Una intervención para mejorar el aprendizaje social y emocional del alumnado en riesgo de exclusión social

  1. Francisco-Domingo Fernández-Martín 1
  2. Francisco-Javier Hinojo-Lucena 1
  3. Inmaculada Aznar-Díaz 1
  4. María-Pilar Cáceres-Reche 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada, Spain
Revista:
Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

ISSN: 1139-613X,  2174-5374

Año de publicación: 2024

Volumen: 27

Número: 1

Páginas: 303-322

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

Resumen

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of Itinerario+ program, an intervention aimed at improving the different areas of competence of the social and emotional learning model (i.e., self-awareness, social awareness, self-management, relationship skills and responsible decision-making) among students of Basic Vocational Education and Training from disadvantaged contexts. The sample was composed by 140 first year students (70 experimental group y 70 control group) from four different Basic Vocational Education and Training programs taught in five educational centers in the southern district of the city of Madrid (Spain). Social and emotional learning was assessed by the Social and Emotional Learning Scale. After assigning students to either the experimental or control group according to quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group, it was confirmed that both groups were equivalent around the control variables or covariates and Itinerario+ program was implemented. This intervention was integrated with school instruction, so the curriculum was developed in six transversal projects, including other activities (i.e., peer mentoring, individualized tutoring, vocational and professional guidance, internships in a professional environment), which were carried out by a team of previously trained teachers and educators. The results after comparing the experimental and control groups yield statistically significant differences in favor of the experimental group in social and emotional learning. These results confirm the effectiveness of the program to improve the social and emotional learning of students at risk of social exclusion, so it can be stated that Itinerario+ is an example of evidence-based practice.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en Psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038–1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
  • Choi, A., & Calero, J. (2013). Determinantes del riesgo de fracaso escolar en España en PISA-2009 y propuestas de reforma. Revista de Educación, 362, 562–593. http://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2013-362-242
  • Coe, R. (12-14 de septiembre de 2002). It’s the effect size, stupid. What effect size is and why it is important [Ponencia de Congreso]. Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Exeter, England.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2ª ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2021). What is the CASEL framework? Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
  • Corcoran, R. P., Cheung, A. C. K., Kim, E., & Xie, C. (2018). Effective universal school-based social and emotional learning programs for improving academic achievement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Educational Research Review, 25, 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.12.001
  • Diekstra, R. F. W. (2008). Effectiveness of school-based social and emotional education programmes worldwide. En C. Clouder (Ed..), Social and emotional education: an international analysis (pp. 255–312). Fundación Marcelino Botín.
  • Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9300-6
  • Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
  • Fernández, F. D., Arco, J. L., & Hervás, M. (2019). La evaluación ex-ante de un programa, proyecto o acción de aprendizaje-servicio. En M. Ruíz, & J. García (Eds.), Aprendizaje-servicio. Los retos de la evaluación (pp. 57–70). Narcea.
  • Fernández, M., Mena, L., & Riviere, J. (2010). Fracaso y abandono escolar en España. Fundación la Caixa.
  • Fernández, F. D., Moreno, A. J., Marín, J. A., & Romero, J. M. (2022). Adolescents’ emotions in Spanish education: development and validation of the social and emotional learning scale. Sustainability, 14(7), Artículo 3755. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073755
  • Fernández, F. D., Romero, J. M., Marín, J. A., & Gómez, G. (2021). Social and emotional learning in the Ibero-American context: a systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Artículo 738501. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738501
  • Fundación Tomillo. (2022). Itinerario +. Fundación Tomillo
  • Gertler, P. J., Martínez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. J. (2017). La evaluación de impacto en la práctica (2ª ed.). Banco Internacional para la Reconstrucción y el Desarrollo/Banco Mundial. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0888-3
  • González, D., Vieira, M. J., & Vidal, J. (2019). Variables que influyen en la transición de la educación primaria a la educación secundaria obligatoria. Un modelo comprensivo. Bordón. Revista de pedagogía, 71(2), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2019.68957
  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (6ª ed.). Pearson International Edition.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of meta-analyses in education. Routledge.
  • Jagers, R. J., Harris, A., & Skoog, A. (2015). A review of classroom-based SEL programs at the middle school level. En J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domotrovich, R. P. Weisberg, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: research and practice (pp. 167–180). Guilford Press.
  • Jagers, R. J., Rivas-Drake, D., & Williams, B. (2019). Transformative Social and Emotional Learning (SEL): Toward SEL in service of educational equity and excellence. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1623032
  • Kalton, G. (2020). Introduction to survey sampling. Sage.
  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4ª ed.). Guilford Publications.
  • Kraft, M. A. (2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20912798
  • Ledesma, R., Macbeth, G., & Cortada, N. (2008). Tamaño del efecto: revisión teórica y aplicaciones con el sistema estadístico ViSta. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 40(3), 425–439.
  • Mahoney, J. L., Weissberg, R. P., Greenberg, M. T., Dusenbury, L., Jagers, R. J., Niemi, K., Schlinger, M., Schlund, J., Shriver, T. P., VanAusdal, K., & Yoder, N. (2020). Systemic social and emotional learning: promoting educational success for all preschool to high school students. American Psychologist, 76(7), 1128–1142. http://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000701
  • Murano, D., Sawyer, J. E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2020). A meta-analytic review of preschool social and emotional learning interventions. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 227–263. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914743
  • National Commission on Social, Emotional, and Academic Development. (2019). From a nation at risk to a nation at hope. The Aspen Institute.
  • Oberle, E., Domitrovich, C. E., Meyers, D. C., & Weissberg, R. P. (2016). Establishing systemic social and emotional learning approaches in schools: a framework for schoolwide implementation. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46, 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1125450
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Beyond academic learning: First results from the survey of social and emotional skills. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/92a11084-en
  • Payton, J., Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., Schellinger, K. B., & Pachan, M. (2008). The positive impact of social and emotional learning for kindergarten to eighth-grade students: findings from three scientific reviews. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
  • Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
  • Sabey, C. V., Charlton, C. T., Pyle, D., Lignugaris-Kraft, B., & Ross, S. W. (2017). A review of classwide or universal social, emotional, behavioral programs for students in kindergarten. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 512–543. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316689307
  • Sklad, M., Diekstra, R., De Ritter, M., Ben, J., & Gravesteijn, C. (2012). Effectiveness of school-based universal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: do they enhance students’ development in the area of skill, behavior, and adjustment? Psychology in the Schools, 49(9), 892–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21641
  • Soper, D. S. (2021). A-priori sample size calculator for students t-test [Software].
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7ª ed.). Pearson.
  • Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: a meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
  • Trujillo, J. M., Cáceres, Mª. P., Alonso, S., & Gómez, G. (2021). Diseño y pilotaje de la escala de aprendizaje social y emocional. En I. Aznar, C. Rodríguez, M. Ramos, & G. Gómez. Desafíos de la investigación y la innovación educativa ante la sociedad inclusiva (pp. 68–77). Dykinson.
  • Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., & Gullotta, T. P. (2015). Social and emotional learning: past, present and future. En J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domitrovich, R. P. Weissberg, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: research and practice (pp. 3–19). Guilford Press.
  • Wigelsworth, M., Lendrum, A., Oldfield, J., Scott, A., ten Bokkel, I., Tate, K., & Emery, C. (2016). The impact of trial stage, developer involvement and international transferability on universal social and emotional learning programme outcomes: a meta-analysis. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46, 347–376. doi/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1195791
  • Yang, W. P., Datu, J. A. D., Lin, X. Y., Lau, M. M., & Li, H. (2019). Can early childhood curriculum enhance social-emotional competence in low-income children? A meta-analysis of the educational effects. Early Education and Development, 30, 36–59. http://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2018.1539557
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet