The Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Affected Decision-Making Processes

  1. Carlos Romero-Rivas 1
  2. Sara Rodriguez-Cuadrado 1
  1. 1 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01cby8j38

Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2021

Número: 24

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2021.14 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Resumen

A sample of 641 participants were presented with four decision-making tasks during the first stages of the COVID–19 lockdown in Spain: The dictator game, framing problems, utilitarian/deontological and altruistic/egoistic moral dilemmas. Participants also completed questionnaires on mental health status and experiences related to the COVID–19 pandemic. We used boosted regression trees (an advanced form of regression analysis based on machine learning) to model relationships between responses to the questionnaires and decision-making tasks. Results showed that the psychological impact of the COVID–19 pandemic predicted participants’ responses to the framing problems and utilitarian/deontological and altruistic/egoistic moral dilemmas (but not to the dictator game). More concretely, the more psychological impact participants suffered, the more they were willing to choose the safest response in the framing problems, and the more deontological/altruistic were their responses to moral dilemmas. These results suggest that the psychological impact of the COVID–19 pandemic might prompt automatic processes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bados, A., Solanas, A., & Andrés, R. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS). Psicothema, 17(4), 679–683.
  • Báguena Puigcerver, M. J., Soler, E. V., Mateo, M. A. B., Badia, M. C. R., & Reig, R. (2001). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la Escala Revisada de Impacto del Estresor (EIE-R) (Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Revised Stressor Impact Scale (EIE-R)). Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 27(114), 581–604.
  • Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Slingsby, J. K., Harrell, K. L., Peekna, H. M., & Todd, R. M. (1991). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 413–426. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.61.3.413
  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. http://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
  • Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395, 912–920. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
  • Brown, T. A., Sautter, J. A., Littvay, L., Sautter, A. C., & Bearnes, B. (2010). Ethics and personality: Empathy and narcissism as moderators of ethical decision making in business students. Journal of Education for Business, 85(4), 203–208. http://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903449501
  • Capraro, V. (2019). The dual-process approach to human sociality: A review. SSRN. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3409146
  • Cella, M., Dymond, S., & Cooper, A. (2010). Impaired flexible decision-making in major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 124(1–2), 207–210. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.013
  • Cellini, N., Canale, N., Mioni, G., & Costa, S. (2020). Changes in sleep pattern, sense of time, and digital media use during COVID–19 lockdown in Italy. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/ 10.31234/osf.io/284mr
  • Costa, A., Foucart, A., Arnon, I., Aparici, M., & Apesteguia, J. (2014). “Piensa” twice: On the foreign language effect in decisionmaking. Cognition, 130(2), 236–254. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.010
  • Costa, A., Foucart, A., Hayakawa, S., Aparici,M., Apesteguia, J., Heafner, J., & Keysar, B. (2014). Your morals depend on language. PLOS ONE, 9(4), Article e94842. http://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0094842
  • Creamer, M., Bell, R., & Failla, S. (2003). Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale-revised. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(12), 1489–1496. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.010
  • Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. Times Brooks.
  • Elith, J., & Leathwick, J. (n.d.). Appendix: Boosted Regression Trees for ecological modeling. R Documentation. https:// rspatial.org/raster/sdm/9_sdm_brt.html
  • Elith, J., Leathwick, J. R., &Hastie, T. (2008). Aworking guide to boosted regression trees. Journal ofAnimalEcology,77(4), 802–813.
  • Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241. http:// doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
  • Foot, P. (1978). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect in virtues and vices. Basil Blackwell.
  • Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton,M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6(3), 347–369. http://doi.org/10.1006/ game.1994.1021
  • Fromell, H., Nosenzo, D., & Owens, T. (2020). Altruism, fast and slow? Evidence from a meta-analysis and a new experiment. Experimental Economics, 23, 979–1001. http:// doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09645-z
  • Greene, J. D. (2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 322–323. http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004
  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293 (5537), 2105–2108. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
  • Hasegawa, T., Ikeda, K., & Takahashi, T. (2007). Social evaluation-induced amylase elevation and economic decision-making in the dictator game in humans. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 28(5), 662–665.
  • Kahane, G., Everett, J. A. C., Earp, B. D., Farias, M., & Savulescu, J. (2015). ‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good. Cognition, 134, 193–209. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.005
  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003- 066X.58.9.697
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292. http://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  • López-Gómez, I., Hervás, G., & Vázquez, C. (2015). Adaptación de la “Escala de afecto positivo y negativo” (PANAS) en una muestra general española (Adaptation of the ”Positive and Negative Affect Scale” (PANAS) in a general Spanish sample). Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 23, 529–548.
  • Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Psychology Foundation of Australia.
  • May, C. L., & Wisco, B. E. (2020). Reward processing and decision-making in Posttraumatic stress disorder. Behavior Therapy, 51(5), 814–828. http://doi.org/10.1016/ j.beth.2019.11.005
  • Powell, P. A., & Roberts, J. (2017). Situational determinants of cognitive, affective, and compassionate empathy in naturalistic digital interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 137–148. http://doi.org/10.1016/ j.chb.2016.11.024
  • Odriozola-González, P., Planchuelo-Gómez, Á., IrurtiaMuñiz, M. J., & de Luis-García, R. (2020). Psychological symptoms of the outbreak of the COVID–19 crisis and confinement in the population of Spain. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/ 10.31234/osf.io/mq4fg
  • Porcelli, A. J., &Delgado,M.R. (2009). Acute stressmodulates risk taking in financial decision making. Psychological Science, 20(3), 278–283. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9280.2009.02288.x
  • Rand, D. G., Brescoll, V. L., Everett, J. A. C., Capraro, V., & Barcelo, H. (2016). Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 389–396. http:// doi.org/10.1037/xge0000154
  • Ruderman, L., Ehrlich, D. B., Roy, A., Pietrzak, R.H., HarpazRotem, I., & Levy, I. (2016). Posttraumatic stress symptoms and aversion to ambiguous losses in combat veterans. Depression and Anxiety, 33(7), 606–613. http://doi.org/ 10.1002/da.22494
  • Sailer, U., Robinson, S., Fischmeister, F. P. S., König, D., Oppenauer, C., Lueger-Schuster, B., Moser, E., Kryspin-Exner, I., & Bauer, H. (2008). Altered reward processing in the nucleus accumbens and mesial prefrontal cortex of patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Neuropsychologia, 46(11), 2836–2844. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.022
  • Stagnaro, M., Littman, R., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Individual difference in acts of self-sacrifice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, Article E217. http://doi.org/10.1017/ S0140525X18001759
  • Starcke, K., & Brand, M. (2012). Decision making under stress: A selective review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(4), 1228–1248. http://doi.org/10.1016/ j.neubiorev.2012.02.003
  • Starcke, K., Polzer, C., Wolf, O. T., & Brand, M. (2011). Does stress alter everyday moral decision-making? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36(2), 210–219.
  • Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem.TheYale Law Journal, 94(6), 1395–1415.
  • Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
  • Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17(6), 476–477. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9280.2006.01731.x
  • van Gelder, J.-L., de Vries, R. E., & van Der Pligt, J. (2009). Evaluating a dual-processmodel of risk: Affect and cognition as determinants of risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(1), 45–61. http://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.610
  • Wang, C., Horby, P. W., Hayden, F. G., & Gao, G. F. (2020). A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. The Lancet, 395(10223), 470–473. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(20)30185-9
  • Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020). Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID–19) epidemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), Article 1729. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.54.6.1063
  • Whitehouse, H. (2018). Dying for the group: Towards a general theory of extreme self-sacrifice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, Article E192. http://doi.org/10.1017/ S0140525X18000249
  • Youssef, F. F., Dookeeram, K., Basdeo, V., Francis, E., Doman, M., Mamed, D., Maloo, S., Degannes, J., Dobo, L., Disthotlo, P., & Legall, G. (2012). Stress alters personal moral decision making. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(4), 491–498. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.017
  • Yu, R. (2016). Stress potentiates decision biases: A stress induced deliberation-to-intuition (SIDI) model. Neurobiology of Stress, 3, 83–95. http://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ynstr.2015.12.006
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet