Mapeo sobre el uso de la Neurotecnología en educación desde una perspectiva ética

  1. Inmaculada García-Martínez
  2. Norma Torres-Hernández
  3. Irene Espinosa-Fernández
  4. Lara Checa-Domene
Revista:
Pixel-Bit: Revista de medios y educación

ISSN: 1133-8482

Año de publicación: 2023

Número: 68

Páginas: 273-304

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Pixel-Bit: Revista de medios y educación

Resumen

Neurotechnology has a long tradition in the clinical field. However, it is increasingly present in the field of education. This review aims to provide an overview of research based on educational neurotechnology that considers the ethical component in its design and implementation. For this purpose, the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the databases Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC and Science Direct were followed. After the double review process with the inclusion and exclusion criteria considered, the review sample was set at 12 articles. The main findings found support the effectiveness of using neurotechnology in the field of education, especially for students with special educational needs.It also shows its usefulness in the acquisition of instrumental learning and for obtaining improvements in different areas of development such as attention, memory and motivation. However, in addition to their implicit benefits, the inclusion of educational neurotechnology implies a number of challenges for both teachers and educational institutions, related to training, ethics and the administrative and economic management of these resources and tools. Similarly, despite the existence of different theoretical studies, there is a call for more empirical studies on this topic

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Antonenko, P. D. (2019). Educational neuroscience: Exploring cognitive processes that underlie learning. Mind, brain and technology, 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02631-8_3
  • Ardila, A., Bertolucci, P. H., Braga, L. W., Castro-Caldas, A., Judd, T., Kosmidis, M. H., ... & Rosselli, M. (2010). Illiteracy: the neuropsychology of cognition without reading. Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 25(8), 689-712. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acq079
  • Aguiton, S. (2015). Mettre en démocratie les technologies émergentes ? Participation et pouvoir à l’ère de la crise écologique. Contretemps, 26, 40-49. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02009585
  • Bastidas, V. (2021) Neurotecnología: interfaz cerebrocomputador y protección de datos cerebrales o neurodatos en el contexto del tratamiento de datos personales en la unión europea. Revista iberoamericana de derecho informático, 101-176. file:///C:/Users/Acer/Desktop/NEUROTECNOLOGIAS/Dialnet-Neurotecnologia-8397899.pdf
  • Bergaliev, T., & Mazurov, M. (2020). Study of the Effectiveness of State Support in the Development and Implementation of Neuro-educational Technologies. In International Conference of Artificial Intelligence, Medical Engineering, Education (pp. 315-321). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39162-1_29
  • Cox, A. M. (2021). Exploring the impact of Artificial Intelligence and robots on higher education through literature-based design fictions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00237-8
  • Dehaene, S. (2007). Les neurones de la lecture. Odile Jacob.
  • Demera-Zambrano, K. C., LópezVera, L. S., Zambrano-Romero, M. G., Navarrete Solórzano, D. A., Quijije Troya, N. S., & Rodríguez Gámez, M. (2021). Educational neurotechnology in attention to the specific needs of higher basic general education students. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(10), 943-957.
  • Fanelli, A., & Ghezzi D. (2021). Transient electronics: new opportunities for implantable Neurotechnology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 72,22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.08.011
  • Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2020). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389
  • Güven, Ş. T., Dalgiç, A. İ., & Duman, Ö. (2020). Evaluation of the efficiency of the web-based epilepsy education program (WEEP) for youth with epilepsy and parents: A randomized controlled trial. Epilepsy & Behavior, 111, 107142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107142
  • Ienca, M., Andorno, R. (2017). Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sci Soc Policy 13, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1
  • Johnson, Z. A., Sciolino, N. R., Plummer, N. W., Harrison, P. R., Jensen, P., & Robertson, S. D. (2021). Assessment of mapping the brain, a novel research and neurotechnology based approach for the modern neuroscience classroom. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 19(2), A226.
  • Kuch, D., Kearnes, M., & Gulson, K. (2020). The promise of precision: datafication in medicine, agriculture and education. Policy Studies, 41(5), 527-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2020.1724384
  • Martin-Requejo, K., & Santiago-Ramajo, S. (2022). Últimos avances científicos de los efectos neuropsicológicos de la educación musical. Artseduca, (31), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.6035/artseduca.5976
  • Matusz, P. J., Dikker, S., Huth, A. G., & Perrodin, C. (2019). Are we ready for real-world neuroscience? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(3), 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_e_01276
  • Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos [OCDE] (2022). Recommendation of the Council on Responsible Innovation in Neurotechnology, OECD/LEGAL/0457
  • Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista Española de Cardiología, 74(9), 790-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016
  • Pease, A., Goodenough, T., Sinai, P., Breheny, K., Watanabe, R., & Williams, C. (2021). Improving outcomes for primary school children at risk of cerebral visual impairments (the CVI project): study protocol for the process evaluation of a feasibility cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMJ open, 11(5), e044856. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044856
  • Pillette, L., Jeunet, C., Mansencal, B., N’kambou, R., N’Kaoua, B., & Lotte, F. (2020). A physical learning companion for Mental-Imagery BCI User Training. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 136, 102380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.102380
  • Pradas, S. (2017). La Neurotecnología Educativa. Claves del uso de la tecnología en el proceso de aprendizaje. ReiDoCrea, 6(2), 40-47.
  • Pradas, S. (2016). Neurotecnología educativa. La tecnología al servicio del alumno y del profesor. Centro Nacional de Innovación e Investigación Educativa. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte.
  • Privitera, A. J., & Hao, D. (2022). Educational neurotechnology: Where do we go from here?. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 19, 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2022.100195
  • Putrino, D., & Krakauer, J. W. (2022). Neurotechnology’s Prospects for Bringing About Meaningful Reductions in Neurological Impairment. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 15459683221137341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968322113734
  • Rapson, R., Marsden, J., Latour, J., Ingram, W., Stevens, K. N., Cocking, L., & Carter, B. (2022). Multicentre, randomised controlled feasibility study to compare a 10-week physiotherapy programme using an interactive exercise training device to improve walking and balance, to usual care of children with cerebral palsy aged 4–18 years: the ACCEPT study protocol. BMJ open, 12(5), e058916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058916
  • Raza, S. A., & Khan, K. A. (2021). Knowledge and innovative factors: how cloud computing improves students’ academic performance. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 19(2), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2020-0047
  • Reber, P. J. (2013). The neural basis of implicit learning and memory: A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research. Neuropsychologia, 51(10), 2026-2042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.019
  • Roebuck-Spencer, T. M., Glen, T., Puente, A. E., Denney, R. L., Ruff, R. M., Hostetter, G., & Bianchini, K. J. (2017). Cognitive screening tests versus comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries: a national academy of neuropsychology education paper. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 32(4), 491-498. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx021
  • Rodríguez Garza, R. (2016). La construcción de ambientes de aprendizajes desde los principios de la neurociencia cognitiva. Revista de educación inclusiva, 9(2), 245-263.
  • Rudolph, M. (2017). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Online Higher Education, 1(2), 1-10.
  • Shook, J. R., Galvagni, L., & Giordano, J. (2014). Cognitive enhancement kept within contexts: neuroethics and informed public policy. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 8, 228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00228
  • Sorochinsky, M., Koryakin, P., & Popov, M. (2022, September). A study of students' attention levels while watching educational videos with the use of neurofeedback. In 2022 Fourth International Conference Neurotechnologies and Neurointerfaces (CNN) (pp. 165-167). IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CNN56452.2022.9912564
  • Thumbeck, S. M., Schmid, P., Chesneau, S., & Domahs, F. (2021). Efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension in persons with aphasia: a study protocol for a repeated measures study. BMJ open, 11(7), e048126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048126
  • Tubig, P. & McCusker, D. (2020). Fostering the trustworthiness of researchers: SPECS and the role of ethical reflexivity in novel neurotechnology research. Research Ethics, (), 174701612095250–. 10.1177/1747016120952500
  • van Atteveldt, N., Tijsma, G., Janssen, T., & Kupper, F. (2019). Responsible research and innovation as a novel approach to guide educational impact of mind, brain, and education research. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(4), 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12213
  • van Atteveldt, N., van Kesteren, M. T., Braams, B., & Krabben-dam, L. (2018). Neuroimaging of learning and development:Improving ecological validity.Frontline Learning Research,6(3), 186–203. 10.14786/flr.v6i3.366
  • Yuste, R. (2019). Las nuevas neurotecnologías y su impacto en la ciencia, medicina y sociedad. Lección Cajal Vicerrectorado de Cultura y Proyección Social. Universidad de Zaragoza. https://www.fundacionareces.es/recursos/doc/portal/2019/07/17/revista-fra-num-21-las-nuevas-neurotecnologias-rafael-yuste.pdf
  • Wang, Y., Hong, S., & Tai, C. (2019). China’s efforts to lead the way in AI start in its classrooms. Wall Street J.
  • Williamson, B. (2019). Brain data: Scanning, scraping and sculpting the plastic learning brain through neurotechnology. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0008-5
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet