Prediction of disruptive behaviors from boredom and satisfaction with physical education

  1. Baños, Raul 1
  2. Barretos Ruvalcaba, Michelle 2
  3. Baena-Extremera, Antonio 3
  4. Granero-Gallegos, Antonio 4
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Baja California

    Mexicali, México

    ROR https://ror.org/05xwcq167

  3. 3 Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Granada
  4. 4 Facultad de Educación. Universidad de Almería
Revista:
Cultura, ciencia y deporte

ISSN: 1696-5043

Año de publicación: 2024

Volumen: 19

Número: 59

Páginas: 89-101

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.12800/CCD.V19I59.2173 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Cultura, ciencia y deporte

Resumen

El objetivo del presente estudio fue analizar las propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Conducta Disruptiva en Educación Física (CCD-EF) en el contexto mexicano. Se diseñó un estudio no experimental, transversal, correlacional-causal, en el que participaron 378 niñas (M = 13.99; DT = .30) y 375 niños (M = 14.02; DT = .33), todos estudiantes de secundaria. Las propiedades psicométricas de la escala fueron analizadas mediante diferentes análisis exploratorios y confirmatorios que demuestran que este instrumento con cuatro factores correlacionados, y como modelos de orden superior, es válido, confiable e invariante en función del sexo. Un modelo de regresión con variables latentes mostró una predicción positiva y significativa del aburrimiento con la Educación Física sobre las conductas disruptivas, encontrando que esta predicción es mayor en niños que en niñas. El CCD-EF ha demostrado ser un instrumento confiable y válido para utilizar con estudiantes mexicanos de secundaria.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Asun-Dieste, S., & Guíu Carrera, M. (2023). Use of formative assessment in physical education teacher education in secondary school: a case study. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte, 18(55), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.12800/ccd.v18i55.1918
  • Aznar-Ballesta, A., & Vernetta, M. (2023). Influencia de la satisfacción e importancia de la educación física en el abandono deportivo. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 16(32), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v16i32.8604
  • Baena-Extremera, A., Granero-Gallegos, A., & Martínez-Molina, M. (2015). Spanish version of the evaluation of teaching competencies scale in physical education of secondary school. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 15(3), 113-122. https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1578-84232015000300011
  • Baños, R. (2020). Boredom and disruptive behaviours in the physical education classrom. Journal of Sport and Health Research, 12(3), 406-419. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/JSHR/article/view/83570
  • Baños, R. (2021). Clima motivacional y conductas disruptivas en educación física en estudiantes españoles y mexicanos de educación secundaria. Journal of Sport and Health Research, 13(1), 1-12. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/JSHR/article/view/87340
  • Baños, R., Baena-Extremera, A., Ortiz-Camacho, M. M., Zamarripa, J., Beltrán de la Fuente, A., & Juvera Portilla, J. L. (2019). Influence of the competences of secondary teachers on disruptive behavior in the classroom. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 12(24), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v12i24.2141
  • Baños, R., Barretos-Ruvalcaba, M., & Baena-Extremera, A. (2019). Protocol for the study of the academic, psychological and physical activity variables that influence the academic performance of Mexican and Spanish adolescents. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 12(25), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v12i25.2480
  • Baños, R., Baena-Extremera, A., & Granero-Gallegos, A. (2019). The relationships between high school subjects in terms of school satisfaction and academic performance in Mexican adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), 3494. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183494
  • Baños, R., Ortiz-Camacho, M. M., Baena-Extremera, A., & Tristán-Rodríguez, J. L. (2017). Satisfaction, motivation and academic performance in students of secondary and high school: background, design, methodology and proposal of analysis for a research paper. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 10(20), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v10i20.1011
  • Benbenishty, R., Astor, R. A., & Roziner, I. (2018). A school-based multilevel study of adolescent suicide ideation in California high schools. The Journal of Pediatrics, 196, 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.12.070
  • Bentler, P.M. (2007). On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 825–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.024
  • Burns, T., & Gottschalk F. (2019). Educating 21st Century children: emotional well-being in the digital age. educational research and innovation. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/educating-21st-century-children-b7f33425-en.htm
  • Buscá, F., Ruiz, L., & Rekalde, I. (2014). Conflict resolution in schools as Learning Communities through physical education. Retos. Nuevas tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 25, 156-161. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i25.34503
