Sport-Sciences University students’ perceptions related to the use of debates and e-portfolios as student-centered learning strategie

  1. Santiago Guijarro Romero 1
  2. Mariana Amaral da Cunha 2
  3. Rui Araújo 2
  4. Rui Marcelino 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

  2. 2 Instituto Superior da Maia
    info

    Instituto Superior da Maia

    Maia, Portugal

    ROR https://ror.org/04f761z39

Revista:
Ágora para la educación física y el deporte

ISSN: 1578-2174

Año de publicación: 2023

Número: 25

Páginas: 117-139

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.24197/AEFD.25.2023.117-139 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Ágora para la educación física y el deporte

Resumen

En este estudio se analizaron las percepciones de los estudiantes universitarios del Grado en Ciencias del Deporte sobre el uso de los debates y el e-portafolio como estrategias de aprendizaje centradas en el estudiante. En el estudio participaron 426 estudiantes del tercer y último año del grado (23% mujeres; edad media = 20,6 ± 1,1). Se utilizó un cuestionario para recoger los datos y el análisis temático reveló cuatro temas positivos (aprendizaje activo, intercambio de información, innovación y desarrollo de habilidades) y tres negativos (ignorancia de la metodología, falta de interés/distracción y trabajo extra) relacionados con estas estrategias. A pesar de algunas percepciones negativas, los estudiantes resaltaron los aspectos positivos de estos métodos, indicando que su uso mejoraría los resultados del aprendizaje.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akleh, A., & Wahab, R. A. (2020). Effectiveness of course portfolio in improving course quality at higher education. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(3), 39–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n3p39
  • Alcoba González, J. (2012). La clasificación de los métodos La clasificación de los métodos de enseñanza en educación superior. Contextos Educativos, 15, 93–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18172/con.657
  • Alén, E., Domínguez, T., & de Carlos, P. (2015). University students’ perceptions of the use of academic debates as a teaching methodology. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 16, 15–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2014.11.001
  • Bean, J., & Melzer, D. (2021). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Berné Manero, C., Lozano Chavarría, P., & Marzo Navarro, M. (2011). Innovación en la docencia universitaria a través de la metodología MTD. Revista de Educación, 355, 605–619. DOI: https://doi.org/10-4438/1988-592X-RE-2010-355-117
  • Bolliger, D., & Shepherd, C. (2010). Student perceptions of ePortfolio integration in online courses. Distance Education, 31(3), 295–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2010.513955
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26.
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
  • Cariñanos-Ayala, S., Arrue, M., Zarandona, J., & Labaka, A. (2021). The use of structured debate as a teaching strategy among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 98, 104766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104766
  • Chaudhuri, T., & Cabau, B. (2017). E-portfolios in higher education: A multidisciplinary approach. Springer.
  • Cheung, S., Kwok, H., & Choi, P. (2017). Perceptions regarding the implementation of E-Portfolio for students in sport and recreation internship placements. In T. Chaudhuri & B. Cabau (Eds.), E-Portfolios in higher education: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 131–139). Springer.
  • Ciesielkiewicz, M. (2019). The use of e-portfolios in higher education: From the students’ perspective. Issues in Educational Research, 29(3), 649–667.
  • Dale, G. (2000). Distractions and coping strategies of elite decathletes during their memorable performances. The Sport Psychologist, 14(1), 17–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.14.1.17
  • Dalton, S. (2007). Five standards for effective teaching: How to succeed with all learners, grades K-8. John Wiley & Sons.
  • de la Cruz Tomé, M. (2003). Necesidad y objetivos de la formación pedagógica del profesor universitario. Revista de Educación, 331, 35–66. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=670567
  • DʼSouza, C. (2013). Debating: A catalyst to enhance learning skills and competencies. Education + Training, 55(6), 538–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2011-0097
  • Flynn, C. O. (2022). Reflections on an E-Portfolio assessment in a first-year physiology course. Biomedical Engineering Education, 2(1), 61–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-021-00058-9
  • Freire, P. (2014). Pedagogia da autonomia: Saberes necessários à prática educativa. Paz e Terra.
  • Grijalva-Borja, N., Espinosa, V., Quinteros, S., & Salguero, A. (2020). Analysis of the perception of university students about the use of Microsoft OneNote as an electronic laboratory notebook in response to non-face-to-face education in pandemic times. In S. Rodriguez Morales, E. Fonseca, J. Salgado, P. Pérez-Gosende, M. Orellana Cordero, & S. Berrezueta (Eds.), Communications in Computer and Information Science (pp. 150–162). Springer.
  • Healey, R. (2012). The power of debate: Reflections on the potential of debates for engaging students in critical thinking about controversial geographical topics. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(2), 239–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2011.619522
  • Herrmann, K. J. (2013). The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(3), 175–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413498035
  • Jiménez Hernández, D., González Ortiz, J. J., & Tornel Abellán, M. (2020). Metodologías activas en la universidad y su relación con los enfoques de enseñanza. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación Del Profesorado, 24(1), 76–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i1.8173
  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1999). El aprendizaje cooperativo en el aula. Paidós.
  • Kabilian, M., & Khan, M. (2012). Assessing pre-service English language teachers’ learning using e-portfolios: Benefits, challenges and competencies gained. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1007–1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.011
  • Kennedy, R. R. (2009). The power of in-class debates. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(3), 225–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787409343186
  • Libarkin, J. C., & Kurdziel, J. P. (2002). Research methodologies in science education: Qualitative data. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50(2), 195–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2002.12028052
  • Lin, Q. (2008). Preservice teachers’ learning experiences of constructing e-portfolios online. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 194–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.07.002
  • Malik, S., & Juanjua, F. (2011). Active lecturing: An effective pedagogic approach. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(2), 963–967.
  • Metzler, M. (2011). Instructional models for Physical Education (3rd Ed.). Holcomb Hathaway.
  • Nasseif, H. (2021). Exploring E-Portfolio as a new technology tool in Saudi Arabian higher education: A case study. Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 479–499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.0e590f93
  • OECD. (2019). Benchmarking higher education system performance. OECD Publishing.
  • Oliver-Hoyo, M., & Allen, D. (2006). The use of triangulation methods in qualitative educational research. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(4), 42–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
  • Onen, D. (2016). Using debate to teach: A multi-skilling pedagogy often neglected by university academic staff. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(7), 110–126. Recuperado el 22 de mayo de 2023 de: https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/706
  • Rodger, D., & Stewart-Lord, A. (2020). Students’ perceptions of debating as a learning strategy: A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 42, 102681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102681
  • Rosas-Maldonado, M., Bascuñán, D., & Martin, A. (2020). Potential benefits of debates: Perceptions of EFL pre-service teachers. Lenguas Modernas, 55, 133–150. Recuperado el 25 de noviembre de 2022 en: https://lenguasmodernas.uchile.cl/index.php/LM/article/view/58723
  • Salman, I. (2015). OneNote in education: An effective way to enhance approaches of teaching and learning in classroom. IT E-Magazine, 5, 5–8.
  • Snider, A., & Schnurer, M. (2002). Many sides: Debate across the curriculum. International Debate Education Association.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet