05.08.2020).
  • Olivieri, C. y Ortega Santos, A. (2020). Not only Deserts, Not Only Oases. Territorial Identities in Baja California (Mexico) and Xinjiang (China) in the Contemporary Age. Global Humanities, 5 (7), 27-43.
  • Ortega Santos, A. y Olivieri, C. (Eds) (2020). Saberes bioculturales. En pie de resistencias desde el Sur Global. Editorial Universidad de Granada.
  • Qarluq, A.i.J., y McMillen, D.H. (2011). Towards a ‘Harmonious Society’? a brief case study of the post-Liberation settlement in Beijing of Uyghur intellectuals and their relations with the majority society. Asian Ethnicity, 12 (1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2010.510876
  • Peña Romulo, C. (1956). The Meaning of Bandung. The University of North Carolina Press.
  • Pérez García, M. (2014). From Eurocentrism to Sinocentrism: New Challenges in Global History. European Journal of Scientific Research, 119 (3), 337-352.
  • Regional Ethnic Autonomy Law of the People's Republic of China. (1984). Recuperado de: https://www.cecc.gov/resources/legal-provisions/regional-ethnic-autonomy-law-of-the-peoples-republic-of-china-amended (06.08.2020).
  • Restrepo, E. (2016). Descentrando a Europa: aportes de la teoría postcolonial y el giro decolonial al conocimiento situado. Revista Latina de Sociología, 6, 60-71. https://doi:10.17979/relaso.2016.6.1.1965
  • Roberts, S. R. (2020). The War on the Uyghurs: China's Campaign Against Xinjiang's Muslims. Princeton University Press.
  • Santos, B. d. S. (2005). Desigualdad, Exclusión y Globalización: Hacia la Construcción Multicultural de la Igualdad y la Diferencia. Revista de Interculturalidad, 1, 9-44
  • Santos, B. d. S. (2007). Para além do Pensamento Abissal: Das linhas globais a uma ecologia de saberes. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 78, 3-46. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.753
  • Santos, B. d. S. (2010a). Descolonizar el saber, reinventar el poder. Ediciones Trilce.
  • Santos, B. d. S. (2010b). From the Postmodern to the Postcolonial – and Beyond Both. En Gutiérrez Rodríguez, E., Boatc?, M., Costa, S. (Eds.), Decolonizing European Sociology. Transdisciplinary Approaches (pp. 225-242). Ashga-te.
  • Santos, B. d. S. (2012). De las dualidades a las ecologías. Cuaderno de Trabajo, 18, 13-32.
  • Santos, B. d. S. (2014). Derechos humanos, democracia y desarrollo. Centro de Estudios de Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad, Dejusticia.
  • Santos, B. d. S., y Meneses, M. P. (Eds.). (2014). Epistemologías del Sur. Perspectivas. Ediciones Akal.
  • Sautman, B. (2000). Is Xinjiang an Internal Colony? Inner Asia, 2 (2), 239-271. https://doi:10.1163/146481700793647788
  • Steinmetz, G. (2014). The Sociology of Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonialism. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 77-103. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043131
  • Suárez-Krabbe, J. (01.04.2019). Modernity. Dicionário Alice. Recuperado de: https://alice.ces.uc.pt/dictionary/?id=23838&pag=23918&id_lingua=4&entry=24325 (11.08.2020).
  • Summers, T. (2016). China’s ‘New Silk Roads’: sub-national regions and networks of global political economy. Third World Quarterly, 37 (9), 1.628-1.643. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1153415
  • Swyngedouw, E. y Ernstson, H. (2018). Interrupting the Anthropo-obScene: Immuno-bioploitics and Depoliticizing Ontologies in the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society, 35 (6), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418757314
  • The World Bank (29.03.2018). Belt and Road Initiative. Recuperado de: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/brief/belt-and-road-initiative (06.08.2020).
  • Thum, R. (2012). Modular History: Identity Maintenance before Uyghur Nationalism. The Journal of Asian Studies, 71 (3), 627-653. https://doi:10.1017/S0021911812000629
  • Vergès, F. (2017). Racial Capitalocene. En Johnson, G.T. (Ed). Futures of Black Radicalism (pp. 72-82). Verso.
  • Yoon, D.M. (2018). Bandung Nostalgia and the Global South. En West-Pavlov, R. (Ed). The Global South and Literature (pp. 23-33). Cambridge University Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet