Assessment of landscape visual fragility in the Natural Protected Area Sierra de las Nieves (southern Spain)

  1. Menjíbar-Romero, Mario 1
  2. Remond, Ricardo 2
  3. Martínez-Murillo, Juan Francisco 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Málaga
    info

    Universidad de Málaga

    Málaga, España

    ROR https://ror.org/036b2ww28

  2. 2 Universidad de La Habana
    info

    Universidad de La Habana

    La Habana, Cuba

    ROR https://ror.org/04204gr61

Journal:
Investigaciones Geográficas (España)

ISSN: 0213-4691,  1989-9890

Year of publication: 2023

Issue: 80

Pages: 57-79

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14198/INGEO.25021 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Investigaciones Geográficas (España)

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Visual fragility is a fundamental analysis of landscape quality, especially for protected natural areas highly valued for their biodiversity, geodiversity and cultural heritage. This is the case of the Sierra de las Nieves Protected Natural Area, located in southern Spain, declared a national park in 2021 and which brings together outstanding natural systems. Its aesthetic character is a key point for both the local population and visitors, so phenomena such as fire pose a territorial threat. This study analyses which are the most fragile landscapes from a visual point of view. Thus, using spatial analysis techniques in GIS, the landscape units were delimited and their visual fragility was evaluated considering a 5x5m DEM of spatial resolution and defining visual basins from geolocated points along the road network, which included paved roads, unpaved roads and official trails of the study area. The results indicate a broad spatial variability in visual fragility depending on the observation point, throughout the natural area, although the landscapes with the highly valued forests of Abies pinsapo Boiss. and Quercus alpestris showed the greatest fragility, especially those located in the central, southern and eastern sectors over 900 m above sea level. These results contribute to managing the areas most exposed to threats with a visual impact, such as fire, which can negatively influence the aesthetic character of the landscapes of the Sierra de las Nieves.

Bibliographic References

  • Alonso, S.G., Aguiló, M., & Ramos, A. (1986). Visual impact assessment methodology for industrial development site review in Spain. In R.C. Samrdon, J.F. Palmer, & J.P. Felleman (Eds.), Foundations for visual project analysis (pp. 277-305). Wiley.
  • Antrop, M. & Van Eetvelde, V. (2017). Landscape Perspectives: the holistic nature of landscape. Springer (Landscape Series, 23). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1183-6
  • Antrop, M. (2000). Geography and landscape science. Belgeo, Revue belge de géographie, 1–2–3–4. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.13975
  • Aramburu Maqua, M.P. & Escribano Bombín, R. (2014). Guía para la elaboración de estudios del medio físico (4th ed.). Fundación Conde del Valle de Salazar (E.T.S.I. de Montes) y Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente
  • Arias-García, J., Gómez-Zotano, J., & Delgado-Peña, J.J. (2018). Classifying landscape in endorheic basins: a methodological approach for the implementation of the European landscape convention. European Journal of Geography, 8-2, 55–77. https://ojs.eurogeojournal.eu/showPaper.php?id=986
  • Bastin L., Cornford D., Jones R., Heuvelink B.M., Pebesma E., Stasch C., Nativi S., Mazzetti P., & Williams M. (2013). Managing uncertainty in integrated environmental modelling: The Uncert Web framework. Environmental Modelling & Software, 39, 116-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.008
  • Bastian, O. (2008). Landscape classification between fact and fiction. Paper Presented at the Conference Warzaw University and Polish Association of Landscape Ecology, Warzawa Pol ska Asocjacja Ekologii Krajobrazu.
  • Bertrand, G. (1968). Paysage et géographie physique globale. Esquisse méthodologique. Revue géographique des Pyrénées et du Sud-Ouest. Sud-Ouest Européen, 39-3, 249–272. https://doi.org/10.3406/ rgpso.1968.4553
  • Bishop, I.D. (2002). Determination of Thresholds of Visual Impact: The Case of Wind Turbines. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 29-5. https://doi.org/10.1068/b12854
  • Bishop, I.D. (2003). Assessment of Visual Qualities, Impacts, and Behaviours, in the Landscape, by Using Measures of Visibility. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 30-5. https://doi. org/10.1068/b12956
  • BOE (2021). Ley 9/2021, de 1 de julio, de declaración del Parque Nacional Sierra de las Nieves. Madrid: Boletín Oficial del Estado. https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2021-10958
  • Brabyn, L. (2009). Classifying landscape character. Landscape Research, 34(3), 299–321. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/01426390802371202
  • Bunce, R.G.H., Barr, C.J., Clarke, R.T., Howard, D.C., & Lane, .M.J. (1996). ITE Merlewood land classification of Great Britain. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.1996. tb00023.x
  • Cancer, L. (1994). Aproximación critica a las teorías más representativas de la ciencia del paisaje. Geographicalia, 31, 17-34.
  • Christian, C.S. (1958). The concept of land units and land systems. Proceedings of the Ninth Pacific Science Congress.
  • Consejería de Sostenibilidad, Medio Ambiente y Economía Azul (2023). Proyecto de Decreto XX/2022, por el que se declara el Espacio Natural de la Sierra de las Nieves y se crean y regulan sus órganos de gestión y participación. https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/sites/default/files/2022-11/Primer%20Borrador%20 %E2%80%9CTexto%20sometido%20a%20informaci%C3%B3n%20P%C3%BAblica%E2%80%9D.pdf
  • David O., Ascough J.C., Lloyd W., Green T.R., Rojas K.W., Leavesley G.H., & Ahuja L.R. (2013). A software engineering perspective on environmental modelling framework design: The Object Modeling System. Environmental Modelling & Software, 39, 201-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.006 Delgado Peña, J.J., Remond, R., & Martínez Murillo, J.F. (2017). Fragilidad visual del paisaje asociada a la dinámica temporal de los castañares en Faraján (España). Cuadernos Geográficos, 56, 116-135. https:// revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/cuadgeo/article/view/5375/5849
  • Dos Santos Pires, P. (2011). Marco teórico-metodológico de los estudios del paisaje. Perspectivas de aplicación en la planificación del turismo. Estudios y Perspectivas en Turismo, 20, Article 522541. https:// www.redalyc.org/pdf/1807/180717583001.pdf
  • European Council (2000). European Landscape Convention. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/ heritage/landscape/versionsconvention/spanish.pdf
  • Fisher, F. M. (1995). An Exploration of Probable Viewsheds in Landscape Planning. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 22. https://doi.org/10.1068/b220527
  • FranchPardo, I. & Cáncer, L. (2017). El componente visual en la cartografía del paisaje. Aptitud paisajística para la protección en la cuenca del río Chiquito (Morelia, Michoacán). Investigaciones Geográficas, 93, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.14350/rig.54730
  • García-Quintana A., Martín-Duque J.F., González-Martín J.A., García-Hidalgo J.F., Pedraza J., Herranz P., Rincón R., & Estévez H. (2005). Geology and rural landscapes in Central Spain (Guadalajara, Castilla-La Mancha). Environmental Geology, 47, 782-794.
  • Giolito, E. R. D. R., & Meyer, Y. (2016). Valoración de la calidad y fragilidad del paisaje en la bahía de Pasaia, Gipuzkoa. Un análisis con técnicas SIG. Aplicaciones geotecnológicas para el desarrollo económico sostenible. Oral comunication at the XVII Congreso Nacional de Tecnologías de la Información Geográfica, Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles.
  • Gutiérrez-Hernández, O., Cámara Artigas, R., & García, L.V. (2018). Regeneración de los pinsapares béticos. Análisis de tendencia interanual y estacional del NDVI. Pirineos, 173, e035. https://doi.org/10.3989/ pirineos.2018.173002
  • Hazeu, G.W., Metzger, M.J., Mücher, C.A., Perez-Soba, M., Renetzeder, C., & Andersen, E. (2011). European environmental stratifications and typologies: an overview. Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment, 142, 29–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.01.009
  • Hermes, J., Van Berkel, D., Burkhard, B., Plieninger, T., Fagerholm, N., Haaren, C., & Albert, C. (2018). Assessment and valuation of recreational ecosystem services of landscapes. Ecosystem services, 31, 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.011
  • Hettner, A. (1928). Die Oberflächenformen Des Festlandes: Probleme Und Methoden Der Morphologie. Teubner (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-16087-8
  • Klauco M., Gregorova B., Koleda P., Stankov U., Markovic V., & Lemenkova P., (2017). Land planning as a support for sustainable development based on tourism: a case study of Slovak rural region. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 16, 449-458. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2017.045
  • Laurie, I. C. (1975). Literary manuscript sources: A query. The Bibliotheck: A Scottish Journal of Bibliography and Allied Topics, 7, 115. https://search.proquest.com/openview/86656b232923b6354aa77ceef8d97a71 /1?pq-origsite5gscholar&cbl51817457
  • Laurie, M. (1983). Introducción a la arquitectura del paisaje. Ed. Gustavo Gilli.
  • Linton, D. L. (1968). The assessment of scenery as a natural resource. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 84, 219238. https://doi.org/10.1080/00369226808736099
  • Litton, R. (1972). Aesthetic dimensions of the landscape. In J. V. Krutilla (Ed.), Natural Environments. Studies in theoretical and applied analysis. Resources for the future (pp. 262-291). John Hopkins University Press.
  • Lovejoy, D. (1973). Land use and landscape planning. Publisher Barnes & Noble Language English. https:// agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID5US201300514857
  • Martínez-Béjar, R., Ibáñez-Cruz, F., Compton, P., & Cao, T.M. (2001). An easy-maintenance, reusable approach for building knowledge-based systems: application to landscape assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 20, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(00)00055-5 Martínez-Graña, A.M., Goy, J.L., De Bustamante I., & Zazo C., (2014). Characterization of environmental impact on resources, using strategic assessment of environmental impact and management of natural spaces of “Las Batuecas-Sierra de Francia” and “Quilamas” (Salamanca, Spain). Environmental Earth Sciences, 71, 39-51, 9–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2692-5
  • Martínez-Graña, A.M. & Valdés V. (2016). Remote Sensing and GIS Applied to the Landscape for the Environmental Restoration of Urbanizations by Means of 3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization (Salamanca, Spain). International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5010002
  • Martínez-Graña, A.M., Silva, P., Valdés V., & Elez, J. (2019). Paths for linear infrastructure in “Las BatuecasSierra de Francia” and “Quilamas” Nature Parks (Central System, Salamanca, Spain). Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 18, 991-999. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2019.096
  • Martínez-Murillo, J.F., Remond, R., Hueso-González, P., & Ruiz-Sinoga, J.D. (2016). Resiliencia de la cubierta vegetal en un área de montaña mediterránea afectada por el fuego: el caso del incendio de río verde (provincia de Málaga, sur de España). Pirineos, 171, e024. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/pirineos.2016.171008
  • McHarg, I.L. (1969). Design with nature. American Museum of Natural History. https://periodicos.ufba.br/ index.php/rua/article/download/3162/2273
  • MITECO. (2023). Parque Nacional Sierra de las Nieves. https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/parques-nacionalesoapn/red-parques-nacionales/parques-nacionales/sierra-de-las-nieves/
  • Nativi S., Mazzetti P. & Geller G.N., (2013). Environmental model access and interoperability: The GEO Model Web initiative. Environmental Modelling & Software, 39, 214-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envsoft.2012.03.007
  • Olmedo Cobo, J. & Gómez Zotano, J. (2017). Los climas de la Serranía de Ronda: una propuesta de clasificación. Takurunna, 6-7, 23-57. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6188994
  • Ojeda, C.G., Jaque Castillo, E., & Fernández Castillo, S. (2021). Postwildfire Landscape Identity in Mediterranean Ecosystems: Three Study Cases from the Coastal Range of Central Chile. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111, 1692-1704. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1850228
  • Parrilla Alcalá, E., Márquez Pérez, J., & Rodríguez Díaz, V. (2005). Establecimiento de la fragilidad visual del paisaje mediante SIG en el entorno del PN de La Breña y Marismas del Barbate (Cádiz, España): Aproximación metodológica. http://hdl.handle.net/11441/53298
  • Priego-Santander, A.G., Isunza-Vera, E., Luna-Gonzalez, N. & Perez-Damian., J.L. (2003). Tipos morfometricos del relieve de Mexico, a escala 1:250 000. Dirección General de Investigaciones en Ordenamiento Ecologico y Conservacion de Ecosistemas. INE, SEMARNAT. http://mapas.ine.gob.mx/est_vertical.htm
  • Quintela, J. (1995). El inventario, el análisis y el diagnóstico geoecológico de los paisajes mediante el empleo de los SIG [Doctoral Thesis, Universidad de La Habana].
  • Ramos, A., Ramos, F., Cifuentes, P., & Fernandez-Cañadas, M. (1976). Visual landscape evaluation, a grid technique. Landscape Planning, 3, 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(76)90103-9
  • Ramón, A., Salinas, E., & Remond, R. (2009). Diseño metodológico para la elaboración de mapas de paisajes con el uso de los SIG: aplicación a la cuenca alta del río Cauto, Cuba, Geografía y Sistemas de Información Geográfica. GeoSIG, 1, 95-108.
  • Remond-Noa, R., González-Sousa, R., Cámara-García, F.L., Cabrera, N., Quintana-Cortina, C., & MartínezMurillo, J.F. (2022). Modelling land use changes and impacts on the visual fragility of a UNESCO Landscape Heritage Site (Viñales, Cuba). In P. Pereira, E. Gomes, & J. Rocha (Eds.), Mapping and Forecasting Land Use. The Present and Future of Planning (pp. 265-297). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323- 90947-1.00006-5
  • Saeidi, S., Mohammadzadeh, M., Salmanmahiny, A., & Mirkarimi, S. (2017). Performance evaluation of multiple methods for landscape aesthetic suitability mapping: A comparative study between Multi-Criteria Evaluation, Logistic Regression and Multi-Layer Perceptron neural network. Land Use Policy, 67, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.014
  • Scarfò, F., Mercurio, R., & del Peso, C. (2013). Assessing visual impacts of forest operations on a landscape in the Serre Regional Park of southern Italy. Landscape Ecology Engineering, 9, 1–10. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11355-011-0168-x
  • Samarasinghe S., & Strickert G., (2013). Mixed-method integration and advances in fuzzy cognitive maps for computational policy simulations for natural hazard mitigation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 39, 188-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.06.008
  • Sang, N., Gold, C., & Miller, D. (2016). The topological viewshed: Embedding topological pointers into digital terrain models to improve GIS capability for visual landscape analysis. International Journal of Digital Earth, 9, 11851205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1192229
  • Sarlöv Herlin, I. (2016). Exploring the national contexts and cultural ideas that preceded the landscape character assessment method in England. Landscape Research, 41, 175–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080 /01426397.2015.1135317
  • Serrano Giné, D. (2013). Tipología y organización del paisaje en Muntanyes d’Ordal (Barcelona). Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 61, 195-214. https://doi.org/10.21138/bage.1541
  • Sillero-Medina, J.A., Pérez-González, M.E., Martínez-Murillo, J.F., & Ruiz-Sinoga, J.D. (2020). Factors affecting eco-geomorphological dynamics in two contrasting Mediterranean environments. Geomorphology, 352, e106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106996
  • Simensen, T., Halvorsen, R., & Erikstad, L. (2018). Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: A systematic review. Land Use Policy, 75, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.022
  • Strevens T.C., Puotinen M.L., & Whelan R.J., (2008). Powerline easements: Ecological impacts and contribution to habitat fragmentation from linear features. Pacific Conservation Biology, 14, 159-168. https://doi. org/10.1071/PC080159
  • Turner, M.G., & Gardner, R.H. (2001). Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Springer. Vallina Rodríguez, A. (2020). Análisis de la calidad visual del paisaje del Parque Nacional de la Sierra de
  • Guadarrama mediante procedimientos indirectos: EMC y SIG. Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense, 40, 183-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/AGUC.69338
  • Zube, E. H. (1976). Perception of landscape and land use. Human behavior and environment. Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2550-5_3
Data source: Dialnet