  • Byrne, B.M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
  • Carretero-Dios, H., & Pérez, C. (2007). Standards for the development and the review of instrumental studies: considerations about test selection in psychological research. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 863-882. https://www.aepc.es/ijchp/carretero_es.pdf
  • Castillo, I., Balaguer, I., & Duda, J. L. (2001). Las perspectivas de meta de los adolescentes en el contexto deportivo. Psicothema, 14(2), 280–287. https://www.psicothema.com/pdf/721.pdf
  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Cothran, D. J., Kulinna, P. H., & Garrahy, D. (2009). Attributions for and consequences of student misbehavior. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 14(2), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980701712148
  • Cothran, D. J., & Kulinna, P. H. (2007). Students’ reports of misbehavior in physical education. Research Quaterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(3), 216 -224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2007.10599419
  • De Agüero, M. (2020). Research on bullying and violence at school in Mexico. Revista Digital Universitaria, 21(4). http://doi.org/10.22201/cuaieed.16076079e.2020.21.4.2
  • Declaration of Helsinki (2013). Ethical principles for medical research involving humans. World Medical Association. https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/education/medical-ethics-manual/
  • Domínguez-Lara, S. (2017). Effect size in regression analysis. Interacciones. Journal of Family, Clinical and Health Psychology, 3(1), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.24016/2017.v3n1.46
  • Fernández-Garcimartín, C., López Pastor, V. M., Fuentes-Nieto, T., & Hortigüela-Alcalá, D. (2023). Formative and shared assessment and final degree projects in physical education pre-service teacher education. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte, 18(55), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.12800/ccd.v18i55.1922
  • Glock, S., & Kleen, H. (2017). Gender and student misbehavior: evidence from implicit and explicit measures. Teaching and Teacher Education 67, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.015
  • Granero-Gallegos, A., & Baena-Extremera, A. (2016). Validation of the short-form Spanish version of the physical education classroom instrument measuring secondary pupils’ disruptive behaviours. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 16(2), 89-98. https://revistas.um.es/cpd/article/view/264451
  • Granero-Gallegos, A., Baños, R., Baena-Extremera, A., & Martínez-Molina, M. (2020). Analysis of misbehaviours and satisfaction with school in secondary education according to student gender and teaching competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(63). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00063
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Hansen, G., & Ringdal, R. (2018). Formative assessment as a future step in maintaining the mastery-approach and performance-avoidance goal stability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.005
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  • Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6a Ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2015). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: preventing and responding to cyberbullying (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R
  • Hoyo-Guillot, A., & Ruiz-Montero, P. J. (2023). Influence of a personal and social responsibility model intervention on educative motivation, prosocial environment and physical education importance on secondary school students. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 16(34), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v16i34.9629
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1): 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Invernizzi, P. L., Crotti, M., Bosio, A., Cavaggioni, L., Alberti., G., & Scurati, R. (2019). Multi-teaching styles approach and active reflection: effectiveness in improving fitness level, motor competence, enjoyment, amount of physical activity, and effects on the perception of physical education lessons in primary school children. Sustainability 11(2), 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020405
  • Krech, P. R., Kulinna, P. H., & Cothran, D. (2010). Development of a short-form version of the physical education classroom instrument: measuring secondary pupils' disruptive behaviours. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(3), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980903150121
  • Kulinna, P. H., Cothran, D., & Regualos, R. (2003). Development of an instrument to measure student disruptive behavior. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 7(1), 25-41. https://asu.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/development-of-an-instrument-to-measure-student-disruptive-behavi
  • Kulinna, P. H., Cothran, D., & Regualos, R. (2006). Teachers’ reports of student misbehavior in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 77(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2006.10599329
  • Lévy-Mangin, J. P., & Varela, J. (2006). Modelización con estructuras de covarianzas en ciencias sociales. Netbiblo.
  • Lynn, M. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-385. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3640358/
  • Maddeh, T., Bennour, N., & Souissi, N. (2015). Study of students’ disruptive behavior in high school education in physical education classes. Advances in Physical Education, 5(3), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.4236/ape.2015.53018
  • Manzano, D. (2021). Diferencias entre aspectos psicológicos en Educación Primaria y Educación Secundaria: motivación, necesidades psicológicas básicas, responsabilidad, clima de aula, conductas antisociales y violencia. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 14(28), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v14i28.4198
  • Manzano-Sánchez, D., Ferrer-López, B., Battaglia, G., & Gómez-López, M. (2023). Support for autonomy and fear of failure in physical education lessons. Differences between “gender and physical extracurricular sports. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 16(34), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v16i34.9476
  • Markland, D. (2007). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 851-858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.023
  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. L. (2004). In search of golden rules: comment on approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in over generalising Hu & Bentler (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320-341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
  • Martínez-Molina, M., Granero-Gallegos, A., Baena-Extremera, A., & Baños, R. (2020). Factorial invariance by sex of the physical education classroom instrument and evaluation of teaching competencies scale adapted to physical education with secondary students. Psychology, Society, & Education, 12(2), 125-137. https://repositorio.ual.es/bitstream/handle/10835/8671/3172-10639-1-PB.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • Milfont, T. L., & Fisher, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111–121. https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/857/607
  • Myers, N. D., Martin, J. J., Ntoumanis, N., Celimli, S., & Bartholomew, K. (2014). Exploratory bifactor analysis in sport, exercise, and performance psychology: a substantive-methodological synergy. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 3(4), 258-272. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000015
  • Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.J. (1995). Teoría psicométrica. Mcgraw-Hill.
  • Olweus, D., & Breivik, K. (2014). Plight of victims of school bullying: the opposite of well-being. In A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frønes & J. E. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of Child Well-Being SE - 90 (pp. 2593–2616). Springer.
  • Palacios-Gómez, J., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., & Hernando-Garijo, A. (2023). Fears and perceptions of the application of formative and shared assessment by a novel physical education teacher. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 16(34), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v16i34.9627
  • Rindskopf, D., & Rose, T. (1988). Some theory and applications of confirmatory second- order factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_3
  • Scharenberg, K. (2016). The interplay of social and ethnic classroom composition, tracking, and gender on students’ school satisfaction. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology. 15(2), 320–346. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.2.320
  • Senado de la República de México (2019). Boletín: México, en los primeros lugares del mundo en acoso escolar. Publicado miércoles, 21 de agosto del 2019.
  • SEP (2017). Aprendizajes clave para la formación integral. SEP. https://www.gob.mx/sep/articulos/aprendizajes-clave-para-la-educacion-integral
  • Soper, D. S. (2022). A-priori sample size calculator for Student t-Tests. Free Statistics Calculators. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/
  • Sulbarán, A., & León, A. (2014). Estudio de las conductas disruptivas en la escuela según la percepción docente. Administración Educacional, 2, 35-50. http://erevistas.saber.ula.ve/index.php/administracioneducacional/article/view/5302
  • Sun, R.C. (2016). Student misbehavior in Hong Kong: the predictive role of positive youth development and school satisfaction. Applied Research in Quality of Life 11, 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9395-x
  • Supaporn, S., Dodds, P., & Griffin, L. (2003). An ecological analysis of middle school misbehavior through student and teacher perspectives. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22(3), 328-349. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.22.3.328
  • Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L. S. (2018). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson.
  • Taylor, I., Ntoumanis, N., & Standage, M. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to understanding antecedents of teachers’ motivational strategies in physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.1.75
  • Teo, T. S. H., Srivastava, S.C., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: an empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99-132.https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
  • Von-Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2008). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 61(4), 344-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008