Dinámicas sociales en la explosión diagnóstica de la depresión

  1. Víctor Fernández Castro 1
  2. Miguel Núñez de Prado Gordillo 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Utrecht University
    info

    Utrecht University

    Utrecht, Holanda

    ROR https://ror.org/04pp8hn57

Revista:
Panorama social

ISSN: 1699-6852

Año de publicación: 2023

Título del ejemplar: La crisis de salud mental: más allá de las estadísticas

Número: 38

Páginas: 23-37

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Panorama social

Resumen

El aumento de la depresión en el mundo plantea una paradoja: ¿cómo es posible que la incidencia no pare de crecer a pesar del aumento de la inversión en salud mental e investigación? Apoyándonos en varias herramientas de la filosofía de la mente contemporánea, argumentaremos que el efecto bucle (producido por el aumento de información relativa a un fenómeno que modifica el propio fenómeno), la naturaleza social de nuestras capacidades metacognitivas y la aparición de ciertas narrativas que colocan al individuo como fuente principal de sus malestares, contribuyen a explicar esa explosión diagnóstica.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ABED, R. y St. JOHN-SMITH, P. (2022). Introduction to evolutionary psychiatry. En R. Abed y P. St John-Smith (Eds.), Evolutionary Psychiatry: Current Perspectives on Evolution and Mental Health (pp. 1-18). Cambridge University Press.
  • ALFONSO-SÁNCHEZ, J. L., MARTIN-MORENO, J. M., MARTINEZ, I. M. y MARTINEZ, A. A. (2020). Epidemiological study and cost analysis of suicide in Spain: Over 100 years of evolution. Archives of Suicide Research, 24(sup2), S356-S369.
  • ALLEN, N. B. y BADCOCK, P. B. (2003). The social risk hypothesis of depressed mood: Evolutionary, psychosocial, and neurobiological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(6), p. 887.
  • ALLEN, N. B. y BADCOCK, P. B. (2006). Darwinian models of depression: A review of evolutionary accounts of mood and mood disorders. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 30(5), pp. 815-826.
  • AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION. (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5-TRTM, revised 5th ed. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
  • BOCKTING, C. L., TEN DOESSCHATE, M. C., SPIJKER, J., SPINHOVEN, P., KOETER, M. W., SCHENE, A. H. y DELTA STUDY GROUP. (2008). Continuation and maintenance use of antidepressants in recurrent depression. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 77(1), pp. 17–26.
  • CSIBRA, G. y GERGELY, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), pp. 148-153.
  • DALAL, F. (2018). CBT: The cognitive behavioural tsunami: Managerialism, politics and the corruptions of science. Routledge.
  • DATTANI, S., RITCHIE, H. y ROSER, M. (2021). Mental health. Our World in Data 2021. https://ourworldindata.org/mental-health
  • DAVIES, J. (2021). Sedated: How modern capitalism created our mental health crisis. Atlantic Book London.
  • DE SILVA, M. J., MCKENZIE, K., HARPHAM, T. y HUTTLY, S. R. (2005). Social capital and mental illness: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, pp. 619-627.
  • DINGS, R. y DE BRUIN, L. C. (2022). What’s special about ‘not feeling like oneself’? A deflationary account of self (-illness) ambiguity. Philosophical Explorations, 25(3), pp. 269-289.
  • DINGS, R. y GLAS, G. (2020). Self-management in psychiatry as reducing self-illness ambiguity. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 27(4), pp. 333-347.
  • FERNÁNDEZ CASTRO, V. (2020). Regulation, normativity and folk psychology. Topoi, 39, pp. 57–67.
  • FERNÁNDEZ CASTRO y MARTÍNEZ-MANRIQUE, F. (2021). Shaping your own mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), pp.139-167.
  • FITCH, C., HAMILTON, S., BASSETT, P. y DAVEY, R. (2011). The relationship between personal debt and mental health: a systematic review. Mental Health Review Journal, 16(4), pp. 153-166.
  • FRAZER-CARROLL, M. (2023). Mad World: The politics of mental health. Pluto Press.
  • GBD 2019 DISEASES AND INJURIES COLLABORATORS. (2020). Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet, 396(10258), pp. 1204–1222.
  • GBD 2019 MENTAL DISORDERS COLLABORATORS. (2022). Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Psychiatry, 9(2), pp. 137-150.
  • GILBERT, P. (1992). Depression: The evolution of powerlessness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates y Guilford.
  • GONZÁLEZ DURO, E. (2017). Capital, individualismo y salud mental. Cisma Editorial.
  • GRIFFITHS, S. y STEEN, S. (2013). Improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) programme: Setting key performance indicators in a more robust context: A new perspective. Journal of Psychological Therapies in Primary Care, 2, pp. 133-141.
  • HACKING, I. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. En D. SPERBER, D. PREMACK y A. J. PREMACK (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 351–83). Clarendon Press.
  • HACKING, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Harvard University Press.
  • HAGEN, E. H. (1999). The functions of postpartum depression. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(5), pp. 325–359.
  • HAGEN, E. H. (2011). Evolutionary theories of depression: a critical review. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(12), pp. 716-726.
  • HENRICH, J., MCELREATH, R., BARR, A., ENSMINGER, J., BARRETT, C., BOLYANATZ, A. y ZIKER, J. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312(5781), pp. 1767-1770.
  • HOJMAN, D. A., MIRANDA, Á. y RUIZ-TAGLE, J. (2016). Debt trajectories and mental health. Social Science & Medicine, 167, pp. 54-62.
  • HORWITZ, A. V. y WAKEFIELD, J. C. (2007). The loss of sadness: How psychiatry transformed normal sorrow into depressive disorder. Oxford University Press.
  • INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH METRICS AND EVALUATION. (2020). GBD Results. IHME, University of Washington. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/ y https://www.healthdata.org/spain. (Acceso el 16/05/2023).
  • INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA. (2020). Encuesta Europea de Salud 2020. Prevalencia de cuadros depresivos activos según sexo y grupo de edad. Población de 15 y más años. http://www.ine.es (acceso el 16/05/2023).
  • JEPPSSON, S. M. J. (2022). Solving the self-illness ambiguity: The case for construction over discovery. Philosophical Explorations, 25(3), pp. 294-313.
  • MCGEER, V. (2007). The regulative dimension of folk psychology. En D. HUTTO y M. RATCLIFFE (Eds.), Folk psychology re-assessed (pp. 137–156). Springer.
  • MCGEER, V. (2015). Mind-making practices: The social infrastructure of self-knowing agency and responsibility. Philosophical Explorations, 18(2), pp. 259–281.
  • MCGEER, V. (2021). Enculturating folk psychologists. Synthese, 199, pp. 1039–1063.
  • MONCRIEFF, J., COOPER, R. E., STOCKMANN, T., AMENDOLA, S., HENGARTNER, M. P. y HOROWITZ, M. A. (2022). The serotonin theory of depression: A systematic umbrella review of the evidence. Molecular Psychiatry, pp. 1-14.
  • MUNTANER, C., EATON, W. W., DIALA, C., KESSLER, R. C. y SORLIE, P. D. (1998). Social class, assets, organizational control and the prevalence of common groups of psychiatric disorders. Social Science & Medicine, 47, pp. 2043-2053.
  • MURALI, V. y OYEBODE, F. (2004). Poverty, social inequality and mental health. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 10(3), pp. 216-224.
  • MURPHY, D. (2020). Philosophy of psychiatry. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/psychiatry/
  • NESSE, R. M. (2000). Is depression an adaptation? Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, pp. 14–20.
  • OOSTERHUIS, H. (2018). Locura, salud mental y ciudadanía: del individualismo posesivo al neoliberalismo. Revista de la Asociación Española de Neuropsiquiatría, 38(134), pp. 515-545.
  • ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL DE LA SALUD. (2020). Mental Health Atlas 2020. Organización Mundial de la Salud.
  • ORGANIZACIÓN PARA LA COOPERACIÓN Y EL DESARROLLO ECONÓMICOS. (2021). OECD Statistics. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico. https://stats.oecd.org/ (Acceso 16/05/2023).
  • SADLER, J. Z. (2007). The psychiatric significance of the personal Self. Psychiatry, 70(2), pp. 113-129.
  • STRIJBOS, D. W. y DE BRUIN, L. (2015). Self-interpretation as first-person mindshaping: Implications for confabulation research. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 18, pp. 297-307.
  • SZASZ, T. S. (1961). The myth of mental illness: Foundations of a theory of personal conduct. Perennial.
  • TEKIN, Ş. (2015). Against hyponarrating grief: Incompatible research and treatment interests in the DSM-5. En S. Demazeux, P. Singy (Eds), The DSM-5 in perspective. History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences, vol. 10. Springer.
  • VIETA, E., ALONSO, J., PÉREZ-SOLA, V., ROCA, M., HERNANDO, T., SICRAS-MAINAR, A., SICRAS-NAVARRO, A., HERRERA, B. y GABILONDO, A. (2021). Epidemiology and costs of depressive disorder in Spain: The EPICO study. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 50, pp. 93-103.
  • VITTENGL, J. R. (2017). Poorer long-term outcomes among persons with major depressive disorder treated with medication. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 86(5), pp. 302–304.
  • WAKEFIELD, J. (1992). The concept of medical disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist, 47(3), pp. 373–388.
  • WAKEFIELD, J. (2007). The concept of mental disorder. World Psychiatry, 6(2), pp. 149–156.
  • WHITAKER, R. (2001). Mad in America: Bad science, bad medicine, and the enduring mistreatment of the mentally ill. Basic Books.
  • WHITAKER, R. (2002). Mad in America: Bad science, bad medicine, and the enduring mistreatment of the mentally ill. Basic Books
  • WOODS, A., HART, A. y SPANDLER, H. (2022). The recovery narrative: Politics and possibilities of a genre. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 46(2), pp. 221–247.
  • ZAWIDZKI, T. W. (2013). Mindshaping: A new framework for understanding human social cognition. MIT Press.
  • ZAWIDZKI, T. W. (2016). Mindshaping and self-interpretation. En J. Kiverstein (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of the Social Mind. Routledge.d
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet