Bibliometric Analysis of the Research Landscape in Human-Computer Interaction in Ibero-America

  1. Solis Pino, Andrés Felipe 1
  2. Ruiz, Pablo H. 2
  3. Agredo-Delgado, Vanessa 3
  4. Mon, Alicia 4
  5. Collazos, Cesar Alberto 1
  1. 1 Universidad del Cauca, Colombia
  2. 2 Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia, Colombia
  3. 3 Corporación Universitaria Comfacauca, Colombia
  4. 4 Universidad Nacional de La Matanza, Argentina
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
TecnoLógicas

ISSN: 2256-5337,  0123-7799

Año de publicación: 2024

Número: 59

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.22430/22565337.2907 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: TecnoLógicas

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

La interacción humano-computadora es una disciplina centrada en la optimización de las interfaces hombre-máquina. Iberoamérica es una región destacada en cuanto a avances en esta área adaptados a su singular entorno socioeconómico. Sin embargo, aún no se dispone de una caracterización global del panorama investigativo para esta disciplina en la región. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar la literatura científica sobre interacción humano-computadora en Iberoamérica utilizando técnicas bibliométricas, identificando autores clave, instituciones, estructura conceptual y tendencias de investigación. La metodología empleada consistió en un análisis bibliométrico de 9812 documentos del período 1990-2023 provenientes de Scopus y Web of Science. Los datos se analizaron utilizando Bibliometrix y VOSviewer para el análisis estadístico y de redes. Los resultados revelaron que España, Brasil, Portugal, México y Colombia están a la vanguardia de la investigación con más del 90 % del total de publicaciones experimentando una tasa de crecimiento anual de aproximadamente 14,6 %, impulsada por sólidas colaboraciones internacionales. Los temas clave son la interacción humano-computadora, la realidad virtual, la realidad aumentada y los videojuegos, mientras que la educación es una de las principales áreas de aplicación. La principal conclusión es que el panorama de la investigación en interacción humano-computadora en Iberoamérica se caracteriza por una rápida evolución, integración internacional y diversidad conceptual, indicativo de un campo maduro e interdisciplinario que responde a las demandas regionales. El avance de este campo podría verse impulsado por una mayor financiación del sector privado. Los futuros diseños de sistemas en la región deberían priorizar la sensibilidad cultural y la inclusión.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • N. Gupta, “An overview on human-computer interaction,” Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 110–116, Feb. 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2278-4853.2021.01181.2
  • C. Acharya, H. Thimbleby, and P. Oladimeji, “Human computer interaction and medical devices,” in Proceedings of HCI 2010, Sep. 2010, pp. 168–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2010.22
  • M. Stanković, and U. Karabiyik, “Exploratory Study on Kali NetHunter Lite: A Digital Forensics Approach,” J. Cybersecurity Priv., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 750–763, Sep. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcp2030038
  • G. Cockton, “Value-centred HCI,” in Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, Oct. 2004, pp. 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/1028014.1028038
  • F. Gurcan, N. E. Cagiltay, and K. Cagiltay, “Mapping Human–Computer Interaction Research Themes and Trends from Its Existence to Today: A Topic Modeling-Based Review of past 60 Years,” Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 267–280, Sep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1819668
  • C. A. Collazos, M. Ortega, A. Granollers, C. Rusu, and F. L. Gutierrez, “HCI in Ibero-America: Academic, Research, and Professional Issues,” IT Prof., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 8–11, Mar.-Apr. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2016.38
  • A. Alvarado Garcia et al., “Fostering HCI Research in, by, and for Latin America,” in Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, Apr. 2020, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3381055
  • L. A. Castro, L. S. Gaytán-Lugo, P. C. Santana-Mancilla, V. Herskovic, and E. D. C. Valderrama Bahamondez, “Human computer-interaction in Latin America,” Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 255–257, Apr. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01550-3
  • G. D. G. De Carvalho et al., “Bibliometrics and systematic reviews: A comparison between the Proknow-C and the Methodi Ordinatio,” J. Informetr., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 101043, Aug. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101043
  • A. Ninkov, J. R. Frank, and L. A. Maggio, “Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing,” Perspect. Med. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 173–176, Dec. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4
  • F. E. Sandnes, “A bibliometric study of human–computer interaction research activity in the Nordic-Baltic Eight countries,” Scientometrics, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 4733–4767, Apr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03940-z
  • K. Koumaditis, and T. Hussain, “Human Computer Interaction Research Through the Lens of a Bibliometric Analysis,” in Human-Computer Interaction. User Interface Design, Development and Multimodality, M. Kurosu, Ed., Springer Cham, 2017, pp. 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58071-5_2
  • H. Tan, J. Sun, W. Wenjia, and C. Zhu, “User Experience & Usability of Driving: A Bibliometric Analysis of 2000-2019,” Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 297–307, Jan. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1860516
  • J. Wang, R. Cheng, M. Liu, and L. Pin-Chao, “Research Trends of Human–Computer Interaction Studies in Construction Hazard Recognition: A Bibliometric Review,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 18, p. 6172, Sep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186172
  • A. F. Solis Pino, P. H. Ruiz, V. Agredo-Delgado, A. Mon, and C. A. Collazos, “HCI Research in Ibero-America: A bibliometric analysis,” presented at the IX Jornadas Iberoamericanas de Interacción Humano-Computadora, Argentina, 2023.
  • J. A. Moral-Muñoz, E. Herrera-Viedma, A. Santisteban-Espejo, and M. J. Cobo, “Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review,” Prof. Inf., vol. 29, no. 1, Jan. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
  • N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 133, pp. 285–296, Sep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  • M. Aria, and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” Journal of Informetrics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, Nov. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  • L. L. Wang, K. Mack, E. J. McDonnell, D. Jain, L. Findlater, and J. E. Froehlich, “A bibliometric analysis of citation diversity in accessibility and HCI research,” in Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama Japan, May. 2021, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451618
  • A. F. Abbas, A. Jusoh, A. Mas’od, A. H. Alsharif, and J. Ali, “Bibliometrix analysis of information sharing in social media,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2016556, Jan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.2016556
  • H. Arruda, E. R. Silva, M. Lessa, D. J. Proença, and R. Bartholo, “VOSviewer and Bibliometrix.,” J. Med. Libr. Assoc., vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 392–395, Dec. 2022. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1434
  • C. Ching-Ter, Z. Wen-Xuan, and J. Hajiyev, “An Integrated Smartphone and Tariff Plan Selection for Taxi Service Operators: MCDM and RStudio Approach,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 31457–31472, Mar. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903201
  • F. Parra, A. Jacobs, and L. L. Trevino, “Shippy Express: Augmenting accounting education with Google Sheets,” Journal of Accounting Education, vol. 56, p. 100740, Sep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100740
  • V. K. Singh, P. Singh, M. Karmakar, J. Leta, and P. Mayr, “The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis,” Scientometrics, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 5113–5142, Jun. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
  • Z. Sarsenbayeva et al., “Mapping 20 years of accessibility research in HCI: A co-word analysis,” Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., vol. 175, p. 103018, Jul. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103018
  • O. Auranen, and M. Nieminen, “University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison,” Res. Policy, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 822–834, Jul. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003
  • J. Mervis and D. Malakoff. “Applied research gets starring role in Biden’s 2022 budget.” Science.org. Accessed: May. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.science.org/content/article/applied-research-gets-starring-role-biden-s-2022-budget
  • J. Mañana-Rodríguez, “A critical review of SCImago Journal & Country Rank,” Res. Eval., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 343–354, Mar. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu008
  • A. L. Iñiguez-Carrillo, L. S. Gaytán-Lugo, R. Maciel-Arellano, M. García-Ruiz, and D. Aréchiga, “The state of voice user interfaces in Latin America,” Av. En Interacción Hum.-Comput., no. 1, pp. 28–36, Nov. 2020. https://doi.org/10.47756/aihc.y5i1.64
  • A. J. Samimi, “Scientific Output and GDP: Evidence from Countries around the World,” J. Educ. Vocat. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 38–41, Aug. 2011. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v2i2.23
  • K. Heng, M. Hamid, and A. Khan, “Factors influencing academics’ research engagement and productivity: A developing countries perspective,” Issues Educ. Res., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 965–987, Sep. 2020. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.465283943914964
  • R. Pavez, J. Diaz, J. Arango-Lopez, D. Ahumada, C. Mendez-Sandoval, and F. Moreira, “Emo-mirror: a proposal to support emotion recognition in children with autism spectrum disorders,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 7913–7924, Apr. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06592-5
  • F. Yahya Asiri, E. Kruger, and M. Tennant, “Global Dental Publications in PubMed Databases between 2009 and 2019—A Bibliometric Analysis,” Molecules, vol. 25, no. 20, p. 4747, Oct. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204747
  • S. Vahdat, “The role of IT-based technologies on the management of human resources in the COVID-19 era,” Kybernetes, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 2065–2088, May. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2021-0333
  • S. Amershi et al., “Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction,” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, May. 2019, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233
  • A. Gómez-Pérez, M. Fernández-López, and O. Corcho, “The most Outstanding Ontologies” in Ontological Engineering: with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. London: Springer, 2004. https://acortar.link/HyocLQ
  • J. Zhang, Q. Yu, F. Zheng, C. Long, Z. Lu, and Z. Duan, “Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research,” J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 967–972, Apr. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437
  • M. A. Razzak, and M. N. Islam, “Exploring and Evaluating the Usability Factors for Military Application: A Road Map for HCI in Military Applications,” Hum. Factors Mech. Eng. Def. Saf., vol. 4, no. 1, Jan. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41314-019-0032-6
  • O. St-Cyr, C. M. MacDonald, and E. F. Churchill, “EduCHI 2019 Symposium: Global Perspectives on HCI Education,” in Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow Scotland, May 2019, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3298994
  • A. A. Oyelude, “Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in libraries and museums,” Libr. Hi Tech News, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1–4, Aug. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-04-2018-0023
  • S. Kewalramani, and N. Veresov, “Multimodal Creative Inquiry: Theorising a New Approach for Children’s Science Meaning-Making in Early Childhood Education,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 927–947, Jun. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10029-3
  • S. Gargrish, A. Mantri, and D. P. Kaur, “Evaluation of memory retention among students using augmented reality based geometry learning assistant,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 12891–12912, Nov. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11147-9
  • J. C. Gallo, and P. F. Cárdenas, “Designing an Interface for Trajectory Programming in Industrial Robots Using Augmented Reality,” in Advances in Automation and Robotics Research, A. Martínez, H. A. Moreno, I. G. Carrera, A. Campos, and J. Baca, Eds., Switzerland: Springer Cham, 2020, pp. 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40309-6_14
  • J. Díaz, A. Bustamante, G. M. Ramírez V, and J. Hochstetter, “Video Games Platforms: A Gateway to New Trends for Initial Programming Education,” in 2022 41st International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC), Santiago, Chile, 2022, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCCC57464.2022.10000326
  • F. Lopera et al., “A task force for diagnosis and treatment of people with Alzheimer’s disease in Latin America,” Front. Neurol., vol. 14, Jul. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1198869
  • E. Vinogradova, “Artificial intelligence technologies and the rise of cyber threats in Latin America,” Latinskaia Amerika, no. 3, pp. 34–48, Mar. 2023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044748X0024415-5
  • L. van Niekerk et al., “Building the social innovation for health ecosystem in Latin America: experiences and learning from SIHI-LAC,” BMJ Innov., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 224–233, Jul. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000898
  • G. Vecchio, I. Tiznado-Aitken, and R. Hurtubia, “Transport and equity in Latin America: a critical review of socially oriented accessibility assessments,” Transp. Rev., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 354–381, Jan. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1711828
  • B. Stigall, J. Waycott, S. Baker, and K. Caine, “Older Adults’ Perception and Use of Voice User Interfaces: A Preliminary Review of the Computing Literature,” in Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction, Fremantle WA Australia, 2019, pp. 423–427. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369457.3369506
  • M. S. Hasan, and H. Yu, “Innovative developments in HCI and future trends,” Int. J. Autom. Comput., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 10–20, Feb. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-016-1039-6
  • E. Mencarini, A. Rapp, L. Tirabeni, and M. Zancanaro, “Designing Wearable Systems for Sports: A Review of Trends and Opportunities in Human–Computer Interaction,” IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 314–325, Aug. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2019.2919702
  • C. C. Stephanidis et al., “Seven HCI Grand Challenges,” Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., vol. 35, no. 14, pp. 1229–1269, Jul. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259
  • L. Salgado, R. Pereira, and I. Gasparini, “Cultural Issues in HCI: Challenges and Opportunities,” in Human-Computer Interaction: Design and Evaluation, M. Kurosu, Ed., Switzerland: Springer Cham, 2015, pp. 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20901-2_6
  • X. Ren, C. Silpasuwanchai, and J. Cahill, “Human-Engaged Computing: the future of Human–Computer Interaction,” CCF Trans. Pervasive Comput. Interact., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 47–68, May. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42486-019-00007-0
  • M. J. Cobo, A. G. López-Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and F. Herrera, “Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 1382–1402, Jul. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
  • R. Alkhammash, “Bibliometric, network, and thematic mapping analyses of metaphor and discourse in COVID-19 publications from 2020 to 2022,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, Jan. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1062943
  • D. A. Iquira Becerra, O. Sharhorodska, C. A. Tacca Barrantes, J. L. Monroy Vilcahuaman, B. J. Sumire Coasaca, and C. A. Collazos Ordoñez, “Proposal for a User-Centered Virtual Reality System for Promoting Tourism in Peru,” in HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Papers: Interacting with eXtended Reality and Artificial Intelligence, J. Y. C. Chen, G. Fragomeni, H. Degen, and S. Ntoa, Eds., Switzerland: Springer Cham, 2022, pp. 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21707-4_5
  • R. L. Gómez, and A. M. Suárez, “Gaming to succeed in college: Protocol for a scoping review of quantitative studies on the design and use of serious games for enhancing teaching and learning in higher education,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 2, p. 100021, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100021
  • N. Sánchez-Pi, and L. Martí, “Towards a green AI: evolutionary solutions for an ecologically viable artificial intelligence,” in Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, Lille France: ACM, Jul. 2021, pp. 1135–1140. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449726.3461428
  • Y. K. Meena, and K. V. Arya, “Multimodal interaction and IoT applications,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 4781–4785, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-14278-w
  • M. Wong-Villacres et al., “Lessons from Latin America: Embracing Horizontality to Reconstruct HCI as a Pluriverse,” Interactions, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 56–63, Mar. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447794
  • J. Muñoz-Arteaga, “Collaborative Production Model of Educational Resources for HCI Community in Latino America,” in Human 4.0-From Biology to Cybernetic, Y. Rybarczyk, Ed., Rijeka, Croacia: IntechOpen, 2021, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90992
  • P. Pinto, I. Theodoro, M. Arrais, and J. Oliveira, “Data mining and social web semantics: a case study on the use of hashtags and memes in Online Social Networks,” IEEE Lat. Am. Trans., vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 196-216, Dec. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2017.8071088
  • S. Harlow, and D. Harp, “Collective Action On The Web. A cross-cultural study of social networking sites and online and offline activism in the United States and Latin America,” Inf. Commun. Soc., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 196–216, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.591411
  • C. Hurtado-Parrado, C. Gantiva, A. Gómez-A, L. Cuenya, L. Ortega, and J. L. Rico, “Editorial: Research on Emotion and Learning: Contributions from Latin America,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, p. 585, Apr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00585
  • K. Pittí, B. Curto, V. Moreno, and M. J. Rodríguez, “Resources and features of robotics learning environments (RLEs) in Spain and Latin America,” in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality, Salamanca Spain: ACM, Nov. 2013, pp. 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1145/2536536.2536584
  • J. T. Prieto et al., “Will Participatory Syndromic Surveillance Work in Latin America? Piloting a Mobile Approach to Crowdsource Influenza-Like Illness Data in Guatemala,” JMIR Public Health Surveill., vol. 3, no. 4, p. e87, Oct-Dec 2017. https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.8610
  • W. Faveron de Almeida, C. Aparecido de Moraes Lima, and S. Marques Peres, “A systematic mapping of feature extraction and feature selection methods of electroencephalogram signals for neurological diseases diagnostic assistance,” IEEE Lat. Am. Trans., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 735–745, May. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2021.9448287
  • D. M. West and J. R. Allen. “How artificial intelligence is transforming the world.” Brookings. Accessed: Apr. 2018. [Online.] Available: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-artificial-intelligence-is-transforming-the-world/
  • D. Herrera, F. Roberti, M. Toibero, and R. Carelli, “Human-Robot Interaction: Legible behavior rules in passing and crossing events,” IEEE Lat. Am. Trans., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 2644–2650, Jun. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2016.7555232
  • E. Tranos, and Y. M. Ioannides, “Ubiquitous digital technologies and spatial structure; an update,” PloS One, vol. 16, no. 4, p. e0248982, Apr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248982
  • S. Feng, and N. Law, “Mapping Artificial Intelligence in Education Research: a Network‐based Keyword Analysis,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 277–303, Jun. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00244-4
  • R. Fabre, D. Egret, J. Schöpfel, and O. Azeroual, “Evaluating the scientific impact of research infrastructures: The role of current research information systems,” Quant. Sci. Stud., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 42–64, Apr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00111
  • J. L. Rosenbloom, D. K. Ginther, T. Juhl, and J. A. Heppert, “The Effects of Research & Development Funding on Scientific Productivity: Academic Chemistry, 1990-2009,” PloS One, vol. 10, no. 9, p. e0138176, Sep. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138176
  • D. D. Kipo-Sunyehzi, “Implementation Research in Developed and Developing Countries: an Analysis of the Trends and Directions,” Public Organ. Rev., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1259–1273, Sep. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00659-0
  • E. C. E. de Almeida, and J. A. Guimarães, “Brazil’s growing production of scientific articles-how are we doing with review articles and other qualitative indicators?,” Scientometrics, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 287–315, Nov. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0967-y
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet