Spanish adaptation of the support for economic inequality scale (s-seis)

  1. Mar Montoya-Lozano
  2. Eva Moreno-Bella
  3. Juan Diego García-Castro
  4. Guillermo B. Willis
  5. Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915,  1886-144X

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 35

Número: 3

Páginas: 310-318

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.7334/PSICOTHEMA2022.226 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

La versión Española de la Escala de Apoyo a la Desigualdad Económica (S-SEIS) evalúa la tendencia de las personas a tener actitudes positivas hacia la desigualdad económica. Método: Se realizaron dos estudios correlacionales, uno exploratorio (N = 619) y otro confirmatorio (N = 562). Resultados: S-SEIS mostró una buena fiabilidad en los dos estudios. El análisis factorial mostró una estructura unifactorial en el Estudio 1 que se confirmó en el Estudio 2. Igualmente encontramos una relación entre S-SEIS y otras medidas de actitudes hacia la desigualdad ampliamente utilizadas, como la intolerancia hacia la desigualdad. S-SEIS correlaciona positivamente con la creencia en un mundo justo, la orientación hacia la dominancia social (SDO), la justificación del sistema económico (ESJ), la confianza institucional y la democracia percibida; correlaciona negativamente con la intolerancia hacia la desigualdad, la desigualdad percibida, la sociabilidad/competencia percibida de las personas en situación de pobreza y el apoyo a la redistribución. Conclusiones: Los hallazgos sugieren que la S-SEIS es una medida válida para evaluar el apoyo a la desigualdad económica en muestras españolas.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017, August 8-10). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion [Paper presentation]. First International Conference on Applied & Industrial Mathematics and Statistics, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163
  • Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586-592. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
  • Anderson, C. J., & Singer, M. M. (2008). The sensitive left and the impervious right: Multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4-5), 564-599. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0010414007313113
  • Barreiro, A., Etchezahar, E., & Prado-Gascó, V. (2018). Psychometric properties of the personal and general belief in a just world scales in the Argentine context. Psykhe, 27(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/ psykhe.27.1.1102
  • Bavetta, S., Li Donni, P., & Marino, M. (2019). An empirical analysis of the determinants of perceived inequality. Review of Income and Wealth, 65(2), 264-292. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12351
  • Benson, R., Duffy, B., Hesketh, R., & Hewlett, K. (2021). Attitudes to inequalities. IFS Deaton Review of Inequalities. https://ifs.org.uk/ inequality/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Attitudes-to-inequalities.pdf
  • Blanchet, T., Chancel, L., & Gethin, A. (2019). How unequal is Europe? Evidence from distributional national accounts, 1980-2017 (Report No. N° 2019/06). World Inequality Database. https://wid.world/ document/bcg2019-full-paper/
  • Castillo, J. C. (2011). Legitimacy of inequality in a highly unequal context: Evidence from the Chilean case. Social Justice Research, 24, 314–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-011-0144-5
  • Castillo, J. C., García-Castro, J. D., & Venegas, M. (2022). Perception of economic inequality: concepts, associated factors and prospects of a burgeoning research agenda. International Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 180-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2021.2 009275
  • Connor, P., Varney, J., Keltner, D., & Chen, S. (2021). Social class competence stereotypes are amplified by socially signaled economic inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(1), 89– 105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220916640
  • Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the Personal Belief in a Just World Scale’s validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022091609047
  • Davidai, S., & Ongis, M. (2019). The politics of zero-sum thinking: The relationship between political ideology and the belief that life is a zero-sum game. Science Advances, 5(12), eaay3761. https://doi. org/10.1126/sciadv.aay3761
  • Delgado-Rico, E., Carretero-Dios, H., & Ruch, W. (2012). Content validity evidences in test development: An applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12(3), 449– 460. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-64551
  • Durante, F., Bearns Tablante, C., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Poor but warm, rich but cold (and competent): Social classes in the stereotype content model. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 131–150. https://doi. org/10.1111/josi.12208
  • Durante, F., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). How social-class stereotypes maintain inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 43–48. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.033
  • Durante, F., Fiske, S. T., Kervyn, N., Cuddy, A. J., Akande, A., Adetoun, B. E., Adewuyi, M. F., Tserere, M. M., Ramiah, A. A., Mastor, K. A., Barlow, F. K., Bonn, G., Tafarodi, R. W., Bosak, J., Cairns, E., Doherty, C., Capozza, D., Chandran, A., Chryssochoou, X., & Storari, C. C. (2013). Nations’ income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 726-746. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12005
  • European Social Survey (2018). ESS Round 9 Source Questionnaire [Questionnaire]. Sikt Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.21338/NSD-ESS9-2018
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022- 3514.82.6.878
  • Fiske, S. T., & Durante, F. (2019). Mutual status stereotypes maintain inequality. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Inequality (pp. 335–348). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-28856-3_21
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • García-Castro, J. D., González, R., Frigolett, C., Jiménez-Moya, G., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Willis, G. (2022). Changing attitudes toward redistribution: The role of perceived economic inequality in everyday life and intolerance of inequality. The Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2021.2 006126
  • García-Castro, J. D., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Willis, G. (2020). Perceiving economic inequality in everyday life decreases tolerance to inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90, Article 104019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104019
  • García-Castro, J. D., Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2019). I know people who can and who cannot: A measure of the perception of economic inequality in everyday life. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.008
  • García-Sánchez, E., Willis, G. B., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Palacio Sañudo, J., David Polo, J., & Rentería Pérez, E. (2018). Perceptions of economic inequality and support for redistribution: The role of existential and utopian standards. Social Justice Research, 31(4), 335-354. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11211-018-0317-6
  • Goubin, S. (2018). Economic inequality, perceived responsiveness and political trust. Acta Politica, 55, 267-304. http://doi.org/10.1057/ s41269-018-0115-z
  • Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLSSEM). SAGE.
  • Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & S. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3–38). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • ISSP Research Group (2012). International Social Survey Programme 2009: Social Inequality IV-ISSP 2009 (Version 4.0.0.) [Questionnaire]. GESIS Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12777
  • Jaume, L., Etchezahar, E., & Cervone, N. (2012). La justificación del sistema económico y su relación con la orientación a la dominancia social [Justification of the economic system and its relationship with the social dominance orientation]. Boletín de Psicología, 106, 81-91. https://www.uv.es/seoane/boletin/previos/N106-5.pdf
  • Jylhä, K. M. (2016). Ideological roots of climate change denial: Resistance to change, acceptance of inequality, or both? [Doctoral dissertation, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis]. Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet. https://uu.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:945529/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  • Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
  • Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Kiatpongsan, S., & Norton, M. I. (2014). How much (more) should CEOs make? A universal desire for more equal pay. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 587-593. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1745691614549773
  • Krieckhaus, J., Son, B., Bellinger, N. M., & Wells, J. M. (2014). Economic inequality and democratic support. The Journal of Politics, 76(1), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001229
  • Krijnen, J., Ülkümen, G., Bogard, J., & Fox, C. R. (2021). Lay theories of financial well-being predict political and policy message preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(2), 310-336. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3695322
  • Kuhn, A. (2019). The subversive nature of inequality: Subjective inequality perceptions and attitudes to social inequality. European Journal of Political Economy, 59, 331-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejpoleco.2019.04.004
  • Linde, J. (2012). Why feed the hand that bites you? Perceptions of procedural fairness and system support in post-communist democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 51(3), 410-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02005.x
  • Loveless, M. (2016, July 13-15). How individuals’ perceptions of inequality may affect their perceptions of corruption: A challenge to new democracies [Paper presentation]. Sixth ECINEQ Meeting, Université du Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Europe. https://doi. org/10.1108/S1049-258520160000024011
  • Mercier, B., Wiwad, D., Piff, P. K., Aknin, L. B., Robinson, A. R., Shariff, A., & Vazire, S. (2020). Does belief in free will increase support for economic inequality? Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 25. https://doi. org/10.1525/collabra.303
  • Meyvis, T., & Van Osselaer, S. M. (2018). Increasing the power of your study by increasing the effect size. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1157-1173. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx110
  • Moreno-Bella, E., Willis, G. B., & Moya, M. (2019). Economic inequality and masculinity– femininity: The prevailing perceived traits in higher unequal contexts are masculine. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01590
  • Pedersen, R. T., & Mutz, D. C. (2019). Attitudes toward economic inequality: The illusory agreement. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(4), 835-851. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.18
  • Phelan, J. E., & Rudman, L. A. (2011). System justification beliefs, affirmative action, and resistance to equal opportunity organizations. Social Cognition, 29(3), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.376
  • Piff, P. K., Wiwad, D., Robinson, A. R., Aknin, L. B., Mercier, B., & Shariff, A. (2020). Shifting attributions for poverty motivates opposition to inequality and enhances egalitarianism. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 496-505. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0835-8
  • Pratto, F., Liu, J., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Bachrach, H. & Hegarty, P. (2000). Social dominance and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369-409. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022022100031003005
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741-763. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
  • Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Bratanova, B., Willis, G. B., Lopez-Rodriguez, L., Sturrock, A. y Loughnan, S. (2017). Social class and ideologies of inequality: How they uphold societies. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 99-116. http://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12206
  • Roex, K. L., Huijts, T., & Sieben, I. (2019). Attitudes towards income inequality: ‘Winners’ versus ‘losers’ of the perceived meritocracy. Acta Sociologica, 62(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0001699317748340
  • Sainz, M., Martínez, R., Sutton, R. M., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Moya, M. (2020). Less human, more to blame: Animalizing poor people increases blame and decreases support for wealth redistribution. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(4), 546-559. https://doi. org/10.1177%2F1368430219841135
  • Silván-Ferrero, Mª. P., & Bustillos, A. (2007). Adaptation of The Social Dominance Orientation scale into Spanish: Validation of groupbased dominance and opposition to equality as underlying factors. International Journal of Social Psychology, 22(1), 3-15. https://doi. org/10.1174/021347407779697485
  • Sommet, N., Elliot, A. J., Jamieson, J. P., & Butera, F. (2019). Income inequality, perceived competitiveness, and approach‐avoidance motivation. Journal of Personality, 87(4), 767-784. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12432
  • Tan, X., Liu, L., Huag, Z., Zheng, W., & Liang, Y. (2016). The effects of general system justification on corruption perception and intent. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01107
  • Tanjitpiyanond, P., Jetten, J., & Peters, K. (2022). How economic inequality shapes social class stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98, Article 104248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jesp.2021.104248
  • Tassinari, M & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2020). Perceived procedural justice, group identification, and support for economic equality: A test of the Group Engagement Model. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 6(2/1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1285/i24212113v6i2- 1p56
  • The Economist Intelligence Unit (2018). Democracy Index 2018: Me too? Political participation, protest and democracy. https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspxcampaignid=democracy2018
  • United Nations (2021). Reduce inequality within and among countries. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/goal-10/
  • Vargas-Salfate, S., Paez, D., Liu, J. H., Pratto, F., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). A comparison of social dominance theory and system justification: The role of social status in 19 nations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(7), 1060-1076. https://doi. org/10.1177%2F0146167218757455
  • Wiwad, D., Mercier, B., Maraun, M. D., Robinson, A. R., Piff, P. K., Aknin, L. B., & Sharuff, A. F. (2019). The Support for Economic Inequality Scale: Development and adjudication. PLoS ONE, 14(6), Article e0218685. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218685
  • Willis, G. B., García-Sánchez, E., Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., GarcíaCastro, J. D., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2022). The psychosocial effects of economic inequality depend on its perception. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 301-309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00044-0
  • World Values Survey (WVS, 2014). 2010-2014 World Values Survey Wave 6 [Questionnaire]. World Values Survey Association. http:// www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet